Page 1 GOMOS Calibration Review - ESTEC - 10 September 2002 GOMOS Level 2 processing Verification activities Comparison with external sources ESTEC – SEPTEMBER.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Welcome to Who Wants to be a Millionaire
Advertisements

4.1- Plot Points in a Coordinate Plane
Whether it rains, Whether it pours, Wherever I go,
Slide 1 Insert your own content. Slide 2 Insert your own content.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 3.1 Chapter 3.
1 Chapter 58 - Clinical Syndromes of Metabolic Alkalosis Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Project Meeting Content Group
Combining Like Terms. Only combine terms that are exactly the same!! Whats the same mean? –If numbers have a variable, then you can combine only ones.
Counting On Wendy Pallant 2002.
Validation and Application of Jason-1 and Envisat Significant Wave Heights Tom Durrant Diana Greenslade Ocean and Marine Forecasting Group Bureau of Meteorology.
Rossana Dragani Using and evaluating PROMOTE services at ECMWF PROMOTE User Meeting Nice, 16 March 2009.
1 The GEMS production systems and retrospective reanalysis Adrian Simmons.
0 - 0.
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2pt 3 pt 4pt 5 pt 1pt 2pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4pt 5 pt 1pt Simplify All mixed up Misc. AddingSubtract.
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt Time Money AdditionSubtraction.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULTIPLICATION EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 3. WHAT EVER YOU DO TO ONE SIDE YOU HAVE TO DO TO THE OTHER 2. DIVIDE BY THE NUMBER IN FRONT OF THE VARIABLE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Teacher Name Class / Subject Date A:B: Write an answer here #1 Write your question Here C:D: Write an answer here.
Addition Facts
Environmental Remote Sensing GEOG 2021
The following plots show a comparison of the temperature seasonal cycle between SSU data and vertically integrated lidar and HALOE satellite data. The.
Stratospheric Measurements: Microwave Sounders I. Current Methods – MSU4/AMSU9 Diurnal Adjustment Merging II. Problems and Limitations III. Other AMSU.
Welcome to Who Wants to be a Millionaire
Welcome to Who Wants to be a Millionaire
Improving the View of Air Quality from Space Jim Crawford Science Directorate NASA Langley.
Session 19: Individual Presentations. TimeFriday Day fives objectives Individual Presentations Individual.
CHIMERE air quality forecasts : results during Pays de la Loire summer 2004 experiment and end-user point of view ! Arnaud REBOURS - AIR PAYS DE LA LOIRE.
O X Click on Number next to person for a question.
The challenge ahead: Ocean Predictions in the Arctic Region Lars Petter Røed * Presented at the OPNet Workshop May 2008, Geilo, Norway * Also affiliated.
5.9 + = 10 a)3.6 b)4.1 c)5.3 Question 1: Good Answer!! Well Done!! = 10 Question 1:
Light Detectives. Limb of Sun Very low mass star Brown dwarf Jupiter Light Detectives – #2.
Page 1 ASAR Validatoin Review - ESRIN – 9-13 December 2002 Ocean geophysical results from ASAR  Geophysical overview  ocean spectra : the isidore case.
Page1 SCIAMACHY Calibration Review – ESTEC – Sept 2002 SCIAMACHY Tangent Height Verification H.Bovensmann University of Bremen Institute of Remote.
Page 1 GOMOS Calibration Review - ESTEC - 10 September 2002 Radiometric performance ESTEC – SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 Instrument performance session Gilbert BARROT.
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
Page 1© Crown copyright Simulation of radar reflectivities in the UK Met Office model: comparison with CloudSat Data Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo, M.E. Brooks.
Past Tense Probe. Past Tense Probe Past Tense Probe – Practice 1.
Properties of Exponents
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Click your mouse to move the card ahead! Work with a buddy using two Abacuses. First click and follow along using your abacus. After each click talk about.
11 = This is the fact family. You say: 8+3=11 and 3+8=11
Week 1.
Bottoms Up Factoring. Start with the X-box 3-9 Product Sum
O X Click on Number next to person for a question.
Preliminary results of the seasonal ozone vertical trends at OHP France Maud Pastel, Sophie Godin-Beekmann Latmos CNRS UVSQ, France  NDACC Lidar Working.
Report from the 2 nd ACVE Workshop Frascati, Italy, 3-7 May 2004 Yasmine Calisesi International Space Science Institute.
Atmospheric structure from lidar and radar Jens Bösenberg 1.Motivation 2.Layer structure 3.Water vapour profiling 4.Turbulence structure 5.Cloud profiling.
On average TES exhibits a small positive bias in the middle and lower troposphere of less than 15% and a larger negative bias of up to 30% in the upper.
Introduction A new methodology is developed for integrating complementary ground-based data sources to provide consistent ozone vertical distribution time.
MIR OZONE ISSUES Horizontal (STE) and vertical transport (long life time in UTLS) Photochemical production by precursors (biomass burning, lightning,..)
Page 1 Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002 Validation of ENVISAT trace gas data products by comparison.
Simulation Experiments for GEO-CAPE Regional Air Quality GEO-CAPE Workshop September 22, 2009 Peter Zoogman, Daniel J. Jacob, Kelly Chance, Lin Zhang,
Validation workshop, Frascati, 13 December 2002Page 1 SCIAMACHY products quality and recommendations Based on presentations and discussions during this.
Page 1ENVISAT Validation Review / GOMOS session - ESRIN – 13th December 2002 ENVISAT VALIDATION WORKSHOP GOMOS Recommendations by the ESL team : Service.
SCIAMACHY long-term validation M. Weber, S. Mieruch, A. Rozanov, C. von Savigny, W. Chehade, R. Bauer, and H. Bovensmann Institut für Umweltphysik, Universität.
Envisat Validation Workshop Atmospheric Chemistry Validation Team Ground-Based Measurements and Campaign Database Subgroup Comparisons with GOMOS air-density.
An assessment of the NRLMSISE-00 density thermosphere description in presence of space weather events C. Lathuillère and M. Menvielle The data and the.
Time Series A collection of measurements recorded at specific time intervals.
Validation of SCIAMACHY total ozone: ESA/DLR V5(W) and IUP WFDOAS V2(W) M. Weber, S. Dikty, J. P.Burrows, M. Coldewey-Egbers (1), V. E. Fioletov (2), S.
Page 1 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, GOMOS O 3 (r) 12/12/2002 ACVT-GBMCD subgroup GOMOS ozone profiles, analysis of comparison with GMBCD datasets.
Page 1 Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002 Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation.
Page 1 Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002 Monitoring of SCIAMACHY Total Column Ozone Using the.
EOS-Aura MLS Validation Using Radiosonde Profiles During the WAVES Campaign Cassie Stearns August 10,2006 Dr. Bojan Bojkov and Dr. David Whiteman, Advisors.
Ozone monitoring with GOMOS-ENVISAT experiment version 6
AO 160 – OZVAL Validation of ENVISAT ozone products through assimilation in the MSDOL model: First results obtained with GOMOS Authors: B. Théodore and.
Acknowledgements : R. Bevilacqua and NRL POAM III Science Team
Presentation transcript:

Page 1 GOMOS Calibration Review - ESTEC - 10 September 2002 GOMOS Level 2 processing Verification activities Comparison with external sources ESTEC – SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 Level 2 session Alain Hauchecorne, Marielle Guirlet, Erkki Kyrölä, Johanna Tamminen, Antoine Mangin, Odile Fanton d’Andon

Page 2 GOMOS Calibration Review - ESTEC - 10 September 2002 GOMOS O3 vertical profiles: first attempts of validation Comparisons of GOMOS O3 vertical profiles with: HALOE, POAM, lidar Objectives: Systematic bias with star ? Latitude ? Dark/Bright limb Deficiencies of processing ?

Page 3 GOMOS Calibration Review - ESTEC - 10 September 2002 Courtesy HALOE data C. Jackman, L. Deaver, J.R. Russell

Page 4 GOMOS Calibration Review - ESTEC - 10 September 2002 Courtesy HALOE data C. Jackman, L. Deaver J.R. Russell

Page 5 GOMOS Calibration Review - ESTEC - 10 September 2002 Courtesy HALOE data C. Jackman, L. Deaver, J.R. Russell

Page 6 GOMOS Calibration Review - ESTEC - 10 September 2002 Courtesy HALOE data C. Jackman, L. Deaver, J.R. Russell

Page 7 GOMOS Calibration Review - ESTEC - 10 September 2002 Courtesy HALOE data C. Jackman, L. Deaver, J.R. Russell

Page 8 GOMOS Calibration Review - ESTEC - 10 September 2002 Courtesy HALOE data C. Jackman, L. Deaver, J.R. Russell

Page 9 GOMOS Calibration Review - ESTEC - 10 September 2002 Courtesy POAM data R. Bevilacqua

Page 10 GOMOS Calibration Review - ESTEC - 10 September 2002 Courtesy POAM data R. Bevilacqua

Page 11 GOMOS Calibration Review - ESTEC - 10 September 2002 Courtesy lidar data A. Hauchecorne, S. Godin

Page 12 GOMOS Calibration Review - ESTEC - 10 September 2002 Early start of the validation phase R00799/S081 First GOMOS-external ozone local (lidar – OHP) profile comparison, Currently under investigation at Service d’Aéronomie (Alain Hauchecorne) Measurements separated by less than 250 km And by 2 hours Mv=2.36, T=28000K Courtesy lidar data A. Hauchecorne, S. Godin

Page 13 GOMOS Calibration Review - ESTEC - 10 September 2002 Courtesy lidar data A. Hauchecorne, S. Godin

Page 14 GOMOS Calibration Review - ESTEC - 10 September 2002  Short-scale features rather well captured for some profiles  Need of a larger number of measurements for more systematic studies: variation with latitude variation with distance variation with season  Use of averaging kernels  Support from assimilation tools Conclusions and perspectives