BUILDING STRONG ® Do not include this Slide. This template is a guide for preparing power points presentations. The information requested is important.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Adobe 5 Collaborative Proposed Project Plan February 23, 2004.
Advertisements

Flood Risk Analysis – the USACE Approach
State Waters and Stream Buffers
Flood Profile Modeling with Split Flows and Weirs
GE 121 – Engineering Design Engineering Design GE121 Oral Presentations Lecture 10.
Fort Bend Flood Management Association Flood Risk Reduction Symposium October 3rd, 2014 (Part-A) Brazos River at San Felipe - USGS Gage Fort Bend County.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Public Law 84-99, Rehabilitation and Inspection Program Mike deMasi Chief Emergency Management, PL Program.
Levee Seepage: Concerns, Evaluations, and Solutions Pete Nix, P. E
Sharif University of Technology Civil Engineering Department Tehran-Iran Dam Safety An Approach to Prevent Dam Incidents.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Methods for Determining Maximum Flood Elevations Landward of Failed Levees: An Example from the Great Missouri.
“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Background on Engineering Risk Assessments (ERA) for USACE Civil Works.
R7Levees.org Presented by: William Zung, PMP, CFM May 24, 2012.
IN-DELTA STORAGE PROGRAM STAKEHOLDERS COMMITTEE MEETING URS Corporation January 22, 2003 URS Corporation January 22, 2003.
Sacramento District Regional Vegetation Variance Paige Caldwell, P.E. Emergency Manager.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Initial Research into the Effects of Woody Vegetation on Levees Maureen K. Corcoran U.S. Army Engineer Research.
1 Scoggins Dam Overview of Seismic Risk July 18, 2012.
SUTTER BUTTE FLOOD CONTROL AGENCY Supplemental Presentation on Variances and Encroachments Feather River West Levee Project Project Area C May 24, 2013.
Bridge 2153 Final Report Premier Engineering Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology.
Hydraulic Screening and Analysis Needed for USACE Review
William B. Reed Senior Hydrologist Colorado Basin River Forecast Center CBRFC Support for Dam Breaks DamBreak and EAPs Arizona 2011 Spring Hydrology Seminar.
Acquisition of Flood Control Easements Triangle High-Ground Area City of West Sacramento, Yolo Co. Meeting of the Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Consequence Assessment for Dam Failure Simulations Kurt Buchanan, CFM Economist Mapping, Modeling, and Consequences.
“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Risk modeling.
ASFPM – May 24, 2012 CASE STUDY – 408 PERMITTING AND LEVEE ACCREDITATION FOR WATERLOO, NEBRASKA ASFPM MAY 24, 2012 Presented by Randy Behm, PE, CFM Lalit.
1 ELEMENTS OF AN EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN PLANNING APPROACH Issued May 2009 Level II: Introduction to Design Education and Certification for Persons.
Professional Engineering Services For Restoration Project John Mitnik, P.E. Engineering & Construction Bureau Chief Operations, Maintenance & Construction.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Prioritizing Investments within the USACE Levee Safety Program Process and Methodology Overview Jason Needham,
Proposed Benefit Assessment District Overview Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority (TRLIA) TRLIA.ORG March 10,
Beargrass Creek Case Study Description of the Study Area Hydrology & Hydraulics Economic Analysis Project Planning Assessment of the Risk Based Analysis.
Hydrologic Design and Design Storms Readings: Applied Hydrology Sections /18/2005.
BUILDING STRONG ® Do not include this Slide. This template is a guide for preparing power points presentations. The information requested is important.
Rivers and Streams The Hydrologic Cycle. Rivers and Streams Drainage basin or watershed.
Corps of Engineers Levee Safety Program Levee Safety Program Manager
Ventura County Levee Systems Levee Certification Compliance Efforts Presentation to the Ventura County Watershed Protection District Board of Supervisors.
An Unnatural Disaster Social, Legal, and Ethical Considerations for Engineering Managers MEM 604.
Hydraulic and Hydrologic Considerations in Planning Course FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT Chuck Shadie Mississippi Valley Division.
Levee Screening Tool - Cedar Right Bank
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Little Calumet River Forest Ave Levee System Periodic Inspection No.1 Yuki Galisanao, PE, PG Team Lead, Geotechnical.
Responses to Levee Certification Requests 1.Closures 2.Maintenance Plans 3.U/S and D/S Levee Tie-ins.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Little Calumet River Marshalltown Levee System Routine Inspection Yuki Galisanao, PE, PG Team Lead, Geotechnical.
Steps in Foundation Engineering Understand project and site Develop design criteria Identify possible foundation alternatives Conduct soil investigation.
Central Valley Flood Protection Board Meeting – Agenda Item No. 6B APPLICATION NO
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Yakima Flood Control Project – Left Bank Yakima, Washington Dennis Fischer, P.E. Levee Safety Program Manager.
Levee Inspections and Eligibility NWS Levee Safety Program Seattle District 23 APRIL 2013 Charles Ifft, P.E. Inspection of Completed Works Project Manager.
New Orleans Hurricane Protection System Overview by Mike Park HPS Program Manager Task Force Hope U.S. Army Corps of Engineers March 19, 2008.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mark Twain Lake Water Control Manual Update Joan Stemler St. Louis District Water Control.
Expected Long Term Site Evolution of Alameda Creek and former Salt Ponds following Tidal Marsh Restoration Matt Wickland Philip.
Presented to: Central Valley Flood Protection Board August 23, 2013 Sacramento Area Levee Accreditation Key Results from Encroachment Analysis.
Floodplain Management D Nagesh Kumar, IISc Water Resources Planning and Management: M8L5 Water Resources Systems Modeling.
TOPSAIL BEACH 30 Yr Beach Management Plan June 8, 2011.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Emergency Response Policy Revision Update ( ER & EP ) Jeffrey Jensen CECW-HS USACE Flood Risk Management.
2 American River Common Features General Re-evaluation Report Request for Board Approval of Letter Requesting Consideration of Locally Preferred Plan (LPP)
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Name of Levee Segment Presenter Name Presenter Title Duty Location Date of Presentation.
APPLICATION NO LEVEE DISTRICT No. 1 Of SUTTER COUNTY STAR BEND SETBACK LEVEE SUTTER COUNTY April 17, 2009.
FLO-2D Model Development Below Caballo Dam to Ft. Quitman Prepared by: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Albuquerque District and Mussetter Engineering, Inc.
International Levee Handbook Overview of the handbook Chapter 4: Operation and maintenance (O&M)
International Levee Handbook Overview of the handbook Chapter 3 Functions, Forms and Failure of Levees.
International Levee Handbook Overview of the handbook Chapter 8 Physical processes and tools for levee assessment and design.
West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency November 10, 2011 Update on Current Levee Construction Projects and on the Southport Sacramento River Levee Early.
Preliminary Engineering Analysis and Design Foxcroft Colony and Mosby Woods Condominiums Prepared for: City Council Work Session November 3, 2015.
Anthony Alvarado, PE, CFM National Hydraulic Engineering Conference
There are 2 Types of Bridge Inspectors – Class B and Class A.
8/11/2016 Mosquito Creek 2D hydraulic analysis:
Hydraulic Routing in Rivers
4th Annual Construction Law Summit
GIS Applications in the Water Management Sector
Love Field Modernization Program
AASHTO LRFD Section 12 Standards
Stream Crossing Replacement Policy
Civil Engineering Dept.
Presentation transcript:

BUILDING STRONG ® Do not include this Slide. This template is a guide for preparing power points presentations. The information requested is important and should be provided in generally the same sequence and same format. But each presentation must be tailored for the specific segment being presented. Some slides can be eliminated and sometimes extra slides will be necessary to best convey the background and backup data needed to make the case for the LSAC rating. Pictures are generally a very good method for communicating information on a particular feature or defect being evaluated. Some of the additional summary type slides will eventually be produced directly from the LST but until then you will have to cut and paste the data / graph into the power point. Adjust font size, color, layout, tables, etc. as needed to improve the presentation. Do not overload your slides with too much information; It is better to add a slide. Don’t be surprised to see future revisions to the Power Point. The power point for the SOG will likely be a subset of this power point.

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Name of Levee Segment Presenter Name Presenter Title Duty Location Date of Presentation

BUILDING STRONG ® Levee Overview  USACE District  Name of Segment  Identify Segments relationship to Levee System (Does Segment = System, or is it only a part of a bigger system.)  Segment ID from NLD  Name of water course/river/creek  Authorization / Project  Identity of Owner Operator  Dates of Construction (year)  Population at Risk

BUILDING STRONG ® Location Map/Overview

BUILDING STRONG ® Vicinity/Segment Map SEE EXAMPLE, NEXT SLIDE

BUILDING STRONG ® Vicinity/Segment Map

BUILDING STRONG ® Summarize Hydraulics Use graphics on following slide to present information  Frequency top of levee/floodwall or show on typical sections  Frequency toe of levee/floodwall or show on typical sections  Identify frequency of event that results in poor performance/history of problems  Summarize loading history – flood of record plus other major flood events

BUILDING STRONG ® Summary of Hydraulics  Authorized Capacity Frequency - xxx yr return period  Overtopped: No / Yes  Failured: No / Yes  Times Loaded (events) 25% - xx 50% - xx 75% - xx 10 year return 1000 year return Record Flood 66% of height

BUILDING STRONG ® Performance History

BUILDING STRONG ® Geomorphology / Foundation Geology  Present typical foundation / subsurface conditions in longitudinal profile and or cross sections to document section being assessed.

BUILDING STRONG ® Typical Sections Levee Embankment Elev ft15ft Riverside Landside Toe Elevation Approx Crest Height:xx-xx Ft Crest Width: xx Ft Foundation Geology: Levee Materials /Zoning: Riverside Erosion Protection:Sod/Riprap

BUILDING STRONG ® Typical Flood Wall Section

BUILDING STRONG ® Typical Section with Culvert

BUILDING STRONG ® Example: Culverts/Closure

BUILDING STRONG ® Review of Assessment Ratings  Review/Compare ICW Rating with LST Rating in Table format  Highlight Primary Factors and other indicators needing attention / discussion. Use table format similar to that shown on following slides. ADJUST TABLE COLUMN WIDTHS AS NEEDED

BUILDING STRONG ® EMBANKMENT SEEPAGE SUPPORTING PHOTOS

BUILDING STRONG ® Embankment Seepage Assessment Ratings Performance ModeICW Rating LST Rating Comment Embankment and Foundation Seepage and Piping Unwanted Vegetation Growth (1) Encroachments (3) Settlement (7) Cracking (9) Animal Control (10) Culverts/Discharge Pipes (11) Underseepage Relief Wells/Toe/Drainage Systems (14) Seepage (15)

BUILDING STRONG ® EMBANKMENT STABILITY SUPPORTING PHOTOS

BUILDING STRONG ® Embankment Stability Assessment Ratings Performance ModeICW Rating LST Rating Comment Embankment Stability Unwanted Vegetation Growth (1) Encroachments (3) Slope Stability (5) Settlement (7) Depressions/Rutting (8) Cracking (9) Underseepage Relief Wells/Toe/Drainage Systems (14)

BUILDING STRONG ® FLOOD WALL SEEPAGE SUPPORTING PHOTOS

BUILDING STRONG ® Flood Wall Seepage Assessment Ratings Performance ModeICW Rating LST Rating Comment Flood Wall Under Seepage and Piping Culverts/Discharge Pipes (n/a) Unwanted Vegetation Growth (1) Encroachments (2) Underseepage Relief Wells/Toe/Drainage Systems (8) Seepage (9)

BUILDING STRONG ® FLOOD WALL STABILITY SUPPORTING PHOTOS

BUILDING STRONG ® Flood Wall Stability Assessment Ratings Performance ModeICW Rating LST Rating Comment Flood Wall Stability Unwanted Vegetation Growth (1) Encroachments (2) Concrete Surfaces (4) Tilting, Sliding or Settlement of Concrete Structures (5) Foundation of Concrete Structures (6) Underseepage Relief Wells/Toe/Drainage Systems (8)

BUILDING STRONG ® CULVERTS AND CLOSURE SUPPORTING PHOTOS

BUILDING STRONG ® CULVERTS AND CLOSURE ASSESSMENT RATINGS

BUILDING STRONG ® Consequence Data Summary  Weighted Fatality Rate xxxx  Threatened Population w/o warning xxxx  Estimated Loss of Life w/o warning xxxx  Number of structures Inundated xxxx  Economic Damages $xxxxxx  Critical Infrastructure / Environments

BUILDING STRONG ® Assessment Rating Summary Primary Factors Embankment & Foundation Seepage - U,M,A Embankment Stability - U,M,A Erosion - U,M,A Closure System - U,M,A Flood Wall Stability - U,M,A Flood Wall Under Seepage - U,M,A

BUILDING STRONG ® Major Contributors to Overall Risk Rating

BUILDING STRONG ® Major Contributors to Risk Prior to Capacity Exceedance

BUILDING STRONG ® Segment Ratings Compared to All Segments

BUILDING STRONG ® Performance Index vs LOL

BUILDING STRONG ® Performance Index vs Economic Damages

BUILDING STRONG ® Recommended LSAC Rating  Prior to Capacity Exceedance LSAC = xx  Capacity Exceedance LSAC = xx  Recommended LSAC = xx  Add Reasons for adjusting LSAC rating

BUILDING STRONG ® Do not include this Slide. This template is a guide for preparing power points presentations. The information requested is important and should be provided in generally the same sequence and same format. But each presentation must be tailored for the specific segment being presented. Some slides can be eliminated and sometimes extra slides will be necessary to best convey the background and backup data needed to make the case for the LSAC rating. Pictures are generally a very good method for communicating information on a particular feature or defect being evaluated. Some of the additional summary type slides will eventually be produced directly from the LST but until then you will have to cut and paste the data / graph into the power point. Adjust font size, color, layout, tables, etc. as needed to improve the presentation. Do not overload your slides with too much information; It is better to add a slide. Don’t be surprised to see future revisions to the Power Point. The power point for the SOG will likely be a subset of this power point.