 2007 Mississippi Department of Education 2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Training Revised (Grades K-5) Day 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Author: Brenda Stephenson The University of Tennessee Date submitted to deafed.net – Date submitted to deafed.net – March 6, 2006 March 6, 2006 To contact.
Advertisements

LOOKING AHEAD TO THE NEW CURRICULUM MATH COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS AND CREC.
Understanding by Design Stage 3
Mathematics Unit 6 - Getting Ready for the Unit
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
 2007 Mississippi Department of Education 2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Revised Training (Grades 6-12) Day 2.
 2007 Mississippi Department of Education 2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Revised Training (Grades K-5) Day 1.
2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Revised Training (Grades 6-12)
Bringing it all together!
Teaching of Numeracy in the BEP Curriculum. BEP Throughlines Creating Personal Futures Developing Literate and Numerate Citizens Enhancing Skills and.
WELCOME to WELCOME to Implementation Training for: The Revised Ontario Curriculum for Canadian and World Studies Grades 9 and 10.
Team Task Choose 1 Progression to READ: Number and Operations--Fractions Ratios and Proportional Relationships Develop “Content” Knowledge.
Exploring the Math Content of the Iowa Core Curriculum…
The mere imparting of information is not education. Above all things, the effort must result in helping a person think and do for himself/herself. Carter.
MULTILINGUAL & MULTICULTURAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
Content Trajectories, Instructional Materials, and Curriculum Decisions PROM/SE Ohio Mathematics Associates Institute Spring 2005 PROM/SE Ohio Mathematics.
Effective Instruction in Mathematics for the Junior learner Number Sense and Numeration.
SE2 Math FIT Project Sign in and take a name tag. Help yourself to refreshments!
Grade 4 – Module 5 Module Focus Session
MATHEMATICS KLA Years 1 to 10 Understanding the syllabus MATHEMATICS.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Ratios Grade 6 – Module 5.
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
November 2013 Network Team Institute
Grade 2 – Module 8 Module Focus Session
Implementing Mathematics K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of teacher judgement © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS AND READING K-5 Curriculum Overview.
Two key suggestions that came from the various focus groups across Ontario were:
Delaware Professional Teaching Standards 3.0 Content Knowledge 4.0 Human Development and Learning 5.0 Diverse Learners 6.0 Communication 7.0 Learning Environment.
Mathematics 5: Support Differentiated Instruction.
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings.
Sunnyside School District
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Advantages of Using Children’s Literature provides a motivating introduction to complex curriculum topics mathematical vocabulary can be reinforced and.
Teaching a Lesson (and Researching!)  Available online at  Examples and supplemental information in BLUE.
Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms Ready, Set, SCIENCE.
Class 4: Part 1 Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Class April 4, 2011.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
Physical Education Standards Toolkit (4 hours) OCISS Instructional Services Branch.
Teaching to the Next Generation SSS (2007) Elementary Pre-School Inservice August 17, 2010.
Using Understanding by Design
Math Units. The following are pictures of what you will see when you go to the internet.
The Backward Design Process
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
Matthew Birtel EDUC 503 FALL 2012 November 27, 2012.
Ten Minute Math LARGEST DECIMAL You will have 30 seconds to decide which decimal you think is the largest
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing.
Understanding By Design
3 Stages of Backward Design 1. Identify desired results. 2. Determine acceptable evidence. 3. Plan learning experiences & instruction.
National Research Council Of the National Academies
Understanding by Design Developed by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe Published by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) A.K.A.
SAS What is a coach to do? Classrooms for the Future/21st Century Teaching and Learning with Technology, Pennsylvania Department of Education.
Learning Target Cycles Chris Coombes
WELCOME TO GRADE 4 BIG IDEA 3 While we are waiting to begin, please make sure that you have: signed in on the hard copy. signed in on the computer. Directions.
Connected Math Program Teaching and Learning Through Problem Solving.
Session 1 Holy Family Unit Plan Review. Holy Family Unit Plan Subject Area Grade Level Unit Title Estimated Time Student Population.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
Comparing Old to New Science Standards How Have they changed?
Jessica Babbes EDU 650: Teaching Learning and Leading in the 21st Century Kimberly A. Smith March 10, 2014.
Teacher Professional Learning and Development Presentation for PPTA Curriculum Workshops 2009.
Adapted from ASCD Materials.  Is a framework for developing units  Begins with looking at the end.  What do we want students to know?  How will they.
“To begin with the end in mind means to start with a clear understanding of your destination. It means to know where you’re going so that you better understand.
PROM/SE Ohio Mathematics Associates Institute Spring 2005
Understanding by Design
3 Stages of Backward Design
Teaching Mathematics Finding the most effective way to teach middle school students mathematics.
Presentation transcript:

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education 2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Training Revised (Grades K-5) Day 2

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Reading Reflections At your table, discuss important ideas you took from the articles you read. How did the ideas relate to our tasks and discussions from yesterday? How did the ideas relate to our exploration of the curriculum framework? Record your ideas on chart paper.

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Understanding by Design: Step 1 1. Define desired results  a. Establish goals: What relevant goals (such as content, competencies, or objectives) will this design address?  b. Understandings: What are the big ideas that students will understand? What specific understandings about them are desired? What misunderstandings are predictable?  c. Essential questions: What questions will foster inquiry, understanding, and transfer of learning?  d. What key knowledge and skills will students acquire as a result of this unit or series of lessons? What should they eventually be able to do as a result of such knowledge and skills?

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Understanding by Design: Step 2 2. Assessment Evidence  a. Performance tasks: Through what authentic performance tasks will students demonstrate the desired understandings? By what criteria will performances of understanding be judged?  b. Other evidence: Through what other evidence (such as quizzes, tests, writing prompts) will students demonstrate achievement of the desired results? How will students reflect upon and self-assess their learning?

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Understanding by Design: Step 3 3. Learning Plan  a. Learning activities: What learning experiences and instruction will enable students to achieve the desired results?

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education 5 Characteristics of Tasks that Affect Student Learning Introduction of new topics with a problem- solving task Use of communication strategies Connections across topics Development over time Tasks that challenge

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Underlying Learning Theory Problem-solving focus Introduction of topics with problem solving Inclusion of non-routine and application problems Use of higher-order thinking questions

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Underlying Learning Theory Use of communication strategies Reading Writing Speaking Critical listening Multiple representations

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Underlying Learning Theory Connections across topics Links to previous understandings Use of threads or strands through all topics Multiple, linked objectives taught concurrently to eliminate isolated and fragmented teaching

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Underlying Learning Theory Allow time to learn 3–8 days of development for a new topic 8–11 days of repetition Problems change qualitatively over time, not the same type repeated

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Underlying Learning Theory Tasks that challenge Use open-ended questions to allow a wide group of students the opportunity to engage in the question or problem

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education

Curriculum materials Select a chapter in your curriculum materials. Find instances or evidence of the 5 characteristics of learning tasks. Be able to support your examples. Which criteria appear to be missing?

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Continuous models for fractions Continuous models for fractions: Continuous models could be related to length, area, volume or mass. The quantity represents.

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Discrete models for fractions Discrete models: Discrete models are typically sets of objects. This represents (ratio of purple to the total).

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Benchmark Fractions Provide a referent for estimating size of fractions 0 1

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education

Curriculum materials and fractions Using your curriculum materials, discuss the following: How are fractions introduced or reviewed? Are both continuous and discrete models used? How are the models connected or related for students?

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Fraction computations: Addition and Subtraction Using the benchmark fractions, estimate the sum and difference of the problems:

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Using the rulers we created, perform the operations of the problems below. Be able to explain the actions you used on the ruler to get the sum or difference.

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Perimeter and Area Using the 24-inch long string as the edge, create as many rectangles as you can. Measure the sides and record their dimensions in a table like the one below. DimensionsPerimeterArea

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Perimeter and Area

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education What patterns do you notice?

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Perimeter and Area How many rectangles can be made with an area of 36 square units? Use the 36 tiles and find all the rectangles you can.

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Perimeter and Area Recording Table

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education What patterns do you notice?

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Perimeter and Area What can you say about the relationships between area and perimeter?

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Rectangle Area Use base X height rather than length X width.

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Parallelogram Area

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Triangle Area

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Trapezoid Area

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Measurement Strand What do you notice, as you look across the grades in the measurement strand of the framework, about the progression of the development of measurement formulas?

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Comparison to Textbooks How does the development of area and perimeter in your textbook compare to the curriculum framework? How is the development we did with area and perimeter similar to your textbook? How is the development we did with area and perimeter different from your textbook?

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Closing focus questions What are key components of the curriculum framework? Decide at your table what you consider to be critical ideas. What questions remain about the framework?