Santa Rosa County District Schools Educational Support Evaluation System.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
C) between 18 and 27. D) between 27 and 50.
Advertisements

Chemical Quantities or
Chapter 7 Chemical Quantities
III. Formula Calculations
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
Business Math Chapter 3: Decimals.
Algebraic Expressions
Results-based Financing Workshop Evaluation Results Kigali Rwanda June, 2008.
Arithmetic and Geometric Means
Training for Teachers and Specialists
1 Citrus County 21 st CCLC Progress Report Larry Parman External Evaluator.
New Title I/NCLB Directors Workshop NCLB Winter Conference January 16, 2007 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development Margaret MacKinnon, Title.
Multiplying binomials You will have 20 seconds to answer each of the following multiplication problems. If you get hung up, go to the next problem when.
Number Theory Click to begin. Click here for Final Jeopardy.
Reducing Fractions. Factor A number that is multiplied by another number to find a product. Factors of 24 are (1,2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24).
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt Time Money AdditionSubtraction.
2.11.
Year 6 mental test 15 second questions Calculation Addition.
£1 Million £500,000 £250,000 £125,000 £64,000 £32,000 £16,000 £8,000 £4,000 £2,000 £1,000 £500 £300 £200 £100 Welcome.
Performance Appraisal Systems
Solve Multi-step Equations
Chapter 3 Mathematics of Finance
Objective - To simplify expressions using the order of operations. Simplify each expression below. 1) 6 + 5(8 - 2) 2) 3) 4)
1 Building Use Study Plattsburgh City School District Advisory Committee Meeting September 18, 2013 Castallo and Silky- Education Consultants Bill Silky.
Traffic Impact Study “Study to evaluate the impact on a roadway network due to a proposed development”
1 SESSION 5- RECORDING AND REPORTING IN GRADES R-12 Computer Applications Technology Information Technology.
The SCPS Professional Growth System
Key Concepts and Skills
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
This module: Telling the time
Georgia has Led the Nation for 3 Consecutive Years.
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
Look at This PowerPoint for help on you times tables
ECATS RCCA CAMP PROCESS ENHANCEMENTS
Time Value of Money Time value of money: $1 received today is not the same as $1 received in the future. How do we equate cash flows received or paid at.
B ALTIMORE C ITY P UBLIC S CHOOLS School Leader Effectiveness Evaluation Calculating The Overall Rating Office of Achievement and Accountability.
Santa Rosa County District Schools Evaluation Systems.
Santa Rosa County District Schools Professional Orientation Program (POP) Professional Improvement Plan (PIP)
Introduction to Acuity School District of Philadelphia Extended Day Program and Strategic Intervention Programs Assessment.
SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS.
SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.
1..
DPAS II Jessica Baker & Cheryl Cresci MED 7701 Dr. Joseph Massare.
Section 8.1 D1 Percents Math in Our World. Learning Objectives  Convert between percent, decimal, and fraction form.  Perform calculations involving.
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
Strategy Review Meeting Strategy Review Meeting
2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.
Before Between After.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
Introduction to Valuation: The Time Value of Money
25 seconds left…...
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
Subtraction: Adding UP
SCIA Special Circumstances Instructional Assistance
12.1 – Arithmetic Sequences and Series
Week 1.
Clock will move after 1 minute
An Interactive Tutorial by S. Mahaffey (Osborne High School)
PSSA Preparation.
Using Lowest Common Denominator to add and subtract fractions
Select a time to count down from the clock above
Sample questions for iRespond. 1. How many significant digits does have? A.) 1 B.) 2 C.) 4 D.) 5.
Professional Development and Appraisal System Teacher Orientation.
McRel’s Evaluation System Training Session 1 May 14, 2013 Herbert Hoover Middle School.
Dr. Jon Milleman, Assistant Superintendent Sabra Gage, WTEA President MSDWT Teacher Evaluation Information Review of Updates
Teacher Evaluation System LSKD Site Administrator Training August 6, 2014.
Completing the Classroom Teacher and Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluations for Presented by: The Office of Talent Development Employee Evaluations.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
SRCDS: ESP Evaluation System
Presentation transcript:

Santa Rosa County District Schools Educational Support Evaluation System

SRCDS: ESP Evaluation System Educational Support Personnel Evaluation System (REVAMPED) – The system reflects the Administrative and Instructional Evaluation System – In addition to the Evaluation Data, the Educational Support Personnel Evaluation System now includes school-wide “Studer” Parent & Student Survey data and Student Performance data. – School Site administrators will review the evaluation system with all of their Educational Support Personnel during pre-planning.

SRCDS: ESP Evaluation System – Section I: Added Self Assessment (See New Rubric) Revamped to look and function more like the Administrative and Instructional Evaluation System The Rubric has been updated ESP will complete before the end of the first nine weeks 21 Indicators : (5 major areas) – Dependability (5 Indicators) – Quality/Quantity of Work (4 Indicators) – Initiative (3 Indicators) – Interpersonal/ Attitude (5 Indicators) – Personal (4 Indicators)

SRCDS: ESP Evaluation System Section II: – Supervisor Evaluation Same as Self Assessment (see Rubric) 5 Areas with 21 Indicators Ratings are: – Highly Effective (HE) = 4.0 – Effective (E) = 3.0 – Needs Improvement (NI): (Comments Required) = 2.0 – Unsatisfactory (U): (Comments Required) = 1.0 – Rate each ESP on each of the indicators by marking one tally under the rating (HE, E, NI, U)

SRCDS: ESP Evaluation System Section II: – Overall Indicator Rating (there are 21): The number of tallies per rating will be multiplied by the rating value, added together, then divided by 21 (which is the # of indicators). Evaluation Summary HE (4.0)E (3.0)NI (2.0)U (1.0) Number of Indicators Marked 8 X 4 = 32 9 X 3 = 27 3 X 2 = 6 1 x1 = 1 Overall Evaluation Score = 6666/21 =3.14 Evaluation Summary HE (4.0)E (3.0)NI (2.0)U (1.0) Number of Indicators Marked

SRCDS: ESP Evaluation System Section II: – Supervisor Evaluation Scoring Overall Indicator Rating Calculation uses a scale to determine Overall Indicator Rating: – Highly Effective: – Effective: 3.49 – 2.25 – Needs Improvement: 2.24 – 1.75 – Unsatisfactory: Below 1.75 – Example : 3.14 = Effective

SRCDS: ESP Evaluation System Section III: – Surveys (Student and Parent) Same surveys used for Administration and Instructional Evaluations School wide results will be used. School wide surveys will count 10% – The school wide student survey will count 5% – The school wide parent survey will count 5% The Studer School Wide Surveys for both Parent and Student (5 point scale) will be converted to a Results Evaluation Score (4 point scale) Survey ResultsEvaluation Score 4.00 – 5.00Highly Effective (4.0) 2.75 – 3.99Effective (3.0) 2.00 – 2.74Needs Improvement (2.0) Below 2.00Unsatisfactory (1.0) Example: School Wide Parent Survey Result of 3.25 would equate to an Evaluation Score of Effective (3.0) School Wide Student Survey Result of 4.15 would equate to an Evaluation Score of Highly Effective (4.0)

SRCDS: ESP Evaluation System Section IV: – Student Performance Will Count 10% of the total ESP observation The student performance formula for the ESP will be the same as their work site administrator. EX: The bookkeeper score at Holley Navarre Primary would use the same formula as the Principal at Holley Navarre Primary. The difference is that the score would only count 10% of the overall evaluation score. EX: A district maintenance worker or bus driver would use the same formula as the Assistant Superintendent for Administrative Services. The difference is that the score would only count 10% of the overall evaluation score.

SRCDS: ESP Evaluation System Section V: – Overall Evaluation This section totals the previous four sections to identify an overall evaluation rating. Each section will be totaled and weighed using the assigned percentages. The overall evaluation score will use the following scale: Highly Effective (HE)4.00 – 3.50 Effective (E)3.49 – 2.25 Needs Improvement (NI)2.24 – 1.75 Unsatisfactory (U)Below 1.75

SRCDS: ESP Evaluation System Section V: – Overall Evaluation TypeScoreWeightWeighted Score Supervisor Evaluation (Section II) Parent Survey (Section III) Student Survey (Section III) Student Assessment (Section IV) TOTAL SCORE TOTAL SCORE3.05 Overall Evaluation CategoryEffective

SRCDS: ESP Evaluation System The Educational Support Evaluation System manual can be found on the district home page.