Santa Rosa County District Schools Professional Orientation Program (POP) Professional Improvement Plan (PIP)

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Entry to Student Outcomes (ESO). Objective: Teachers will analyze student data to drive instruction and increase student achievement.

Advertisements

DPAS II EVALUATION 2012 Dr. Donald Beers Progress Education Corporation DPAS II.

NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation

Performance Appraisal Systems

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track

Santa Rosa County District Schools Evaluation Systems.

PROFESSIONAL GROWTH PLAN UPDATE PROPOSALS COMMITTEE UPDATE MAY 2008

By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.

Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.

By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.

C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST

New Mexico Public School Department Guidelines for Annual Teacher Performance Evaluation School Year PDP Revision Committee: Dr. Janaan Diemer,

August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.

1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,

Academy School District 20. Licensed staff of Academy School District 20 will engage in a differentiated, collaborative, and reflective evaluation process.

CTE Credential Program For IHE and District Representatives Meetings held March & April 2010.

Professional Development and Appraisal System

 Teacher and administrator evaluations are governed by Florida Statute and State Board Rule 6A  The Florida Department of Education and.

Teacher Evaluation Process Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete.

Differentiated Supervision

Presenter: Gary Bates.  “If a certificated employee receives a rating of ineffective or improvement necessary, the evaluator and the certificated employee.

Your Mentoring Program: Step by Step including the Danielson Framework North Palos #117 Presenters: Marilyn Marino, NBCT – Mentor Coordinator David Creagan.

Preparation & Development of Professional Portfolio Workshop: Danielson A Presenter: Mrs. Shirley J. Delgado M. A.

Agenda Overview of evaluation Timeline Next steps.

Annual Evaluation Phase 1 Report For Teachers Office of Professional Growth Teacher Observation and Evaluation System (T.O.E.S.)

For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES/OPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For.

State Board Mission, Goals, and Policies

Mahoning County ESC’s Early Childhood Resident Educator Program.

NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction Looking Ahead:

NC Teacher Evaluation Process

Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.

Teacher Evaluation: Facilitating Effective Instruction Hamlet Canosa, Ed.D. Vice President for Education Columbia Union Conference.

Professional Performance Process OPD 864 – Writing the Mid-Year and Summative Evaluation Report Our Journey Continues! 21 st Century Supervision and Evaluation.

Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.

BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.

Collaborative Action Research (CAR). Objective : Teacher will lead and participate in a collaborative action group exploring a topic based on student.

Teacher Evaluation ___________________________ Modified ADEPT Model Assisting Developing Evaluating Professional Teaching

Teaching and Learning Courageous Journey Presentation by: Glenn Maleyko, Ph.D December 9, 2013.

EDF 2005 Chapter 2 Becoming a Professional Educator.

Washoe County School District Mike Paul- Director of Professional Growth Systems and TIF3 & TIF4 Grants Yvette Deighton- TIF4 Program Coordinator Jim Grace.

Certified Evaluation Orientation Non-Principal Administrative Certified Staff July 20, 2015 Complete Plan posted on District Website

For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES.

1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT: PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction.

Collaborative Action Research Option (2013) Staff Development.

Collaborative Action Research Option: Staff Development.

Student Outcomes (SO) Objective: Teachers will analyze student data to drive instruction and increase student achievement.

Expanded ADEPT Guidance Presentation Office of Educator Effectiveness May 9, 2016.

Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.

CEL5D+ Teacher Panel Tips and tricks for a successful first year. ASD CEL5D+ Training1.

Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process

One Team. One Vision. Unlimited Success Gerald Oehler Old Court Middle School

Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.

Dissemination Training

Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process

Teacher Evaluation Process

Certified Evaluation Orientation

Chapter 14: Evaluation of Instruction

Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System

Hello Adam Cibulka Chuck Syperski

Teacher Performance Evaluation

What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?

Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation

Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System

Baldwin FLEXIBLE CLERICAL AND PROFESSIONAL LEARNING and DIFFERENTIATED SUPERVISION.

Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.

KEEP2 Training and Updates

Teacher Evaluation Process

Evaluation Information

Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System

Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System

Presentation transcript:

Santa Rosa County District Schools Professional Orientation Program (POP) Professional Improvement Plan (PIP)

SRCDS: Professional Orientation Program (POP) Same Process new format Majority of the program is electronic located in the Professional Growth System (PGS) – Portfolio Requirements sent to HR (paper chase) Documentation of the Appeals Process Final FEAPS assessment by team and signatures Mentor Team’s Final Recommendation Form – The POP participant must complete all POP requirements plus IP Level 1 requirements

SRCDS: Professional Orientation Program (POP) Observations: – 10 Minimum Observations plus one 1 st Semester Evaluation Building Administrator :2 formal, 4 informal (these are tied into the Evaluation System to eliminate duplicate of effort), and One 1 st semester evaluation Mentor Peer: 2 formal Mentor Other Educator: 2 formal All observations require a Pre and Post Conference

SRCDS: Professional Orientation Program (PIP) – Electronic process in PGS – Process for PIP is located in the Instructional Evaluation Manual

Santa Rosa County District School Evaluation Systems Thank you for your patience and cooperation as we continue to “grow” these tools.