Cost Estimating Workshop March 14-17, 2011. Project Phase Update Phase 1 and 3 Brad Hyre, P.E. Transportation Manager HDR Phase 2 Manoj Sethi, P.E. Executive.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
St. Anthony Falls Bridge Replacement Jon Chiglo, P.E., Project Manager.
Advertisements

Barrier Warrants. Potential Hazards –Bridge Abutments/Piers/Approach Railing –Large Drainage Structures –Non-Breakaway Sign and Luminaire Supports –Embankments.
Dennis L. Edwards Tunnel
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
ODOT Structure Project Manager Training
Module Floor Systems.
CONSTRUCTION DRILLING INC.
Grade Separation Alternative
MONDAY 17 MARCH 2003 Haivan Pass Tunnel Construction Project CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS February 2003.
RAILROAD BRIDGE AND TRACK DESIGN AND COORDINATION ISSUES Lloyd M. Wolf, P.E.
IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG
BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR Practice Questions Next.
July Training Outline Part 1 Cost-per –SF and Detailed Estimate Pay Item Detailed Estimate Segments Bridge Level Data Segment Level Data Supports.
St. Croix River Crossing S. P
Indianapolis Airport Interchange Bridges Presented to: TRB Bridge Aesthetics Subcommittee January 11, 2005.
1 UPCOMING OPPORTUNITIES – Contractors Caissons Contractor(s) to perform installation of caissons to include purchase of all required materials. u Low/High.
From US 17 to SR 11 and SR 11 to Cone Road FPID No
Concrete Construction Part 1
Concrete Box Culverts (CBC)
MDOT ACTT Workshop Structures I-94 From I-96 to East of Connor Participants Steve Stroh, URS Corp Vijay Chandra, Parson Brinckerhoff Raj Ailaney, FHWA.
Bridge over BNSF Railroad 7 km East of Windham - East Bridge Replacement Project Using Accelerated Bridge Construction.
SHRP2 Project R04 Bridge Designs for ABC
ENG-1010 Lecture 16 Bridge Design.
Chapter 34 Bridge Construction.
South Side Red River Bridge Corridor Study Phase III Preliminary Geotechnical Study Phase IV New Alignment Alternatives Evaluation.
 Project Delivery  Design Considerations  Lessons Learned.
Foundations. Foundation supports weight of structure –Includes soil and rock under foundation –Building construction described by foundation type Slab.
Bridge 2153 Final Report Premier Engineering Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology.
Region One Bridge Design – Robert Jose Tovar “If I have seen further it is by standing upon the shoulders of giants” – Isaac Newton.
Crane Bridge Design STJ Engineering Matt Albert AJ Chandler Noah Fehrenbacher Jake Gennicks Jake Wilhoit Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology.
Competency: Draw Foundation Plans
RETAINING WALLS.
Bridge Structure Types and Components. BRIDGE STRUCTURE TYPES AND COMPONENTS TECHNICAL STANDARDS BRANCH INTRODUCTION TO BRIDGES TRANSPORTATION Slide 2.
2014 CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES Estimates Estimates 3 Point of the illustration? Document your assumptions.
4 TH STREET BRIDGE Pueblo, Colorado December 2006 Project Overview.
Public Information Meeting Rehabilitation of Bridge No Flat Rock Hill Road over I-95 Old Lyme, Connecticut Rehabilitation of Bridge No Flat.
Environmental Assessment Public Information Meeting – September 2010 Realignment of a Portion of a Utah Lake Drainage Basin Water Delivery System (ULS)
Alameda Creek Bridge Replacement Scoping Meeting March 4, 2014.
Broadway Street Viaduct Improvement, Pre-Load Testing and Geotech Report Workshop Consultant Presentation Iowa DOT 2 nd April 2007.
Other Construction Projects
Mike Baumann Statewide Utility Engineer January 22, 2015.
Reading Structural Drawings
Bridge Engineering (5) Substructure – Abutments and Piers
Basic Structural Theory. BASIC STRUCTURAL THEORY TECHNICAL STANDARDS BRANCH INTRODUCTION TO BRIDGES TRANSPORTATION Slide 2 Beams Different member types.
Seventh Edition By David A. Madsen, Terence M. Shumaker, and David P. Madsen Civil Drafting Technology Chapter 13 Civil Engineering Detail Drawings.
Traffic Barrier Guidelines Section 3.0 Potential Roadside Obstacles Hands-On Workshop III July
CE303: Introduction to Construction Blueprint Lab.
CARSON CITY FREEWAY PHASE 2B-1 PHASE 2 PHASE 2A PHASE 2B.
Recent Guideline Changes 1 Recent AT Guideline Changes Existing Documents New Technical Documents Bridge Structure Design Criteria Bridge Design Bulletins.
Basic Hydraulics: Bridges. Definition & terminology Abutments Flow contraction.
Salt Lake City – Las Vegas High Speed Rail – Alignment Study Student Engineering Associates.
FOUNDATIONS.
BULDING CONSTRUCTION ( )
 HDR, Ott Constructability, Dan Brown  Visit and boat tour of Rouchleau pit ◦ Access better than potrayed ◦ Challenging geotechnically 
Brookeville Bypass Final Design Presentation Initech May 6, 2004.
Concrete Box Culverts (CBC)
Required Drawings and Info for Formwork or Scaffold Design
Oregon DOT Integral Abutment Design Criteria
Geohazard inventory Training • April 19, 2017
Drawing Longitudinal & Cross Sections
INTEGRAL BRIDGES Guided by: Dipu.V.S Lecturer Civil Engg Dept
Construction Examples in Japan High Capacity Micropile
By T.G.N.C.VAMSI KRISHNA. 171FB M.tech – Civil.
Arch205 Materials and building construction 1 foundation
CONSTRUCTION METHODS & TECHNOLOGY
Arch205 building construction foundation
Competency: Draw Foundation Plans
Concrete A structural material made by combining cement, sand, aggregate, and water.
Construction Considerations
Presentation transcript:

Cost Estimating Workshop March 14-17, 2011

Project Phase Update Phase 1 and 3 Brad Hyre, P.E. Transportation Manager HDR Phase 2 Manoj Sethi, P.E. Executive Vice President DLZ

Phase 2 C.R. 28 to U.S. 23 Typical Section

Roadway Design Horizontal Alignment (No change) Vertical Alignment (Significant change) Interchanges (Refinement)

Interchanges Lucasville-Minford Rd (CR 28)

Interchanges US 23

Utilities Relocations Expected AEP Transmission – 138KV facility (near STA ) Electric Dist. Line along CR-28, CR-29, CR-54, Flatwood Fallen Timber Road, Fairgrounds Road and R/R Tracks Water, Gas & Sanitary Lines run parallel along Fairgrounds Road

Geotechnical Bridge foundations – Spread footings – Driven piles – Drilled shafts

Geotechnical Embankments – High fills – Soft soils May require 3H:1V slopes, staged construction –US 23 Interchange –Lucasville-Minford Road Interchange

Geotechnical Embankments (cont’d) – Special benching for sidehill fills – Embankment materials mostly rock – Durable rock at base of embankments for drainage

Geotechnical Cut Slopes – Cut slopes higher than 150 feet 0.5H:1V cut slopes in competent sandstone 1H:1V cut slopes in weathered rock 2H:1V cut slopes in weak rock and overburden –Benches Construction deviation benches every 60’ vertical Overburden benches Geotechnical benches

Geotechnical Cut Slopes (cont’d)

Geotechnical Cut Slopes (cont’d) Catchment ditches for rockfall Several different options proposed

Geotechnical Cut Slopes (cont’d)

Geotechnical Cut Slopes (cont’d)

Structures 10 Structures in this Phase

SCI-823-MAINLINE 4 bridges Bridge No. Bridge DescriptionStructure TypeEstimated Cost 1018 L&R S.R. 823 over Lucasville- Minford Road L/R (VC = feet) 3-span prestressed concrete 60” I-beam with integral abutments, cap and column piers $3,978, L&R S.R. 823 over Blue Run (CR-29) L/R (VC = 40.0 feet) Single span prestressed 60” I- Beam on semi-integral abutments w/MSE wall supported abutments $2,656, L&R S.R. 823 over Morris Lane Blue Run Road L/R (VC = 52.0 feet) 5-span prestressed I-Beam with semi-integral abutments and T- type piers on spill thru slopes $10,838, S.R. 823 Under Flatwood-Fallen Timber Road (CR-184) (VC = 71.0 feet) 2-span steel plate girders with semi-integral abutments on spill thru slopes (1:1) $3,012,800 Total$20,484,800

Morris Lane -Blue Run Significant change to this Design is proposed

US 23 INTERCHANGE: 6 Bridges & MSE Walls Bridge No. Bridge DescriptionStructure TypeEstimated Cost 1593 Ramp B over Fairground Road (C.R. 55) Single-span prestressed concrete with semi-integral abutments behind MSE walls $542, Ramp B over Norfolk Southern Railway 3-span steel plate girders with conventional stub abutments. A pill thru slope is used at forward abutment, rear abutment is behind an MSE wall supported by Geopiers $3,205, S.R. 823 over Fairground Road (C.R. 55) Single-span prestressed concrete beams with semi-integral abutments behind MSE walls $1,046, S.R. 823 over Norfolk Southern Railway and US span steel plate girders with semi- integral abutments behind MSE walls $3,186,000

US 23 INTERCHANGE (contd.) Bridge No. Bridge DescriptionStructure TypeEstimated Cost 1595 Ramp C over Fairground Road (C.R. 55) Single-span prestressed concrete beam with semi-integral abutments behind MSE walls $583, Ramp C over Norfolk Southern Railway 3-span steel plate girders with conventional stub abutments. A spill thru slope is used at the rear abutment and the forward abutment is behind an MSE wall supported by Geopiers $3,655,000 Walls 6 MSE Walls at the Interchange. Geopiers for Ramp B and C $5,674,400 Total $17,891,400

S.R. 823 over NS Railway and US 23

Hydraulics Open drainage system using culverts and ditches Closed drainage systems using catch basins, manholes and storm sewers Culverts range from 36-in. to 72-in. 10’x5’ Box under U.S. 23 Length of culverts up to 900-ft. Height of fill above some culverts up to 120-ft.