TH 169 & I-494 Interchange Design-Build Project S.P January 27, 2010 Michael Beer, P.E. Mn/DOT Project Manager PROJECT INFORMATIONAL MEETING

DISCLAIMER What is discussed today is informational only; it is meant to assist interested teams in the pursuit of this project. What is discussed today is informational only; it is meant to assist interested teams in the pursuit of this project. The ultimate contract requirements will be included in the Request for Proposals (RFP). The ultimate contract requirements will be included in the Request for Proposals (RFP). There may be changes between now and the time the RFP is issued.

DESIGN-BUILD INFORMATION Jay Hietpas, Mn/DOT Central Office Innovative Contracting Director

Design-Build Best-Value Request for Qualifications (RFQ) Submit SOQ Electronically (2/5/10) Submit SOQ Electronically (2/5/10) Short-List Up to 5 Teams Short-List Up to 5 Teams Single Point of Contact – Jay Hietpas Single Point of Contact – Jay Hietpas Clarifications and Addendums posted to ftp site Clarifications and Addendums posted to ftp site Addendum 1 – Bonding Clarification 1  No guarantee that the project moves forward

Conflict of Interest & Ex Parte Communication Approach Posted on Website: Mn/DOT Retained Consultants HNTB HNTB SRF SRF CardnoTBE CardnoTBE “Other Consultants” “Other Consultants” Ex Parte CommunicationEx Parte Communication

Design-Build Best-Value Information Sharing ftp website ( ftp://ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/ocic/169_494/) ftp website ( ftp://ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/ocic/169_494/) One-on-one meetings One-on-one meetings Request for Proposals (RFP) Technical Proposal Technical Proposal Alternate Technical Concepts Alternate Technical Concepts One-on-One Meetings Stipends Price/DBE Proposal Price/DBE Proposal

Procurement Timeline RFQ Clarification Due:Feb 3, 2010 SOQ DueFeb 5, 2010 Short-ListFeb 12, 2010 Issue RFPFeb 19, 2010 Tech Proposals DueApril 16, 2010 Price Proposals DueApril 19, 2010 LettingApril 23, 2010 Anticipated ContractMay 19, 2010

PROJECT INFORMATION TH 169/494 DB Potential ARRA II Funding Michael Beer, Mn/DOT Metro District Project Manager

Project Partners City of Bloomington, Edina, and Eden Prairie City of Bloomington, Edina, and Eden Prairie Hennepin County Hennepin County Federal Highway Administration Federal Highway Administration Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Design-Build Proposers Design-Build Proposers HNTB – Design-Build Contract Development HNTB – Design-Build Contract Development

Project Information

Project Description General Layout Roadway RoadwayLimitsProfiles Drainage Drainage Nine-Mile Creek Ponding Right of Way Right of Way Parcel Update PIF Bridges BridgesFly-overWidening

Project Description Utilities Extensive relocations Extensive relocationsNoise Conducting analysis Conducting analysis Visual Quality Already identified Already identifiedBorings Many completed, but Many completed, but still in progress

Project Description Environmental Permits Permits NEPA NEPA Nine-Mile Creek Nine-Mile CreekGeotechnical High Water table High Water table Organics Organics Full Build Compatibility Alignments Alignments Retaining Walls Retaining Walls Drainage and Ponds Drainage and Ponds Utility Relocations Utility Relocations

Design-Build General Discussion Points Co-Housing Will require full co-housing Bridge Design??? DBE DBE Goal will be determined at RFP Outreach Meeting Utility Meeting Attendance will be mandatory in the RFP Oversight Contract

Project Goals Quality  Encourage innovative design & construction practices  Design and construct a quality project with quality personnel Schedule and Budget  Current goal is to completed by the end of 2012 Stakeholder Satisfaction  Minimize traffic disruptions  Minimize impacts to residents and businesses  Provide timely coordination to stakeholders  Minimize utility impacts and facilitate timely relocation Environment  Minimize environmental impacts Safety Employment Opportunities

Questions ?