Enhancing Professional Practice

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
USING THE FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING TO SUPPORT EFFECTIVE TEACHER EVALUATION Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member.
Advertisements

The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson
Danielson Framework: Review and Card Sort Activity
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Teacher Excellence and Support System
Domain 3: Instruction. ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished Expectations for learningTeacher’s purpose in a lesson or unit is unclear to.
1. On an index card, please jot down facts you already know about the Danielson FfT. Turn to someone sitting near you and share what you have written.
C HARLOTTE D ANIELSON ’ S F RAMEWORK FOR T EACHING Overview for Arkansas TESS Teacher Training.
Introduction Framework for Teaching by Charlotte Danielson
The Framework for Teaching: Digging Deeper August 27, 2012 Bernie Cleland & Duffy Miller
Cinnaminson Township Public Schools November 6, 2012 INTRODUCTION TO THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK OF PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE FOR TEACHERS.
Danielson Rubric Kim Oakes Staff Development Specialist E2CCB/IES Kim Oakes Erie2 BOCES - Adopted ©2010 McKay Consulting, LLC.
Assessment Literacy & Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) The goal of this session is to make visible.
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Lesson Planning and Preparation
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Domain II Creating and Environment for Learning
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
Educational Performance Incentive Compensation
Panorama High School Professional Development Teaching and Learning Framework January 10, 2013 California Standard for the Teaching Profession Engaging.
The Danielson Model: What Does This Mean for Lutheran Educators?
The Framework for Teaching and the Student-Led Classroom
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Domain 1: Preparation and Planning. ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished Knowledge of content and the structure of the discipline In planning.
Arkansas Teacher Evaluation Pilot Program
The Danielson Framework and Your Evaluation AK Teaching Standard DP_8c: Engages in Instructional Development Activities Danielson Domain 4e: Growing and.
The Framework for Teaching Domain 1 Planning and Preparation.
General Instructions 1. Save the Power Pt template to your desktop and a flashdrive used only for your portfolio. Using SAVE AS rename the portfolio with.
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
A Summary of Wisconsin’s Educator Effectiveness System for West De Pere.
BHS Administration “Back to Basics – This is Our time” Part I
Welcome: BISD Teacher Evaluation System 8/21/14 "A commitment to professional learning is important, not because teaching is of poor quality and must be.
Your Name Teaching Portfolio (Begin Year-End Year)
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.
James P. B. Duffy School #12 State of the School Address November, 2012.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
YEAR 1 INDUCTION Day One Workshop Pennsbury School District.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
ENHANCING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE Framework for Teaching Aug. 27 th Title II Day.
The Effective Teacher Chapter 1 James M. Cooper. Do Now In your notes answer the following question: –What makes a teacher effective?
Materials Needed: Videos: – Wisdom of Practice – Levels of Performance – (optional) Classroom video to look for engagement Mr. Holland’s Opus ( Chapter.
Day 7 Domain 3: Instruction Year 2 Induction Pennsbury School District Maureen Gradel.
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness B. Examining the Framework
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
Welcome ! Collab Meeting May 6, Things to remember  Aug 12 – First day for teachers  Aug – FAI In-service  Aug 25 – First day for students.
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
Teacher Evaluation Overview
1 WI Educator Effectiveness System Understanding Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
CLASSROOM OBSERVATION PRIORITIES PREPARED & PRESENTED S. SUPERVISOR HELENA MOHAMMAD Ministry of Education ELT General Supervision
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Welcome: BISD Teacher Evaluation System 8/26/2015 "A commitment to professional learning is important, not because teaching is of poor quality and must.
Compass- Teacher Performance Evaluation Rubric
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
Make It Happen The Power of Communication and Thinking
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Enhancing Professional Practice
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
Domain 1: Preparation and Planning
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member
Teacher Evaluation Process School Year
Presentation transcript:

Enhancing Professional Practice Introduction to the Framework for Teaching

Outcomes An introduction to the Danielson Framework as a tool for examining and improving teaching practice Understand the structure and the language of the Framework for Teaching Know the domains and components of the Framework for Teaching Identify the essential characteristics of each of the Framework’s levels of performance Generate examples of classroom practice

Agenda What is good teaching? ICE BREAKER Overview Teachscape & My Learning Plan Overviews Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Activity 10 Domain 3: Instruction Activity 9 Reflection Save the dates: THIS IS YOUR REMINDER TO FACULTY

Norms Equity of voice Attentive listening Safety to share different perspectives Commitment to the work

The Danielson Framework for Teaching Domain 1 Planning and Preparation Domain 1 Planning and Preparation 1a Demonstrating Knowledge of Content & Pedagogy 1b Demonstrating Knowledge of Students 1c Setting Instructional Outcomes 1d Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources 1e Designing Coherent Instruction 1f Designing Student Assessment Domain 2 Classroom Environment 2a Creating an Environment of Respect & Rapport 2b Creating a Culture of Learning 2c Managing Classroom Procedures 2d Managing Student Behavior 2e Managing Physical Space Domain 2 Classroom Environment 2a Creating an Environment of Respect & Rapport 2b Creating a Culture of Learning 2c Managing Classroom Procedures 2d Managing Student Behavior 2e Managing Physical Space Domain 2 Classroom Environment The Danielson Framework for Teaching Domain 4 Professional Responsibilities 4a Reflecting on Teaching 4b Maintaining Accurate Records 4c Communicating with Families 4d Participating in a Professional Community 4e Growing and Developing Professionally 4f Showing Professionalism Domain 4 Professional Responsibilities Domain 3 Instruction 3a Communicating with Students 3b Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques 3c Engaging Students in Learning 3d Using Assessment in Instruction 3e Demonstrating Flexibility & Responsiveness Domain 3 Instruction Domain 3 Instruction 3a Communicating with Students 3b Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques 3c Engaging Students in Learning 3d Using Assessment in Instruction 3e Demonstrating Flexibility & Responsiveness

The Framework for Teaching 4 Domains 22 Components 76 Elements DOMAIN = 3. Instruction COMPONENT = c. Engaging Students in Learning ELEMENT = Grouping of Students

Levels of Performance •UNSATISFACTORY: TEACHING SHOWS EVIDENCE OF NOT UNDERSTANDING THE CONCEPTS UNDERLYING THE COMPONENT •MAY REPRESENT PRACTICE THAT REQUIRES INTERVENTION •BASIC: TEACHING SHOWS EVIDENCE OF KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS RELATED TO TEACHING-BUT INCONSISTENT PERFORMANCE DUE TO LACK OF EXPERIENCE •PROFICIENT: TEACHING SHOWS EVIDENCE OF THOROUGH KNOWLEDGE OF ALL ASPECTS OF THE PROFESSION. STUDENTS ARE ENGAGED IN LEARNING. THIS IS SUCCESSFUL, ACCOMPLISHED, PROFESSIONAL, AND EFFECTIVE TEACHING. •DISTINGUISHED-CLASSROOM FUNCTIONS AS A COMMUNITY OF LEARNERS WITH STUDENT ASSUMPTION OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR LEARNING

Levels of Performance UNSATISFACTORY BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED Lack of Unsafe Harmful Unclear Unaware Poor Unsuitable Inconsistent Partial General Attempts Awareness Moderate Minimal Consistent Frequent Successful Appropriate Clear Positive Smooth Solid Seamless Subtle Skillful Preventative Leadership Students TEACHER DIRECTED SUCCESS STUDENT DIRECTED SUCCESS

Good Teacher Project While watching and listening to the videos, “How would your students respond to the questions?” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13dXvqdoRx0&feature=em-share_video_user http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-fNOgXJT3c&feature=em-share_video_user

What Does Evidence Look Like? ACTIVITY SMALL GROUPS WILL IDENTIFY EVIDENCE FOR THE COMPONENTS IN DOMAIN 1 Divide participants into six groups. Each group identifies evidence for each of the elements in that component (1a, 1b, etc.). Groups then share out.

Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Activity 10 With your partners, discuss the video and relate it to the remaining components in Domain 1. As you discuss the components, refer to the elements to inform your thinking: 1a Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy: p. 47 1b Knowledge of Students: p. 49 1d Knowledge of Resources: p. 56 1c Setting Instructional Outcomes: p. 54 1f Designing Student Assessments: p. 63 Complete the concept map that indicates the relationship of each component to 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction. How do the other components in Domain 1 support the design of engaging student activities? Handout page 19

“Look Fors and Listen Fors” “Look Fors and Listen Fors” in Components of Charlotte Danielson’s Framework for Professional Practice Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component 1a: Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy Knowledge of content and the structure of the discipline Knowledge of prerequisite relationships Knowledge of content-related pedagogy Look Fors and Listen Fors: Lessons based on current best practice Advanced courses in content and techniques Instructional artifacts (evidence in the form of student work products with comments) Instructional interactions with students

“Look Fors and Listen Fors” “Look Fors and Listen Fors” in Components of Charlotte Danielson’s Framework for Professional Practice Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component 1b: Demonstrating Knowledge of Students Knowledge of child and adolescent development Knowledge of the learning process Knowledge of students’ skills, knowledge, and language proficiency Knowledge of students’ interests and cultural heritage Knowledge of students’ special needs Look Fors and Listen Fors: Inventories, surveys and communications to families are used to gather information about students at the beginning of the year. Uses school records, i.e. test scores, permanent records, IEP’s etc. as primary sources of knowledge of students. Uses secondary sources such as conversations with prior teachers and other school personnel. Class description that appropriately classifies students by learning abilities and other indicators (2nd language, other ethnic-cultural issues, special needs – both medical, social and educational)

“Look Fors and Listen Fors” “Look Fors and Listen Fors” in Components of Charlotte Danielson’s Framework for Professional Practice Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component 1c: Setting Instructional Outcomes Value, sequence, and alignment Clarity Balance Suitability for diverse learners Look Fors and Listen Fors: Goals are age/level appropriate Goals are suitable for diverse learners Goals = what students will learn as opposed to lesson objectives which = what students will know, understand, and be able to do Goals can be assessed

“Look Fors and Listen Fors” Domain 1: Planning and Preparation “Look Fors and Listen Fors” in Components of Charlotte Danielson’s Framework for Professional Practice Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component 1d: Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources Resources for classroom use Resources to extend content knowledge and pedagogy Resources for students Look Fors and Listen Fors: Resources to assist teaching and/or help students, i.e. texts, instructional aids, field trips, experts from community, programs/experiences, technology Knowledge of a range of resources, services and aids

“Look Fors and Listen Fors” “Look Fors and Listen Fors” in Components of Charlotte Danielson’s Framework for Professional Practice Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction Learning activities Instructional materials and resources Instructional groups Lesson and unit structure Look Fors and Listen Fors: In Unit Plans – at least three weeks with daily topics and activities that reflect organization and sequencing, and variety of materials and groups In Lesson Plans – description of students, instructional objectives, assessments, activating, cognitive, and summarizing strategies, materials, and potential misunderstandings Grouping patterns with a student focus: Low – teacher or student leads large group, students work in small groups while teacher circulates; students work alone, teacher monitors Moderate – teacher works w/ small groups; students work alone or in small groups High – student lead presentations or other leadership roles within a structured lesson

“Look Fors and Listen Fors” “Look Fors and Listen Fors” in Components of Charlotte Danielson’s Framework for Professional Practice Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component 1f: Designing Student Assessment Congruence with instructional outcomes Criteria and standards Design of formative assessments Use for planning Look Fors and Listen Fors: Methods of assessing each goal: tests, data analysis, production of findings, collaboration Scoring systems/rubrics establishing measurable criteria are communicated up front Authentic, real world applications are evident Feedback to students guide next steps, i.e. teaching or re-teaching

Knowing Content & Pedagogy 1a Students 1b Resources 1d Doing 1c Instructional Outcomes Designing Assessments 1f Designing Instruction 1e

What Does Evidence Look Like? ACTIVITY SMALL GROUPS WILL IDENTIFY EVIDENCE FOR THE COMPONENTS IN DOMAIN 3 Divide participants into five groups. Each group identifies evidence for each of the elements in that component (3a, 3b, etc.). Groups then share out.

“Look Fors and Listen Fors” “Look Fors and Listen Fors” in Components of Charlotte Danielson’s Framework for Professional Practice Domain 3: Instruction Component 3a: Communicating with Students • Expectations for learning • Directions and procedures • Explanations of content • Use of oral and written language Look Fors and Listen Fors: • Clear directions and explanations (oral and written) • Vivid, expressive language is used to enhance student experience • Clear limits are set,, including time factors • Language is audible, legible; correct usage, spelling, etc. is apparent • Teacher carefully chooses words, using rich vocabulary for students to model

“Look Fors and Listen Fors” “Look Fors and Listen Fors” in Components of Charlotte Danielson’s Framework for Professional Practice Domain 3: Instruction Component 3b: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques • Quality of questions • Discussion techniques • Student participation Look Fors and Listen Fors: • Essential question is posted for each lesson; question is asked by teacher and answered by students throughout the lesson • Questions engage students in an exploration of content, are not rapid fire, low level, recitation of facts • “Think time” is allowed before responses • Teacher probes to seek clarification, i.e. “explain….”, “give an explanation for…” • All students are engaged in discussion; not just a few, students often take initiative • Teacher stays on topic, uses follow-up, rephrases and applies what students contribute or pose

“Look Fors and Listen Fors” “Look Fors and Listen Fors” in Components of Charlotte Danielson’s Framework for Professional Practice Domain 3: Instruction Component 3c: Engaging Students in Learning • Activities and assignments • Grouping of students • Instructional materials and resources • Structure and pacing Look Fors and Listen Fors: • Instructional artifacts – student work, out of class assignments • Teachers uses of examples and metaphors that illustrate new learning; teacher connects with student knowledge, interests and culture • Teacher promotes problem-solving; permits choice, encourages depth-find patterns, tests hypotheses, requires thought; is relevant and authentic • Groupings are based on instructional goals • Materials and resources are ready for student use with little or no disruption • Structure of lesson is maintained; pacing is appropriate with a beginning, a middle, and end (closure)

“Look Fors and Listen Fors” “Look Fors and Listen Fors” in Components of Charlotte Danielson’s Framework for Professional Practice Domain 3: Instruction Component 3d: Using Assessment in Instruction • Assessment criteria • Monitoring of student learning • Feedback to students • Student self-assessment and monitoring of progress Look Fors and Listen Fors: • Teacher and peer comments on student work • Teacher uses body language such as nods, quizzical looks, etc. to encourage students • Effective feedback that is specific, descriptive, understandable; Feedback is not praise (“good work” or “good job), grades, encouragement (“Keep it up” or “You can do it) or criticism (“Unacceptable…You get a zero”) • Comments give students information needed to adjust what they are doing and get better at it or solve a problem; it provides time to think and reflect; performance is related to standards • All feedback is provided in a timely fashion, “on the spot”, or on work products, as needed to support learning

“Look Fors and Listen Fors” “Look Fors and Listen Fors” in Components of Charlotte Danielson’s Framework for Professional Practice Domain 3: Instruction Component 3e: Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness • Lesson adjustment • Response to students • Persistence Look Fors and Listen Fors: • Adjustments that improve student experience or clarify confusion • Change provides for needs specific learners (visual, auditory, slower, brighter, etc.) • Teacher abandons lesson all together or coordinates with a spontaneous event • Teacher possesses an extensive repertoire of strategies such that transitions are seamless; students may not be aware that a change has occurred

Connecting Design with Engagement COMPONENT 1e Designing Coherent Instruction COMPONENT 3c Engaging Students in Learning Learning Activities Instructional materials and resources Instructional groups Lesson and unit structure Activities and assignments Instructional materials and resources Grouping of students Structure and pacing

REFLECTION Save the dates: ???? In order to help us better address your needs, please complete the evaluation on My Learning Plan with in the next few days. Thank you! REFLECTION Save the dates: ????