22 Feb 2008UCL Physics Meeting1 WW CSC update Adam, Erkcan, Jon, Peter.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
15 December 2008Pd meeting1 News/highlights dalla CMSweek ( con qualche dettaglio su analisi dei CRAFT data ) U.Gasparini.
Advertisements

9/15/03IEEE Singapore Meeting1 FER: Do We Need It? Joseph Cleveland Anna Tee Jin Weon Chang Samsung Spetember 15, 2003 IEEE C /83r1.
Discovery of a standard model Higgs boson using vector boson fusion at the LHC Craig Buttar University of Sheffield Collaborators: G.Azuelos, V.Cavasinni,
High-fidelity or Low-fidelity, Paper or Computer? Choosing attributes when testing web prototypes Miriam Walker Leila Takayama Professor James Landay University.
Simplified Interline Settlement A fundamental change… Nicholas Coote Project Sponsor.
Jan Cambridge Collaboration Meeting1 Pi/Mu Separation and Muon dE/dX Leo Jenner, UCL.
11 Mar 2004Nemo Collaboration Meeting1 Preliminary Study of 214 Bi Background in Mo foils Preliminary Study of 214 Bi Background in Mo foils Leo Jenner,
P.P. & APD gain ratio report— 4 month testing Ken Chiang, J.Y. Lin, Jeri Chang 2009/3/19.
First look of ME study on ttH(  bb) channel Univ. of Tokyo Y.Kataoka
Top Physics Validation: Reconstruction, Simulation and Bytestream Paul S Miyagawa The University of Manchester.
1  trigger optimization in CMS Tracker Giuseppe Bagliesi On behalf of  tracking group Workshop on B/tau Physics at LHC Helsinki, May 30 - June 1, 2002.
Validation of DC3 fully simulated W→eν samples (NLO, reconstructed in ) Laura Gilbert 01/08/06.
1 previously, when I calculated event selection efficiencies, I defined efficiencies as the following: efficiency in electron channel = (total number of.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
W’  tb  lnubb efficiency VS. electron/muon P T cut muon channel electron channel.
1 Andrea Bangert, ATLAS SCT Meeting, Monte Carlo Studies Of Top Quark Pair Production Andrea Bangert, Max Planck Institute of Physics, CSC T6.
Analysis Meeting – April 17 '07 Status and plan update for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson.
Alpgen MC Samples Jet Flavour Identifier Lepton ID Plots.
Using Track based missing Et tools to reject fake MET background Zhijun Liang,Song-Ming Wang,Dong liu, Rachid Mazini Academia Sinica 8/28/20151 TWiki page.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
H->ZZ->4l Update Trying to re-do CSC note: MC Sample Trigger Eff. Electron Selection Eff. Muon Selection Eff.
Steps toward ttH (H->bb) in the Atlas ‘PhysicsAnalysis’ Environment. Chris Collins-Tooth Christian Shaw.
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
10 TeV Updates on Efficiencies and Event Shapes Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei (U. Arizona) Single lepton + jets channel.
Associated top Higgs search: with ttH (H  bb) Chris Collins-Tooth, 17 June 2008.
2004 Xmas MeetingSarah Allwood WW Scattering at ATLAS.
Archana Sharma, Suman Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan Updates on the RPC trigger efficiency work with data driven.
A few slides to summarise what Alessandro and I were up to for March 24th video meeting Taking for granted that W+/- are good measurements to make- are.
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
Simone Gennai SNS, INFN-Pisa1 Radion searches in CMS A first look to  hh G. Dewhirst, L. Fano, S. Gennai, S. Nikitenko.
H 1 → a 1 a 1 → µ + µ - τ + τ - ATLAS Experiment: Search of Higgs Boson decaying into a 1 in Next to Minimal SuperSymmetric Model By: Hou Keong(Tim) Lou.
BESS Model Resonance in the pp W + W tt + X Channel at LHC M. Gintner, I. Melo, B. Trpišová University of Žilina Herlany, September 2006.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
B. Resende Top WG 28/10/05 Polarization studies in ttbar events 1 Polarization studies in tt events with full simulation 1.Physics motivations 2.Full simulation.
Fully Hadronic Top Anti-Top Decay (Using TopView) Fully Hadronic Top Anti-Top Decay (Using TopView) Ido Mussche NIPHAD meeting, Februari 9 th :
Issues with cluster calibration + selection cuts for TrigEgamma note Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 12/08/2010.
March 2005Sarah Allwood WW Scattering at ATLAS Sarah Allwood University of Manchester IOP HEPP conference 2005, Dublin.
1 Pythia versus Alpgen for W+jets (High Mass Dibosons work) Sarah Allwood 07/12/06.
Hggs-D meeting MPI 11/20061 Higgs Physics – Activities in Bonn/Siegen Jörn Große-Knetter ATLAS-Higgs-D Treffen München,
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
A search for the ZZ signal in the 3 lepton channel Azeddine Kasmi Robert Kehoe Southern Methodist University Thanks to: H. Ma, M. Aharrouche.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
Processing large data sets Brad Abbott. Now J/Psi Starting with root-tuples Add 4-momentum to look for candidates Pick events (raw) -> reconstruct event.
1 06/2/2007 tth, (h → bb): Cuts-Based analysis status/progress Chris Collins-Tooth 06-Feb-2007.
Aug _5071 Top stop by charm channel analysis using D0 runI data OUTLINE physics process of top to stop Monte Carlo simulation for signal data.
BEACH 04J. Piedra1 SiSA Tracking Silicon stand alone (SiSA) tracking optimization SiSA validation Matthew Herndon University of Wisconsin Joint Physics.
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
Marcello Barisonzi First results of AOD analysis on t-channel Single Top DAD 30/05/2005 Page 1 AOD on Single Top Marcello Barisonzi.
Search for Pair Produced Stops Decaying to a Dileptonic Final State at CMS David Kolchmeyer.
H->WW->lνlν Analysis - Improvements and results - - Data and MC - Higgs Working group meeting, 6 January 2011 Magda Chełstowska & Rosemarie Aben.
2nd lepton veto, in the one-lepton SUSY analysis
Update on Invisible Higgs analysis in the tth channel
Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008
Report from SUSY working group
on top mass measurement based on B had decay length
ttH (Hγγ) search and CP measurement
NIKHEF / Universiteit van Amsterdam
Individual Particle Reconstruction
tt+jets simulation comparisons
Generation of samples for VBF H0-->ZZ*-->bbll
Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
Update on LHCb Level-1 trigger
ZZ→llnn Analysis Thomas Barber University of Cambridge
Status of the H4l CSC Note (HG2)
Dilepton Mass. Progress report.
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Search for a New Vector Resonance in the pp WWtt+X Channel at LHC
Presentation transcript:

22 Feb 2008UCL Physics Meeting1 WW CSC update Adam, Erkcan, Jon, Peter

22 Feb 2008UCL Physics Meeting2 Outline 2-jet W reconstruction Central jet veto and smart(er) overlap removal Atlfast lepton efficiency corrections Curse of EV & Root Final WW mass plots and summary

22 Feb 2008UCL Physics Meeting3 Hadronic Ws from 2 jets The updated algorithm: Check if mass of hardest jet is within the mass single jet W mass window. If so, check whether it satisfies the y-scale cut. If not, try reconstructing from 2 jets. 2-jet reconstruction: Loop through all pairs of jets in the event. Identify the pair with highest combined Pt (use vector sum). See if it falls into the 2-jet W mass window (different mean and width).

22 Feb 2008UCL Physics Meeting4 1-jet and 2-jet masses… Different means and widths for the mass windows.

22 Feb 2008UCL Physics Meeting5 Y-value for 2-jet scenario? Question: Could we use define a y-value for the 2-jet Ws? Use the 4-momenta of the two jets, to calculate the relative transverse momentum of one against the other (k T ). Choose the smaller k T and divide to the P T of the reconstructed W. This is the equivalent of sqrt(y 12 ).

22 Feb 2008UCL Physics Meeting6 Y-value for signal vs. bkg. Small difference after the mass cuts.

22 Feb 2008UCL Physics Meeting7 Y-value vs. Mass An additional 5-10% improvement after a little optimization. signalw+jets bg

22 Feb 2008UCL Physics Meeting8 Central Jet Veto Significant discrepancy between fast and full sim in the central jet veto efficiency: ~98% vs. ~75%. Reason: Electrons misidentified as jets in the full sim. Solution: Reject any jet that overlaps with an isEM=medium object (  R<0.4).

22 Feb 2008UCL Physics Meeting9 A Lesson about Eventview (ie. Smart(er) Overlap Removal) Question: You use EV, isn’t overlap removal handling this automatically? Answer: Yes by default, but we don’t use it! Why? –EV overlap removal work on classes of objects, ie. first insert all your electrons and then insert jets which are not overlapping with them. => Not smart! –First reconstruct your hadronic W from any jets. Then require that the lepton used for leptonic W reconstruction not overlap with this/these jet(s). Efficiency for signal: ~99%. Blindly use EV overlap removal: Loose ~20% of your signal. –Apply electron overlap removal afterwards for your “secondary” jets (like central jets, tag jets, etc.)

22 Feb 2008UCL Physics Meeting10 Atlfast Lepton Efficiency Altfast has too high lepton efficiency…

22 Feb 2008UCL Physics Meeting11 Atlfast Correction… First order correction as a function of the true P T. Leptonic W reco eff –full sim: ( )% –fast sim before fix: ( )% –fast sim after fix: ( )%

22 Feb 2008UCL Physics Meeting12 Last Minute Obstacle (or the Curse of ROOT and EVtuples) Finalized all cuts, scripts to run everything automatically and to produce final plots and even the latex tables! But… –Root fails to chain some of the signal ntuples! –These roottuples are mostly produced on our local batch farm. (Surprise: Grid ones ok.) –Each TFile is fine on its own, but when you try to chain them, your process goes into an infinite loop. –Adam filed bug report to Root guys, but we are unable to isolate the problem. –We don’t have time!!!

22 Feb 2008UCL Physics Meeting13 Solution to ROOT problem Use hexeditor to compare “good” ROOT files with “bad” ones. Somehow the exact unix path to the tuples ingrained into the TFiles. Try hexediting: Doesn’t work. Finally: A macro to read the TTrees and clone them into new TFiles, then merge them into single huge TFile: Single file, no need for TChaining any longer.

22 Feb 2008UCL Physics Meeting14 Conclusions Now everything working smoothly. Finished WW analysis. Have running code for WZ analysis. => To be finalized by next Tuesday.

22 Feb 2008UCL Physics Meeting15 Final m WW plot (example updated)