1 Front End rf and Gas Cavities David Neuffer Fermilab f October 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fill in missing numbers or operations
Advertisements

Multiplication X 1 1 x 1 = 1 2 x 1 = 2 3 x 1 = 3 4 x 1 = 4 5 x 1 = 5 6 x 1 = 6 7 x 1 = 7 8 x 1 = 8 9 x 1 = 9 10 x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = 12 X 2 1.
Division ÷ 1 1 ÷ 1 = 1 2 ÷ 1 = 2 3 ÷ 1 = 3 4 ÷ 1 = 4 5 ÷ 1 = 5 6 ÷ 1 = 6 7 ÷ 1 = 7 8 ÷ 1 = 8 9 ÷ 1 = 9 10 ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = 12 ÷ 2 2 ÷ 2 =
1 1  1 =.
1  1 =.
Answer these on your whiteboards:
1 paul drumm; Jan’05; MICE RF Needs MICE RF Power Paul Drumm ISIS Facility Rutherford Appleton Laboratory & MICE.
1 Project X Proton Driver David Neuffer September 2011.
Least Common Multiples and Greatest Common Factors
Subtraction: Adding UP
Number bonds to 10,
2 x0 0 12/13/2014 Know Your Facts!. 2 x1 2 12/13/2014 Know Your Facts!
The US 5 Year Muon Acceleration R&D Program To Boldly Go… MICE Collaboration Meeting Harbin January, 2009.
IIT NFMCC Meeting ‘06 Recent Optimization Studies of Adiabatic Buncher and Phase Rotator A.Poklonskiy (SPbSU, MSU), D.Neuffer (FNAL) C.Johnstone (FNAL),
Beam Test of a High-Pressure GH 2 -Filled RF Cavity (for efficient muon beam cooling for a MC or NF, since the low-Z ionization energy-loss absorber and.
1 Neutrino Factory Front End (IDS) -Chicane & Absorber David Neuffer C. Rogers, P. Snopok, C. Yoshikawa, … January 31, 2012.
Bunched-Beam Phase Rotation David Neuffer Fermilab.
1 Optimization of baseline front end for a neutrino factory David Neuffer FNAL (August 19, 2009)
1 Neutrino Factory Front End (IDS) and Variations David Neuffer G. Prior, C. Rogers, P. Snopok, C. Yoshikawa, … August 2011 NuFACT99 -Lyon.
Bunched-Beam Phase Rotation- Variation and 0ptimization David Neuffer, A. Poklonskiy Fermilab.
Taylor Models Workhop 20 December 2004 Exploring and optimizing Adiabatic Buncher and Phase Rotator for Neutrino Factory in COSY Infinity A.Poklonskiy.
1 Muon Bunching for a Muon Collider David Neuffer FNAL August 3, 2010.
RF Bucket Area Introduction Intense muon beams have many potential applications, including neutrino factories and muon colliders. However, muons are produced.
1 RAL + Front End Studies International Design Study David Neuffer FNAL (January 5, 2009)
1 Front End Studies and Plans David Neuffer FNAL (November 10, 2009)
1 Front End Studies and Plans David Neuffer FNAL (October 27, 2009)
1 Front End Studies- International Design Study Update David Neuffer FNAL February 2, 2010.
Μ-Capture, Energy Rotation, Cooling and High-pressure Cavities David Neuffer Fermilab.
V.Daniel Elvira Status Report on Cooling Simulations using GEANT4 Motivation: Explore a realistic design of a 44/88 MHz based cooling channel for a -factory.
1 Energy-Phase Rotation with a proton absorber David Neuffer September 27, 2011.
Simulation Study Results Study: Replace LiH-based cooler with gas-filled transport and rf cavities Results: Beam Cooling is significantly improved. Final.
NF Front End Meeting, April 27, 2010 Initial Cooling with HFOFO Snake Y. Alexahin, FNAL APC.
1 Neutrino Factory Front End (IDS) and Variations David Neuffer November 23, 2010.
1 Ionization Cooling – neutrinos, colliders and beta-beams David Neuffer July 2009.
MuCool Test Area RF Workshop 111/15/2010 Muons, Inc. Loaded Pillbox Cavity Milorad Popovic & Katheryn Decker French (with Mike, Chuck, Katsuya, Al and.
The Front End MAP Review Fermi National Accelerator Lab August 24-26, 2010 Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory.
-Factory Front End Phase Rotation Optimization David Neuffer Fermilab Muons, Inc.
1 Front End Capture/Phase Rotation & Cooling Studies David Neuffer Cary Yoshikawa December 2008.
Institutional Logo Here Harold G. Kirk DOE Review of MAP (FNAL August 29-31, 2012)1 The Front End Harold Kirk Brookhaven National Lab August 30, 2012.
Muons within Acceleration Acceptance Cuts at End of Transverse Cooling Channel TOWARDS A GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION OF THE MUON ACCELERATOR FRONT END H. K. Sayed,
1 Front End – present status David Neuffer March 31, 2015.
1 Triggers and mitigation strategies of rf breakdown for muon accelerator cavities Diktys Stratakis University of California, Los Angeles Fermi National.
Bunched-Beam Phase Rotation for a Neutrino Factory David Neuffer Fermilab.
Bunched-Beam Phase Rotation and FFAG -Factory Injection David Neuffer Fermilab.
Bunched-Beam Phase Rotation for a Neutrino Factory David Neuffer, Andreas Van Ginneken, Daniel Elvira Fermilab.
Front-End Design Overview Diktys Stratakis Brookhaven National Laboratory February 19, 2014 D. Stratakis | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014)1.
-Factory Front End Phase Rotation Gas-filled rf David Neuffer Fermilab Muons, Inc.
1 The 325 MHz Solution David Neuffer Fermilab January 15, 2013.
1 Front End for MAP Neutrino Factory/Collider rf considerations David Neuffer May 29, 2014.
1 Front End – present status David Neuffer March 17, 2015.
1 International Design Study Front End & Variations David Neuffer January 2009.
FRONTEND DESIGN & OPTIMIZATION STUDIES HISHAM KAMAL SAYED BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY June 26, 2014 Collaboration: J. S. Berg - X. Ding - V.B. Graves.
NuFACT06 Summer School -Factory Front End and Cooling David Neuffer f Fermilab.
1 Front End – present status David Neuffer March 3, 2015.
IDS-NF Accelerator Baseline The Neutrino Factory [1, 2] based on the muon storage ring will be a precision tool to study the neutrino oscillations.It may.
Muon Collider R&D Plans & New Initiative 1.Introduction 2.Muon Collider Schematic 3.Conceptual Breakthrough 4.Ongoing R&D 5.Muon Collider Task Force 6.Muon.
Institutional Logo Here July 11, 2012 Muon Accelerator Program Advisory Committee Review (FNAL July 11-13, 2012)1 The Front End.
1 Muon Capture for a Muon Collider David Neuffer July 2009.
Bunched-Beam Phase Rotation - Ring Coolers? - FFAGs? David Neuffer Fermilab.
Adiabatic buncher and (  ) Rotator Exploration & Optimization David Neuffer(FNAL), Alexey Poklonskiy (FNAL, MSU, SPSU)
Muon Collider Design Workshop, Jefferson Lab 112/09/2008 Muons, Inc. Loaded Pillbox Cavity Milorad Popovic (with Mike, Chuck, Katsuya, Al and Rol)
Pros and Cons of Existing Cooling Schemes David Neuffer Fermilab.
1 Front End – gas-filled cavities David Neuffer May 19, 2015.
1 Bunch Recombiner for a μ + μ - Collider Cooling Scenario David Neuffer FNAL (July 7, 2010)
1 Front End – present status David Neuffer December 4, 2014.
Final Results from IDS-NF Study NUFACT14 Workshop, Glasgow on behalf of the IDS-NF Collaboration Paul Soler, 26 August 2014.
+-- Collider Front end- Balbekov version
Future Muon Colliders: A Perspective
David Neuffer Cary Yoshikawa March 2009
The Accelerator Complex from the International Design Study
Presentation transcript:

1 Front End rf and Gas Cavities David Neuffer Fermilab f October 2011

20utline  Introduction  ν-Factory Front end  rf/B limitation  gas-filled rf ν-Factory →μ + -μ - Collider  Discussion 18.9 m~60.7 m FE Targ et Solenoid DriftBuncherRotatorCooler ~33m42 m ~80 m p π→μ

3 Parameters of IDR baseline  Initial drift from target to buncher is 79.6m  18.9m (adiabatic ~20T to ~1.5T solenoid)  60.7m (1.5T solenoid)  Buncher rf – 33m  320  232 MHz  0  9 MV/m (2/3 occupancy)  B=1.5T  Rotator rf -42m  232  202 MHz  12 MV/m (2/3 occupancy)  B=1.5T  Cooler (50 to 90m)  ASOL lattice, P 0 = 232MeV/c,  Baseline has ~16MV/m, cm LiH absorbers /cell

4 Possible rf cavity limitations V’ rf may be limited in B-fields  800 MHz pillbox cavity  200 MHz pillbox test (different B)  NF needs up to ~1.5T, 12 MV/m More for cooling Potential strategies:  Use Be Cavities (Palmer)  Use lower fields (V’, B)  <10MV/m at 1.5T? Need variant for cooling ?  Cooling channel variants  Use gas-filled rf cavities  Insulated rf cavities  Bucked coils (Alekou)  Magnetic shielding 201MHz 805MHz Need More Experiments ! at ~200MHz with B ~B frontend

H 2 gas-filled rf in front end cooling section  Scenario I  include only enough gas to prevent breakdown – ~20 atm E/P = ~9.9 V/cm/Torr  Scenario II  include gas density to provide all cooling ~100atm  E/P ~2 5

beam in rf cavity  ionization produces electrons along the beam path  ~1 e - / 35eV of energy loss (?)  μ in H 2 – 4.1 MeV/gm/cm 2 At Liquid density (0.0708) 8290 e - /cm At 1 atm ~9.82 e - /cm At 20 atm ~196 e - /cm At 100atm ~980 e - /cm  Electrons have low energy collisions with H 2 in electric field, equilibrating to a meant velocity proportional  baseline 200 MHz cavity is 0.5m long  10 4 e/cavity per μ at 20 atm  5×10 4 e/cavity at 100 atm 6

Electrons within cavity 7

Beam Scenario ?  Muon + intensity depends on proton production intensity  Assume 4MW – 8GeV  N p ≈ 3 ×10 15 /s  60 Hz scenario  ~5×10 13 /bunch  Each bunch produces train of secondary bunches ~20 bunches, 0.2 μ/p ~ 5×10 11 charges/bunch  50 Hz, 5 bunches/cycle  ~1.2×10 13 /bunch ~ charges/bunch 8

Effect in rf cavity:  Baseline stored energy in 1 rf cavity is 158J  5×10 11 ×10 4 × 2.6× J/cavity/bunch/rf cycle ~1.3J/rf cycle  but we have ~20 bunches ~26J/rf cycle  after 20 rf cycles lose 200J  Assumes no recombination/loss of electrons over 100ns  (20 cycles)  100 atm scenario is only a factor of 2 worse. 9

Mitigation  Fewer p/bunch  50Hz, 5 bunches, 2MW scenario reduces by factor of ~10 manageable  Must reduce free electron lifetime in gas  if < ~10ns problem is manageable  < ~200ns (KY)  Is smaller with small amount of dopant 10

11Conclusions  Gas-filled rf in ν-Factory Front end Cooling could have large beam-loading effect  Require electron recombination within ~20ns  Can obtain this with dopant in H 2  Gas-Filled rf can be used in Front end  is not trouble-free however