Paul Bonnet – Oxford University – Developing Real Time Substructure Dynamic Testing (RTS testing)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Time averages and ensemble averages
Advertisements

Finite Element Radiative and Conductive Module for use with PHOENICS Department of Materials Engineering, University of Swansea, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK DERA.
13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, August 2004
PARMA UNIVERSITY SIMULATIONS OF THE ISOLATED BUILDING TEST CASE F. AURELI, A. MARANZONI & P. MIGNOSA DICATeA, Parma University Parco Area delle Scienze.
Model-based Real-Time Hybrid Simulation for Large-Scale Experimental Evaluation Brian M. Phillips University of Illinois B. F. Spencer, Jr. University.
UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE Hybrid Testing Simulating Dynamic Structures in the Laboratory Tony Blakeborough and Martin Williams.
QoS-based Management of Multiple Shared Resources in Dynamic Real-Time Systems Klaus Ecker, Frank Drews School of EECS, Ohio University, Athens, OH {ecker,
Structural Dynamics Laboratory Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology,
An Introduction to Hybrid Simulation – Displacement-Controlled Methods
Technology readiness levels in a nutshell
College of Information Technology & Design
IMPACT ~ Breach Physical Modelling Review of Modelling Work Undertaken So Far...
B.A. Izzuddin, L. Macorini and G. Rinaldin
4/22/ LU Decomposition Electrical Engineering Majors Authors: Autar Kaw Transforming.
ADVANCED DYNAMIC TESTING TECHNIQUES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING by Andrei M Reinhorn Xiaoyun Shao CIE 616 FALL 2004.
Experimental Assessment of Coastal Infrastructure Vulnerability Brian M. Phillips Assistant Professor University of Maryland Mpact Week: Disaster Resilience.
Dr. Kirti Chandra Sahu Department of Chemical Engineering IIT Hyderabad.
Exponential Tracking Control of Hydraulic Proportional Directional Valve and Cylinder via Integrator Backstepping J. Chen†, W. E. Dixon‡, J. R. Wagner†,
Coupling Continuum Model and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Methods for Reactive Transport Yilin Fang, Timothy D Scheibe and Alexandre M Tartakovsky Pacific.
Bridge-related research at the University of Bristol John H.G. Macdonald.
Department for ENGINEERING STRUCTURES Professor Vlado MICOV, Ph.D Head of Department.
Nazgol Haghighat Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Ir. Daniel J. Rixen
1 LEHIGH MODEL ATLSS Engineering Research Center Lehigh University Version 1.2.
Direct Method of Interpolation
Finite Element Method in Geotechnical Engineering
Chapter Outline Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design.
Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Simulation and Control Aspects of FHT M. V. Sivaselvan CO-PI CU-NEES Assistant Professor Dept. of Civil, Environmental.
MCE 561 Computational Methods in Solid Mechanics
2.3 More on Solving Linear Equations
Jerry G. Rose, PE University of Kentucky Department of Civil Engineering REES 3: Module 3-D REES 2014.
THE SYSTEMS LIFE CYCLE ANALYSE DESIGN IMPLEMENT MAINTENANCE IDENTIFY/INVESTIGATE.
Virtual Experiments for Teaching Hysteretic Structural Behavior Shirley J. Dyke, Nestor Castaneda, and Zach Feinstein Washington University in St. Louis.
Cheng Chen Ph.D., Assistant Professor School of Engineering San Francisco State University Probabilistic Reliability Analysis of Real-Time Hybrid Simulation.
University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy Department of Material Science and Engineering FINITEELEMENT METHOD By eng. Veselin Paunov Prof. Veselin.
Module on the Assessment of the Structural Condition Bucharest October 5-7, st MEMSCON Event 07/10/10, BucharestDBA.
Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN Phone: (765) Fax: (765) Investigation of the Effect of Transfer.
1 Real-Time Hybrid Simulations P. Benson Shing University of California, San Diego.
Jean Claude Dotreppe, Thi Binh Chu, Jean Marc Franssen University of Liège, Belgium 3d fib International Congress 2010 – Washington D.C « Think Globally,
Tsinghua University·Beijing Real-time dynamic hybrid testing coupled finite element and shaking table Jin-Ting Wang, Men-Xia Zhou & Feng Jin.
Scientific Computing Numerical Solution Of Ordinary Differential Equations - Euler’s Method.
Strategies for Solving Large-Scale Optimization Problems Judith Hill Sandia National Laboratories October 23, 2007 Modeling and High-Performance Computing.
Hybrid Simulation of Structural Collapse
Mass Transfer Coefficient
Understanding Molecular Simulations Introduction
COSMOSMotion Slides.
Finite Element Analysis
MAE Advanced Computer Aided Design Your Name Title Place, Date.
What is Science? This slide show will present a question, followed by a slide with an acceptable answer. For some questions, there is a definite correct.
Requirements of High Accuracy Computing 1) Adopted numerical scheme must resolve all physical time and length scales. 2) Numerical scheme must be neutrally.
1 Direct Method of Interpolation Computer Engineering Majors Authors: Autar Kaw, Jai Paul
High Rise Design High Rise Design (Notes prepared by A. Hira – modified by N. Haritos) Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University.
Kyle Bossung Tyler Breitung Paul Curtin. The Gleason Works:  Gleason Works is a multinational machine manufacturer whose products create gears for a.
Introduction and Preliminaries D Nagesh Kumar, IISc Water Resources Planning and Management: M4L1 Dynamic Programming and Applications.
Solving Multi-Step Equations INTEGRATED MATHEMATICS.
Date of download: 7/10/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Modular Code for Real Time Dynamic Simulation of Gas Turbines in Simulink J.
Finite element method for structural dynamic and stability analyses
Process Dynamics and Operations Group (DYN) TU-Dortmund
Finite Element Method in Geotechnical Engineering
Eduardo Ismael Hernández UPAEP University, MEXICO
3-3 Solving Inequalities Using Multiplication or Division
2.3 Linear Inequalities Understand basic terminology related to inequalities Solve linear inequalities symbolically Solve linear inequalities graphically.
CE 808: Structural Fire Engineering SAFIR - Computer Program
Fluid Dynamic Analysis of Wind Turbine Wakes
Chemical Engineering Majors Authors: Autar Kaw
First we need to draw a place table grid. Then write our number in it
POLYNOMIAL INTERPOLATION
5 POINT PLAN THE SYSTEMS LIFE CYCLE ANALYSE DESIGN
Experiments on Strained Premixed Flames in the Distributed Reaction Regime Alessandro Gomez, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yale University, USA.
Numerical Computation and Optimization
6th Lecture : Numerical Methods
Presentation transcript:

Paul Bonnet – Oxford University – Developing Real Time Substructure Dynamic Testing (RTS testing)

The problem: analyse the behaviour of a structure in an earthquake Let’s do a computer model of the structure Let’s build a replica of the structure on a shaking table Let’s conduct a pseudo-dynamic test on the structure All these methods have their inherent drawbacks All these methods have their inherent drawbacks Modelling cracks, fatigue, concrete, strain rate effects, etc. Scale effects and/or load capacity & cost No experimental velocity and inertial effects Let’s conduct a real-time substructure test

1 numerical substructure + 1 physical substructure + 1 emulation interface The idea behind RTS testing: divide structure into a part solved numerically and a part tested physically. separatebutcomplementary ensuring correct boundary conditions on each substructure affect each other at all times For a RTS experiment to work, the 2 substructures and the interface emulation need to be solved / tested / conducted SIMULTANEOUSLY & in REAL-TIME. have dynamic effects

Example: behaviour of a dynamically isolated 10 storey building during an earthquake?

Benefits of RTS testing: Structural parts of interest => physically tested with the rest offering an infinite repeatability. Complete structure is emulated with much lower cost & capacity than shaking table test. Dynamic effects are exact because reproduced in real-time. => Practical & financial benefits while retaining good scientific validity.

Results of preliminary tests:

Challenges / current work: Quick numerical substructure computation. => Using discrete time integration scheme (several schemes to compare). “Instantaneous” actuation is not possible (presence of an “actuator delay” → instability). => Need to know how much delay, minimise it, know how & why it varies. => Need to compensate for actuation delay (several methods to compare). Method needs to be applied & proven for non-linear numerical & physical substructures of earthquake engineering size & properties. => Conduct a validation test on a 2 storey building column.

If you’d like to know more… …come and visit us in the Oxford University Structural Dynamics Laboratory Tel: