1 © ACRI-ST, all rights reserved – 2012 Isotropic RFI detection Jean-Luc Vergely (ACRI-ST) Claire Henocq (ACRI-ST) Philippe Waldteufel (LATMOS)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley
Advertisements

1 TITLE OF THE ARTICLE Author (Institution) Co-Author (Institution) .
Chapter 5 One- and Two-Sample Estimation Problems.
©2011 1www.id-book.com Evaluation studies: From controlled to natural settings Chapter 14.
Slide 1 Insert your own content. Slide 2 Insert your own content.
Barents Sea Ecosystem Resilience under global environmental change Annual Meeting – 4-7 October Herdla.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 3.1 Chapter 3.
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 4 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
1 Chapter 58 - Clinical Syndromes of Metabolic Alkalosis Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 7 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 14.
Quest ion 1? A.) answer B.) answer C.) correct answerD.) answer L C.) correct answer F.
11/2010 5/ /2011 5/ /20125/2012 N N-1 N-2 N-3 5/ /2011 5/2011 5/ /2011 5/2011.
Combining Like Terms. Only combine terms that are exactly the same!! Whats the same mean? –If numbers have a variable, then you can combine only ones.
1 Binary Signal Detection In MATLAB weve worked some with AWGN noise and the concept of bit error probability. Lets describe how this is measured.
Click to edit Master subtitle style Case study: 1st October 2010.
Multiplying monomials & binomials You will have 20 seconds to answer the following 15 questions. There will be a chime signaling when the questions change.
0 - 0.
MULTIPLICATION EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 3. WHAT EVER YOU DO TO ONE SIDE YOU HAVE TO DO TO THE OTHER 2. DIVIDE BY THE NUMBER IN FRONT OF THE VARIABLE.
Teacher Name Class / Subject Date A:B: Write an answer here #1 Write your question Here C:D: Write an answer here.
Addition Facts
© S Haughton more than 3?
5.9 + = 10 a)3.6 b)4.1 c)5.3 Question 1: Good Answer!! Well Done!! = 10 Question 1:
BIAS TRENDS IN THE 1-SLOPE (REPROCESSING) AND CALIBRATED L1 BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURES Joe Tenerelli SMOS Payload Calibration Meeting September 2012.
Combine Like Terms. Simplify the Given Expression Below:
Limits (Algebraic) Calculus Fall, What can we do with limits?
CP4O Progress meeting 1 - Frascati November WP 5000 – Impact Assessment S. Labroue, T. Moreau, P. Thibaut (CLS) N. Picot, F. Boy (CNES)
Addition 1’s to 20.
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Commissioning Plan, 07/05/2009 Level 2 Ocean Salinity Processor Commissioning Plan 7 May 2009 ARGANS ACRI-ST ICM-CSIC.
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity – Reprocessing Level 2 Ocean Salinity Reprocessing 17 September 2008.
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Level 2 Ocean Salinity QWG #4 7-9 March 2011 ARGANS & L2OS ESL.
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity L1OP v620 border flag width 23 May 2014 ARGANS & L2OS ESL
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Reprocessed constant calibration L1c OTT drift study 13 April 2011 ARGANS & L2OS ESL ascendingdescending.
1 © ACRI-ST, all rights reserved – 2012 Galactic noise model adjustment Jean-Luc Vergely (ACRI-ST) Jacqueline Boutin (LOCEAN) Xiaobin Yin (LOCEAN)
UPDATE ON BIAS TRENDS, DIRECT SUN CORRECTION, AND ROUGHNESS CORRECTION Joe Tenerelli May 10, 2011.
AN INITIAL LOOK AT THE IMPACT OF THE NEW ANTENNA LOSS MODEL Joe Tenerelli SMOS QUALITY WORKING GROUP #4 7-9 March 2011.
PART 1: A Brief Comparison of Time- Latitude First Stokes Bias Structure in v505 and v620 PART 1: A Brief Comparison of Time- Latitude First Stokes Bias.
UPDATE ON SMOS LONG-TERM BIASES OVER THE OCEAN AND ROUGH SURFACE SCATTERING OF CELESTIAL SKY NOISE Joe Tenerelli SMOS L2OS Progress Meeting Arles, France,
REVIEW OF OBSERVED BIAS TRENDS OVER THE OCEAN AND POTENTIAL IMPACT OF PROCESSOR EVOLUTION Joe & Nicolas IFREMER/CLS ESL Quality Working Group #5 May 30-31,
©Evergreen Public Schools /31/2011 Systems of Inequalities Teacher Notes Supplies: Notes: Vocabulary:
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Week 1.
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
On the use of observations from the Aquarius/SAC-D mission to study the cryosphere Emmanuel Dinnat 1,2 and Ludovic Brucker 1,3 1. Cryospheric Sciences.
SMOS L1v620-L2v613 versus L1v505- L2v550 validation May 2011 Nicolas Martin, Jacqueline Boutin LOCEAN 26 May 2014.
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Level 2 Ocean Salinity L1 -> L2OS tools 12 February 2014 ARGANS & SMOS L2OS ESL.
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Level 2 Ocean Salinity Using TEC estimated from Stokes 3 24 October 2012 ACRI-st, LOCEAN & ARGANS SMOS+polarimetry.
1 © ACRI-ST, all rights reserved – 2012 TEC estimation Jean-Luc Vergely (ACRI-ST) Jacqueline Boutin (LOCEAN)
1 Boutin et al., Avril 2015, SMOS-OCEAN TOSCA SMOS Salinity anomalies – Towards the correction of SMOS SSS systematic biases - J. Boutin 1, N. Martin 1,
Cold Sky Calibration Aquarius: D. M. Le Vine MWR: J. C. Gallo.
L2OS RFI status Nicolas Lamquin, Jean-Luc Vergely Jacqueline Boutin Paul Spurgeon ICM, Barcelona, 16/17 May 2013.
Galactic noise model adjustment Jean-Luc Vergely (ACRI-ST) Jacqueline Boutin (LOCEAN) Xiaobin Yin (LOCEAN)
SMOS Science Workshop, Arles, th Sept, 2011 IMPROVING SMOS SALINITY RETRIEVAL: SYSTEMATIC ERROR DIAGNOSTIC J. Gourrion, R. Sabia, M. Portabella,
SMOS QWG-5, 30 May- 1 June 2011, ESRIN Ocean Salinity 1 1.Commissioning reprocessing analysis 2.New processor version: improvements and problems detected/solved.
UPDATE ON THE SUN GLINT Joe Tenerelli Ocean Data Lab SMOS Level 2 OS Progress Meeting 26 SMOS Barcelona Expert Centre Barcelona, Spain April 2015.
SMOS QWG-6, ESRIN October 2011 OTT generation strategy and associated issues 1 The SMOS L2 OS Team.
QWG-10 ESRIN 4-6 February 2013 Quality control study for SMOS data / Flags analysis C. Gabarró, J. Martínez, E. Olmedo M. Portabella, J. Font and BEC team.
Outlier detection in L2OSPP - usefulness in RFI detection- SMOS L2OS Progress Meeting – 21/22 February -BEC.
SMOS Quality Working Group Meeting #2 Frascati (Rome), September 13 th -14 th,2010 SMOS-BEC Team.
SMOS QWG-9, ESRIN October 2012 L2OS: Product performance summary v550 highlights 1 The SMOS L2 OS Team.
New model used existing formulation for foam coverage and foam emissivity; tested over 3 half orbits in the Pacific foam coverage exponent modified to.
21-23/04/2015PM27 J-L Vergely, J. Boutin, N. Kolodziejczyk, N. Martin, S. Marchand SMOS RFI/Outlier filtering.
SMOS Science Meeting September 2011 Arles, FR Simulating Aquarius by Resampling SMOS Gary Lagerloef, Yann Kerr & Eric Anterrieu and Initial Results.
Impact of sea surface roughness on SMOS measurements A new empirical model S. Guimbard & SMOS-BEC Team SMOS Barcelona Expert Centre Pg. Marítim de la Barceloneta.
Errors on SMOS retrieved SSS and their dependency to a priori wind speed X. Yin 1, J. Boutin 1, J. Vergely 2, P. Spurgeon 3, and F. Gaillard 4 1. LOCEAN.
UPDATE ON GALACTIC NOISE CORRECTION Joe Tenerelli SMOS Quality Working Group #9 ESA ESRIN 24 October 2012.
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya CORRECTION OF SPATIAL ERRORS IN SMOS BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURE IMAGES L. Wu, I. Corbella, F. Torres, N. Duffo, M. Martín-Neira.
21-23/04/2015PM27 ACRI-ST ARGANS LOCEAN TEC follow-up.
Tests on V500 Sun On versus Sun Off 1)Tbmeas. –Tbmodel in the FOV X. Yin, J. Boutin Inputs from R. Balague, P. Spurgeon, A. Chuprin, M. Martin-Neira and.
Presentation transcript:

1 © ACRI-ST, all rights reserved – 2012 Isotropic RFI detection Jean-Luc Vergely (ACRI-ST) Claire Henocq (ACRI-ST) Philippe Waldteufel (LATMOS)

2 © ACRI-ST, all rights reserved – 2012 Introduction Principal aims of this study : Looking for strong isotropic source -> RFI St1, A3 and A4 analysis.

3 © ACRI-ST, all rights reserved – 2012 Data set Data set to be used 2010 and 2011 reprocessed data. Philosophy: -> use L1c browse products for global analysis: source detection on ocean and land targets.

4 © ACRI-ST, all rights reserved – 2012 Data set Land/ocean L1c browse products L1c browse products over two years (2010 and 2011) : - four polarizations (in FP mode) at the same geometry - TB at antenna level - TB at 42.5° incidence - TB errors Allow global analysis on 5 FOV zones Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5

5 © ACRI-ST, all rights reserved – 2012 Introduction St1,A3 or A4 emission Is the signal observed on descending and ascending orbits ? Is the signal isotropic? Is the signal variable or constant ? Is the signal spatially coherent ?

6 © ACRI-ST, all rights reserved – 2012 Isotropic source Detected in the 5 zones in ascending and descending -> good azimuth coverage. Normalization to be done because of using zones affected by different OTT correction. Applying a threshold. St1 and A4 For A3 : ascending and descending zone 3

7 © ACRI-ST, all rights reserved – 2012 St1 isotropic source Isotropic source detection

8 © ACRI-ST, all rights reserved – 2012 St1 isotropic source Isotropic source detection

9 © ACRI-ST, all rights reserved – 2012 St1 isotropic source

10 © ACRI-ST, all rights reserved – 2012 A4 isotropic sources Threshold of 3 K Only RFI …

11 © ACRI-ST, all rights reserved – 2012 A4 isotropic source Isotropic source detection

12 © ACRI-ST, all rights reserved – 2012 A3 asc/desc sources Threshold of 7 K

13 © ACRI-ST, all rights reserved – 2012 A3 isotropic source Isotropic source detection

14 © ACRI-ST, all rights reserved – 2012 Principal conclusions Looking for RFI from St1, A3 and A4 SMOS measurements: isotropic sources For RFI detection : do not use A4 (correlated with A3). Only few isotropic sources have been detected. Constant isotropic source for St1 could be RFI. Distinction between sources and Gibbs effect to be done. -> further works : play with different thresholds (adaptation of the threshold according to the target (ocean or land).