ROCKET-AF Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advanced Practice of Pharmacy Experience: Journal Club Mai Nguyen Mercer University COPHS Doctor of Pharmacy Candidate 2012 Preceptor: Dr. Ali Rahimi.
Advertisements

ACTIVE Effects of Addition of Clopidogrel to Aspirin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation who are Unsuitable for Vitamin K Antagonists.
The RE-LY Study: Randomized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulant therapY Dabigatran Compared to Warfarin in 18,113 Patients with Atrial Fibrillation at.
The basics for simulations
AF and the New Oral Anti-Coagulants
Pexelizumab for the Reduction of Infarction and Mortality in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft ll (PRIMO-CABG II) Trial Presented at The American College of.
JOURNAL REVIEW Newer Antithrombotics in AF 1 Dr Ranjith MP Senior Resident Department of Cardiology Government Medical college Kozhikode.
The Changing Landscape of Anticoagulation William D. Cahoon, Jr., PharmD, BCPS Cardiology Clinical Pharmacist VCU Health System April 12, 2012.
PROPRIETA’ GENERALI INDICATIONS Apixaban is recommended as an option for preventing stroke and systemic embolism in people with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
Update on Anti-platelets Gabriel A. Vidal, MD Vascular Neurology Ochsner Medical Center October 14 th, 2009.
Standard Medical Therapy TRA 40 mg mg/d TRA 40 mg mg/d Placebo EP:CV Death/MI/stroke/hosp for RI/urgent coronary revasc. 1  EP:CV Death/MI/stroke/hosp.
ARISTOTLE TRIAL Dr R Nyabadza GPST1 Ward 32. Structure AF, stroke and CHA 2 -DS 2 VASC Anticoagulant choices ARISTOTLE trial Cost NICE guidance and the.
Study by: Granger et al. NEJM, September 2011,Vol No. 11 Presented by: Amelia Crawford PA-S2 Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
Manufacturer: Daiichi Sankyo FDA Approval Date: 01/08/2015
Jim Hoehns, Pharm.D.. Edoxaban Oral factor Xa inhibitor Bioavailability: 62% Tmax: 1-2 hrs Elimination: 50% renal Half-life: 9-11 hours.
Randomized Evaluation of Long- term anticoagulant therapY Dabigatran Compared to Warfarin in 18,113 Patients with Atrial Fibrillation at Risk of Stroke.
Atrial Fibrillation Warfarin and its newer alternatives
  Warfarin Dabigatran Rivaroxaban Apixaban Edoxaban Target
Supervisor: Vs 余垣斌 Presenter: CR 周益聖. INTRODUCTION.
The Long Term Multi-Center Extension of Dabigatran Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (RELY-ABLE) study To reviewers and moderators: These.
Randomized, double-blind, multicenter, controlled trial.
Antiplatelet or Anticoagulant: Do They Have the same Efficacy? University of Central Florida Deborah Andrews RN, BSN.
ACTIVE Clopidogrel plus Aspirin versus Aspirin in Patients Unsuitable for Warfarin.
Dodson Thompson, DO Northlakes Community Clinic Minong, WI.
UK/CVS (1) | February 2013 Emerging technologies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation UK/CVS (1) | Date of preparation: February 2013.
Aim To determine the effects of a Coversyl- based blood pressure lowering regimen on the risk of recurrent stroke among patients with a history of stroke.
Stroke Prevention Using the Oral Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Ximelagatran in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation SPORTIF V Trial Presented at American.
ARISTOTLE Objectives Primary: test for noninferiority of apixaban, a novel oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, versus warfarin Secondary: test for superiority.
Oral Rivaroxaban for Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism.
Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction Benjamin M. Scirica, MD, MPH On behalf of the TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 Steering.
The ACTIVE Investigators. N Engl J Med 2009 Apr 3 [Epub]
Presented by Renato D. Lopes, MD, PhD, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, USA for the ARISTOTLE investigators. Efficacy and Safety of Apixaban.
Long-Term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention: Insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH on behalf of the PEGASUS-TIMI.
Long-Term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention: Insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH on behalf of the PEGASUS-TIMI.
WarfarinApixaban Primary outcome: major/clinically relevant bleeding (through 6 months) Secondary objective: Death, MI, stroke, stent thrombosis Randomize.
Bleeding After Initiation of Multiple Antithrombotic Drugs, Including Triple Therapy, in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Following Myocardial Infarction and.
Date of download: 6/21/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Low-Dose Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular.
Flow Diagram of the Trial Selection Process Jeffrey S. Berger et al, JAMA. 2006;295:
R4 문정락 / IC prof. 김진배 Lancet Haematol 2015;2: e150–59.
Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Manesh R. Patel, M.D., Kenneth W. Mahaffey, M.D., Jyotsna Garg, M.S., Guohua Pan, Ph.D.,
Date of download: 6/27/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Use and Outcomes of Triple Therapy Among Older Patients.
Manesh R. Patel, M.D., Kenneth W. Mahaffey, M.D., Jyotsna Garg, M.S., Guohua Pan, Ph.D., Daniel E. Singer, M.D., Werner Hacke, M.D., Ph.D., Gunter Breithardt,
Perioperative Bridging Anticoagulation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation NEJM Aug 27, 2015.
Review on NOACs Studies DR. KOUROSH SADEGHI TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES.
1 Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation R3 Dae Ho Kim / Prof. Jin Bae Kim N Engl J Med 2011; DOI: Manesh R. Patel, M.D.,
Comparison of Dabigatran and Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Valvular Heart DiseaseClinical Perspective by Michael D. Ezekowitz, Rangadham.
Case 66 year old male with PMH of HTN, DM, ESRD on renal replacement TIW, stroke in 2011 with right side residual weakness, atrial fibrillation, currently.
Denise Sutter, PharmD, BCPS
Volume 149, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
LEADER trial: Primary Outcome
A Comparison of RE-LY and ROCKET AF Trial Designs and Outcomes
Figure 1 Flow chart diagram of high-risk group AF patients
Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation
CANTOS: The Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study
First time a CETP inhibitor shows reduction of serious CV events
Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for stroke prevention in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation: Time for a reappraisal  Gregory.
Randomized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulant therapY
Novel oral anticoagulants in comparison with warfarin
Oral Anticoagulation and Preventing Stent Thrombosis
ACTIVE A Effects of Addition of Clopidogrel to Aspirin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation who are Unsuitable for Vitamin K Antagonists.
Net Clinical Benefit of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Phase III Atrial Fibrillation Trials  Giulia Renda, MD, PhD, Marta.
Efficacy and safety outcomes with NOAC compared with warfarin in NOAC patients with 14 457 years of risk and 49 418 warfarin patients with 75 747.
These slides highlight a presentation from a Special Session of the Late-Breaking Clinical Trials sessions during the American College of Cardiology 2005.
ACC 2003 Late Breaking Trials
5 Good Minutes on Atrial Fibrillation-related Stroke
Flow diagram for exclusions of trials identified RCT indicates randomized controlled trial Hulten E, et al. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:
Pamela E. Scott et al. JACC 2018;71:
Gianluigi Savarese et al. JCHF 2016;4:
Presenter Disclosure Information
The CHA(2)DS2-(VASc) stroke risk and HAS-BLED bleeding risk index are calculated by totalling the scores for each risk factor present.68–71 The lower graph.
Presentation transcript:

ROCKET-AF Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation. Raj Chahal 23/08/2011 NEJM 16 th August 2011

multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, event-driven trial that was conducted at 1178 sites in 45 countries. From 18/12/06 to 17/06/09, a total of 14,264 patients underwent randomization. The median duration of treatment exposure was 590 days; the median follow-up period was 707 days.

Inclusion criteria ◦ Documented AF on ECG ◦ CHADS2 = 2 or More ◦ Over 18

Exclusion criteria ◦ Recent stroke/TIA ◦ Sig mitral stenosis ◦ Endocarditis ◦ Aspirin >100mg ◦ CKD 4 or liver failure ◦ Uncontrolled HTN ◦ Anaemia, low platelets

Randomised to have: ◦ Rivaroxaban 20mg OD (or 15 if GFR 30-49) ◦ Dose adjusted warfarin Double dummy with sham INRs

Efficacy outcomes Primary ◦ composite of stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) and systemic embolism. Secondary ◦ composite of stroke, systemic embolism, or death from cardiovascular causes ◦ composite of stroke, systemic embolism, death from cardiovascular causes, or myocardial infarction

Safety outcomes composite of major and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding events

Patient characteristics Both groups evenly matched. Median age % women 90.5% had hypertension, 62.5% had heart failure, 40.0% had diabetes; 54.8% stroke/TIAs The mean CHADS 2 scores were 3.5

Warfarin therapy Among patients in the warfarin group, INR values were within the therapeutic range (2.0 to 3.0) a mean of 55% of the time (median, 58%; interquartile range, 43 to 71).

Outcomes

In the per-protocol population (the patients included in the primary efficacy analysis), stroke or systemic embolism occurred in 188 patients in the rivaroxaban group (1.7% per year) and in 241 patients in the warfarin group (2.2% per year) (hazard ratio in the rivaroxaban group, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.96; P<0.001 for noninferiority)

In the as-treated safety population, primary events occurred in 189 patients in the rivaroxaban group (1.7% per year) and in 243 patients in the warfarin group (2.2% per year) (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.95; P=0.01 for superiority)

Among all randomized patients in the intention-to-treat analysis, primary events occurred in 269 patients in the rivaroxaban group (2.1% per year) and in 306 patients in the warfarin group (2.4% per year) (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.03; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P=0.12 for superiority)

Safety outcomes Major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 1475 patients in the rivaroxaban group and in 1449 patients in the warfarin group (14.9% and 14.5% per year, respectively; hazard ratio in the rivaroxaban group, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.11; P=0.44)

Rates of major bleeding were similar in the rivaroxaban and warfarin groups (3.6% and 3.4%, respectively; P=0.58). Rates of intracranial hemorrhage were significantly lower in the rivaroxaban group than in the warfarin group (0.5% vs. 0.7% per year; hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.93; P=0.02)

Major bleeding from a gastrointestinal site was more common in the rivaroxaban group, with 224 bleeding events (3.2%), as compared with 154 events in the warfarin group (2.2%, P<0.001)

No significant difference in secondary outcomes.

discussions