IRPA 13. Glasgow. Scotland. 13-18 May 2012 A PROSPECTIVE RADIOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR A PHOSPHATE INDUSTRY PROJECT Rócio Glória dos Reis Dejanira da.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Socio-Economic Benefits Assessment on Weather Service in China Dr. LV Minghui Meeting of The WMO Forum: Social and Economic Applications and Benefits.
Advertisements

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Introductions; Objectives and Scope of the Course Tr aining course on Authorization and Inspection of Uranium Mining.
SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Planned reference and intervention levels in Finland Raimo Mustonen,
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Management of Radioactive Residues from Mining, Mineral Processing, and other NORM related Activities (DS459) -
Use of reference biospheres to prove long-term safety of repositories for radioactive waste Workshop, Berlin, August 2008.
Revision and consolidation of Euratom Basic Safety Standards
Cluff Lake Project IAEA- RSLS Workshop Elliot Lake, Ontario, May 2, 2014 Dale Huffman Vice-President, SHEQ AREVA Resources Canada.
RESRAD Program Manager Environmental Science Division
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Risk-Based Regulation.
What do Workers in the Field Need to Know About NORM/TENORM
DOE 2010 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference November 17, 2010 Loren W. Setlow, CPG Office of Radiation and.
Exemption, Clearance, Discharges
Risk Assessment.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
Gauges and well logging
MODULE “STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT”
PART IX: EMERGENCY EXPOSURE SITUATIONS Module IX.1: Generic requirements for emergency exposure situations Lesson IX.1-2: General Requirements Lecture.
Earth Science 4.3 Water, Air, Land Resources
Environmental Protection Waste Safety Section, Division of Radiation, Transport and Waste Safety Department of Nuclear Safety and Security.
Safety Assessment Methodologies and Implementation of Monitoring and Control Programmes Dr. Japie van Blerk AquiSim Consulting (Pty) Ltd Wednesday, 24.
4.3 Water, Air, and Land Resources
Contaminated land: dealing with hydrocarbon contamination Assessing risks to human health.
Ecological Disasters and Pollution in Kazakstan and Efforts to Counteract Them.
Ronald Warren Ecological & Environmental Monitoring National Security Technologies, LLC Community Environmental Monitoring Program Workshop July 26, 2011.
Handling of Future Human Actions in the safety assessment SR-Site Eva Andersson.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” RADIATION PROTECTION SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo.
Government of Western Australia Department of Mines and Petroleum Please read this before using presentation This presentation is based on content presented.
International Atomic Energy Agency IX.4.9. Mining Waste Disposal options for different waste types, safety principles and technologies for assuring long-term.
Production of Nitric Acid Environmental Impact Assessment Erik TolonenNick Poulin Environmental Engineering Environmental Planning and Decision Making.
1 of 21 Introduction to the EPA 7-Step DQO Process DQO Training Course Day 1 Module 7 (30 minutes) Steps Presenter: Sebastian Tindall.
Workshop U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rockville, Maryland Pacific Northwest National Laboratory November 15-17, 2005 GENII Version 2.0 Overview and.
CRITICAL PATHWAY ANALYSIS FOR RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT CONTROL AND ASSESSMENT Riaz Akber
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Overview_kpt_0730 Current Fresh Water “Mass Balance”  Water Demand –Resident Population (2003): 150.
Climate, Air Quality and Noise Graham Latonas Gartner Lee Limited RWDI Air Inc.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” SAFETY ASSESSMENT DURING DECOMMISSIONING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP ,
History of Nuclear Material Ashley Radcliffe. Radon is a cancer-causing radioactive element You can not see, taste, or smell it It is found in soil, rock,
Intervention for Chronic and Emergency Exposure Situations Assessment and Response during Radiological Emergency Dose Assessment Overview Lecture IAEA.
TERRAMIN AUSTRALIA Limited
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Emergency Response Protective Actions Day 10 – Lecture 3.
Atomic Energy Organization of Iran Iran Nuclear Regulatory Authority (INRA) Ramsar the Radioactive Nature Presented by: Naser Rastkhah Head of INRA.
Sessions VI and VII Conclusions and summary Francois Besnus Session Chair Cape Town July 6, 2007.
MODULE “PREPARING AND MANAGEMENT OF DOCUMENTATION” SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo da Vinci”
Regulatory Approach to Radioactive Waste Management and Remediation in Central Asia Tamara Zhunussova Vienna, IAEA, 6-8 November, 2012.
“ OVERALL DECISION MAKING IN PLANNING FOR REMEDIATION OF URANIUM MINES” Presentation to the Senior Regulator’s meeting at the 56 th IAEA General Conference.
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
Regulation of Discharges of Nuclear Facilities in Ukraine Iurii Bonchuk Radiation Protection Institute Kiev, Ukraine EMRAS II - Reference.
Lead NAAQS Review: 2 nd Draft Risk Assessment NTAA/EPA Tribal Air Call August 8, 2007 Deirdre Murphy and Zachary Pekar OAQPS.
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW Nuclear energy. OECD Convention on Third Party Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy (Paris 1960) Convention on Civil.
-1- UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ Demonstrating the Safety of Long-Term Waste Management Facilities Dave Garrick 2015 September.
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
Government of Western Australia Department of Mines and Petroleum Please read this before using presentation This presentation is based on content presented.
Ukraine Petro Nakhaba All-Ukrainian Public Organization “ Chysta Khvylya ” Deputy Head Kyiv, Ukraine Contaminated Sites Management Joint UMOE-DEPA Project.
Radon Radioactive gas in your home? What is radon? Radon is radioactive Radon is radioactive It decays and emits an alpha particle It decays and emits.
Å.Wiklund NORM network workshop, Dresden November 2009 The provisions for NORM in the new European Basic Safety Standards Åsa Wiklund DG Transport.
Chapter 7.2 (cont.) Groundwater as precipitation hits the ground, it may either (a) soak into the ground (infiltration) or this water has two alternatives:
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Safety Standards and Public Exposure to Radon Trevor Boal Radiation Protection Unit - NSRW.
Lynas Advanced Materials Plant
Application of the International Safety Standards to Radon and NORM
Module Planned exposure situations Public exposure (GSR Part 3)
J.P. Bolívar 1) and R. García-Tenorio 2)
TE NORM and ALARA in the Florida Phosphate Industry
Wolaita Sodo University Department of Physics , Wolaita Ethiopia Indoor radon concentration and its health hazard in the dwellings of Wolaita Sodo.
Ambient Air Monitoring Near Mosaic’s Phosphogypsum Stack
Please read this before using presentation
ENVIRONET Plenary Meeting Vienna, Austria, 5 – 7 December 2017
TENORM in Municipal Solid Waste Landfills: Assessing the Risk
The pathological effects of ionising radiation
SAFETY AND SITTING ASSESSMENT FOR NPPs DEPLOYMENT IN INDONESIA
Harmonisation of exposure and risk assessment models for the BeNeKempen project Griet Van Gestel OVAM.
CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS ON THE WATER RESOURCES OF GHANA
Presentation transcript:

IRPA 13. Glasgow. Scotland May 2012 A PROSPECTIVE RADIOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR A PHOSPHATE INDUSTRY PROJECT Rócio Glória dos Reis Dejanira da Costa Lauria

Objective The prospective radiological risk assessment helps the decision makers to identify the radiological risks. This can contribute for proposition of actions for minimizing risks and in consequence to ensure the viability of the project. This presentation concerns a prospective radiological risk assessment of a planned NORM industry: the Santa Quitéria facility,

 The phosphate ore contains:  11% of P 2 O 5 and 0.1% of U 3 O 8 ;  The Santa Quitéria Facility will be the major Brazilian uranium mine;  It will produced 240,000 tons of phosphate and 1,500 tons of yellow cake per year;  At the end, some 37 million tons of PG will be produced.  The concentration of 226 Ra and 210 Pb in the PG would be 13 Bq/g.  Stage of the project: Looking for financial support for starting the facility building. The Santa Quitéria Facility

Simplified Process of the facility Phosphate rock 11%P2O5 0.1% U 3 O 8 Phosphoric Acid tons/y Uranium 1500 tons/y Phosphogypsum Sulphuric Acid Purification

Santa Quitéria site Semiarid climate, average temperature of 27°C, where rainfall is scarce but often of high intensity. The soil has low permeability. The landscape is etched by several continuous and intermittent streams. There are some perennial ponds. Population: rural and sparse; subsistence farms; Wells supply drinking water

Impact assessment of the PG stack The radiological impact was assessed with the RESRAD OFFSITE 2.6 and RESRAD (onsite) 6.5 codes; Parameters: available local parameters, RESRAD defaults, and similarities (e.g. the size of the PG stack) Three scenarios were developed : – A farm scenario: for people living close to the borders of the site; for people living on the stack, after the closure of the facility-site abandon. – A worker scenario.

Scenario 1  Representative person living close to the borders of the site; o Wells supply their drink water; o The products of the diet are locally produced; o The worst case scenario was simulated in which the direction of groundwater flux and the preferential direction of the wind are from the stack towards the farm; by EPA

Location of the critical group in relation to the PG stark.

Result: Scenario 1  The simulation pointed out a value of dose for the representative person of 2.5 mSv/year; The fish consumption is the main contributor for the dose.

Sensitivity Analysis The rainfall erosion index was identified as the most influential parameter for the total dose. Surface runoff causes erosion of Phosphogypsum stack and then the PG is carried to the surface water.

Scenario 2-Abandon of the site  The critical group is located on the top of the PG stack;

Worker Scenario The worker spends 4 hours per day on the stack; The exposure pathways are radon and dust inhalation, soil ingestion and external gamma;

The total dose value is 6.5 mSv/year; The main contributor to the dose was 226 Ra; The main exposure pathway was the external gamma exposure. Worker dose

CONCLUSION  For this assessment, the PG was the only source term of radiation in the site, and even so, the representative person dose exceeded the public dose limit of 1 mSv/year, as established by the new Basic Safety Standard (IAEA 2011) for planned exposition.  According to the results, the disposal and shape of the stack is of major concern, since the runoff might be the main pathway for the environmental contamination.  Based on that, studies should be carried out to determine the parameters related to runoff and the shape and disposal of the stack. Also the use of contention barriers for avoid the environmental contamination by runoff should be studied.

CONCLUSION  The abandon scenario reveals a high dose for inhabitants who settle on the PG stack. It therefore demonstrates the need to plan the decommissioning of the site still in the phase of planning and include this subject in the studies of viability of the project. Specifically for SQS, the studies should encompass the alternatives for safe disposal and recycling of PG.  Even though the PG stack is part of a conventional phosphoric acid facility, in view of the found value of dose, occupational radioprotection requirements will be need  Summarizing, this study emphasizes the importance of conducting an environmental and occupational risk assessment, in the stage of planning of a NORM facility.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!