Overview Review of the Goddard method Update on instrument/detector evolution (a purely phenomenological approach) Characterization of the soft proton.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca Low energy calibration with the Vela SNR K. Dennerl, 2009 March 31 Low energy calibration with the Vela SNR Mallorca,
Advertisements

XMM EPIC MOS Jenny Carter 4 th EPIC BG WG Meeting Mallorca, 25/10/06 BGWG blank sky data analysis Jenny Carter, University of Leicester.
XMM EPIC MOS Steve Sembay Mallorca 01/04/09 A Phenomenological approach to the MOS detector response. Steve Sembay Phenomenological.
EPIC Meeting, Palermo Ottobre 2003 Short and Medium term Variability study of NGC2516 late type stars with EPIC-XMM Outline: NGC 2516 characteristics.
Clusters as calibration tools S. Molendi (IASF-MI)
X-ray spectral variability of seven LINER nuclei with XMM-Newton and Chandra data Author: Hernandez-Garcia, L; Gonzalez-Martin, O; Marquez, I; Masegosa.
Filter Wheel Closed Calibration Observations Kip Kuntz Johns Hopkins University and NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center EPIC Operations and Calibration Meeting.
Probing Magnetic Reconnection with Active Region Transient Brightenings Martin Donachie Advisors: Adam Kobelski & Roger Scott.
A giant flare from the magnetar SGR a tsunami of gamma-rays Søren Brandt Danish National Space Center.
Strange Galactic Supernova Remnants G (the Tornado) & G in X-rays Anant Tanna Physics IV 2007 Supervisor: Prof. Bryan Gaensler.
S.Mereghetti - Simbol-X: The hard X-ray Universe in focus - Bologna -15/5/20071 Studying the Galactic Ridge Emission with SIMBOL-X Sandro Mereghetti IASF.
The MOS Background (and XMM-ESAS)‏ K.D. Kuntz The Henry A. Rowland Dept of P&A Johns Hopkins University And occasionally GSFC With PN additions from S.L.Snowden.
GLAST Science Support CenterAugust 9, 2004 Likelihood Analysis of LAT Data James Chiang (GLAST SSC – SLAC)
Jonathan Gimeno Boal, UCM MODEL PSF EFFECTS OF PILE-UP Jonathan Gimeno Boal, UCM Tutor: Martin Stuhlinger.
Swift/BAT Hard X-ray Survey Preliminary results in Markwardt et al ' energy coded color.
RHESSI/GOES Observations of the Non-flaring Sun from 2002 to J. McTiernan SSL/UCB.
MOS Pn cross calibration with a sample of Galaxy Clusters MOS Pn cross calibration with a sample of Galaxy Clusters Alberto Leccardi & Silvano Molendi.
Experience with combined Fe55/Vela SNR calibration - MOS Andrea Tiengo INAF, IASF-Milano In collaboration with: Mariachiara Rossetti (IASF-Milano) Martin.
AGASA update M. Teshima ICRR, U of CfCP mini workshop Oct
The problem with double event patterns (M. Brusa, K. Dennerl – MPE) EPIC CAL/OPS meeting - MPE.
A Study of the Quiescent Particle Background A Study of the “Corner Spectra” from the public archive: obsids that were public as of 20 July 2005.
EPIC Calibration Meeting, K. Dennerl Saclay/France, 2003 Sept offset map correction Spatial variation of the energy scale Energy correction for pixels.
Uses of solar hard X-rays Basics of observations Hard X-rays at flare onset The event of April 18, 2001 Conclusions Yohkoh 10th Jan. 21, 2002Hugh Hudson,
MOS 3x3 mode slow slew survey Richard Saxton October 2006.
Cumulative  Deviation of data & model scaled  to 0.3  99%  90%  95% HD 36861J (rp200200a01) Probability of Variability A Large ROSAT Survey.
1 XMM-Newton Extended Source Analysis Software Steve Snowden & Kip Kuntz  Publicly Released 5 April 2006  XMM-Newton Extended Source Analysis Software.
XMM EPIC MOS Andy Read for the BGWG CAL/OPS/BG Meeting Palermo, Sicily 11-13/04/07 EPIC Background Working Group Summary: Meeting.
Center to Limb Variation of Hard X-Ray Spectra from RHESSI J.McTiernan (SSL/UCB) ABSTRACT: We use the RHESSI flare database to measure the center to limb.
Center to Limb Variation of Hard X-Ray Spectra from RHESSI J. McTiernan SSL/UCB.
An XMM-ESAS Update Steve Snowden NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center EPIC Operations and Calibration Meeting - BGWG Palermo - 11 March 2007.
EPIC Calibration Meeting, Mallorca K. Dennerl, 2006 October 26 Suppression of the low-energy noise Suppression of the low-energy noise: an improved approach.
Deterministic Modeling of the MOS Background Steve Snowden NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center EPIC Operations and Calibration Meeting Mallorca 1-3 February.
XMM EPIC MOS Andy Read EPIC CAL/OPS Meeting Mallorca, Spain 26-27/10/06 EPIC BGWG XMM-Newton EPIC BackGround Working Group founded.
LSSO-10/2007 SWCX in the XMM era K.D.Kuntz The Henry A. Rowland Department of Physics and Astronomy The Johns Hopkins University.
Bkg modeling for hot medium z Clusters Bkg modeling for hot medium z Clusters Alberto Leccardi Silvano Molendi.
XMM EPIC MOS Andy Read EPIC CAL/OPS Meeting MPE, Germany 04-05/05/06 EPIC BGWG XMM-Newton EPIC BackGround Working Group founded (~1.
XMM-Newton 1 D Lumb -- SCI-ST. EPIC TTD Nov01 EPIC Background Template Files Why we need them - previous attempts insufficient Adding together high galactic.
Observation of Solar Wind Charge Exchange Emission from Exospheric Material in Earth's Magnetosheath S. L. Snowden, M. R. Collier, T. Cravens, K. D. Kuntz,
1 XMM-Newton Extended Source Analysis Software Steve Snowden & Kip Kuntz  Publicly Released 5 April 2006  XMM-Newton Extended Source Analysis Software.
EPIC Calibration Meeting, Madrid Correcting spatial inhomogeneities of the absolute energy scale K. Dennerl, 2010 March 23 Correcting spatial inhomogeneities.
RXJ a soft X-ray excess in a low luminosity accreting pulsar La Palombara & Mereghetti astro-ph/
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Lecture 19 EPIC background Event lists and selection The RGA Calibration quantities Exposure calculations.
Conclusions We established the characteristics of the Fe K line emission in these sources. In 7 observations, we did not detect the source significantly.
Long-term monitor on Mrk 421 using ARGO-YBJ experiment S.Z Chen (IHEP/CAS/China, On behalf of the ARGO-YBJ collaboration  1. Introduction.
XMM EPIC MOS Andy Read 3 rd EPIC BG WG Meeting MPE, Germany 02/05/06.
A multi-colour survey of NGC253 with XMM-Newton Robin Barnard, Lindsey Shaw Greening & Ulrich Kolb The Open University.
Analysis of low surface brightness sources with EPIC Alberto Leccardi EPIC background working group meeting Palermo, 11 April 2007.
SAG+SASWG Meeting Potsdam /15 PN Tasks – Status Report (update since Leicester) Hermann Brunner - MPE  epframes:  The dark quadrant problem.
Background treatment in spectral analysis of low surface brightness sources Alberto Leccardi & Silvano Molendi Garching, 2 nd May 2006 EPIC background.
Alex A. TakedaAug. 18, 2010 Mentor Dr. Alexander Kutyrev.
Final Presentation By Matthew Lewis 17 th March 2006 “To Determine the Accuracy that GOES True Numbers can Reproduce the Full X-ray Spectrum of the Sun”
NoRH Observations of RHESSI Microflares M.R. Kundu, Dept. of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD E.J.Schmahl, Dept. of Astronomy, University.
(a) (b) (c) DETX DETY DETX DETY XIS2 DETX DETY XIS0 XIS2 Counts keV -1 ACTY N. Tawa, M. Nagai, K. Hayasida, H. Nakamoto, M. Namiki (Osaka-U), H. Yamaguchi.
MOS Data Reduction Michael Balogh University of Durham.
Practical applications: CCD spectroscopy Tracing path of 2-d spectrum across detector –Measuring position of spectrum on detector –Fitting a polynomial.
Monitoring the Seyfert Galaxy Mkn766 Continuum and Fe line variability Mkn766 is a highly variable Seyfert 1 galaxy. The richness of.
Metal abundance evolution in distant galaxy clusters observed by XMM-Newton Alessandro Baldi Astronomy Dept. - University of Bologna INAF - OABO In collaboration.
The Slow Slew Survey Richard Saxton / Pedro Rodriguez November 2006.
1 JCSDA Infrared Sea Surface Emissivity Model Status Paul van Delst 2 nd MURI Workshop April 2004 Madison WI.
CAA 6 th Cross Cal Meeting RAL, th Oct 2007 RAPID/IES Calibration Status J.A. Davies.
The X-ray Universe 2008 Granada, 29 May 2008
Figure 1. Three light curves of IRAS 13224–3809 in 600-s bins
COS FUV Flat Fields and Signal-to-Noise Characteristics
A large XMM-Newton project on SN 1006
Multi-epoch X-ray observations of Seyfert 1 galaxies
A large XMM-Newton project on SN 1006
The spectral properties of Galactic X-ray sources at faint fluxes
UVIS Calibration Update
The spectral evolution of impulsive solar X-ray flares
Swift observations of X-Ray naked GRBs
Presentation transcript:

Overview Review of the Goddard method Update on instrument/detector evolution (a purely phenomenological approach) Characterization of the soft proton flares (spectral shape and spatial distributions) Testing the stability of this method (by looking at pointings with multiple obsids)

Method Review: Philosophy Emission from the Galactic ISM fills the FOV –Sufficiently faint that it must be summed over large regions in order to produce a good spectrum The same is true of extended extragalactic emission (e.g. galaxies & clusters) Background subtraction method must provide good statistics over large regions of the FOV but still be sensitive to the small-scale variations in the detector

Method Review The corner pixels are a measure of the particle background

Method Review The corner pixels are a measure of the particle background There are not enough counts in the corner pixels of a single observation for a robust characterization of the background… …need to find some way of using corner data from other observations…...need to characterize the temporal variations of the corner spectra.

Method Review: Corner Data The Entire Public Archive, Revs –3500 observations, 8100 observation segments –76 Ms/MOS camera Remove CalClosed and badly flared data –2500 observation segments/MOS camera –44 Ms/MOS camera 34% of MOS data affected by flares

Method Review: Corner Data For each obsid we formed a histogram of the rate, set the “quiescent level” to mean rate, and removed periods >3σ above quiescent level.

The mean corner spectrum 3 Parameters for the Spectral Shape Rate: keV Hardness: / keV PL Index 5-12 keV

For A Typical Chip Rate Hardness Index

Variation in the Hardness is greater than statistical: Hardness is temporally variable Variation in Power Law Index is statistical Method Review

Step 1: Augmentation For a given observation, measure Rate and Hardness. From the database of corner data, extract more data with similar rates and hardness.

Step 1: Augmentation Since the mean spectrum varies from chip-to-chip, augmentation must be done on chip-by-chip basis. Method Review

The background spectrum measured by the corner data need not be the same spectrum measured within the FOV. The instrumental lines are known to vary particularly strongly with location.

The continuum also varies strongly Method Review

Step 2: Correct spectrum to the FOV Assume that temporal variations affect the corner pixels and the FOV in a similar manner. The background spectrum in the observation FOV is then given by Obs. Corner spectrum*FWC FOV spectrum FWC Corner spectrum

Method Review Step 2: Correct spectrum to the FOV Chip 1 is a special case – corner data must be constructed from a subset of corner data for the other chips –MOS1 use 2, 3, 6, & 7 –MOS2 use 3, 4, & 7

Method Review: FWC Data The Entire Public Archive For normal chip states –60-85 observation segments – Ms of exposure – ×10 5 counts For anomalous chip states –~10 observation segments – ks of exposure – ×10 4 counts

Method Review Step 3: Ignore the Al and Si lines Slight shifts in gain or location can produce strong P-Cygni profiles after subtraction. Therefore interpolate over keV in forming the background spectrum and Fit the Al and Si lines when fitting the object spectrum

Method Review Implementation: Originally: Perl scripts calling SAS tasks, IDL routines for light curve cleaning and background spectrum construction (mine) Now: Perl scripts calling SAS tasks, FORTRAN routines for light curve cleaning and background spectrum construction (Snowden) Soon: Perl scripts calling SAS tasks (Perry)

Detector Phenomenology Not all chips are well behaved…

Detector Phenomenology Not all chips are well behaved…

Detector Phenomenology Not all chips are well behaved… MOS1-4, MOS1-5, MOS2-2, MOS2-5 –anomalous states occur at different times –always characterized by high rates and low hardness

Detector Phenomenology MOS1-4, MOS1-5, MOS2-2, MOS2-5 –always characterized by high rates and low hardness due to low energy “plateau”

Detector Phenomenology MOS1-4, MOS1-5, MOS2-2, MOS2-5 –always characterized by high rates and low hardness due to low energy “plateau” –“extra” component somewhat localized for some chips 2-5S2-5H keV

Detector Phenomenology MOS1-4, MOS1-5, MOS2-2, MOS2-5 –always characterized by high rates and low hardness due to low energy “plateau” –“extra” component somewhat localized for some chips, but not so clear in other cases 1-5S1-5H keV

Detector Phenomenology MOS1-4, MOS1-5, MOS2-2, MOS2-5 –“extra” component somewhat localized for some chips, but not so clear in other cases –MOS1-4 anomalous state does not generally appear in the corner pixels 1-4S1-4H keV

Detector Phenomenology Summary of States –S: “standard state” –V: “verification” : 1-4, 2-2, 2-5 for Rev<41.5 –H: “high”:1-4, 1-5, 2-5, detectable in corner pixels –A: “anonymous”: 1-4, not detectable in corner pix. No other chip has yet been detected in A state But since A state can only be detected in FWC data… Need to understand what causes these states –Are there detector parameters that can be used to detect these states independently? –Particularly important for the A states!

Handling multiple states –V state does not have enough effected data to justify significant effort –H state FWC data does exist, poor for 1-4 & 1-5 –A state FWC data OK for 1-4 (not great) Modifications to ESAS –Detect chip state first –Extract appropriate state FWC data –Augmentation careful to exclude data from the wrong state –For now 1-4 is caveat emptor Detector Phenomenology 

Since there may be residual s.p. contamination, Must characterize the spectrum Must characterize the spatial distribution Easiest to detect effects in the spectrum Soft Proton Flare Characterization Total count rate in the FOV: object+cosmic background+QPB+s.p.flares Light curve cleaning minimizes sum but –Does not guarantee that s.p.flares=0

Soft Proton Flares

Use the entire public archive For each obsid, run light-curve cleaning If light-curve cleaning successful –Extract spectrum from full FOV for flare-free int. –Extract spectrum from full FOV from flare int. –Spectrum=flare−non-flare*t flare /t non-flare since flare spectral shape depends upon the strength of the flare, select only weak flares for this analysis –Assumes that s.p. flare is additive.

Soft Proton Flares Characterize flare spectrum by ( keV)/( keV) hardness ratio Wide range of hardness ratios Not clear whether statistically significant Moot point

Soft Proton Flares Assume that the S.P. spectral shape is variable –Variation of hardness ratio –Dependence of hardness ratio on flare strength Can’t be subtracted from object spectrum → must be fitted with object spectrum Find functional form with fewest parameters to describe the entire family of spectra RMF and ARF not appropriate for soft protons

Soft Proton Flares Best fit A 0 exp(−B 0 E)+A 1 exp(−B 1 E) where A 1 =a 0 +a 1 A 0 +a 2 A 0 2 B 1 =b 0 +b 1 B 0 +b 2 B 0 2 which provides a very good fit to the data, the a i and b i need be determined only once, but has the problem that it can not be implemented is most spectral fitting packages

Soft Proton Flares Broken power law fit using RMF is OK A 0 E −B 0 for E<E b A 0 E b B 1 −B 0 E −B 0 for E>E b Broken power law fit using RMF with E b =constant Is almost as good

Soft Proton Flares

Spatial distribution determined in same way as the spectrum but with bright point sources explicitly removed from the images

Soft Proton Flares Spatial distribution determined in same way as the spectrum but with bright point sources explicitely removed from the images Only small scale feature is low energy “hot” edge of MOS1-2, none seen in MOS2 Distribution flat at low energies, peaked at higher energies

Soft Proton Flares Spatial distribution determined in same way as the spectrum but with bright point sources explicitly removed from the images Only small scale feature is low energy “hot” edge of MOS1-2, none seen in MOS2 Distribution flat at low energies, peaked at higher energies, always flatter than the X-ray vignetting No vignetting differences due to filters

Soft Proton Flares Spectro-spatial variation –Spectrum becomes steeper with radius –Little difference between chips at the same radius (with the exception of the “hot” spot on MOS1-2)

Soft Proton Flares If fitting multiple regions (i.e., a cluster) –The normalization of the S.P. contamination must be allowed to vary with radius. –The spectral shape of the S.P. contamination must be allowed to vary with radius.

Application How good is the method? –Small number statistics for corner data –Marginal statistics for FWC corrections –Introducing systematics at low energies? Test –Find directions with multiple obsids Divide MOS1 and MOS2 spectra by responses Sum and smooth Compare Chose 8 high b fields with a total of 40 obsids

Application Lowest spectrum set as fiducial –Dotted = uncertainty in difference

Application Lowest spectrum set as fiducial Statistics: of 40 obsids –5-8 show signs of SWCX –1 shows strong SPC –Several show minor SPC Differences between spectra (other than those due to SWCX) consistent within uncertainties

Application