Project Nexus (AMR) Workgroup – 7 th July 2010 Response to Transporter action.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PN UNC Workgroup (AQ topic)
Advertisements

CONFIDENTIAL - Title of presentation © 24 November 2009 EDF Energy plc. All rights Reserved. 1.
PNUNC AMR3 Topic Workgroup 12 th May, Transporter response to actions.  AMR004: Transporters (CW) to provide supporting justification as to why,
Discharging Shipper AMR responsibilities at DM sites Gareth Evans on behalf of Total Gas and Power Ltd.
1 Project Nexus Modelling costs and benefits Andrew Wallace, Cesar Coelho Ofgem Project Nexus IA Subgroup 25 July 2012.
PN UNC Workgroup (AQ topic) Meeting 3, 18 th July 2011.
Application of User Pays Principles to Existing Service Lines 22nd November 2006.
Proposal to Change the UNC AQ ‘Backstop Date’ to accommodate the 2010 Seasonal Normal Review DESC – 2nd October 2009 NOTE: Instances where TBC is stated.
USRV Incentives Review Chris Warner. USRV Resolution Responsibility and Occurrence  E8.1.1  “…the User shall investigate Reconciliation Values that.
Project Nexus Workgroup Primes & Subs 7 th October 2014.
SPA Enquiry Process - Additional Requirements for AMR sites ICoSS Presentation.
Implementation of Non Effective Days Nexus Workgroup – March
1 Project Nexus Market Differentiation Topic Workgroup 14 th & 15 th July 2009.
Project Nexus Workgroup 9 th September Background During detailed design a number of areas have been identified that require clarification with.
Modification 0410 questions Gareth Evans on behalf of Total Gas & Power.
PN UNC AMR Topic Workgroup Meeting 19 – Meter Reading.
AQ Overview.  Annual Quantity (AQ) is a value held for each meter point that reflects the expectation as to the volume of gas that a meter point will.
Draft Review Proposal 175 Encouraging Participation in the elective DM Regime Phil Broom 25 October 2007.
PN UNC Workgroup Supply Point Register 25 th October 2011.
Project Nexus Workgroup AQ Backstop Date Options 7 th October 2014.
UNC G7.3.7 Invoicing Read Estimation Proposal Requirement for Read Estimation & Proposed Methodology Dean Johnson Distribution Workstream – 25 th August.
Project Nexus Workgroup Read Validation following Transfer of Ownership 13 th October
Gas Performance Assurance Framework 11 th January 2013 Confidential.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
ADD PRESENTATION TITLE HERE (GO TO: VIEW / MASTER / SLIDE MASTER TO AMEND) ADD PRESENTER’S NAME HERE / ADD DATE HERE © Copyright EDF Energy. All rights.
11 User Pays User Committee 11th January Agenda  Minutes & Actions from previous meeting  Agency Charging Statement Update  Change Management.
1 v1 iGT CSEP Billing Solution ScottishPower Proposals April 08.
Project Nexus Workgroup Extension of Modification 0434 to permit retrospective updates pre-dating Project Nexus Go Live Date 9 th September 2014.
PN UNC Workgroup Read Validation 4 th October 2011.
1 Mod Review Group 126 Apr 2007 slides 126 Review Group – Restriction of Invoice Billing Period  These slides describe the business rules for the treatment.
Use of AMR data Gareth Evans on behalf of Corona Energy.
PN UNC 4 th September 2012 Reconciliation Issues (Action: NEX06/02)
Version PNUNC AQ Principles Workgroup Mod 0209 – Rolling AQ Presenter: Steve Nunnington 23 rd March 2010.
PN UNC Workgroup Invoicing 24 th October Objectives of the Workgroups To determine detailed business requirements Consider/review comments made.
Replacement of Any Read – Initial views. 2 Assumptions  Can’t re-open NDM Allocation or Energy Balancing after D+5  Can’t go back to a read before prevailing.
1 UNC Review Group 175 – Encouraging Participation in the Elective Daily Metered Regime 26 th June 2008.
UNC Modification Proposal 0380 Periodic Annual Quantity Calculation Calculation of Daily Supply Point Capacity Alan Raper – DNCMF 26 th September 2011.
DM Elective Transfer Scenarios 29 January Principles  Incoming Shipper or Read Provider responsible for obtaining read at Start of GFD – i.e.
CONFIDENTIAL - Mod Initial Business Rules © 24 November 2009 EDF Energy plc. All rights Reserved. 1.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
PN UNC Workgroup Invoicing 10 th January Objectives of the Workgroups To determine business principles for future Invoicing processes –Consider/review.
Meter Error – NTS Revenue Flows Gas TCMF – 2 nd December 2010.
Project Nexus UNC Workstream Consolidation of High-Level Principles Fiona Cottam 19 May 2010.
Supply Point Register 7th December 2011
Supply Point Register 21st November 2011
Supply Point Register 10th January 2012
UNC Modification Proposal 0202 National Grid Distribution
PN UNC Workgroup Invoicing 4th October 2011.
CSEPs Reconciliation Proposals
Weekly Progress Update 11 May 2018
Mod Proposal 0268 : AQ Backstop Date
PN UNC AMR Topic Workgroup
Project Nexus Workgroup
PN UNC Workgroup (Settlement topic)
Deferral of Retrospective Updates Functionality
PN UNC AMR Topic Workgroup
Nexus Workgroup Winter Consumption and the influence on Winter Annual Ratio (WAR) Bands 8th January 2014.
Nexus Workgroup Mod 0473 Presentation
MOD 640 INVOICING VALIDATION RULES
Gas Customer Forum Project Nexus xoserve update (as of 19th July 2010) 26th July 2010 Final.
GT Response to Action AMR014 Project Nexus AMR Workgroup 20th July | Energy Networks Association.
AQ BTU Form – Process & Timeline 29th September 2009
Daily Metered Supply Points
Project Nexus Workgroup
AQ Review System Calculation Overview
PN UNC AMR Topic Workgroup Meeting 14 – Meter Reading
xoserve Services XOSERVE SCOPE Sites Register Maintenance Shipper
Meter Read Rejections ..
PN UNC Workgroup (AQ topic)
Enabling Large Scale Utilisation of Class 3
Presentation transcript:

Project Nexus (AMR) Workgroup – 7 th July 2010 Response to Transporter action

Transporter action response – 22 nd June meeting  From minutes of 22 nd June meeting. The group identified a requirement to determine:  ……who needs the data, and for what purpose, as a necessary starting point.  The Transporters were asked to specify their meter read data requirements going forward, which CW believed would be well worth looking at and he would be happy to provide thoughts for the next meeting.  Action AMR0014: Transporters (CW) to specify the Transporter meter read data requirements going forward

Core Transporter Meter Reading data requirements  Primary obligations set out in UNC Principal Document.  Consumption data is used to calculate/derive AQs and undertake NDM Reconciliation (Individual). We currently determine consumptions by using:  Validated Meter Readings:  Required to calculate Metered Volumes and by applying CV to calculate Metered Quantities (kWh values)  Meter Information:  Required to derive Metered Volumes by applying relevant ‘asset’ data to ‘cyclical’ read sequences  Transporters use Meter Information for some other purposes such as helping to validate ‘M’ numbers.

Core Transporter Meter Reading data requirements  Ultimately Transporters require access to accurate energy values to meet our UNC obligations.  Going forward we need to be absolutely certain that we can derive or obtain these accurately and in a timely way to maximise the efficiency of our key UNC related processes  We know that the receipt of Meter Readings and Meter Information are a tried and tested way in which this can be achieved but are there alternatives?  We believe that the administratively burdensome and inefficient activities of dealing with erroneous and poor quality data need to be dealt with. How can this be achieved?  We would welcome the views of Shippers regarding how this key requirement can be safeguarded in the most efficient manner