Group B Feedback Copac Collection Management Tools Project Workshop on Retention and Preservation, March 12 th 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collaborative Collection Management Revived? Michael Jubb RIN Strategic Management of Monographs Discussion Forum 17 March 2011.
Advertisements

E-resources Collection Management Anna Grigson E-resources Manager.
KAT HAGEDORN HATHITRUST SPECIAL PROJECTS COORDINATOR UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN LIBRARIES OCTOBER 9, 2009 Seamless Sharing: NYU, HathiTrust, ReCAP and the.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Status of Task 2.1 Project Management Group Meeting
Ithaka A Systemwide View of Library Collections Brian Lavoie, OCLC Research Roger C. Schonfeld, Ithaka CNI Spring Task Force Meeting April 5, 2005.
UCA Case Study: Look-Here! A Case Study on the processes and procedures for establishing and embedding a digitisation strategy for UCA.
JISC/BL Workshop Digital Libraries and their services March 6, 2006 Richard Boulderstone Director eStrategy, The British Library.
Lorcan Dempsey OCLC Big Heads – Heads of Technical Services of Large Research Libraries ALA 2013 Chicago 28 June things about
Mimi Calter Assistant University Librarian & Chief of Staff Stanford University Libraries & Academic Information Resources 13 April 2012 Western Regional.
Chapter 9 Assessing Constructive Learning and Problem Solving With Technology Reference: Jonassen, D. H., Howland, J., Moore, J, & Marra, R. M. (2003).
University of Sydney – Academic Forum – 13 April 2005 John Shipp University Librarian THE FUTURE OF THE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY CHANGES IN SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION.
The White Rose Collaborative Collection Partnership Brian Clifford University of Leeds.
Chapter 5. Slide 1 Digital Archives, Collections Digital Archives, CollectionsObjectives  To provide or improve access to the most valuable and unique.
Gwen Bird Executive Director, COPPUL Leonora Crema AUL Client Services & Programs, UBC and Chair, SPAN Management Committee Council of Prairie and Pacific.
Collaborative Technical Services Team Report GUGM May 15, 2014 Cathy Jeffrey.
Preserving the integrity of the National Research Collection Michael Emly University of Leeds 10 September 2012.
JISC Collections 19 May 2015 | ILI 2007 | Slide 1.
Moving Shared Print to the Network Level Emily Stambaugh ALA Annual Conference Las Vegas, NV June 27, 2014 “Looking to the Future of Shared Print” Shared.
Waking up from the Dream: Can Resource in Common Work? Presented: June 26, 2011 Wyoma vanDuinkerken and Crystal Vinal.
Embracing Digital Collections: Embracing Digital Collections: Access Issues and Practices for Academic Libraries Oregon Library Association Salem, OR April.
Thank You! Pricing and Product Information Available Master’s Large and Larger: Dylan Moulton – Master’s.
1 JRNL: Journal Retention and Needs Listing A Software Tool for Print Journal Archives Judith C. Russell Dean of University Libraries Print Archiving Network.
Maria Savova, The Claremont Colleges Terese Heidenwolf, Lafayette College Kevin Butterfield, University of Richmond CNI Spring meeting – April 1, 2014.
Large scale shared print and futures for shared monographs Regional Print Management Symposium March 27-28, 2014 OCLC Research, CIC, OSU Libraries Emily.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Data Mining Library Collection Silos: Print Books and E-books in Library Collections Lynn Silipigni Connaway Ed O’Neill.
The European Manuscript & Hand Press Book Heritage The role of the Consortium of European Research Libraries (CERL) Manuscript Collection in the National.
LOUISVILLE.EDU Sharing Our Special Collections with the World: an IMSLP Digitizing Project By James Procell, Music Librarian University of Louisville.
E-books, E-audio, and Other E-content Instructor: Anthony Costa An Infopeople Workshop Fall 2006.
LIFE 3 LIFE3: Predicting Long Term Preservation Costs Paul Wheatley Digital Preservation Manager The British Library.
LIFE 3 LIFE 3 : Predicting Long Term Preservation Costs Brian Hole LIFE 3 Project Manager The British Library KeepIt training course 05/02/10.
5-7 November 2014 ADLSN - ADLC Practical Digital Content Management from Digital Libraries & Archives Perspective.
Workshop 5 December 2011 Christine Ellwood Assistant Director (Content) University of York Copac CCM tools project Subject strengths.
University of Leeds Library Employing Copac Collection Management Tools Brian Clifford Deputy University Librarian.
Retention and preservation within the Copac Tools Michael Emly University of Leeds CCM Workshop 19 March 2012.
RKA ILL Implications in a Bookless Library: Needs, Strategies and Solutions Kathryn Miller 2015.
How to Make an ILLiad Request Here are step-by-step instructions on how to request material from Interlibrary Loan.
Monograph Collection Development in an Age of Uncertainty: The University of Haifa Library Experience Cecilia Harel Head of Collection Development, Gifts.
SCELC Shared Print for Monographs Bob Kieft Occidental College March 5, 2014.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center NAST Report Attributes ALA Midwinter 2007 Meeting January 21, 2007 David Millikin Product Manager, Library Logistics.
OCLC Programs & Research Prospecting in the library data mines Brian Lavoie Consulting Research Scientist OCLC Programs & Research Annual Partners Meeting.
International Seminary on Digitisation: Experience and Technology 11 th May 2004 | National Library | Lisbon – Portugal DIGITAL ARCHIVE OF PORTUGUESE ART.
HATHITRUST A Shared Digital Repository The HathiTrust Print Monograph Archive Planning Task Force Print Archive Network Forum ALA 2015 Annual Meeting June.
Presenting Digital Harmony to Users Ricky Erway OCLC Programs and Research MCN Nov. 8, 2007.
Ebooks? John Akeroyd Milano March 7 th Ebook Readers.
Group 1 – Session 3 Key Points. Experiences in digital archiving Who is involved? –Partnerships with library and computer centre –Who should be responsible?
2/2/2016 Authentic Assessment in TVET Yufei Gao. Definition In the context of this presentation and my research: Authentic assessment in TVET : focuses.
Zoe Bliss Acquisitions and Information Officer AHDS History UKDA, University of Essex.
1 JRNL: Journal Retention and Needs Listing A Software Tool for Print Journal Archives Judith C. Russell Dean of University Libraries Benjamin Walker Assistant.
COLLECTION DESCRIPTION IN CONTEXT Dr Clive Field The British Library May 2002.
Leveraging the Expertise of our Staff and the Information Resources We Manage MIT Libraries Visiting Committee April 13, 2005.
Wait Time Project Implementation Strategy. Implementation Plan: Goals 1.To educate and provide clarification around the wait time project, wait time definitions,
Digital Preservation MetaArchive Cooperative, Digital Preservation Policy Planning Workshop Boston College, Boston, MA October 26, 2010.
Preservation of web resources, part II Ed Pinsent, ULCC.
Acquisition & management of electronic resources at KU Leuven Hilde Van Kiel / Jan Bollansée.
Reference Desk What is a Reference Desk? The Reference Desk is located at the center of the library where you will find a reference librarian to assist.
Headline.
Michigan Shared Print Initiative
Digital library and OR 21 October 2002 Members’ Council
Print Scholarly Journals in the U. S
Resource Lists workshop
Headline.
إدارة وتنمية مصادر المعلومات
When to Hold On and When to Let Go: A Distributed Retrospective Library Assessment Conference, December 6, 2018 Jean Blackburn, Collections Librarian,
Using data to fill an “ARC”
A tale of three surveys: How librarians, faculty and students perceive and use electronic resources March 2009 © SkillSoft Corporation 2003.
Keeping print alive… … or ‘What to do when digital becomes default’
Textbooks on Cambridge Core
WEST Program Assessments Past and Present
Mary Miller Director of Collection Management & Preservation
Preservation Statistics Survey FY2017
Presentation transcript:

Group B Feedback Copac Collection Management Tools Project Workshop on Retention and Preservation, March 12 th 2012

1. Information on items in other libraries Clarification on difference between ‘poor condition’ and ‘damaged’. Need to be explicit about completeness. Issues regarding real commitment behind intention to retain. Assessment and decision dates must be part of the record. Additional suggestions: Partially digitised items, e.g. Under CLA HE for digital course packs or e reserves Potential for creating shared service between HE institutions Where an ebook is available Permanence of print v. e? Need information about e book e.g. how it relates to print, walk-in access, Portico etc.. Where additional alternative formats are available, e.g. microfilm / print Less common for monographs?

1. Information on items in other libraries Ranking: 1.a) Intention to retain (8) 2.c) Damage (26) 3.e) Whole work digitisation? (28) 4.g) Ebook status (34) 5.b) Condition (40) 6.d) ILL policy (47) 7.f) Partial digitisation (51) 8.h) Additional alternative formats (52)

2. Current practice and issues a)Intention to retain - rarely recorded, labour intensive, accuracy diminishes over time - Could CCM automate at collection level? c) Damage - Sometime used - What about annotated work and identifying unique value? e) Whole work digitisation? - Who has digitised and where hosted, Open Access?, IPR, 856 linking for in- house g) Ebook status - Variation of practice - FRBR! Next-generation discovery

2. Current practice and issues b) Condition - Rarely used, varies e.g. Special Collections, not recorded in MARC? - Could CCM ask Copac? d) ILL - Reflected in loan status / policy already? - Changing attitudes to sharing? f) Partial digitisation? - Potential but limited to HE h) Additional alternative formats - Less applicable to monograph collections?

3. Additional questions a)Yes - but GIGO, e.g. record quality, issues over unique identifiers What do OCLC offer? How do they approach this? Data quality - chicken and egg - the need for standards and accuracy to enable collaboration can drive quality (e.g. UKRR experience) b) Yes - would need to be flexible across several scales - e.g. national, regional, local, consortial etc... c) No consensus

4. Additional questions ‘Collaborating to compete’ Enable development of USPs Allow optimal resource allocation Provide Quality Assurance (e.g. As for UKRR) Zombie apocalypse silver lining - DIY and collective autonomy Standards are crucial, e.g. number of copies to preserve nationally 5. Transfer Debate - preservation ‘versus’ access Need to avoid gaming or a race to the bottom