The Low-Energy Neutrino Factory Alan Bross, Malcolm Ellis, Steve Geer, Olga Mena, Silvia Pascoli “Olga and Silvia did all the clever stuff ” IPPP/06/85;

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring Atmospheric Parameters with SuperBeams Enrique Fernández Martínez Departamento de Física Teórica and IFT Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Advertisements

Masterclass Introduction to hands-on Exercise Aim of the exercise Find out what happens in proton-proton collisions at the LHC as seen by the ATLAS.
Masterclass Introduction to hands-on Exercise Aim of the exercise Identify electrons, muons, neutrinos in the ATLAS detector Types of Events (particles.
TASD R&D IDS-NF Mumbai. 2 Alan Bross IDS Plenary Meeting – Mumbai October 12-14, 2009 Detector R&D There are 3 components to this detector and their respective.
High  Li/B  -Beam Enrique Fernández-Martínez, MPI für Physik Munich Based on a collaboration with: P. Coloma, A. Donini and J. López-Pavón.
The US 5 Year Muon Acceleration R&D Program To Boldly Go… MICE Collaboration Meeting Harbin January, 2009.
Modular – Flexible – Networked
Oscillation formalism
ISS meeting UCIrvine 21 August 2006 Alain Blondel 1 Evaluation of « optimal » segmentation for neutrino factory far detectors A. magnetized iron sampling.
J. Strait Fermilab October 21, 2005 The Neutrino Detector of the Future: A Massive Liquid Argon TPC.
Sergio Palomares-Ruiz June 22, 2005 Super-NO A Based on O. Mena, SPR and S. Pascoli hep-ph/ a long-baseline neutrino experiment with two off-axis.
Precision Neutrino Oscillation Measurements & the Neutrino Factory Scoping Study for a Future Accelerator Neutrino Complex – Discussion Meeting Steve Geer,
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
A long-baseline experiment with the IHEP neutrino beam Y. Efremenko detector Presented by.
Near detectors and systematics IDS-NF plenary meeting at TIFR, Mumbai October 13, 2009 Walter Winter Universität Würzburg TexPoint fonts used in EMF: AAAAA.
Neutrino Oscillation Physics at a Neutrino Factory Rob Edgecock RAL/CERN-AB.
TASD Update. 2 Alan Bross IDS Plenary Meeting – Mumbai October 12-14, 2009 Fine-Resolution Totally Active Segmented Detector Simulation of a Totally Active.
K.T. McDonald March 18, 2010 LArTPC BNL 1 Magnetizing a Large Liquid Argon Detector Kirk T. McDonald Princeton University (March 18, 2010)
Neutrino physics: experiments and infrastructure Anselmo Cervera Villanueva Université de Genève Orsay, 31/01/06.
Segmented magnetised detectors Anselmo Cervera Villanueva Universidad de Valencia ISS meeting RAL (UK) 25/04/06 RAL (UK) 25/04/06.
International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Edward McKigney Imperial College RAL March 25, 2002 Physics Motivation and Cooling Introduction.
K.T. McDonald June 18, 2009 DUSEL FNAL 1 Strategies for Liquid Argon Detectors at DUSEL Kirk T. McDonald Princeton University (June 18, 2009)
NEUTRINO FACTORIES Realization & Physics Potential Steve Geer High Intensity Proton Accelerators Fermilab 19 October
INDIA-BASED NEUTRINO OBSERVATORY (INO) STATUS REPORT Naba K Mondal Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai, India NUFACT Scoping Study Meeting at.
The Design of MINER  A Howard Budd University of Rochester August, 2004.
Neutrino Study Group Dec 21, 2001 Brookhaven Neutrino Super-BeamStephen Kahn Page 1 Horn and Solenoid Capture Systems for a BNL Neutrino Superbeam Steve.
Simulation of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for the Neutrino Factory Malcolm Ellis & Alan Bross Fermilab International Scoping Study Meeting KEK,
Alain Blondel Neutrino Factory scenarios I will endeavour to address some principle design issues related to the physics use of high intensity muon beams.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Large Magnetic Calorimeters Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) in a Nufact Nufact04 (Osaka, 1/8/2004)
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
2 Atmospheric Neutrinos Atmospheric neutrino detector at Kolar Gold Field –1965.
Long Baseline Experiments at Fermilab Maury Goodman.
Advanced Extruded Scintillator R&D Alan Bross. 2 Alan Bross ANL-UChicago-FNAL CM4 June 26, 2008 Context  The extruded scintillator R&D Program started.
Road Map of Future Neutrino Physics A personal view Ken Peach Round Table discussion at the 6 th NuFACT Workshop Osaka, Japan 26 th July – 1 st August.
Alain Blondel. AIDA-Neutrino meeting AIDA Neutrino detector studies 1. News from the neutrino scene 2. Beam requirements for AIDA 3. Discuss.
NuMI Off-Axis Experiment Alfons Weber University of Oxford & Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EPS2003, Aachen July 19, 2003.
Optimization of a neutrino factory oscillation experiment 3 rd ISS Meeting Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK April 25-27, 2006 Walter Winter Institute.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.
NuFact02, July 2002, London Takaaki Kajita, ICRR, U.Tokyo For the K2K collab. and JHF-Kamioka WG.
Optimization of a neutrino factory for non-standard neutrino interactions IDS plenary meeting RAL, United Kingdom January 16-17, 2008 Walter Winter Universität.
IDS-NF Accelerator Baseline The Neutrino Factory [1, 2] based on the muon storage ring will be a precision tool to study the neutrino oscillations.It may.
International Design Study for a Neutrino Factory in the 5 Year Plan A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, 2009.
Muon Collider R&D Plans & New Initiative 1.Introduction 2.Muon Collider Schematic 3.Conceptual Breakthrough 4.Ongoing R&D 5.Muon Collider Task Force 6.Muon.
Detector possibilities: scintillator based detectors EUCARD 1 st Annual Meeting, RAL, 13 April 2010 Paul Soler.
Concepts Beyond the Neutrino Factory Baseline Design Alan Bross, Malcolm Ellis, Steve Geer, Olga Mena, Silvia Pascoli.
CHIPP Aug 2010J.S. GraulichSlide 1 MICE and the Neutrino Factory Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Geneva.
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
MiniBooNE MiniBooNE Motivation LSND Signal Interpreting the LSND Signal MiniBooNE Overview Experimental Setup Neutrino Events in the Detector The Oscillation.
2 July 2002 S. Kahn BNL Homestake Long Baseline1 A Super-Neutrino Beam from BNL to Homestake Steve Kahn For the BNL-Homestake Collaboration Presented at.
CP phase and mass hierarchy Ken-ichi Senda Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) &KEK This talk is based on K. Hagiwara, N. Okamura, KS PLB.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting U.C. Irvine Monday 21 st August 2006 M. Ellis & A. Bross.
September 10, 2002M. Fechner1 Energy reconstruction in quasi elastic events unfolding physics and detector effects M. Fechner, Ecole Normale Supérieure.
ICHEP Conference Amsterdam 31st International Conference on High Energy Physics 24  31 July 2002 Gail G. Hanson University of California, Riverside For.
MIND Systematic Errors EuroNu Meeting, RAL 18 January 2010 Paul Soler.
TTdF – EPS Conference Manchester (UK), July 2007 Neutrino hiererchy from atmospheric and beta beam neutrinos with high density magnetised detectors [1]
Detector: Status and Plans 6 th IDS-NF Meeting, RAL, 22 September 2010 Paul Soler.
TASD Update In Context of The Low-Energy Neutrino Factory Alan Bross, Malcolm Ellis *, Steve Geer, Enrique Fernandez- Martinez, Olga Mena, Silvia Pascoli.
Concepts Beyond the Neutrino Factory Baseline Design Detector R&D Alan Bross, Malcolm Ellis, Steve Geer, Olga Mena, Silvia Pascoli.
T2K Experiment Results & Prospects Alfons Weber University of Oxford & STFC/RAL For the T2K Collaboration.
K. Holubyev HEP2007, Manchester, UK, July 2007 CP asymmetries at D0 Kostyantyn Holubyev (Lancaster University) representing D0 collaboration HEP2007,
The Accelerator Complex from the International Design Study
Alain Blondel 11 October 2010 GDR NEU2012 summary
Neutrino Oscillation Physics with a Neutrino Factory
T2KK Sensitivity of Resolving q23 Octant Degeneracy
Oscillation Physics at INO
Presentation transcript:

The Low-Energy Neutrino Factory Alan Bross, Malcolm Ellis, Steve Geer, Olga Mena, Silvia Pascoli “Olga and Silvia did all the clever stuff ” IPPP/06/85; DCPT/06/170; Roma-TH-1443; FERMILAB-PUB E

Alan Bross IDS Meeting RAL January 16, Neutrino Factory – ISS Preliminary Design  Proton Driver  Target, Capture, Decay     Bunching, Phase Rotation u Reduce  E  Cooling  Acceleration  103 MeV  25 & 50 * GeV  Storage/Decay ring * Still under study Why Study Low-Energy Neutrino Factory?

Alan Bross IDS Meeting RAL January 16, Well, Cost is Certainly a Motivation ISS Preliminary  Going from 25 GeV (maybe 50) to 4 GeV u Eliminates FFAGs u Fewer RLAs u Smaller and possibly cheaper storage ring(s) u Saves 25-40% s $1B USD?

Alan Bross IDS Meeting RAL January 16,  Up to now, the NFMCC has focused on neutrino factories with energies of GeV  The collaboration has not studied lower energy neutrino factories because, until recently, the proposed NF detectors have had muon energy thresholds (for measuring wrong-sign muons with adequate background rejection) of a few GeV, which imposes a minimum threshold on the desirable neutrino energy, and hence a minimum NF energy  ~20 GeV.  In the ISS there was progress on understanding how to reduce the detector thresholds for measuring wrong-sign muons … so we can now consider lower energy neutrino factories. But, Can the Physics Goals be Accomplished with a LE-NF?

Alan Bross IDS Meeting RAL January 16, Fine-Resolution Totally Active Segmented Detector Simulation of a Totally Active Scintillating Detector (TASD) using No a and Miner a concepts with Geant4 3 cm 1.5 cm 15 m u 3333 Modules (X and Y plane) u Each plane contains 1000 slabs u Total: 6.7M channels  Momenta between 100 MeV/c to 15 GeV/c  Magnetic field considered: 0.5 T  Reconstructed position resolution ~ 4.5 mm 15 m 150 m B = 0.5T

Alan Bross IDS Meeting RAL January 16, “Special” Detector Has to be Magnetized  Magnetized Totally Active Sampling Calorimeter 25kT  Magnets  15m  X 15m long -0.5T u Times 10! u Cost estimate s $ M –Conventional SC  New Ideas u High T c SC s No Vacuum Insulation u VLHC SC transmission line s Technically proven s Might actually be affordable

Alan Bross IDS Meeting RAL January 16, Superconducting Transmission Line makes this concept possible (affordable)  SCTL not a “concept” – prototyped, tested and costed for the VLHC Project at Fermilab

Alan Bross IDS Meeting RAL January 16, Parameters $1000/m  $50M 100 kA op demonstrated

Alan Bross IDS Meeting RAL January 16, TASD Performance  Event Reconstruction Efficiency Muon charge mis-ID rate Excellent  E

Alan Bross IDS Meeting RAL January 16,  E of TASD With the expected energy resolution of TASD it, can fully exploit the rich oscillation pattern at low energy  0.5 to 1.5 GeV (and go to E threshold of 0.5 GeV)

Alan Bross IDS Meeting RAL January 16, Detector Performance Issues What are the sensitivities to detector backgrounds?  At low energy  background rates grow substantially  How does this affect the sensitivity of the analysis and the potential physics reach?  and K decay in flight become the main background concerns u 1-5 X level.  Figure of merit u Ratio of particle decay lengths to interaction lengths. s For TASD R= 1; for the Magnetized Fe-Scintillator detector it is 8. s So TASD 10 times worse than in Fe-Scint  But, TASD will have vastly superior kink detection (40 hits on  track before decay, continuous dE/dx meas. better  E s We believe that these properties will allow us to control backgrounds to the level or better.

Alan Bross IDS Meeting RAL January 16, The Physics Study  Baseline: 1480km (FNAL-Henderson) u Also did Homestake to Fermilab  Choose NF Energy ~ 4 GeV (Actually 4.12 GeV). This is motivated by the realization that for baselines O(1000km), if  13 is not very small, the oscillation pattern is extremely rich below ~4 GeV.  Will divide the simulated data into 3 energy bins, and fit the wrong-sign muon rates for each bin with positive- & negative- muons stored in the ring (6 rates to fit). Can also fit 6 right-sign muon rates.  Energy bins: En = [0.8,1.5], [1.5,3.5], [3.5,4.12] GeV.  Bins chosen to optimize ability to resolve degenerate solutions.

Alan Bross IDS Meeting RAL January 16,  NF performance: BASIC: (5 years)  (3  useful decays/yr)  (2 signs)  (20Kt fid. Mass) = 3  Kt-decays  (2 signs) BETTER: (10 years)  (5  useful decays/yr)  (2 signs)  (20Kt fid. Mass) = 1  Kt-decays  (2 signs)  Detector efficiency  =0 for E n 0.5 GeV  Energy resolution – 30% (extremely conservative: NOVA ~ 6%, expect TASD to be better)  Central values chosen: sin 2  12 = 0.29,  m 2 21 = 8x10 -5 eV 2,  m 2 31 = 2.5x10 -3 eV 2 and  23 = 40°. Input Parameters

Alan Bross IDS Meeting RAL January 16,  L=1480 Km  Simulate  13 =3 o,  =0 then fit e   & e   rates  Fits for 3 neutrino energy bins:  13 (degrees)  (degrees) Dark: 0.8 – 1.5 GeV Cyan: 1.5 – 3.5 GeV Magenta: >3.5 GeV  Each fit yields one correct & one additional (“intrinsic degeneracy”) solution … but the additional solutions for the 3 bins do not overlap  Unique Solution ! Illustration of how it works: 90%, 95%, 99% CL Contours Solutions corresponding to correct sign  m 2 Resolving Degeneracies

Alan Bross IDS Meeting RAL January 16,  13 (degrees)  (degrees) Illustration of how it works:  Repeat, analysis, picking the wrong sign for  m 2.  The solutions for the 3 bins are no longer consistent  Can determine mass hierarchy.  There is a 3 rd degeneracy, arising from the same predicted rates for  23 &  /2-  23 … can show similar plots to illustrate how this degeneracy gets resolved. 90%, 95%, 99% CL Contours Solutions corresponding to incorrect sign  m 2 Resolving Degeneracies II

Alan Bross IDS Meeting RAL January 16, Disappearance Channel  Central values used: sin 2  23 = 0.4 and 0.44  Maximal mixing rejected at 99% CL if sin 2  23 < 0.48 (  23 < 43.8°) in the low luminosity case 90%, 95% & 99% (2 dof) CL contours resulting from the fits at L = 1480 km, 3 x kton-decays. Only disappearance data have been used

Alan Bross IDS Meeting RAL January 16, Golden Channel e   90%, 95% & 99% (2 dof) CL contours resulting from the fits at L = 1480 km, 1 x kton-decays.  13 = 1°, four central values for  = 0°, 90°, -90° & 180° No Background 10 -3

Alan Bross IDS Meeting RAL January 16, Mass hierarchy can be determined for all , if  13 > 3 o (sin 2 2  13 > 0.01) Mass Hierarchy L=1480 Km  Hierarchy - 99% CL (2 D.O.F.)  Red (no backgrounds) u Dotted - 1 X KT- years u Solid – 3 X KT-years  Black ) u Short dash - 1 X KT- years u Long dash – 3 X KT- years

Alan Bross IDS Meeting RAL January 16,  Reach  -CP Reach 99% CL (2D.O.F.)  Red (no backgrounds) u Dotted - 1 X KT- years u Solid – 3 X KT-years  Black ) u Short dash - 1 X KT-years u Long dash – 3 X KT- years

Alan Bross IDS Meeting RAL January 16, % CL Error on  13 vs. Bkg  13 = 2 o  13 = 3 o  13 = 8 o No dependence on  for the several values of  that have been studied

Alan Bross IDS Meeting RAL January 16, % CL Error on  Solid:  = 0 Dashed:  = 90 o  13 = 2 o  13 = 3 o  13 = 8 o

Alan Bross IDS Meeting RAL January 16,

Alan Bross IDS Meeting RAL January 16, Summary  A Low-Energy Neutrino Factory (coupled with the right detector) gives excellent capability to measure leptonic CP violation and explore the full neutrino mixing matrix, even if the mixing angle  13 is very small (  13 ~ 1°).  In the absence of backgrounds, the neutrino mass hierarchy could be resolved down to sin 2 2  13 =0.002 (0.0003) in the low (high) luminosity scenario, regardless of the value of the CP violating phase .  If we add a background, those limits translate into and  The 99% CL (2 dof) error on the CP violating phase is 0.01 (0.001) in the most pessimistic (optimistic) scenario.

Alan Bross IDS Meeting RAL January 16, Summary  The intrinsic degeneracy is resolved due to the energy binning analysis at the 99% CL. The  23 degeneracy is also solved in the range 2° <  13 < large as well as from  13 = 2° down to  13 = 0.5 ° in both the low and high luminosity scenarios due to the impact of the solar term at small energies and large distances.  For the intermediate values  13 ~ 2°, the  23 degeneracy is present only at the 95, 99% CL (2 dof) in the low luminosity scenario, but it does not interfere with the measurement of CP violation.  Maximal mixing is rejected at the 99% CL (2dof) if  23 > 43.8° just-by exploiting the disappearance data.  Even if  13 -> 0, from the disappearance channel data, we could determine the neutrino mass hierarchy at the 95% CL (2 dof) in the high luminosity scenario.

Alan Bross IDS Meeting RAL January 16, Outlook  A Low-Energy Neutrino Factory (coupled with the right detector) gives excellent capability in exploring the full neutrino mixing matrix and measure leptonic CP violation  A finely segmented TASD is quite possibly the right analysis tool for a Low-Energy NF u Much more simulation/study needs to be done, but the initial results are promising  A Low-Energy Neutrino Factory (4 GeV) is certainly cheaper than a GeV facility (   %)  Plus with proper planning a Low-Energy Neutrino Factory might be upgradeable to higher energy

Alan Bross IDS Meeting RAL January 16, Target, B-rot, Cool Mu2e 8GeV 4GeV NuFact MC-R&D Hall 0.2-4GeV mu-Linac To DUSEL Low Energy NF and Project X