Tx spectral masks for mixed mode (adaptive modulation)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Clive Rodmell Graham Stevens Senior Principal Engineer Product Manager
Advertisements

EE578 Assignment #3 Abdul-Aziz.M Al-Yami October 25 th 2010.
Simulation and Evaluation of Various Block Assignments Evaluation of multiple carriers deployed in a channel block evaluation criteria section.
Doc.: IEEE Submission July 2003 Andy Gowans (UK RA) UK Ultra Wide Band (UWB) Compatibility Study Andy Gowans & Bharat Dudhia UK.
24 May 2004Michael Sharpe, ETSI Secretariat Radio Competence Centre 1 How can ETSI help? The regulatory environment for RFID Michael Sharpe.
Some Recent Topics in Physical-Layer System Standards Felix Kapron Standards Engineering Felix Kapron Standards Engineering.
1 RADAR UNWANTED EMMISSIONS A personal view J R Holloway All data in this presentation comes from public domain sources ITU WP 8B Radar Seminar September.
Using Telephone and Cable Networks
High Speed Digital Access
Cable Broadband EOC (Ethernet On Cable) By Introduction.
NetAstra 5000 Product Overview
9.1 Chapter 9 Using Telephone and Cable Networks for Data Transmission Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction.
Doc.: IEEE /0060r0 Submission January 2004 Christopher Hansen, BroadcomSlide 1 Thoughts on TX Spectral Masks for n Christopher J. Hansen.
Doc.: IEEE /543r0 Submission April 2006 Richard van Nee, Airgo NetworksSlide 1 Transmitter CCA Issues in 2.4 GHz April /543r0 Richard van.
January 6, 2002doc.: IEEE /044r0 SubmissionRishi Mohindra, MAXIMSlide 1 Proposal for IEEE802.11g Receiver Adjacent Channel Rejection Requirement.
Doc.: IEEE g Submission May 11, 2011 Steve Jillings, SemtechSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE /0071r1 Submission January 2004 Aleksandar Purkovic, Nortel NetworksSlide 1 LDPC vs. Convolutional Codes for n Applications:
Doc.: IEEE /531 Submission July 2003 Hart/Skellern CiscoSlide 1 EVM vs PER Plot Not Promising for PSNI Brian Hart, David Skellern (Cisco Systems)
Doc.: IEEE /443r0 Submission October 2001 Anuj Batra, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE g Submission March 15, 2011 Steve Jillings, SemtechSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
S Transmission Methods in Telecommunication Systems (5 cr)
Doc.: IEEE /0309r1 Submission March 2012 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 1MHz Waveform in Wider BW Date: Authors:
ST/SEU-CO | | © Robert Bosch GmbH reserves all rights even in the event of industrial property rights. We reserve all rights of disposal such as copying.
BFWAtg - Guard Bands 28GHz Draft 26GHz Recommendation: –Two FDD systems At least one 28MHz “slot” or single polarisation only in adjacent slots. –Two TDD.
SUPRESSION OF LORAN-C NAVIGATION SIGNAL IN DIGITAL CAVE RADIOS (AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH) Mr. Antonio Muñoz Group of Technologies in hostile Environments.
MPTSWG(02)20 Original HIPERACCESS Scope n FWA radio access >25Mbit/s n Interoperable products n Focus on mass market n Symmetric or asymmetric traffic.
Key Technical Provisions of the White Paper and Protections Afforded to ITFS Licensees. National ITFS Association Annual Conference February 16 th – 19.
Doc.: IEEE /0229r0 Submission February 2012 Assaf Kasher, IntelSlide 1 Transmit Mask Correction Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE p Submission September 2008 Carl Kain, Noblis (USDOT) Response to Comments on Optional Enhanced ACR and AACR Values Date:
Ethernet over VDSL Technical Specifications. Agenda –Rate – Reach –Band Allocation –SNR and BER –PSD mask and Power Backoff Algorithm –Rate Limitation.
Polar Loop Transmitter T. Sowlati, D. Rozenblit, R. Pullela, M. Damgaard, E. McCarthy, D. Koh, D. Ripley, F. Balteanu, I. Gheorghe.
TD-SCDMA.
Doc.: IEEE /0323r0 SubmissionRon Porat, BroadcomSlide 1 Views on ah Use Cases Date: Authors: March 2011.
Doc.: IEEE /1074r0 Submission September 2004 WKFisher/ARINCSlide 1 IEEE p Draft Review Wayne Fisher Broady Cash ARINC, Inc Annapolis, MD.
Doc.: IEEE /140r0 Submission March 2001 Benno Ritter Philips SemiconductorsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE /283 Submission Sept/00 M. Webster and K. HalfordSlide 1 Spectral Mask Considerations for HRb Mark Webster and Karen Halford.
Doc.: IEEE /383 Submission November1998November 1998 Jamshid Khun-Jush, ETSI-BRANSlide 1 BRAN#11 PHY Decisions & Issues to Resolved with
Doc.: IEEE /235r0 Submission May 2001 Philips SemiconductorsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Simulation Data for Letter Ballot Comments on Quasi-guard Subcarriers and Reverse Link Waveform Lai King (Anna) Tee January 15, 2007.
ISEP –Telecommunications Project– July 2006 TELECOMMUNICATIONS PROJECT The Wimax – e presentation Supervisor : Mr BESTAK Team : PAPASTEPHANAKIS Stéphane.
Doc.: IEEE /0039r2 Submission Nov 2010 Raja Banerjea, Marvell SemiconductorSlide 1 Transmit Spectral Mask Changes Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE Submission May 2009 Andrew GowansSlide Review of Exempt Spectrum that may be of interest for medical use.
AI MHz MHz ECC DEC (15)01 + CEPT report 53 ECC-FCC-IC Liaison Meeting Maisons Alfort, May 2015 Didier Chauveau ECC PT1 Chairman.
Validation items and major Conditions
Adjacent Channel results for Four Channels
Channelization for HRb OFDM
TX Masks Date: Authors: January 2017
Long Term Evolution (LTE)
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Adjacent Channel results for Four Channels
Advisor : Tzi-Dar Chiueh Student : Jui-Ping Lien
80-MHz Non-Contiguous Channel Spectrum
2-Channel Option for 11g (proposal)
Rishi Mohindra MAXIM Integrated Products
GSC: Standardization Advancing Global Communications
[Adaptive Spreading Scheme]
[Adaptive Spreading Scheme]
Transmit Spectral Mask Changes
Regional Seminar on Digital TV Broadcasting
Spectral Control Issues for TGg
Jung Yee, IceFyre Semiconductor
802.16a Draft D4 Unlincensed Band Coexistence
Transmit Spectral Mask Changes
PHY Mask Issues Date: Authors: November 2006 November 2006
Response to Comments on Optional Enhanced ACR and AACR Values
Response to Comments on Optional Enhanced ACR and AACR Values
4 Channel Special Committee Report
80-MHz Non-Contiguous Channel Spectrum
Month Year doc.: IEEE y18/r0 March 2018
Month Year doc.: IEEE y18/r0 March 2018
Presentation transcript:

Tx spectral masks for mixed mode (adaptive modulation)

ETSI standards for P-MP Current multipoint (MP) standards in Europe specified by a number of ETSI EN’s Frequency rangeAccess MethodETSI Multipoint System Equipment Standard < 1 GHzAllEN – 3 GHzTDMAEN – 3 GHzFDMAEN – 3 GHzDS-CDMAEN – 3 GHzFH-CDMAEN – 11 GHzTDMAEN – 11 GHzFDMAEN – 11 GHzDS-CDMAEN – 11 GHzDS-CD/TDMAEN – 11 GHzFH-CDMAEN – 29.5 GHzAllEN – 33.4 GHzAllDEN/TM 4116

New Multipart standard DEN/TM 4130 The new draft multipart standard 4130 seeks to combine the separate MP standards for all frequencies up to 33GHz into one. Drafted by STF208. < 1 GHz 1 – 3 GHz GHz GHz GHz Multipart Standard 4130

Tx spectral masks in MP standards Masks designed according to 3 rd -order intermodulaton / net filter discrimination (NFD) for like systems operating in adjacent channels e.g. in 3 – 11 GHz band:

Mixed mode (adaptive modulation) Current standards developed for P-P, terrestrial microwave systems, traditionally use a single modulation scheme (single mode). New generation of NLOS, P-MP systems often have adaptive modulation, (mixed mode), e.g. dynamically switch from QPSK -> 16QAM -> 64QAM depending on SNR and channel conditions for each subscriber. Question: What happens to the Tx spectral mask in mixed mode ? Current standards are inconsistent for mixed mode ……..

Inconsistencies in current standards < 1 GHz 1 – 3 GHz GHz GHz Multipart Standard 4130 ????? } Mixed mode not applicable 1 mask Single-mode masks, but silent on mixed mode Mixed mode must use most stringent mask (except if guardband exists)

Different objectives for Tx spectral mask in mixed mode ManufacturersOperatorsRegulators ObjectiveWould like option of least stringent mask. Would like option of most stringent mask. Dynamically change mask to follow modulation order ? Advs.Cheaper PA, greater link budget, longer range. Less adj. channel interference -> better use of spectrum. Most accurate ? Most logical ? Disadvs.More interference within block. Higher cost terminals. Restricted range. Difficult to measure mask.

Possible Proposals Rapporteur for new Miscellaneous Work Item MI/TM-4162 in WP2 of ETSI TM4 must present a proposal and justification to ETSI for Tx spectral masks (mixed mode) in the multipart standard DEN/TM Ideas for Proposals (a)Specify least stringent mask in mixed mode, but advise that the option to use tighter mask is also provided to help operators with interference. (b)Specify default option as most stringent mask, but allow optional mode with a relaxed mask to help manufacturers meet the spec. (c)Specify that the mask must change dynamically with the modulation. (d)Allow any Tx mask to be used within the block allocation, provided that the block edge mask is not exceeded.

Conclusions 1.Mixed mode Inconsistencies need to be resolved in new draft standard Must be finalised by December 2003 to be included in Comments / suggestions / proposals to : Malcolm Sellars