Educating Students with Special Needs in Quebec Cindy Finn, Ph.D. October 24, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Students with Intellectual Disabilities ED222 Spring 2011.
Advertisements

Meeting the AT Needs of Preschool Students Under The IDEA Ronald M. Hager, Esq., Senior Staff Attorney, National Disability Rights Network, Washington,
Professional Practice Guidelines
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Comprehensive family assessment as a prerequisite of individualized planning, monitoring and evaluation of family-visitation program in Croatia Professor.
Guidelines for IDEA Implementation Developed and Presented through Collaborative Efforts RIDE – Office of Special Populations Rhode Island Technical.
California Statewide System of School Readiness Networks Inclusion of Children with Disabilities Prepared by Chris Drouin, Special Education Division Anne.
1 Alignment of Inclusive Pre-School Learning Environments and Quality Rating Improvement System 391 Grant Funding Board Presentation April 10, 2012.
1 Career Pathways for All Students PreK-14 2 Compiled by Sue Updegraff Keystone AEA Information from –Iowa Career Pathways –Iowa School-to-Work –Iowa.
[Your District's] Comprehensive Guidance Program: Linking School Success with Life Success 1 [Your District’s] Comprehensive Guidance Program Responsive.
OVERVIEW MAKING SENSE OF THE LANGUAGE SERVICES AND SUPPORTS FINDING A SCHOOL MAKING A GOOD START WITH A NEW SCHOOL WORKING WITH SCHOOLS.
Ontario’s Policy Framework for Child and Youth Mental Health
Mississippi Special Education Advisory Panel Annual Report to the State Board of Education July 2009.
Definitions, History and Legislation for Change Individuals with disabilities are restricted by access, opportunity and attitudes.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
Transition IEP Using Your IEP to Plan for Your Life After High School
SPEECH AND LANGUAGE SUPPORT SERVICES IN THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA 1.
“Town Hall Meeting” Future Directions Delivery Model Students with Special Needs.
Manifestation Determination Review
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Helping children achieve their best. In school. At home. In life. National Association of School Psychologists.
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY WEEK California Association of School Psychologists.
Presented by Lawrence Dennis Education Consultant for the Office for Exceptional Children October 23, 2014 OCTA Fall Conference.
THE IEP PROCESS Cassie A. Newson. Purpose of Initial Evaluation  To see if the child is a “child with a disability,” as defined by IDEA  To gather information.
Parent Educational Advocacy Training Center
Understanding the IEP Process
Individual Education Plan Overview Presented By: Pamela Cameron Winter 2013.
Improving Outcomes for Students with Disabilities Office of Exceptional Children Cathy Boshamer, Director John Payne, Team Lead November 7, 2013.
Copyright (c) 2003 Allyn & Bacon Teaching Exceptional, Diverse and At- Risk Students in the General Education Classroom Third Edition Sharon Vaughn Candace.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Students with Severe Disabilities Chapter 12.
New York City Department of Education Bureau of Non Public Schools Reimbursable Services.
NTIP Nov 10, 2009 Judi Kochanka Kim Slomka Special Education: Secondary Panel.
Ontario’s Special Needs Strategy Spring The Vision “An Ontario where children and youth with special needs get the timely and effective services.
Question on Background Reading. How does the M.E.L.S Special Education Policy tie in with the Q.E.P.? Do you see a practical link between a competency-
 Describes the special education program and services that are provided within a school district and those special education programs and services which.
SPECIAL EDUCATION POLICY AND PROGRAMS OVERVIEW October, 2006 Ministry of Education.
Ten Placement Options Committee for Special Education Resource Room English As A Second Language Inclusion Early Intervention General Education Home- schooling.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Chapter 2: The Personnel and Procedures of Special Education Chapter 2 Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008.
ED 315 Inclusive Practices for Students with Learning Problems Spring 2013.
Assessing and Teaching Students with Mild/Moderate Disabilities Chapter 1 IEP Legal Requirements Writing PLOPs.
Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.
Board Presentation November 26, P.L Education for All Handicapped Children Act IDEIA -- Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement.
Special Educational Needs and Disability in our school
District 97 Special Education Status and Plan Michael J. Padavic, LCSW Director.
Getting Oriented to Exceptionality and Special Education There is no single accepted theory of normal development, so relatively few definite statements.
Eastchester Union Free School District Pupil Personnel Presentation Noreen Urso, Ed.D. Director of Pupil Personnel February 26, 2013.
Labeling  Allows students with disabilities to receive services  Labels may be stigmatizing or result in discrimination  View children by their abilities.
1. 2 Roots of Ontario Legislation and Policy Bill 82 (1980), An Amendment to the Education Act: –Universal access: right of all children, condition notwithstanding,
Structure of Special Education A Quick Guide By: Edward Desanti.
Special Education Process: Role of the School Nurse Marge Resan, Education Consultant Special Education Team Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
WELCOME!!! 1  Please make a name tag that looks like this: Favourite jobPlace of birth NAME SEA traininghobby.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
Special Education is not a place, it’s a service. Board Presentation November 28, 2011.
Ontario’s Exceptional Students Agreement on generalities Disagreement on specifics Understanding each others’ perspectives Political overtones Definition.
Special Education 547 Unit Five Special Topics Kevin Anderson Minnesota State University Moorhead 2006.
SPECIAL EDUCATION 101 What Do You Need to Know? Presented by: MaryLou Heron & Kristen Strong Training and Consultation Staff.
Special Education Module #1 : Legislative Overview.
Special Education in the Gen Ed Classroom
Understanding Students with Intellectual Disabilities
Sept. 16, Session #2 PED3106 : Agenda - Housekeeping: Hardcopy course outlines, Assignment 1 (8:30AM-8:45AM) - Complimen-tree, Inclusion in I/S Schools.
Inclusive Education in Thailand Bureau of Special Education Administration Office Of The Basic Education Commission MOE Thailand By Samart Ratanasakorn.
Children’s Educational Potential Facilitated by: Advocates for Occupational Therapy (Study Group 3)
Child & Family Connections #14. What is Child and Family Connections The Early Intervention Program in Illinois State funded program to assist families.
Early Learning Board Presentation March 2, 2016.
Student ParentsTeacher Principal Resource Teacher Guidance Counsellor Liaison worker Divisional Specialists Health Care SpecialistsHealth Care Specialists.
Special Education & IDEA 2004 A Presentation Made to the Liberty University School of Law By Randall Dunn. October 22, 2007.
The PDA Center is funded by the US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Stories from the Field and from our Consumers Building.
Cindy Finn, PhD November 2, 2016
NAEYC Early Childhood Standards
Blackhawk School District
Presentation transcript:

Educating Students with Special Needs in Quebec Cindy Finn, Ph.D. October 24, 2012

Classification of Special Needs in Quebec (MELS) ** Identification procedures and government funding differ for both categories Special Needs Students in Difficulty (Learning or Behavior) Students with Social Maladjustments or Handicaps

Students in difficulty Students identified as having academic difficulties and behavioral challenges – Learning difficulties/Mild Intellectual Delay – Behavior disorders a priori Funding, based on historical percentage of student population (10-12%) School boards determine identification, in accordance with MELS guidelines and collective agreements LBPSB Policy on Special Needs

Students with Handicaps/Severe Behavior Disorders Variable Per capita funding (per board per code) Validation process to substantiate “codes” 3 necessary elements to support a code – Diagnosis by professional – Limitations that affect learning – School-based Services Code = Dx + limitations + services Represents +3.8% of LBPSB population

MELS Codes for students with Social Maladjustments/Handicaps Categories (identified by MELS with numerical code): Severe behavioral disorder (14) Mild motor impairment/Organic impairment (33) Severe motor impairment (36) Language Disorder (34) Moderate to severe intellectual impairment (24) Profound intellectual impairment (23) Pervasive developmental disorder (50) Psychopathological disorder (53) Visual impairment (42) Hearing impairment (44) Atypical disorder (99)

LBPSB Stats on Special Needs 12% of total LBP population 1810 students in difficulty (2012) – 34% at elementary level – 66% at secondary level 879 students with handicaps (2012) – 50.6% at elementary – 49.4% at high school Students with special needs in all LBPSB schools except Soulanges

Breaking down the data In difficulty: Learning Difficulty (74.6%), Behavior Disorders (16.3%), Mild Intellectual Delay (9.1%) Handicaps: Autism (47%), psychopathological disorders (13.5%), moderate-profound intellectual impairments (11%), language impairment (10.5%), mild motor/organic disorders (7.9%), sensory impairments (6.6%), severe motor disability (2.9%)

Provincial Picture Policy on Special Education (1999) Promotes success for all –“Educational success has different meanings depending on the abilities and needs of different students” (p. 15) -6 ways to promote success -Prevention & early intervention -Adapting services to the needs of students -Favoring inclusion/integration in natural environment -Creating community & enhancing partnerships -Assisting students ‘at-risk’ -Evaluating students’ educational success

Complementary Educational Services Services to assist schools in supporting the diverse learning and social needs of all students 12 services, 4 programs

4 Complementary Education Programs Prevention and Promotion: Provide students with an environment conducive to the development of a healthy lifestyle, their health and well being Assistance: Help students with academic and career choices Student Life: Develop students’ sense of autonomy, responsibility, moral and spiritual dimension, interpersonal relationships and sense of community and school belonging Support to Learning: Provide students with conditions conducive to learning

Educational Services for Students within LBPSB Classroom teachers Resource teachers Support from paraprofessionals (Integration aide/Special Education Technician/Social Aide Technician) Student Services Department (Non-teaching professionals) Educational Services Department (Curriculum/Program Consultants) Itinerant Teacher Services – MOSD & MAB (Vision and Hearing) Professionals from outside agencies (CSSS, Batshaw)

Non-teaching professionals supporting all schools Direct services to students (e.g., assessment) Services to schools (e.g., consultation, professional development) Services to parents and families (e.g., FSSTT) Assist with Ministry of Education-related duties (coding, committees, measures, training) Work in partnership with other ministries and community groups (e.g., Batshaw, health, police) Conduct research on best practices regarding special needs and inclusive education Supervise interns/placements, peer supervision

SOURCES OF FUNDING General funding (teacher posts = resource teachers, aides/techs, professionals) In difficulty funding (base funding) Code-generated funding (per capita) Special grants (examples) –30059: IEP release $ –30053: Supports Inclusion –30364: Professional resources – /2: Adapted equipment and technology

Organization of Services Delivered at the School level Importance of Resource Teams

Purpose of Resource Teams  Learn more about student  Review teaching strategies already in progress  Brainstorm additional strategies with multi- disciplinary group  Develop/monitor an action plan  Facilitate communication within the school, with parents, with other professionals involved  Carry out referrals for consultation, assessment, or identification of special needs

PRINCIPAL SP. ED TECH SOCIAL AIDE TECH Possible Resource Team Participants CLSC (SOCIAL WORKER/ NURSE ) SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST RESOURCE TEACHERS SPEECH LANGUAGE PATHOLOGIST OR OCCUPATIONAL THERAPIST SPEECH LANGUAGE PATHOLOGIST OR OCCUPATIONAL THERAPIST CONSULTANT FOR SPECIAL NEEDS/OTHER SSD PROFESSIONALS INVITED GUEST INTEGRATION AIDE FSSTT

Individual Educational Plan A legal, confidential document Must be created when a student is identified with special needs – Formal identification (LD,BD,MI + Handicapped codes) May be developed when an intervention plan is needed but there is no formal identification Linked directly to the QEP and report card To be developed in collaboration with key players A hands-on tool that outlines objectives and strategies that should be referred to regularly and updated as to student’s progress

Points of Transition ELEMENTARY Registration procedures Resource team planning Emphasis on early intervention Collaboration with outside partners HIGH SCHOOLS Graduation Track/Individual paths Work-Oriented Pathway (WOTP) Students with high special needs – Academic emphasis + Life skills (hygiene, sexuality, independent living) Transition planning (until age 21 for some)

Building capacity in our schools Provincial Resources housed at LBPSB Ongoing Professional Development Projects (e.g., ALDI, FLASH)

More initiatives – For students with emotional/social/behavioral challenges – Focus on early intervention, proactive focus – Meaningfully involve parents in child’s world REACH Program – Cycle 1 elementary program for students with severe behavioral difficulties LIFE/Transition Programs – Programs for 16+ students with high special needs Co-op program (John Abbott & Vanier) – Supports autonomous secondary students (18-21) with developmental challenges who participate in college life – Focus on basic academics, life skills, work skills (Light a Dream)

Collaboration with Partners Parents & Families Health & Social Services –Batshaw Youth & Family Centres –Hospitals (MCH, JGH, Douglas) –CSSS (4 on our territory) –Readaptation Centres CRDI (Centres for Intellectual Handicaps) e.g., CROM CRDP (Centres for Physical Handicaps) e.g., MAB/Mackay Universities (McGill, Concordia) & CEGEPS (Vanier, Dawson) Community groups (e.g., WIAIH) Professionals in Private Practice Other schools/school boards (e.g., Montreal Oral School for the Deaf)

Entente MELS-MSSS/ Specialized schools Dawson Alternative/Portage (Batshaw) Angrignon School (Douglas Institute) Philip E. Layton & Mackay Centre School (EMSB) Hors reseau schools (e.g., Peter Hall, MOSD)

MELS Resources

Thank you