Entangled Polarized Photons. Crystals can produce pairs of photons, heading in different directions. These pairs always show the same polarization. ?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Speed, Velocity and Acceleration
Advertisements

Warm up Complete the analogies: 5 is to 25 as 6 is to ___________ 7 is to 77 as 11 is to ___________ ¼ is to ½ as.25 is to ____________
Everything about Integers
Science CBA #2 Review.
Welcome and Good Morning!. Agenda Math Initiative for IBPYP -Program of Inquiry.
Natural Science Division Seminar Series God Plays Dice Quantum Principles Illustrated Frank Rioux Department of Chemistry February 6, 2006.
Experiments thought to prove non – locality may be artifacts Karl Otto Greulich. Fritz Lipmann Institute Beutenbergstr. 11 D Jena Entanglement, the.
Cushing, Chapter 22 The EPR Paper and Bell’s Theorem Mikey Pilger.
1 quantum teleportation David Riethmiller 28 May 2007.
Modern Physics 5/10/11 Spring 2011 Ben Miller, Alexander DeCarli, Kevin Shaw.
Cove: A Practical Quantum Computer Programming Framework Matt Purkeypile Fall 2008.
Blaylock - Clark University 2/17/10 Wringing John Bell vocabulary the EPR paradox Bell’s theorem Bell’s assumptions what does it mean? Guy Blaylock Clark.
Quantum Potpourri An Attempt to Demonstrate Two Fundamental Quantum Concepts Wave-particle Duality and The Superposition Principle Frank Rioux Department.
Entanglement and Bell’s Inequalities
Entanglement and Bell’s Inequalities Aaron Michalko Kyle Coapman Alberto Sepulveda James MacNeil Madhu Ashok Brian Sheffler.
6/9/2015Bell's Theorem1 Spooky Action at a Distance Bell’s Theorem and the Demise of Local Reality Natalia Parshina Peter Johnson Josh Robertson Denise.
Quantum Entanglement and Bell’s Inequalities Kristin M. Beck and Jacob E. Mainzer Demonstrating quantum entanglement of photons via the violation of Bell’s.
PHYS Quantum Mechanics PHYS Quantum Mechanics Dr Jon Billowes Nuclear Physics Group (Schuster Building, room 4.10)
Quantum Entanglement David Badger Danah Albaum. Some thoughts on entanglement... “Spooky action at a distance.” -Albert Einstein “It is a problem that.
Chapter 40 Serway & Jewett 6 th Ed.. Approximate Total Absorption Cavity.
Friday Forum Presentation What Part of the Quantum Theory Don’t You Understand? Frank Rioux Department of Chemistry March 23, 2007.
Quantum Cryptography Prafulla Basavaraja CS 265 – Spring 2005.
Schrödinger’s Rainbow: The Renaissance in Quantum Optical Interferometry Jonathan P. Dowling Quantum Science & Technologies (QST) Group Hearne Institute.
What Exists? The nature of existence. Dictionary definition (Merriam-Webster) To exist: To have real being whether material or spiritual. Being: The quality.
Quantum Superposition, Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Technologies
Institute of Technical Physics Entanglement – Beamen – Quantum cryptography The weird quantum world Bernd Hüttner CPhys FInstP DLR Stuttgart.
In 1887,when Photoelectric Effect was first introduced by Heinrich Hertz, the experiment was not able to be explained using classical principles.
A Quantum Journey Quantum Physics And Quantum Physicists.
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER School of Physics and Astronomy FACULTY OF MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES Nonlocality of a single particle Jacob.
QUANTUM TELEPORTATION
Matter Unit Learning Goal #2: Summarize the major experimental evidence that led to the development of various models, both historic and current.
By Ryan Deetscreek and Greg Goettner
~Spooky~ Action at a Distance by Karah Manninng. The Non-Local Universe  EPR Paradox oEinstein and Bohr debates about uncertainty oEinstein and colleagues.
1 3/10 Day 16: Questions? Hidden Variables Local Realism & EPR “ The problems of language here are really serious. We wish to speak in some way about the.
Weird Atoms and Strange Photons The Quantum Nature of the Universe Hiro Miyake Spark! March 10, 2012.
Blaylock - Williams College 4/17/15 Wringing John Bell vocabulary the EPR paradox Bell’s theorem Bell’s assumptions what does it mean? Guy Blaylock Williams.
Blake Morell Daniel Bowser Trenton Wood. Contents Background Experimental Design & Outcome Implications Future Applications.
The Life and Times of Atom A story of one atom’s coming of age.
1 quantum mysteries again! quantum mysteries again! classical vs. quantum correlations ‘ quantum mechanics is weird” N. Bohr Bell’s inequality? QM VIOLATES.
Quantum mechanical phenomena. The study between quanta and elementary particles. Quanta – an indivisible entity of a quantity that has the same value.
Wednesday, October 31 Ford Final Chapter (10). Agenda Announce: –Test Wednesday –Office Hours probably busy…better book appt. –Read Chs. 1-3 of Vilekin.
Bell tests with Photons Henry Clausen. Outline:  Bell‘s theorem  Photon Bell Test by Aspect  Loopholes  Photon Bell Test by Weihs  Outlook Photon.
Quantum Mechanics1 Schrodinger’s Cat. Quantum Mechanics2 A particular quantum state, completely described by enough quantum numbers, is called a state.
Quantum Optics: Single Photon Interference. Recap on quantum optics The principle of Wave-particle duality says that light behaves like a particle and.
Young’s Double Slit Experiment. From our discussions of waves you know that waves may interfere with each other creating areas of maximum amplitude and.
The Atom Topic 2.1 Atomic Scientists’ Song 2:52. History this is NOT IB material until indicated it is very interesting from a geeky-science stand point.
1 entanglement-quantum teleportation entanglement-quantum teleportation entanglement (what is it?) quantum teleportation (intuitive & mathematical) ‘ quantum.
Presented By: Mathew Hazel John Healy & Ira Nicks.
Chapter 5 Electrons In Atoms.
Quantum Weirdness.
Waves and Particles Motivation Topics Light as a wave;
The EPR Paradox, Bell’s inequalities, and its significance By: Miles H. Taylor.
Bell’s Inequality.
Quantum Cryptography and Quantum Computing. Cryptography is about a)manipulating information b)transmitting information c)storing information.
Quantum quest: The rise of quantum information Quantum quest: The rise of quantum information Prof. Andrew White University of Queensland Brisbane, Australia.
Entangled Electrons.
Paul M. Dooley Tamer Tayea Wenlin Zhou Ian M. Johson Joshua Tarlow
Models of the atom Atomic Theory.
Electromagnetic Radiation
George E.A. Matsas Instituto de Física Teórica/Unesp
Bell’s inequality. The quantum world is stranger than we can imagine
Quantum Teleportation
The Atom Topic 2.1.
Schrödinger’s Rainbow:
Figure 1 Erwin Schrödinger (left) and Niels Bohr Figure 1 Erwin Schrödinger (left) and Niels Bohr. Bohr claimed that a momentum kick, imparted.
Section 18.1: Sequences of Transformations
Double Slit Experiment
Account given by quantum mechanics: Each possible process is represented by a probability amplitude A which can be positive or negative Total amplitude.
Figure 1 Erwin Schrödinger (left) and Niels Bohr Figure 1 Erwin Schrödinger (left) and Niels Bohr. Bohr claimed that a momentum kick, imparted.
Presentation transcript:

Entangled Polarized Photons

Crystals can produce pairs of photons, heading in different directions. These pairs always show the same polarization. ?

These are said to be entangled photons. If one is measured to be vertically polarized, then its partner kilometers away will also be vertical. ? Entanglement

1) Does a polarizing filter act by a) selecting light with certain characteristics, like a sieve selects grains larger than the hole size or by b) changing the light and rotating its polarization, like crayons and a grid Measurement-Reality

Niels Bohr and Einstein argued for 30 years about how to interpret quantum measurements like these.

Niels Bohr codified what became the standard view of quantum mechanics. The filter is like a grid for crayons - the photon has no polarization until it is measured. It is in a superposition of states.

Einstein felt that the filters were like a sieve. The photons must contain characteristics that determine what they will do.

The information from the measurement of one can’t possibly fly instantaneously to its partner.

He referred to this as ‘spukhafte Fernwirkungen’ which is usually translated as ‘spooky action-at-a- distance’.

Most physicists felt that there was no way to test these views. The topic was better left to philosophers. They kept busy using quantum mechanics to advance physics and technology. nuclear power microelectronics medical imaging

Then in 1964 John Bell devised a test. He looked at what happens if the filters are in different orientations.

2)Four entangled pairs of photons head toward two vertical polarizers.

If four make it through on the left, how many make it through on the right? ?

If four make it through on the left, four will make it through on the right. In this situation, Both Einstein and Bohr predict 100% agreement between the photon pairs. Bell recognized that to distinguish between the two models, we need to use filters at different angles.

Turn the filter on the right to 30 o. 3) Which of the following would Einstein expect to see on the right if 4 photons made it through the vertical filter on the left? a)b) c) d)

4) What percentage agreement would he expect on average between the photon pairs? a) 0% b) 25% c) 75% d) 100%

5) If the right filter is vertical and the left is placed at –30 o, what agreement would he expect? a) 0% b) 25% c) 75% d) 100%

Next we combine the two experiments. The left polarizer is at –30 and the right at )Which of the following is possible? a) left b) right c) both d) neither

7) How much agreement is expected? a) 25%b)50%c)75%d)100%

8) How much agreement does quantum mechanics predict? Hint: The two filters are at 60 degrees to each other. a) 0% b) 25% c) 50% d) 75%

Hidden Variables: If the photons have a polarization before measuring - the agreement will be between 100% and 50%. Quantum: The photons have no polarization before measuring. The agreement should be 25%.

In 1983 Alain Aspect did the experiment.

He used crystals, not filters, so that each photons’ polarization was clearly detected and accounted for.

The results were conclusively in support of quantum mechanics, not Einstein. The entanglement of photons has been demonstrated with the photons separated by over 20 km. Somehow, measuring one photon, instantly affects its partner 20 km away.

Entanglement is an important part of explaining superconductors.

Entanglement is an important part of superfluidity.

Entanglement is an important part of quantum computing and cryptography.

Erwin Schrodinger said that entanglement was “the characteristic trait of quantum mechanics, the one that enforces its entire departure from classical lines of thought.”