FCal TB2003 Shower profiles: G4/MC - Test beam DATA comparison A.Artamonov and ITEP group /afs/cern.ch/user/g/gorbunov/public/prof_note.pdf.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Proposal for a new design of LumiCal R. Ingbir, P. Ruzicka, V. Vrba October 07 Malá Skála.
Recent Results on Radiative Kaon decays from NA48 and NA48/2. Silvia Goy López (for the NA48 and NA48/2 collaborations) Universitá degli Studi di Torino.
Electromagnetic shower in the AHCAL selection criteria data / MonteCarlo comparison of: handling linearity shower shapes CALICE collaboration meeting may.
April 19th, 2010Philippe Doublet (LAL) Hadronic showers in the SiW ECAL (with 2008 FNAL data) Philippe Doublet.
LAr Response to pions: Data vs MC (work in progress) S.Paganis (Wisconsin) withIsabelle,Martin LAr+Tile H8 pion CTB Meeting, CERN, 19-April-2005.
Status of the Geant4 Physics Evaluation in ATLAS
Pascal PERRODO, ATLAS-LAPP
Calorimeter1 Understanding the Performance of CMS Calorimeter Seema Sharma,TIFR (On behalf of CMS HCAL)
1Calice-UK Cambridge 9/9/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. Work in progress – no definitive conclusions.
A preliminary analysis of the CALICE test beam data Dhiman Chakraborty, NIU for the CALICE Collaboration LCWS07, Hamburg, Germany May 29 - June 3, 2007.
FMS review, Sep FPD/FMS: calibrations and offline reconstruction Measurements of inclusive  0 production Reconstruction algorithm - clustering.
Michele Faucci Giannelli TILC09, Tsukuba, 18 April 2009 SiW Electromagnetic Calorimeter Testbeam results.
Evaluation of G4 Releases in CMS (Sub-detector Studies) Software used Electrons in Tracker Photons in the Electromagnetic Calorimeter Pions in the Calorimeter.
LCG Meeting, May 14th 2003 V. Daniel Elvira1 G4 (OSCAR_1_4_0) Validation of CMS HCal V. Daniel Elvira Fermilab.
Energy Flow and Jet Calibration Mark Hodgkinson Artemis Meeting 27 September 2007 Contains work by R.Duxfield,P.Hodgson, M.Hodgkinson,D.Tovey.
Preliminary comparison of ATLAS Combined test-beam data with G4: pions in calorimetric system Andrea Dotti, Per Johansson Physics Validation of LHC Simulation.
Analysis of DHCAL Data José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALICE Collaboration Meeting September 17 – 19, 2012 Cambridge, UK.
IceCube: String 21 reconstruction Dmitry Chirkin, LBNL Presented by Spencer Klein LLH reconstruction algorithm Reconstruction of digital waveforms Muon.
The CALICE Si-W ECAL - physics prototype 2012/Apr/25 Tamaki Yoshioka (Kyushu University) Roman Poschl (LAL Orsay)
LAr Response to pions: Data vs MC S.Paganis (Wisconsin) with Isabelle Winterger,Martin Aleksa LAr Week CTB Meeting, CERN, 10-May-2005.
The Forward Liquid Argon Calorimeter of the ATLAS Detector Geant4 Workshop' September. Triumf, Vancouver Patricia Méndez Lorenzo. CERN EP/SFT 1.
Pavel Šťavina, Bratislava 2004 Slovak contribution to experiment ATLAS  Even though Slovakia is small country with limited finances we have fulfilled.
Montpellier, November 15, 2003 J. Cvach, TileHCAL and APD readout1 TileHCAL- fibre readout by APD APDs and preamplifiers Energy scan with DESY beam –Energy.
Marco Delmastro 23/02/2006 Status of LAr EM performance andmeasurements fro CTB1 Status of LAr EM performance and measurements for CTB Overview Data -
Pion Showers in Highly Granular Calorimeters Jaroslav Cvach on behalf of the CALICE Collaboration Institute of Physics of the ASCR, Na Slovance 2, CZ -
8 June 2006V. Niess- CALOR Chicago1 The Simulation of the ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimetry V. Niess CPPM - IN2P3/CNRS - U. Méditerranée – France On.
CALICE Digital Hadron Calorimeter: Calibration and Response to Pions and Positrons International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders LCWS 2013 November.
Cosmic Rays for ATLAS Commissioning Commissioning Meeting ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens May 2003 Halo+Cosmics group: M.Boonekamp, F.Gianotti, R.McPherson,
Feb. 7, 2007First GLAST symposium1 Measuring the PSF and the energy resolution with the GLAST-LAT Calibration Unit Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test.
W-DHCAL Analysis Overview José Repond Argonne National Laboratory.
G4 Validation meeting (5/11/2003) S.VIRET LPSC Grenoble Photon testbeam Data/G4 comparison  Motivation  Testbeam setup & simulation  Analysis & results.
Results from particle beam tests of the ATLAS liquid argon endcap calorimeters Beam test setup Signal reconstruction Response to electrons  Electromagnetic.
1ECFA/Vienna 16/11/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare these test beam data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. CALICE has tested an (incomplete) prototype.
A Luminosity Detector for the Future Linear Collider Ronen Ingbir Prague Workshop HEP Tel Aviv University.
13 July 2005 ACFA8 Gamma Finding procedure for Realistic PFA T.Fujikawa(Tohoku Univ.), M-C. Chang(Tohoku Univ.), K.Fujii(KEK), A.Miyamoto(KEK), S.Yamashita(ICEPP),
HEP Tel Aviv University LumiCal (pads design) Simulation Ronen Ingbir FCAL Simulation meeting, Zeuthen Tel Aviv University HEP experimental Group Collaboration.
Jyly 8, 2009, 3rd open meeting of Belle II collaboration, KEK1 Charles University Prague Zdeněk Doležal for the DEPFET beam test group 3rd Open Meeting.
Calor October 2000 Atlas FCAL - David Bailey 1 ATLAS Forward Calorimeter Hadronic Test Beam Results J.Armitage, L.Babukhadia, D.Bailey, M.Dixit,
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
T. Lari – INFN Milan Status of ATLAS Pixel Test beam simulation Status of the validation studies with test-beam data of the Geant4 simulation and Pixel.
Nantes — 2008, July Analysis of results from EmCal beam test at CERN PS (and SPS) energies P. La Rocca & F. Riggi University & INFN Catania University.
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
1 LumiCal Optimization Simulations Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University Collaboration High precision design May 6 th 2008.
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for hadrons and jets Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration.
Lucia Bortko | Optimisation Studies for the BeamCal Design | | IFJ PAN Krakow | Page 1/16 Optimisation Studies for the BeamCal Design Lucia.
AHCAL analyses overview List of ongoing analyses targeted to the upcoming publications Erika Garutti.
Tungsten-Silicon Luminosity Detector with Flat Geometry Ronen Ingbir Tel Aviv University High Energy Physics Experimental Group.
Test Beam Results on the ATLAS Electromagnetic Calorimeters Lucia Di Ciaccio – LAPP Annecy (on behalf of the ATLAS LAr Group) OUTLINE Description of the.
Villa Olmo, Como October 2001F.Giordano1 SiTRD R & D The Silicon-TRD: Beam Test Results M.Brigida a, C.Favuzzi a, P.Fusco a, F.Gargano a, N.Giglietto.
LAr Reconstruction: Data vs MC (parabola) S.Paganis (Wisconsin) WithManuel,Isabelle,Martin,Karina,Walter,… LAr H8 Meeting, CERN, 5-April-2005.
CALICE, CERN June 29, 2004J. Zálešák, APDs for tileHCAL1 APDs for tileHCAL MiniCal studies with APDs in e-test beam J. Zálešák, Prague with different preamplifiers.
Testbeam analysis Lesya Shchutska. 2 beam telescope ECAL trigger  Prototype: short bars (3×7.35×114 mm 3 ), W absorber, 21 layer, 18 X 0  Readout: Signal.
Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
M. Martemianov, ITEP, October 2003 Analysis of ratio BR(K     0 )/BR(K    ) M. Martemianov V. Kulikov Motivation Selection and cuts Trigger efficiency.
W Prototype Simulations Linear Collider Physics & Detector Meeting December 15, 2009 Christian Grefe CERN, Bonn University.
SHIP calorimeters at test beam I. KorolkoFebruary 2016.
Michele Faucci Giannelli
LAr Response to pions: Data vs MC
gamma ray polarisation measurement
EZDC spectra reconstruction and calibration
FCAL R&D towards a prototype of very compact calorimeter
on behalf of ATLAS LAr Endcap Group
CALICE scintillator HCAL
From Hadronic Energy Scale to Jet Energy Scale
Introduction The aim of this talk is to try to get a feeling on the expected degradation of performance of a calibration once we move from MonteCarlo.
EM Linearity using calibration constants from Geant4
Comparison between Geant4, Fluka and the TileCal test-beam data
longitudinal shower profile
Michele Faucci Giannelli
Presentation transcript:

FCal TB2003 Shower profiles: G4/MC - Test beam DATA comparison A.Artamonov and ITEP group /afs/cern.ch/user/g/gorbunov/public/prof_note.pdf

S/W details Athena: Atlas release 9.3.0, Geant 4 6.2p01, QGSP 2.6, range cut 30 μ MC analisys: LArG4Analysis TB03 analisys:LArFCALTBCnv ,LArFCALTBAna /LArFCalTBRadialDigitCluster by M. Schram, tile amplitude: parabola fit Same clustering method in MC and data (cylindrical cluster, r=8 cm for electrons, r=19 cm for pions) Rough and “smeared” baricenters (tile counting within the radius)

Event selection, calibration Pions: require FC2 and FC3 be negative Multiple track rejection: BPC Pions: FCal 2 and 3 weight=2

Energy resolution

Baricenter reconstruction

Radial shower profiles 200 GeV Electrons, FCal1

Radial shower profiles 200 GeV Pions, FCal1

Radial shower profiles 200 GeV Pions, FCal2

Radial shower profiles 200 GeV Pions, FCal3

Longitudinal shower profiles 200 GeV Pions

Conclusions Reasonable resolution for the parabola fit method The radial profiles are quite well reproduced by MC for electrons. Pions: satisfactory agreement for FCal1 and poor for FCal2,3 (no noise in MC?, poor description in G4 for tungsten?) The tile geometry causes systematical distortion in the baricenter determination. Can be corrected?

Further work (towards October) Apply “smearing” for total energy and resolution calculations Full signal fit (try VE approach and/or OFC). Channel-to- channel corrections Separate baricenter determination for pions in the three FCal modules. Cluster radius optimization