10 th International Workshop on Clinical Pharmacology of HIV Therapy Pierre Giguere, B.Pharm., M.Sc. The Ottawa Hospital.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200.
$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500.
Single Pill HIV Regimens – Introducing the Quad Pedro Cahn, MD Jean-Pierre Routy, MD Calvin Cohen, MD.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy - Pilot LPV/r - M American Study - KalMo - OK - OK04 - KALESOLO - MOST - HIV-NAT 077.
Evaluation of Oral Azacitidine Using Extended Treatment Schedules: A Phase I Study Garcia-Manero G et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 603.
NC STEP/Mission Hospitals School Cessation and Treatment Guide.
$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300.
Slide 1 Insert your own content. Slide 2 Insert your own content.
Institute of Clinical Infectious Diseases. Catholic University, Rome
ART in HIV-Infected Patients with TB: Research Priorities Group II Facilitator: David Cohn Rapporteur: Soumya Swaminathan.
Paediatric Antiretroviral PK University of Liverpool, UK
0 - 0.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 15 second questions Numbers and number system Numbers and the number system, Measures and Shape.
$100 $200 $300 $400 $100 $200 $300 $400 $100 $200 $300 $400 $100 $200 $300 $400 $100 $200 $300 $400.
Created by Susan Neal $100 Fractions Addition Fractions Subtraction Fractions Multiplication Fractions Division General $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200.
UNIT 2: SOLVING EQUATIONS AND INEQUALITIES SOLVE EACH OF THE FOLLOWING EQUATIONS FOR y. # x + 5 y = x 5 y = 2 x y = 2 x y.
Addition 1’s to 20.
Equal or Not. Equal or Not
Slippery Slope
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Innovative Strategies for the Management of HIV Infection Dual therapies without NRTIs Jean-Guy Baril, MD Clinique médicale du Quartier Latin CHUM This.
Look at these sequences. What is happening? 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, , 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800,
Week 1.
Bottoms Up Factoring. Start with the X-box 3-9 Product Sum
Case 2: 40-year-old Woman with Long-standing HIV Infection
VIREAD (Tenofovir DF) Update. Viread Update  Pharmacokinetics  Safety & Tolerability  Efficacy  Virology.
Switch to ATV + r-containing regimen - SWAN - SLOAT.
Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257.
Clinical Pharmacology Overview From the Antiviral Perspective Kellie Schoolar Reynolds, Pharm.D. Pharmacokinetics Team Leader Office of Clinical Pharmacology.
De Luca A 1,2, Bracciale L 1, Doino M 1, Fabbiani M 1, Sidella L 1, Marzocchetti A 1, Farina S 1, D’Avino A 1, Cauda R 1, Di Giambenedetto S 1 Safety and.
Significance of ARV Pharmacokinetics. Data Presentation.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TC MONARK  LPV/r QD vs BID M M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Pharmacokinetics of Saquinavir hard gel (Invirase) when combined with Atazanavir 8.11 D Prelutsky 1, P Salvato 2, R Falcon 3 1. Washington University School.
Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP. Mallolas J, JAIDS 2009;51:29-36 ATAZIP ATAZIP Study: Switch LPV/r to ATV/r  Design  Endpoints –Primary:
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Simplification from Protease Inhibitors to Once or Twice Daily Raltegravir: the ODIS trial Eugenia Vispo, Pablo Barreiro, Francisco Blanco, Sonia Rodríguez-Novoa*,
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI  QDMRK  SPRING-2. Eron JJ, Lancet Infect Dis 2011;11: QDMRK  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of RAL QD: % HIV.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Brett-Smith, ATAC, 2/24/02 Stavudine Extended Release (Zerit ® XR; d4T XR) Stavudine Prolonged Release Capsules ATAC Meeting 2/24/02.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Clinical development programme for Second-Line treatment Anton Pozniak World AIDS Conference, July 2014.
Agenda  Update on Darunavir: Perry Mohammed  Update on Etravirine: Rekha Sinha  Update on TMC278: Peter Williams  Update on TMC207: Karel De Beule.
Overview of Drug Interactions Between Brecanavir (BCV) and Other HIV Protease Inhibitors (PIs) M Shelton, S Ford, M Anderson, S Murray, J Ng-Cashin XVI.
NRTI-sparing  SPARTAN  PROGRESS  NEAT001/ANRS 143  MODERN.
DIONE – 24 week efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of DRV/r QD in treatment-naïve adolescents, 12 to
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
SAILING Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) in treatment- experienced INI-naïve patients DK/DLG/0041/14c September 2015.
Copyright © 2008 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA All rights Reserved Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Analyses for Raltegravir.
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
RAL + MVC + DRV/r + TDF-FTC
Dolutegravir plus Rilpivirine as Maintenance Dual Therapy SWORD-1 and SWORD- 2: Design
Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir in HIV-HCV Coinfected Patients ASTRAL-5
Cases from the Clinic(ians): Case-based Panel Discussion
ARV-trial.com TURQUOISE-I Study: ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir + dasabuvir + ribavirin for HCV in HIV co-infected patients Randomisation 1 : 1 Open-label.
Switch to E/C/F/TAF + DRV
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch to ATV- or ATV/r-containing regimen
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + RAL HARNESS Study 1.
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Presentation transcript:

10 th International Workshop on Clinical Pharmacology of HIV Therapy Pierre Giguere, B.Pharm., M.Sc. The Ottawa Hospital

Selection of the Abstracts  Scientifically sound  High rigorous methods…  Criteria: What made a good impression to the speaker What made a good impression to the speaker

Agenda  Raltegravir PK-PD relationship PK-PD relationship Interactions Interactions  DRVr Simplification using vIQ Simplification using vIQ PK, safety, efficacy 900/100mg qd PK, safety, efficacy 900/100mg qd Interaction with EFV Interaction with EFV  Effect of Smoking EFV EFV  ATV PK/PD from CASTLE PK/PD from CASTLE ATV unboosted + TDF ATV unboosted + TDF Another FAM – ATVr – TDF study ! Another FAM – ATVr – TDF study !  Pregnancy  Malaria

Raltegravir  MOA: irreversible binding to the Integrase preventing strand transfer into host genome  Metabolized UGT1A1  1 study (P_11)failed to show an association due to extreme interpatient variability (CV 92%)

PK-PD of RAL  Cmin poor predictor. AUC ?  Model : HOSCD4R5 cells and HIV-1 cell modified to express fluorescence.  Infected cells using bead cells x 30min then wash out.  Counted fluorescence, which reflects occupency at the integrase site. 

Dissociation of RAL from INT  Window of 4-12 hrs, time after which integration cannot occur  Residency time RA = 5-6 hrs  Impact of N155H: increase dissociation by 10-fold  This parameter would be potentially the best marker of activity  Analogous to One shot Kill

RAL Interaction in HIV+  Atazanavir 400mg OD + RAL 800mg OD  N=15 HIV-infected  ATV 400mg po x 14 days Then + RAL 800mg qd Then + RAL 800mg qd Molto, IWCPHT2009; Abst 0_13.

RAL Interaction in HIV+ Molto, IWCPHT2009; Abst 0_13. No discontinuation due to AE

RAL Interaction in HIV+  Atazanavir 200mg BID + RAL 400mg BID Ripamonti, IWCPHT2009;Abst 0_14.

RAL Interaction in HIV+ Ripamonti, IWCPHT2009;Abst 0_14.

RAL Interaction in HIV+ Ripamonti, IWCPHT2009;Abst 0_14.

RAL Interaction in HIV+ Ripamonti, IWCPHT2009;Abst 0_14.

RAL Interaction in HIV+ Ripamonti, IWCPHT2009;Abst 0_14.

RAL interaction  Ezetimibe 10 mg qd N=20 N=20

Results

Results The variability in raltegravir Cmax and AUC was higher in the presence of ezetimibe. Six (30%) of the volunteers had Ctrough Which were lower than the reported IC95 of 15 ng/mL.

Darunavir 900/100mg  Simplification using vIQ 30 pts with VL 12 weeks 30 pts with VL 12 weeks vIQ (Ctrough / 0.55 x FC IC50) > 2 vIQ (Ctrough / 0.55 x FC IC50) > 2 Ranodmized to continue DRV/r 600/100 mg BID or switch to 900/100mg qd Ranodmized to continue DRV/r 600/100 mg BID or switch to 900/100mg qd If vIQ < 1.5 x 2 values, then switched back If vIQ < 1.5 x 2 values, then switched back PTs had a medium exposure of 5 PI, and a median number protease mutations = 11 PTs had a medium exposure of 5 PI, and a median number protease mutations = 11

Results  3 patients switched back to BID due to low vIQ  All maintained VL<50 copies/mL  DRV Cmin lower in qd group (GMR 0.72 [ ])  TC no different between groups  TG 159  140 mg/dL (p=0.031)

Darunavir 900/100mg qd  25 pts (48% HCV co-infected)  47% had VL<50 at baseline, the remainder median 4.2 log  Results Ctrough= 1.62 [1.06, 1.46] Ctrough= 1.62 [1.06, 1.46] 24/25 had level > 0.55 ug/mL 24/25 had level > 0.55 ug/mL All VL<50 at week 24 All VL<50 at week 24 No effect of gender, HCV, other ART No effect of gender, HCV, other ART Curran et al. IWCPHIVT 2009, Amsterdam, P_14

DRVr-EFV  Attractive once daily first-line regimen  PK DRVr 900/100mg + EFV 600mg  12 Healthy volunteers DRVr 900mg/100mg Day 0day10 PK DRVr 900mg/100mg + EFV 600mg Day 11Day 25 EFV 600mg Day 26Day 40 PK Period 1Period 2Period 3 Lee et al. IWCPHIVT 2009, Amsterdam, P_29

Darunavir/r + EFV DRV Period #2 EFV (Period #3) (2) AUCGMR=0.86 [0.75, 0.97] GM = 0.91 [0.75, 1.11] CmaxGMR=0.92 [0.82, 1.03] GMR=0.80[0.63,1.02] Cmin 1180ng/mL (1) GMR=0.43 [0.32, 0.57] GMR 1.01 [0.81, 1.25] 1.All were > 0.55 ng/mL 2.Half-life higher by 66% Lee et al. IWCPHIVT 2009, Amsterdam, P_29

Smoking  Known interaction with Theophyllin Mediated through induction of the CYP1A2 Mediated through induction of the CYP1A2  1 abstract showing effect of smoking on EFV levels Cortes (P_04) Cortes (P_04) 219 pts from Chile 219 pts from Chile  Also shown to have an inducing effect on constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) known to regulate 2B6

EFV plasma concentrations grouped by CYP2B6 G516T polymorphism Cortes et al. IWCPHIVT 2009, Amsterdam, P_04

EFV plasma concentrations grouped by smoking status Cortes et al. IWCPHIVT 2009, Amsterdam, P_04

Atazanavir: PK-PD CASTLE  883 treatment naïve patients  Samples at day 1, week 4,12,24,36,48  Correlation between Ctrough and efficacy or toxicity Zhu. IWCPHIVT 2009, P_19

PK PD CASTLE  No correlation could be found between Decline in viral load Decline in viral load VL<50 VL<50  For both ATVr and LPVr Zhu. IWCPHIVT 2009, P_19

PK PD CASTLE  Bilirubin was associated with higher trough of ATVr Zhu. IWCPHIVT 2009, P_19

PK PD CASTLE Nausea was associated with trough but not diarrhea nor TC & TG( not shown) Zhu. IWCPHIVT 2009, P_19

ATV + TDF Harris. IWCPHIVT 2009, P_21

ATV + TDF Harris. IWCPHIVT 2009, P_21

ATV + TDF Harris. IWCPHIVT 2009, P_21

ATV + TDF CONCLUSIONS Despite low atazanavir trough levels, selected patients may be virologically controlled on regimens including unboosted atazanavir with tenofovir. Harris. IWCPHIVT 2009, P_21

ATVr +FAM: Saga Continues !  Assess ATVr 300/100mg is affected by FAM 20mg BID FAM 20mg BID FAM 40mg BID FAM 40mg BID 2hrs apart or at same time 2hrs apart or at same time With or without TDF With or without TDF  In HIV-Infected patients Wang. IWCPHIVT 2009, P_30

ATVr +FAM: With NO TDF  Fam 20 BID did not decrease Cmin  Fam 40 BID decreased Cmin by 20% Wang. IWCPHIVT 2009, P_30

ATVr +FAM: With TDF  Fam 20 BID decreased Cmin by 19%  Fam 40 BID decreased Cmin by 25% Wang. IWCPHIVT 2009, P_30

ATVr +FAM: Temporal Separation  Separation of the dose does not change ATV Cmin.  10 hr separation between doses is still required Wang. IWCPHIVT 2009, P_30

Pregnancy  Several studies reported decrease exposure of PIs in 3 rd trimester.  Some advocate increase dose  60 pregnant women on LPVr, ATV and NVP Sample each trimester, at delivery, in the cord and post partum (1-2 months) Sample each trimester, at delivery, in the cord and post partum (1-2 months) Total and free plasma concentration Total and free plasma concentration Interim analysis (42 pregnancies) Interim analysis (42 pregnancies) Fayet. IWCPHIVT 2009, P_57

Pregnancy  LPV: Fu, free and total AUC, Cmin not affected  ATV: Total AUC and Cmin decreased by 36%, while total CL increased. BUT free Cmin and AUC not affected (Fu tends to increase)  NVP: Total AUC and Cmin decreased by 32% while total CL tended to increase. Free AUC and Cmin decreased in parallel  Cord to mother ratio (C/M) LPV and ATV: free C/M ratio were 2-fold; free fraction higher than in mothers plasma LPV and ATV: free C/M ratio were 2-fold; free fraction higher than in mothers plasma NVP: free fractions similar NVP: free fractions similar Fayet. IWCPHIVT 2009, P_57

Malarone PIs - EFV  Malarone = atovaquone + proguanil  Proguanil is metabolized by 2C19 to cycloguanil (active moiety)  Atovaquone: likely metabolized through glucoronidation  PIs and NNRTIS can induce 2C19 (1)  LPVr or RTV can induce glucuronidation  However, Proguanil (not cycloguanil) is the synergistic compound to atovaquone (2) ATV/r LPV/r EFV Health volunteers HIV + 1 month Single dose Malarone Also looked at 2C19*2 and -*3 van Lui. IWCPHIVT 2009, O_19 1.JAIDS 006, 42: AAC :1334-9

Baseline Characteristics van Lui. IWCPHIVT 2009, O_19