NHA/PGAIR/BCLA: AQ and Health – June 15, 2009 Peter L. Jackson 1 Source Apportionment of Fine Particulate Matter In Prince George – Preliminary Results.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

Hamilton Air Quality and Health Impacts Study
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1 Computer Systems Organization & Architecture Chapters 8-12 John D. Carpinelli.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
1 Dr. Peder Jensen Project Manager, Transport and Environment TERM TERM Transport and environment: on the way to a new common transport policy.
EU-Regional Policy Structural actions 1 GROWING EVALUATION CAPACITY THE MID TERM EVALUATION IN OBJECTIVE 1 AND 2 REGIONS 8 OCTOBER 2004.
L a n d e s u m w e l t a m t N o r d r h e i n – W e s t f a l e n Autorenname, Fachbereich Sabine Wurzler High population density and heavy industry:
| Folie 1 The Austrian strategy to reduce PM: perspectives and challenges Workshop on Plans and Programmes of Air Quality and National Emission.
Signatur A web-based tool to test Current and Future perspectives in Air Pollution Forward-Looking Information in Environment Assessment Copenhagen.
1 Dr. Peder Jensen Project Manager, Transport and Environment TERM TERM Transport and environment: on the way to a new common transport policy.
Institute for Environment and Sustainability1 POMI Kick-off Meeting 07/03/2008.
AREP GAW Section 3 Introduction and Overview of Course.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Addition Facts
1 Dealing with Climate Change Dr Jan Wright Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment.
Techniques Utilizing Ambient PM2.5 Air Quality Data to Aid in the 24 hour Designation Process Michael Rizzo AQAG/AQAD/OAQPS EPA State / Local / Tribal.
Effective Test Planning: Scope, Estimates, and Schedule Presented By: Shaun Bradshaw
European Commission Directorate-General for Energy and Transport n° 1 Air Quality & CAFE AREHNA WORKSHOP Kos, 3-5 May 2003 Mrs Michèle LEPELLETIER.
SCATTER final seminar, Brussels, 9 November 2004 SCATTER Testing and evaluating potential solutions to control urban sprawl, through simulation.
A Comprehensive Provincial Air Emissions Inventory to Support AEMERA, ESRD and the AER Richard Melick Emissions Inventory Scientist Air Policy.
Sets Sets © 2005 Richard A. Medeiros next Patterns.
Summary of relevant information in the CAFE Position paper on PM Martin Meadows UNECE PMEG Berlin, 23 & 24 May 2005.
PM NAAQS Review Update Joseph Paisie Air Quality Strategies & Standards Division, Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards, EPA WESTAR Fall Business.
Workshop to Promote the Ratification of the UN-ECE CLRTAP HM Protocol May 2008, Yerevan, Armenia. 1 Additional technical measures, their reduction.
Workshop to Promote the Ratification of the UN-ECE CLRTAP HM Protocol May 2008, Yerevan, Armenia. 1 emissions reduction (and costs) The effectiveness.
An experience on modelling-based assessment of the air quality within the Air Quality Directive framework Ana Isabel Miranda, Isabel Ribeiro, Patrícia.
Addition 1’s to 20.
NORTRIP Different measures to reduce PM10 concentrations –a model sensitivity analysis Gunnar Omstedt, SMHI Introduction model description.
25 seconds left…...
1 Workshop on inventories of greenhouse gas emissions from aviation and navigation May 2004, Copenhagen EU greenhouse gas emission trends and projections.
1 Using one or more of your senses to gather information.
1 Air quality management in the Netherlands PM 10 in the Rotterdam - Rijnmond Area Leo Sef vd Brussels 1/2 September.
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
Bottoms Up Factoring. Start with the X-box 3-9 Product Sum
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
THE AIR UP THERE Particulate Matter in Melbourne, Fl Department of Marine and Environmental Systems Florida Institute of Technology Melbourne, Florida.
DATA TRACKING AND EVALUATION 1. Goal of the STEP program: To increase the number of STEM graduates within the five-year period of the grant. You have.
Clearing the Skies: Airshed Management in Prince George Mellissa Winfield-Lesk, M.Sc., B.ES Environmental Quality Section Head, BC Ministry of Environment.
Source Apportionment of PM 2.5 in the Southeastern US Sangil Lee 1, Yongtao Hu 1, Michael Chang 2, Karsten Baumann 2, Armistead (Ted) Russell 1 1 School.
1 Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
The Use of High Resolution Mesoscale Model Fields with the CALPUFF Dispersion Modelling System in Prince George BC Bryan McEwen Master’s project
Air Quality Management Initiatives for Kuala Lumpur: A study of stakeholder roles, emission sources, and vulnerable populations Dr. Scott Kennedy Energy.
Missouri Air Quality Issues Stephen Hall Air Quality Analysis Section Air Pollution Control Program Air Quality Applied Sciences Team (AQAST) 9 th Semi-Annual.
Air Quality Impact Analysis 1.Establish a relationship between emissions and air quality. AQ past = a EM past + b 2.A change in emissions results in an.
Angeliki Karanasiou Source apportionment of particulate matter in urban aerosol Institute of Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection, Environmental.
June 12 &13, 2007 Mickey Leland National Urban Air Toxics Workshop II – Houston, Texas 1 Albuquerque, New Mexico Community Scale Ambient Air Monitoring.
Causes of Haze Assessment Dave DuBois Desert Research Institute.
Monitoring and Modelling in the Malé Declaration Kevin Hicks Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI), UK Bangkok, March 2008 Malé Declaration 6 th Monitoring.
Analysis Examples and Issues: Identifying Sources Policy Analysis Tools for Air Quality and Health A workshop hosted by NERAM and Pollution Probe Jeffrey.
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
Causes of Haze Assessment (COHA) Update. Current and near-future Major Tasks Visibility trends analysis Assess meteorological representativeness of 2002.
Air Quality in Texas Birnur Guven Houston Advanced Research Center June 23, 2010 – Johnson Space Center.
June 15, 2011 Bob Dulla Sierra Research. Fairbanks PM 2.5 Design Values* ( ) * 98 th Percentile Concentrations 2.
Fairbanks PM 2.5 Source Apportionment Using the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) Model Tony Ward, Ph.D. The University of Montana Center for Environmental Health.
Elements of Air Quality Management Scientific Understanding Community Involvement Cooperative Planning Realistic Goal Setting Long Term Commitment Implementation.
7. Air Quality Modeling Laboratory: individual processes Field: system observations Numerical Models: Enable description of complex, interacting, often.
M. Samaali, M. Sassi, V. Bouchet
Source Attribution AB 617 Community Air Protection Program
Bulkley Valley-Lakes District Air Quality Ambient Air Quality Assessment: June 2006 AGM & Public Forum Benjamin Weinstein Air Quality Meteorologist Ministry.
U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone
Presentation transcript:

NHA/PGAIR/BCLA: AQ and Health – June 15, 2009 Peter L. Jackson 1 Source Apportionment of Fine Particulate Matter In Prince George – Preliminary Results Peter L. Jackson Environmental Science & Engineering Program Natural Resources and Environmental Studies Institute University of Northern British Columbia (modelling by John Spagnol)

NHA/PGAIR/BCLA: AQ and Health – June 15, 2009 Peter L. Jackson 2 Acknowledgements This presentation discusses two studies: –A Speciation Study with analysis and speciation modelling by STI (Sonoma Technologies Inc.) funded by the BC Ministry of Environment and Environment Canada –A dispersion modelling study overseen by the Prince George Air Improvement Roundtable – Research Working Group conducted at UNBC by Dr. John Spagnol working with Dr. Peter Jackson and research assistants, funded by BC Ministry of Environment, Environment Canada, City of Prince George, Northern Health and Canfor. Disclaimer The dispersion modelling results are preliminary – internal review has identified improvements to be implemented and the draft study is currently being externally reviewed.

NHA/PGAIR/BCLA: AQ and Health – June 15, 2009 Peter L. Jackson 3 Air Quality Considerations Sources  Atmosphere  Receptors All must be considered! Most AQ issues are complex and solutions that work can be challenging What we care about are impacts on Receptors (i.e. people)

NHA/PGAIR/BCLA: AQ and Health – June 15, 2009 Peter L. Jackson 4 Information / Research Needs for Management of PM Goal is to reduce both average and episodic levels Requires knowledge of which sources are contributing Routine ambient data is useful but may not provide strong enough evidence Several methods exist, each giving different sorts of answers: none are perfect! Methods can be highly complementary If results from different studies point to same results (triangulation), then they increase confidence and strengthen management actions that result

NHA/PGAIR/BCLA: AQ and Health – June 15, 2009 Peter L. Jackson 5 Types of Source ID Studies 1.Receptor Modelling based on ambient AQ data wind sector analysis (Fudge et al, BCMOE) chemical mass balance (CMB) – associates source chemical source profiles to ambient data (EC/BCMOE/STI study) Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) - lets the ambient data “speak for themselves” and infers source profile (EC/BCMOE/STI study) 2.Dispersion Modelling based on source emission inventory, meteorological data validated by ambient data and can determine contributions of individual sources at any receptor in the airshed Many “levels” of modelling Current comprehensive study using Calpuff (Spagnol et al, UNBC – PGAQIC – Research Working Group)

NHA/PGAIR/BCLA: AQ and Health – June 15, 2009 Peter L. Jackson 6 Receptor Modelling Results Summary

NHA/PGAIR/BCLA: AQ and Health – June 15, 2009 Peter L. Jackson 7 PGAQ DispersionModelling Study Partnership between PGAIR – Research Working Group and UNBC (John Spagnol working with Peter Jackson) RWG members have been involved in the study, including its design, every step of the way – research has been iterative, allowing feedback and continuous improvements Work has undergone RWG review – critical evaluation has resulted in several improvements – currently it is being externally reviewed

NHA/PGAIR/BCLA: AQ and Health – June 15, 2009 Peter L. Jackson 8 Dispersion Modelling Dispersion modelling is a useful tool commonly used to manage air quality and consider impacts of sources on AQ Three components: 1.An inventory of all emissions 2.A meteorological model [calmet] 3.A transport/dispersion/chemistry model that takes the emissions and uses the meteorology to transport and disperse the pollutants, and to consider formation and removal of pollutants in the atmosphere [calpuff] Model results tell us the expected outdoor levels from each source at each point in the area, every hour from

NHA/PGAIR/BCLA: AQ and Health – June 15, 2009 Peter L. Jackson 9 PGAQ (2005) Average emission rates (g/sec) Sec No NOx.SOxPM10PM2.5 2Permitted On-road dust Railway (orig/revised) 333.8/ /.925.2/ /4.4 5On-road mobile Residential Heating Open Burning Commercial Heating Res Sources Com Sources Wind-blownPM Aerosol formation 148 Sum MOE-Victoria (2000) NOxSOxPM10PM MOE-Omenica (1995) without road dust with road dust Draft Emission Inventory (with rail emissions revised, but further changes have also been identified)

NHA/PGAIR/BCLA: AQ and Health – June 15, 2009 Peter L. Jackson PM2.5 annual average Contours are 5, 10, 20 μg/m 3 NOTE: PRELIMINARY RESULTS – FINAL RESULTS WILL DIFFER

NHA/PGAIR/BCLA: AQ and Health – June 15, 2009 Peter L. Jackson 11 Plaza PM NOTE: PRELIMINARY RESULTS – FINAL RESULTS WILL DIFFER (Locomotives too high)

NHA/PGAIR/BCLA: AQ and Health – June 15, 2009 Peter L. Jackson 12 Measured and modelled pollution roses NOTE: PRELIMINARY RESULTS – FINAL RESULTS WILL DIFFER

NHA/PGAIR/BCLA: AQ and Health – June 15, 2009 Peter L. Jackson 13 Comparison of CMB with Preliminary Dispersion Modelling NOTE: PRELIMINARY RESULTS – FINAL RESULTS WILL DIFFER (Heavy duty diesel too high)

NHA/PGAIR/BCLA: AQ and Health – June 15, 2009 Peter L. Jackson 14 Questions / concerns Modelled Rail / locomotive initial emission estimates were too high and have been corrected Modelled concentrations at Plaza do not have as high a frequency of the highest values from the industrial wind sector – we may be underestimating industrial contributions somewhat Contributions from local / neighborhood sources (e.g. wood stoves) are in the model, but will not be significant at the Plaza site due to distance and elevation (therefore the importance of these sources at the neighborhood level should not be underestimated)

NHA/PGAIR/BCLA: AQ and Health – June 15, 2009 Peter L. Jackson 15 Next Steps Report is presently being externally reviewed (an expert 3 rd party reviewer has been contracted by PGAIR) 3 rd party review will be assessed by the RWG, and any additional changes/further work decided upon so that remodelling can be done and study finalized and released Results will be used to inform Phase III of the Air Quality Management Plan

NHA/PGAIR/BCLA: AQ and Health – June 15, 2009 Peter L. Jackson 16 Questions?

NHA/PGAIR/BCLA: AQ and Health – June 15, 2009 Peter L. Jackson 17 Which site should be used to make management decisions? We have monitoring at a number of sites – often located to pick up high values One measure would be a population weighted average…

NHA/PGAIR/BCLA: AQ and Health – June 15, 2009 Peter L. Jackson 18 PM2.5 Modelled annual average levels for permitted (Industrial) sources only Population weighted NOTE: PRELIMINARY RESULTS – FINAL RESULTS WILL DIFFER

NHA/PGAIR/BCLA: AQ and Health – June 15, 2009 Peter L. Jackson PM10 annual average Contours are 10, 20, 30, 50 μg/m 3 NOTE: PRELIMINARY RESULTS – FINAL RESULTS WILL DIFFER

NHA/PGAIR/BCLA: AQ and Health – June 15, 2009 Peter L. Jackson 20 Plaza PM (validation year) NOTE: PRELIMINARY RESULTS – FINAL RESULTS WILL DIFFER (Locomotives too high)

NHA/PGAIR/BCLA: AQ and Health – June 15, 2009 Peter L. Jackson 21 Comparison with BCMOE wind sector analysis

NHA/PGAIR/BCLA: AQ and Health – June 15, 2009 Peter L. Jackson 22 Comparison with wind sector analysis