Session 3 The evidence should be credible & helpful. Implications: the assessments should – ◦ Be grounded in real-world applications, supplemented as.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Differentiated Instruction (DI) Meets Understand by Design (UbD) UB EDUC- 503 May 29, 2012.
Advertisements

Differentiated Instruction (DI) Meets Understand by Design (UbD) UB EDUC- 503 October 15, 2012.
The 21st Century Context for
Understanding by Design Day 2 Roosevelt Complex Secondary Science Training.
Backward Design Stages Identify Student Learning Expectations/ Targets Determine acceptable Evidence of student learning. Plan Learning Experiences & Instruction.
Understanding by Design The ‘Big Ideas’ of UbD © 2002 Wiggins & McTighe –UbD.
Understanding by Design & Assessment
Understanding by Design
An approach to curriculum designed to engage students in inquiry and uncovering ideas.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Chapter 8 Criteria and Validity PERSIAN GROUP. ارزیابی امتحان آزمون ارزیابی امتحان آزمون ارزیابی امتحان آزمون ارزیابی امتحان آزمون ارزیابی امتحان آزمون.
It defines acceptable evidence of student’s attainment of desired results. It determines authentic performance tasks that the student is expected to do.
MODULE 3 1st 2nd 3rd. The Backward Design Learning Objectives What is the purpose of doing an assessment? How to determine what kind of evidences to.
Authentic Performance Tasks
The mere imparting of information is not education. Above all things, the effort must result in helping a person think and do for himself/herself. Carter.
Authentic Assessment Abdelmoneim A. Hassan. Welcome Authentic Assessment Qatar University Workshop.
Understanding by Design
Module 21 The Role of Materials. What’s inside Purpose of materials Learning support Producing materials for ESP Writers or providers of materials Teacher-generated.
1.  com com  And click on the “ASCD Presentations” tab  Tamalpais August 8-9 Day Two.
Dr. Robert Mayes University of Wyoming Science and Mathematics Teaching Center
Redding Elementary School Integrated Learning Experiences Summer 2011 Presentation created by Christopher Wermuth 2011.
46th Annual MPESA Fall Conference
Presentation to RISC IDD February 23, 2011 Copper Stoll.
Overall Teacher Judgements
PLAN AND ORGANISE ASSESSMENT. By the end of this session, you will have an understanding of what is assessment, competency based assessment, assessment.
UNDERSTANDING BY DESIGN
 Understanding by Design Using Backwards Design Principles to Create Standards-Based Units Welcome! We’re glad you’re here…
Understanding by Design Stage 2: Evidence Think Like an Assessor.
Session 2: Are We There Yet? Integrating Understanding by Design and Historical Thinking.
Standards-Based Planning Essential Question: What is good teaching? Rigor, Consistency and Cohesiveness in Unit Planning.
Developing Structured Activity Tools. Aligning assessment methods and tools Often used where real work evidence not available / observable Method: Structured.
Designing an integrated authentic assessment task for Geography and Social Studies.
Stages 1 and 2 Wednesday, August 4th, Stage 1: Step 5 National and State Standards.
School Divisions in the Province of Saskatchewan have recognized the importance of playing and active role in providing quality field experiences to help.
CT 854: Assessment and Evaluation in Science & Mathematics
Adapted from Understanding by Design Academy, Seattle, WA, July 2001 presented by Jay McTighe, ASCD. Think “Scrapbook” versus “Snapshot ”
PLANNING for INQUIRY Backward Design Information to Knowledge Journey Wiggins and McTighe, Kuhlthau, Todd.
The Backward Design Process
Understanding by Design a.k.a. Backward Design
Project Based Learning
High School Department Development Day February 12, 2010.
Understanding By Design
ANALYSIS 1 WEEK 2. WHY ANALYZE? to determine what the root cause is between the way things are and they way they should/could be. ADDIE Model Explained.
Stage 2 Understanding by Design Assessment Evidence.
Understanding by Design the ‘big ideas’ of UbD Copyright: 2002, Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe.
Alternative Assessment Chapter 8 David Goh. Factors Increasing Awareness and Development of Alternative Assessment Educational reform movement Goals 2000,
© 2002 Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe UBD 08/ Understanding by Design the ‘big ideas’ of UbD.
Understanding by Design grant wiggins & jay mctighe
UbD - Stage 2 Assessment Evidence. Our Big Idea Making Best Practices, Common Practice *create a variety of assessments, to be used throughout the lesson,
IT’S ALL ABOUT LEARNING BY SIMON BREWSTER Andrea Muñoz Brown.
Chapter 7- Thinking Like an Assessor Amy Broadbent and Mary Beck EDU 5103.
Lenape School District Understanding by Design Day 2 June 26, 2012 Day 2 June 26, 2012.
Adapted From the Work and Wisdom of Grant Wiggins & Jay McTighe, UBD 08/2002 Understanding by Design the ‘big ideas’ of UbD.
Designing Performance Assessments. Characteristics of Performance Tasks Complex challenges that mirror the issues and problems faced by adultsComplex.
Evaluation Of and For Learning
School – Based Assessment – Framework
Approaching Assessment
Understanding by Design
Validity and reliability
Stage 2: Assessment.
Understanding by Design “Backwards Design”
Understanding By Design Introduction September 17th , 2009
Understanding by Design
Stage 2: Assessment.
Partners in Learning Educator Professional Development
Designing & Conducting Formative Evaluation
Engaged Plenary Patricia McGee.
Good assessment design The overarching principles of good assessment
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION.
The Teacher Work Sample: An Authentic Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Session 3

The evidence should be credible & helpful. Implications: the assessments should – ◦ Be grounded in real-world applications, supplemented as needed by more traditional school evidence ◦ Provide useful feedback to the learner, be transparent, and minimize secrecy ◦ Be valid, reliable - aligned with the desired results of Stage 1 (and fair)

 Template fields ask: ◦ What are key complex performance tasks indicative of understanding? ◦ What other evidence will be collected to build the case for understanding, knowledge, and skill? ◦ What rubrics will be used to assess complex performance?

Saskatchewan Ministry of Learning

Build assessments anchored in authentic tasks using GRASPS: ◦ What is the Goal in the scenario? ◦ What is the Role? ◦ Who is the Audience? ◦ What is your Situation (context)? ◦ What is the Performance challenge? ◦ By what Standards will work be judged in the scenario?

 i.e. You really understand when you can: ◦ Explain ◦ Interpret ◦ Apply ◦ Perspective ◦ Empathize ◦ Self-knowledge