SASD Seminar Series - Academic Program Approval - 2010 ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT FOR THE ACADEMIC PROGRAM APPROVAL PROCESS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Session No. 4 Implementing the State’s Safety Programme Implementing Service Providers SMS
Advertisements

Official BFUG Bologna Seminar ENHANCING EUROPEAN EMPLOYABILITY July 2006 University of Wales Swansea.
Quality and Standards Framework – Collaborative Provision December 2008 Janet Pearce, University Quality Officer.
Quality and Standards Framework – Collaborative Provision The Basics Janet Pearce, University Quality Officer.
External Examining at Keele University
Welcome to Student Administration and Academic Administration
ELIR Workshop 1 Managing the Student Learning Experience.
Halina Oswald JP Director, Monash Research Office
School of Physiotherapy Curtin University of Technology You are considering undertaking PhD or MSc by research study at the School of Physiotherapy Read.
UTS CRICOS PROVIDER CODE: 00099F UKCGE INTERNATIONAL ANNUAL CONFERENCE 2014 Growing quality in uncertain times Prof Nicky Solomon, Dean, Graduate Research.
Sharing Good Practice in Quality
MRFA General Meeting 27 October Agenda Approvals Approval of Minutes (Sept 27, 2010) Officer’s Reports President Treasurer Audit Completion Part-time.
Student Integrity and Misconduct Training and support for decision makers and Academic Integrity Officers.
Graduate Research Degree Orientation 2013 Decision Making and Governance.
Department of Computer Science Faculty of Science Research Methods Supervision.
Internal verification and external standards moderation.
NADP Individual Accreditation Scheme Conference June 2010.
ANU SAS Forum 11 September, 2014 Student Administrative Services Integrated AIMS and MAPPS systems Patricia McCauley Manager Student Administrative Services.
Course Outline Process Overview for Course Convenors.
Successful Graduation Projects
The Research Masters (NFQ level 9) is a coherent programme of supervised Masters-level research normally resulting in the submission of a thesis. It may.
Implementing a framework for employability Penny Renwick, Pro Vice Chancellor, Manchester Metropolitan University.
Training for Implementation of CEC§ Creating AA-T and AS-T (SB 1440 Transfer Degrees) Spring 2011 February 1, 2011.
Annual Monitoring and Review & Mutual Review Quality Assurance Services.
Purpose of the Standards
ZHRC/HTI Financial Management Training
How do I manage my work as well as possible? Know who is responsible for what Three key parties: 1.The student (you) 2.Your supervisor 3.Your unit/UCC.
Benchmarks and Benchmarking in the UK - Lessons Learned Catherine Connor Quality Enhancement Unit London Metropolitan University.
Cheating, Plagiarism and Unfair Practice Franchise Delivery Quality Assurance Services.
National Frameworks of Qualifications, and the UK Experience Dr Robin Humphrey Director of Research Postgraduate Training Faculty of Humanities and Social.
Professor Dolina Dowling
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
Continuous Improvement Monitoring (CIM) Collaborative Partner Forum Awareness Session June 2015.
1 Collaborative Provision and External Examining Nicola Clarke Centre for Academic Standards and Quality Enhancement (CASQE)
Tertiary Education Management Conference 2006 Integration For a New Generation – Technological solutions for linking core functions of teaching and learning.
Student Education Service QUALITY ASSURANCE QAA Update HEFCE consultation on future of quality assessment arrangements QAA Quality Code Alignment - programme.
PLACE OF QUALITY ASSURANCE IN ENHANCEMENT OF ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF MAKERERE UNIVERSITY BY SAM LUBOGA ACTING DIRECTOR QUALITY ASSURANCE DIRECTORATE 9/23/20151.
Collaborative Programmes Annual and Periodic Quality Assurance Arrangements Rebecca Broome Quality Management Division November 2007.
Status of the Recommendations of the Spring 2002 Academic Misconduct Review Committee and Office of Student Integrity (OSI) Update Executive Board Meeting.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
1 Status of PSC recommendations (January December 2007) Portfolio Committee on Public Service and Administration 14 March 2008.
Quality and Relevance in Graduate Studies: Canada-China Academic Forum August 25 – 27, 2010 Enhancing the Quality and Standard of Graduate Education Barbara.
Members of the NSAC Placement Testing Specialist Transfer Credit Evaluation Team AP credits Dual credits Academic Advisors First year of study at Benedictine.
1) Establish & Identify Scheme 5) Evolve Scheme 4) Review & Modify Scheme Deliverables 3) Operate the Framework 2) Manage Performance Assurance Scheme.
The Curriculum/Course Proposal Process What Is The Role of the Curriculum Committee and the Chair?
Council on Higher Education: Three-year Business Plan and MTEF Budget Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training.
GIVE YOUR CURRICULUM PROCESS A TUNE-UP: MAKING CURRICULUM PROCESSES EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT John Freitas, Los Angeles City College Michael Heumann, Imperial.
Multistate Research Program Roles & Responsibilities Eric Young SAAESD Meeting Corpus Christi, TX April 3-6, 2005.
TEQSA The Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency.
Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chairperson of the National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee. Former Dean of the Faculty of Agricultural, Cairo university.
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY CONTINUOUS AUDIT BRIEFING 2015/16 ACTIVITIES Quality Assurance Services.
30/10/2006 University Leaders Meeting 1 Student Assessment: A Mandatory Requirement For Accreditation Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chair-Person National Quality.
1 Capital Union Building – Penn State Harrisburg Administration Building – Penn State Schuylkill.
Principles of Good Governance
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
UCL Annual Student Experience Review
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
SPHERE Study Visit: University of Edinburgh (October 2017)
Best Practices Managing Agendas and the Electronic Curriculum System
Academic Affairs Update Monday, October 17, 2016
June 5, 2017 General Track Meeting.
Setting Actuarial Standards
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
Role of Academic Services
CORPORATE & ACADEMIC GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE
To achieve improvement through: Self assessment Benchmarking
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Georgia State University Dual Enrollment Task Force:
Best Practices Managing Agendas and the Electronic Curriculum System
Presentation transcript:

SASD Seminar Series - Academic Program Approval ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT FOR THE ACADEMIC PROGRAM APPROVAL PROCESS

SASD Seminar Series – Academic Program Approval OBJECTIVES Be familiar with the policy and governance framework Gain understanding of current administrative processes Promote awareness of the administrative support available Opportunity to share good practices and improve administrative processes

SASD Seminar Series – Academic Program Approval CURRENT LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK General Award Rules Program rules HUPP – Course and Program Design HUPP – Academic Program Approval HUPP – Program Nomenclature HUPP – Course Coding System

SASD Seminar Series – Academic Program Approval OBJECTIVES OF THE PROGRAM APPROVAL PROCESS The process has been designed to ensure: consistency with UQ’s academic and strategic priorities incorporation of appropriate learning experiences, teaching and evaluation methods and graduate attributes QA procedures are embedded in each stage of program development the quality and integrity of the program meets the highest academic standards within an established T&L policy framework appropriate notification of proposed changes consultation with relevant academic and administrative units, external and accreditation bodies compliance with relevant legislation, such as the ESOS Act.

SASD Seminar Series – Academic Program Approval KEY PRINCIPLES OF APPROVAL PROCESS Program approvals involve a 2 committee structure: USMC and CAPP CAPP’s role reflects policy oversight and quality assurance PSC’s role is mainly compliance scrutiny Sequence of submissions - designed to allow faculties to obtain necessary approval before a proposal is submitted to next stage of process. Committees only consider information relevant to their role.

SASD Seminar Series – Academic Program Approval University Senior Management Committee (USMC) USMC considers notification of new and major program initiatives. –Considers the strategic aspects of new and major program initiatives prior to the development of more detailed academic aspects of the programs.

SASD Seminar Series – Academic Program Approval Committee for Academic Programs Policy (CAPP) Role of CAPP a Committee of the Academic Board policy oversight to consider and advise Academic Board on matters of educational significance, including: Faculty submissions for new and major academic program proposals development of academic policies

SASD Seminar Series – Academic Program Approval

Programs Sub-Committee (PSC) Role of PSC compliance scrutiny, routine and primarily administrative nature nomenclature amendments changes to program rules courses to be offered in non-standard teaching periods and variations to the Academic Calendar

SASD Seminar Series – Academic Program Approval SINGLE STAGE SUBMISSIONS Required for: program/field discontinuation (CAPP/Executive Deans concurrently) nomenclature amendment (PSC) new dual program from existing programs (CAPP) program rule amendments (PSC) non-award studies (e.g. enhanced studies) (CAPP)

SASD Seminar Series – Academic Program Approval TEMPLATES FOR SUBMISSIONS suite of templates available from Program Bulletin website linked also from HUPP – Academic Program Approval designed to capture all required information

SASD Seminar Series – Academic Program Approval REVIEW OF TEMPLATES review of forms in 2010 objectives –better reflect program approval process –reduce complexity –promote timeliness –improve communication structured consultation process feedback welcome

SASD Seminar Series – Academic Program Approval FORMS SUBMITTED TO CAPP new programs and fields – (forms 1, 2, 4) program discontinuations (form 6) structural changes to existing coursework programs (form 3)

SASD Seminar Series – Academic Program Approval FORMS new dual programs from existing programs (form 4) nomenclature amendments (form 5) discontinuations of programs/study sequences (form 6) program rules (form 7) non-award studies (form 10) new courses (form 11)

SASD Seminar Series – Academic Program Approval PROGRAM BULLETIN encourages communication and collaboration UQ-wide scrutiny and early resolution of cross- faculty issues tracks progress of proposals shows history of program introductions, changes etc ( ) updated after meetings of PSC, CAPP, Academic Board, Legislative Committee and Senate

SASD Seminar Series – Academic Program Approval MEETING DATES (CAPP AND PSC) submission deadlines two weeks prior to meeting meeting dates are communicated to faculties later in the year mapped against key deadlines, e.g. publications, semester start dates

SASD Seminar Series – Academic Program Approval WEBSITES Academic Board website –minutes of meetings –meeting dates –terms of reference and membership –useful links e.g. to Programs Bulletin, relevant reports Senate website –link to ‘University Rules and Rule Amendments approved by Senate’

SASD Seminar Series – Academic Program Approval TOP 5 HINTS 1.Seek advice 2.Be specific and provide appropriate detail 3.Consult with other faculties as required 4.Be mindful of precedent and convention 5.Forward planning

SASD Seminar Series – Academic Program Approval ADVICE AND ASSISTANCE Karen Wheeler (x 51680): Secretary to CAPP Carole Tate (x 51067): Assistant Secretary to CAPP Letitia Madden (x 57106): Secretary to PSC Ian Wilkins (x 53375): Assistant Secretary to PSC Academic Administration provides advice on: – administrative aspects of submissions –forms to be completed –process for approval and next steps (e.g. CRICOS registration)