Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6500.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Miles DW et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 41.
Advertisements

Evaluation of Oral Azacitidine Using Extended Treatment Schedules: A Phase I Study Garcia-Manero G et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 603.
Allogeneic Transplant Following Brentuximab Vedotin Treatment in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory CD30+ Lymphomas Illidge T et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract.
An overview of the differences of different JAK inhibitors
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Combination therapy for MPNs
Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS III) Trial
Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk.
First Efficacy Results of a Randomized, Open- Label, Phase III Study of Adjuvant Doxorubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide, Followed by Docetaxel with or without.
Ongoing clinical trials with JAK2 inhibitors in MF
Prolonged Low Dose Therapy with a Pan-Deacetylase Inhibitor, Panobinostat (LBH589), in Patients with Myelofibrosis1 Phase II Study of Low-Dose Pomalidomide.
Perspectives on defining ruxolitinib resistance/suboptimal response and therapeutic decision-making in this setting Claire Harrison, MD.
Srdan (Serge) Verstovsek M.D., Ph.D. Professor of Medicine Department of Leukemia University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas, USA JAK.
Srdan (Serge) Verstovsek M.D., Ph.D. Professor of Medicine Department of Leukemia University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas, USA Therapy.
Results of a Randomized Study of the JAK Inhibitor Ruxolitinib (INC424) versus Best Available Therapy (BAT) in Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post- Polycythemia.
Benefits of JAK2 Inhibitor Therapy: Why Do They Work in Patients With and Without JAK2 Mutation Alessandro M. Vannucchi Section of Hematology, University.
Results of a Phase II Study of Pacritinib (SB1518), a Novel Oral JAK2 Inhibitor, in Patients with Primary, Post-Polycythemia Vera, and Post- Essential.
Phase 2 Trial of PRM-151, an Anti-Fibrotic Agent, in Patients with Myelofibrosis: Stage 1 Results1 Imetelstat, a Telomerase Inhibitor, Therapy for Myelofibrosis:
Comparison of Nilotinib and Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): ENESTnd Beyond One Year Larson.
The Efficacy and Safety of Continued Hydroxyurea Therapy versus Switching to Ruxolitinib in Patients with Polycythemia Vera: A Randomized, Double-Blind,
Real-World Assessment of Clinical Outcomes in Lower-Risk Myelofibrosis Patients Receiving Treatment with Ruxolitinib Davis KL et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract.
Efficacy, Hematologic Effects and Dose of Ruxolitinib in Myelofibrosis Patients with Low Platelet Starting Counts ( x 10 9 /L): A Comparison to Patients.
Phase III Trial of Pazopanib in Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Sternberg CN et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Oral Presentation)
ASH 2012: New JAK Inhibitors for Myelofibrosis
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
Ibrutinib, Single Agent or in Combination with Dexamethasone, in Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM): Preliminary Phase.
Complete Hematological Molecular and Histological Remissions without Cytoreductive Treatment Lasting After Pegylated-Interferon -2a (peg-IFN-2a) Therapy.
Improved Survival in Patients with First Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Treated with Vosaroxin plus Cytarabine versus Placebo plus.
Final Efficacy Results from OAM4558g, a Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating MetMAb or Placebo in Combination with Erlotinib in Advanced NSCLC Spigel DR.
Rituximab plus Lenalidomide Improves the Complete Remission Rate in Comparison with Rituximab Monotherapy in Untreated Follicular Lymphoma Patients in.
A Phase 1 Study of the Selective Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-Delta (PI3Kδ) Inhibitor, Idelalisib (GS- 1101) in Combination with Rituximab and/or Bendamustine.
Changes in Quality of Life and Disease- Related Symptoms in Patients with Polycythemia Vera Receiving Ruxolitinib or Best Available Therapy: RESPONSE Trial.
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 673.
Results from a Randomized Phase III Trial of Decitabine versus Supportive Care or Low-Dose Cytarabine for the Treatment of Older Patients with Newly Diagnosed.
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Contemporary Review.
1 Oliva EN et al Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 91.
1 Stone RM et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 6.
Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN) Clinical Trials Portfolio
Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 310.
Rosell R et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 7503.
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN) Clinical Trials Portfolio
Phase III PROUD-PV: Ropeginterferon α-2b Noninferior to Hydroxyurea in Polycythemia Vera New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage of.
5-Azacytidine (AZA) in Combination with Ruxolitinib (RUX) as Therapy for Patients (pts) with Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MDS/MPNs)1  
Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 793.
San Miguel JF et al. 1 Proc EHA 2013;Abstract S1151.
Goede V et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 3327.
Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN) Clinical Trials Portfolio
Harrison CN et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 59.
Ruxolitinib + Azacitidine in Newly Diagnosed or R/R, Intermediate- or High-Risk Myelofibrosis New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage.
Combination Ruxolitinib + Sonidegib in Myelofibrosis
PERSIST-1: Pacritinib Improved Spleen Volume Reductions in Myelofibrosis vs Best Available Therapy CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO.
Previous Clinical Experience
New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 ± SD
How Many Inhibitors for JAK2?
JAK2 inhibitors and new therapeutic approaches in PV and ET
Barrios C et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 46.
Giovanni Barosi Center for the Study of Myelofibrosis.
Fenaux P et al. Lancet Oncol 2009;10(3):
Whom should you refer for allogeneic stem cell transplantation?
Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 857.
Baselga J et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 45.
Faderl S et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6503.
1 Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract Cervantes F et al.
Tips on using ruxolitinib
1Kantarjian HM et al. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:
Ruxolitinib for Myelofibrosis–An Update of Its Clinical Effects
Presentation transcript:

Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6500. Results of COMFORT-I, a Randomized Double-Blind, Phase III Trial of JAK1/JAK2 Inhibitor Ruxolitinib (INCB18424) vs Placebo for Patients with Myelofibrosis Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6500.

Introduction Myelofibrosis (MF) is characterized by splenomegaly, debilatating symptoms, cytopenias and shortened survival. MF manifests as primary myelofibrosis (PMF), post-essential thrombocythemia MF (PET-MF) or post-polycythemia vera MF (PPV-MF). Treatment of MF with conventional drugs provides only palliative benefits (Curr Opin Hematol 2006;13:87). The JAK2 V617F mutation is found in about 50% of patients with MF and is associated with certain clinical signs such as splenomegaly (Blood 2007;110:4030). Selective JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib (INCB018424) has been shown to be effective in preclinical models of myeloproliferative neoplasms (Blood 2010;115:3109). Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6500.

JAK2 Signaling Pathway Ligand Receptor Phosphorylation Ruxolitinib Transcription

COMFORT-I: A Phase III Trial of the JAK1/JAK2 Inhibitor Ruxolitinib Eligibility PMF or PPV-MF or PET-MF Intermediate-2 or high risk by IWG-MRT criteria Palpable spleen ≥5 cm Platelet count ≥100 x 109/L JAK2 V617F positive or negative Ruxolitinib 15 or 20 mg BID R Placebo* * Crossover to ruxolitinib arm allowed Ruxolitinib dose dependent upon starting platelet count: 15 mg BID if platelet count 100-200 x 109/L 20 mg BID if platelet count >200 x 109/L Spleen volume measured by MRI every 12 weeks Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6500.

Primary Endpoint: Patients with ≥35% Decrease in Spleen Volume (Week 24) Odds ratio 134.4; 95% CI (17.97-1,005) 41.9 Responders (%) 0.7 Ruxolitinib (n = 155) Placebo (n = 153) Patients discontinuing prior to week 24 or who crossed over prior to week 24 were considered nonresponders. With permission from Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6500.

Mean Percent Change from Baseline in Spleen Size Over Time Spleen Volume (MRI or CT) Palpable Spleen Length Mean % Change ± SEM Ruxolitinib Placebo With permission from Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6500.

Percent of Patients with ≥50% Symptom Score Decrease (Week 24) — ITT OR 15.28; 95% CI (6.93-33.66) 45.9 % of Patients 5.3 Ruxolitinib (n = 148) Placebo (n = 152) Symptom score = sum of scores for itching, night sweats, bone/muscle pain, abdominal discomfort, pain under the left ribs, and early satiety With permission from Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6500.

Probability of Survival Overall Survival Ruxolitinib Placebo 10 (6.5) 14 (9.1) Number (%) of Events Probability of Survival Hazard Ratio = 0.67 LogRank P value = 0.3268 Weeks With permission from Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6500.

Hematology Laboratory Values (Worst Grade on Study*) Ruxolitinib, n = 155 Placebo, n = 151 Grade 3 % Grade 4 % Hemoglobin 34.2 11.0 15.9 3.3 Platelets 9.0 3.9 1.3 Neutrophils 5.2 1.9 0.7 * Patients are included at their worst on-study grade regardless of whether this represents a change from their baseline. Grade 3/4 anemia and thrombocytopenia were more common in those with higher baseline grade. Discontinuation of treatment because of anemia and thrombocytopenia was rare (1 patient in each treatment group for each event). Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6500.

Conclusions Ruxolitinib demonstrated marked and sustained clinical benefits in spleen size. Symptomatic burden was reduced in patients treated with ruxolitinib. Thrombocytopenia and anemia were among the most common adverse events associated with ruxolitinib, though they rarely led to treatment discontinuation. The results of this study, combined with those of the COMFORT-II trial (Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract LBA6501), demonstrate that ruxolitinib may become a treatment option for patients with MF. Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6500.