MARPOL Annex VI TRIPARTITE TOKYO 20th SEPTEMBER 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Cruise Council 2010 Conference
Advertisements

Air Emissions Regulations Update Tripartite meeting 15/16 September 2006; Seoul
ASTM INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS DECEMBER 9, 2009
Overview MARPOL Annex VI Non- MARPOL Actions
Air Emissions from Ships
Fuel Switching Lanfranco Benedetti - CESA Tripartite Tokyo.
MARPOL ANNEX VI AMEDMENTS PRACTICAL CONSEQUENCES INTERTANKO Latin American Panel Cancun October 28/29, 2008.
Tor Svensen, President DNV 08 June 2010 The age of LNG is here Most cost efficient solution for ECAs.
Freight by Water Conference Teesside 7 September 2012 Sulphur Directive Impacts.
Alternative energy for shipping in Nordic waters
Hellenic Forum Athens 6 March 2007 Peter M. Swift.
USE OF MDO BY SHIPS PART OF A HOLISTIC APPROACH BUNKER SUMMIT – GREECE 2007
SECA 1st of January 2015.
Environmental Bunker legislation and the Potential Impact on the Vancouver Market May 2014 May
WAVESPEC Limited A Braemar Seascope Plc. Group Company October 2005 Factors involved in selecting a propulsion system for your LNG shipping project Presentation.
UPDATE ON THE REVISION OF MARPOL ANNEX VI LATIN AMERICAN PANEL March 12-13, 2008 Miami Beach, Florida.
UPDATE ON THE REVISION OF MARPOL ANNEX VI NORTH AMERICAN PANEL March 17, 2008 Stamford, CT.
Clean Fuels for Ships Practical Solution for MARPOL Annex VI and GHG Emissions Reduction MARTECMA Seminar 21 January 2008 Athens Dragos Rauta - INTERTANKO.
| 1 | 1 REDUCING THE IMPACT OF SHIPPING ON THE ENVIRONMENT DECARBONISATION.
BUNKER FUEL REGULATIONS Latest updates/status & an INTERTANKO VIEW
Air Emissions from Ships. Society is driving the requirement for ships to reduce harmful air emissions from engine exhausts.
1 MARPOL – Annex VI Control of Air Pollution from Ships from Ships and its Current Revision process Dr. Tim Gunner, Technical Consultant, Intertanko.
MARPOL ANNEX VI AMENDMENTS PRACTICAL CONSEQUENCES Tripartite Meeting Beijing CCS Headquarters November 8/9, 2008.
NAMEPA 2014 Annual Conference New York City Canada and North American Emission Control Area RDIMS #
INTERTANKO Asian Panel Tokyo 18 September 2007
AIR EMISSIONS from OCEANGOING VESSELS INTERTANKO Houston Tanker Event 2007 AIR EMISSIONS from OCEANGOING VESSELS INTERTANKO Houston Tanker Event 2007 Keith.
IMO requirements to reduce emission to air from ships by Manager Research and Projects Gdansk April 2008 ‘
Air pollution from ships: recent developments by Lex Burgel by Lex Burgel.
MARITIME TALKS 2007 Ship Air Emission Controls – Onboard or Overboard? –
Study on future fuels for cargo vessels in the Baltic Sea
Sea Water Scrubber. INTRODUCTION Crystallox has developed a new generation of horizontal and vertical scrubbers for marine and land based applications.
The Wilhelmsen Premier Marine Fuels - Bunker Seminar- Autumn 2009 Is it possible to ban the use of heavy fuel oil as bunkers? Possible consequences of.
“ Revision of Marpol Annex VI and its implications for the Gulf region ” Peter M. Swift, MD, INTERTANKO 15 December 2008, Dubai.
Environmental Landscape A burden or opportunity? Tony Field South East Europe Marine Business Manager.
CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMMISSION CUSTOMER SERVICE MEETING OCTOBER 28, 2009 MARINE AIR EMISSION CONTROL AND FUEL SWITCHING JOE ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
Maritime Law Association Spring Meeting April 28-30, 2015
Name:Goh Choong Leoong Student No: P Date: 30/08/06.
GWS SMS INTRODUCTION EMS Manual. 3. PROCEDURES FOR BILGE AND WASTE OIL MANAGEMENT OF MACHINERY SPACES As far as possible, the OWS must not be used.
Spotlight on Marine Fuel Issues
Marine Services Sustainable Shipping Conference Sustainable Energy in Marine Transportation Zabi Bazari and Gill Reynolds Lloyd ’ s Register EMEA IMarEST.
Marine Fuels Where are we? Where are we going? How will we get there?
Håkon B. Thoresen, DNV Petroleum Services, Norway 31 Jan 2011 Fuel Quality - Update INTERTANKO Bunker Sub-committee, London.
IBC 2009 APRIL 23, 2009 FACING THE CHALLENGES TO REDUCE AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
The INTERTANKO option to meet stricter Annex VI requirements to reduce emission to air from ships by Manager Research and Projects.
North American Panel Stamford, CT. 19 March 2007 Peter M. Swift.
A Practical guide to wartsila scrubber systems
The INTERTANKO option for the revision of Annex VI - IMO regulation for the Prevention of Air Pollution from ships by Manager.
IFLOS SUMMER ACADEMY 2008 Panel Discussion “SHIP AIR EMISSIONS” Peter M. Swift, MD, INTERTANKO.
IBIA ANNUAL CONVENTION SEPTEMBER 11, 2007 REDUCING AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS JOSEPH ANGELO DIRECTOR, REGULATORY AFFAIRS AND THE AMERICAS.
AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPPING Reducing Atmospheric Pollution Globally: Kristian R. Fuglesang The distillate solution.
AIR EMISSIONS LATIN AMERICAN PANEL Buenos Aires 5th November 2014
Leading the way; making a difference North American Panel October 29, 2014 AIR EMISSIONS/ FUEL QUALITY JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
BUNKERWORLD – MARINE FUEL SUSTAINABILITY FORUM OCTOBER 25, 2007
The INTERTANKO options to meet marine environmental challenges by Manager Research and Projects Global Forum Strategic Planning.
Reduction of harmful emissions from ships by Manager Research and Projects Lausanne 12 September 2008
Anti-Trust/Competition Law Compliance Statement INTERTANKO’s policy is to be firmly committed to maintaining a fair and competitive environment in the.
Tanker performance and Annex VI compliance Manager Research and Projects St. Petersburg 25 November 2008 Vostoc Capital’s The.
Greek Shipping Summit 2007 Athens 8 November 2007 Peter M. Swift.
FFSA Insurance and Legal Committee The Tanker Industry Today “Key Issues” 12 February 2008 Peter M Swift.
5.3 Fuel Switching Tripartite, Tokyo, 15 th & 16 th October 2010.
What have we learned in the meantime?
NORTH AMERICAN PANEL OCTOBER 22, 2007 REDUCING AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
Presenter: Captain Charlie Tweedel Sabine Pilots Association
MARPOL.
MARITIME AIR EMISSIONS Lloyd’s List events 11 December 2007 Distillates THE Solution THE holistic solution for the revision of MARPOL Annex VI Peter.
SSS & MoS FOCAL POINTS MEETING
Vapor Emission Control System
Presented by Lydia Ngugi
Challenges or opportunities for African refining: MARPOL regulations
IMO GLOBAL SULPHUR LIMIT 2020, IMPACTS TO MAJOR FLAGS AND MEASURES TO HELP SHIPOWNERS AND OPERATORS 2019.
Presentation transcript:

MARPOL Annex VI TRIPARTITE TOKYO 20th SEPTEMBER 2007

IMO & UNILATERAL LEGISLATION ON LOW SULPHUR MARINE FUELS DATESHIP TYPEWHEREmax. % SREG AllEverywhere4.5IMO AllBaltic Sea1.5IMO & EU AllAll EU Ports MGO (DMA and DMX) MDO (DMB and DMC) EU Passenger shipsEU1.5EU All aux. & diesel-electric main engines on all ships 24 miles off California shore MGO (DMA grade) MDO (DMB grade) CARB AllNorth Sea & English Channel1.5EU AllNorth Sea & English Channel1.5IMO AllAll EU ports0.1EU Inland waterway shipsAll EU inland waterways0.1EU All aux. & diesel-electric main engines on all ships 24 miles off California shore MGO (DMA grade)0.1 CARB Greek ferriesGreek ports0.1EU

ALTERNATIVES on SOx & PM A. Base Line - No change in SOx regulations B. Global + Regional (SECA) + port (mini SECAs) different S cap values: – (possible lower) Global S cap & lower S cap in SECAs –USA – [0.1%] S cap up to [200] nm from shore –BIMCO proposal – 3% global S cap; 1% 0.5% MDO in SECAs or scrubbers C. GLOBAL S CAP (no SECA) : –Mandate 1% 0.5% MDO for all ships –Global S cap or emissions limit but leave the industry to choose compliance method

EXPERIENCE WITH SECA So far, complinace by LSFO Switch from HFO to LSFO depends on the ships bunker storage capacity and lay-out Standard designs (1 settling & 1 service tanks) provide little flexibility Depending on initial S % of the HFO, fuel switch in at least 48 hrs 60 hours from HFO with 4.04% S to LSFO with 1.3% S

SWITCH SEQUENCE IN BASIC DESINGS Stop HFO transfer from storage to settling tanks (1 to 3 days prior to entry into SECA) Settling tank empty – start transfer of LSFO to the settling tank Service tanks almost empty of HFO – start feeding LSFO from settling tank (some 6 hours before entry into SECA) Cylinder oil feeding rate adjusted or switch to a lower BN cylinder oil Continuous crew attendance/monitoring

Wärtsila – Low Sulphur Guidelines, 9 January 2006

FUEL SWITCH OVER BETTER SOLUTIONS Simpler for ships with 2 settling & 2 service tanks (few hours) Complete segregation between HFO & LSFO systems reduces the fuel switch over to matter of minutes and permits automatic control Complete segregation = no risk of incompatibility between HFO & LSFO blends

Wärtsila – Low Sulphur Guidelines, 9 January 2006

SECAs & CHANGE OVER AREAS AUGUST 2007 MAY 2006 Source: / Changeover Area

SECAs & CHANGE OVER AREAS New Changeover Area Source:

2012? ??? HOW MANY MORE SECAs? IMPACT ON A LARGE NUMBER OF SHIPS 2012?

Wärtsila – Low Sulphur Guidelines, 9 January 2006

SCRUBBERS - large space required in the ships funnel; - - for a main engine of 20 MW, sea water up to 22,000 t/day need to be processed (45t/hr/MW*) - up to 100 kg/day of hazardous sludge (5kg/day/MW*) Scrubbers for Pride of Kent * data supplied by Krystallon

CONCLUSIONS Alternative solutions may require new installations and new operations Design standardisation for safe & simpler operation Expected contributions from: –Ship operators –Ship designers –Classification Soceities Future Tripartite cooperation