Entry to Student Outcomes (ESO). Objective: Teachers will analyze student data to drive instruction and increase student achievement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vs. Attending a Different Training as a Site Team.
Advertisements

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
Session Objectives Begin to understand the goals, purpose and rationale for Program Reviews Learn about the components of implementing Program Reviews.
Center for Secondary Education for Students with Autism (CSESA)
NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Performance Appraisal Systems
Student Learning Objectives -SLOs Student Growth Measures and OTES
Overview of the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System KY Council of Administrators of Special Education Summer Conference July 9th, 2013.
Santa Rosa County District Schools Professional Orientation Program (POP) Professional Improvement Plan (PIP)
Literacy in the middle years of schooling focusing on Aboriginal Students.
The High School Professional Development Plan December 8, 2012.
PROFESSIONAL GROWTH PLAN UPDATE PROPOSALS COMMITTEE UPDATE MAY 2008
PROJECT INTEGRATE END OF YEAR SUMMARY AUGUST 4, 2011.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
Ia Teachers lead in their classrooms. Teachers demonstrate leadership by taking responsibility for the progress of all students to ensure that they graduate.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
September 2013 Current Reforms to Teacher Education in Scotland National Implementation Board.
McRel’s Evaluation System Training Session 1 May 14, 2013 Herbert Hoover Middle School.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Amphitheater Career Ladder Orientation
How do we document evidence of student growth in Healthful Living?
Alternate Assessment on Alternate Achievement Standards Aligned to Common Core State Standards 1.
August Professional Development 1 Janise Lane, Interim Executive Director of Teaching and Learning Linda Chen, Chief Academic Officer August 25 – 28, 2015.
Differentiated Supervision
The 2013 Legislative Session and You – Statute Changes Affecting Schools Iowa Department of Education.
Are any of these questions familiar? How do teachers know what to teach? How do we know when a student is ready to advance? What is an effective way to.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
Strategies and Tips Maxine McCormick MH/Contemporary.
Professional Growth Plan / Professional Development Guide.
FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING (FFT) SUMMER INSTITUTE CONVERSATIONS TO ENHANCE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE DR. MICHAEL BROOKS JUNE 18, 2012.
Integrated Media and Technology Program with an Emphasis on Student Achievement.
Florence/Workshop Two Perceptions of Teaching: The Professional Perception - Teaching is a complex process which includes: 1. Identifying students' needs.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Welcome to PD Forum FY 11. Professional Development Support Structure SchoolsDistrict Support Department PD Team (Administrator, PD Contact, & PD Team.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Collaborative Action Research (CAR). Objective : Teacher will lead and participate in a collaborative action group exploring a topic based on student.
Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Collaborative Action Research Option (2013) Staff Development.
Collaborative Action Research Option: Staff Development.
Student Outcomes (SO) Objective: Teachers will analyze student data to drive instruction and increase student achievement.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
Teacher Licensure PI-34 Wisconsin’s New Process. New License Stages  Initial Educator 5 year, non-renewable  Professional Educator 5 year renewable.
Strategies and Tips Maxine McCormick MH/Contemporary.
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Dissemination Training
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Teacher Evaluation Process
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Alabama Teacher Mentoring Program
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Developing 21st Century Classrooms: Connecting the Dots IV
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Introduction Introduction
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

Entry to Student Outcomes (ESO)

Objective: Teachers will analyze student data to drive instruction and increase student achievement

Program Expectations Completion of this Power Point orientation by August 17, 2012 and read all materials on the web site. Completion of an individual Professional Growth Plan (see Professional Growth Plan Guide) Participation in three (3) Entry to Student Outcomes training sessions Participation in three (3) dialogue meetings with Instructional Support Leaders Participation in a Collaborative Group led by Collaborative Action Research teachers Maintenance and completion of a teacher portfolio, professionally presented and organized

Student Outcomes Expectations for Entry to Student Outcomes (ESO) Development and implementation of a Student Achievement Plan based on Arizona State Standards/Common Core Standards Class Data Sheet for entire population with a minimum of three (3) assessments (pre, mid, post) Student Data Analysis and Teacher Reflection Forms Evidence of 21st Century Skill(s) in student work

Instructional Skills Expectations for Entry to Student Outcomes Instruction is modified and adjusted based upon analysis of student data Amphitheater Teacher Performance Evaluation System (ATPES) informal and formal evaluations conducted by site administrator

Your Career Ladder Support System Includes: Instructional Support Leaders Collaborative Action Research Group Members Team members Read Website for Entry to Student Outcomes ladder/ entry-to-student-outcomes-module- (eso).aspx