Dr Alana Hulme Chambers and Dr. John Donnelly donnelly consultants community development – from design to evaluation Community Engagement Tools.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality School Reform step1.html.
Advertisements

Participatory approaches to evaluation Puja Myles
The IDS id21 project Experiences with user based programme development David Wendt Monitoring and Evaluation Officer.
Methods Enabling Constituency Voice in Impact Evaluation for Improving Development Andre Proctor, Keystone March 2009.
Community Hubs Abundant Assets Alliance Forum Oasis Community Hubs and the Developmental Assets framework Richard Eason Director of Hub Development.
BUILDING THE CAPACITY OF BUSINESS MEMBERSHIP ORGANISATIONS Andrei Mikhnev World Bank Group.
Bridging Research, Information and Culture An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Your Name Your Institution.
Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of Developed by the evaluation unit of
Church Health Check 10 key measurable factors for churches serious about community transformation.
How can we show that links projects are making a difference? Dr Kay Richmond Dr Diane Kirkland Dr Sally Venn.
References Prof. Saul Greenberg, University of Calgary, notes and articles INUSE 6.2 and RESPECT 5.3 Handbook Prof. , University of , Notes and articles.
5.3.2 Participatory Appraisals 1 Participatory Appraisals UPA Package 5, Module 3.
Participatory Rural Appraisal (Chambers 1992, Korten 1996) Diane Pruneau January 2003.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Participatory Rural Appraisal and Rapid Rural Appraisal Sundar Neupane.
Community Engagement in Small Scale Irrigation. Welcome! [Insert trainer name & photo!]
Personal Action Plan T.K. Orgle COURSE ON PARTICIPATORY PLANNING MONITORING AND EVALUATION IAC – 9-27 Feb 2004.
PPME Training in IAC, Netherlands Organisation: Sida-Amhara Rural Development Program (SARDP) Experience with (P)PME: »Involving in the consolidation of.
Sierra Leone Consortium for Relief and Development (CORAD) CARE Int., AFRICARE, Catholic Relief Services, World Vision Int. Action Plan for Making Monitoring.
The Nature of Planned Change
Appreciative Participatory Planning and Action
Madrasa Early Childhood Development Community Based Monitoring and Evaluation (CBM&E) System By Wayne A. Bacale M&E Specialist/ VSO Volunteer Madrasa Resource.
RESEARCH IN THE SERVICE OF CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Heidi Unruh.
Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.
Implementation & Evaluation Regional Seminar ‘04 School Development Planning Initiative “An initiative for schools by schools”
Understanding Project Management. Project attributes  The project has a purpose  Project has a life cycle like an organic entity  Project has clearly.
Monitoring and Evaluation for Adult Education Programmes Module 1 © 2013 PRIA International Academy | Appreciation Courses Monitoring and Evaluation for.
An Introduction to Appreciative Inquiry Dr John Peters Academic Development and Practice Unit October 2008.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
Community Assessments Presentation for the Nutrition, Environment, & Food Systems for Empowerment Internship Program Sharon Lezberg 6/2015.
Inspire Personal Skills Interpersonal & Organisational Awareness Developing People Deliver Creative Thinking & Problem Solving Decision Making, Prioritising,
Evaluation framework: Promoting health through strengthening community action Lori Baugh Littlejohns & Neale Smith David Thompson Health Region, Red Deer,
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
TELECONFERENCE/WEBINAR ON MAY 6,2010 2:30 – 4:00 PM EASTERN THE NATIONAL CHILD WELFARE RESOURCE CENTER FOR ORGANIZATIONAL IMPROVEMENT Building Ongoing.
M ONITORING AND EVALUATION. O UR A PPROACH 1. What is monitoring and evaluation? Conceptual differences and terminologies. 2. Approaches to Monitoring.
Applying a Human Rights-Based Approach and Mainstreaming Gender in Local Development Programming and Implementation Case of Municipal Governance and Sustainable.
Nick Renshaw Participation and Development II. ODA Participation Training II The participation of project beneficiaries is a key dimension to modern development.
Participatory Rural Appraisal RWSSP-LIS Training for SPMU Officials March, 2014 UP Academy of Administration, Lucknow.
September 16, 2014 Professional Learning Communities-PLCs.
9. EAFM START UP B Essential EAFM Date Place 9. EAFM Startup B: Engage Stakeholders Version 1.
Project: CAPACITY BUILDING FOR VIETNAMESE CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANISATIONS ON CLIMATE CHANGE Presented by: Ms. Pham Thi Bich Ngoc CC Project Coordinator, The.
Monitoring and Evaluation
October 16 th, 2012 Kate Westdijk Barri Tinkler.  Explore Participants’ Knowledge and Learning Goals  Define Community-based Participatory Research.
Queen’s Management & Leadership Framework
Monitoring & Evaluation
Using “Appreciative Inquiry” to build evaluation capacity.
July 2007 National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee & Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Role of Action Planning in The Developmental.
THE CHALLENGE TO BE ETHICAL IN EVALUATIONTHE CHALLENGE TO BE ETHICAL IN EVALUATION Dr John Donnelly | Dr Alana Hulme ChambersDr John Donnelly | Dr Alana.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
SJI Impact Assessment 2014 Based on Impact Assessment for Development Agencies – Learning to Value Change (Chris Roche, Oxfam, digital file 2010)
Brief Introduction Dr R Vincent: 1 Most Significant Change: using stories to assess impact.
INEE Guidance Note on Conflict Sensitive Education Location, Date, 2013.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
Integrating Disaster Risk Reduction into Humanitarian Programmes Lessons learnt and recommendations following the FRIEND Program.
The School Effectiveness Framework
ACTED AME Appraisal, Monitoring and Evaluation. Summary 1/ ACTED AME department 2/ AME Responsibilities 3/ AME throughout project cycle 4/ Involvement.
Polk County Positive Behavior Support (PBS) Network Status April PCHS Board Meeting
Capacity Development Results Framework A strategic and results-oriented approach to learning for capacity development.
1 Module 1 Introduction: The Role of Gender in Monitoring and Evaluation.
Gibraltar Philanthropy Forum Conference 19 November 2013 Dr Balwant Singh Kusuma Trust UK Philanthropy in Action.
Monitoring and evaluation Objectives of the Session  To Define Monitoring, impact assessment and Evaluation. (commonly know as M&E)  To know why Monitoring.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Environmental Land Management and Rural Livelihoods Project (2013 – 2018) Project Overview Zafar Mahmudov, Project Coordinator.
Creating Student Success through the Data Team Process Mason City Community School District Kathryn Schladweiler TJ.
Introduction to Participatory Monitoring & Evaluation (PM&E): A Practical Approach to Engaging Stakeholders and Communities in Monitoring & Evaluation.
Mandy Williams, Participation Cymru manager
HRBA Project Planning Steps Moving Towards Clear Project.
Collaborative & Interpersonal Leadership
PROCESSES AND INDICATORS FOR MEASURING THE IMPACT OF EQUALITY BODIES
Strategic planning toolkit
Presentation transcript:

Dr Alana Hulme Chambers and Dr. John Donnelly donnelly consultants community development – from design to evaluation Community Engagement Tools

“…the first act of power people can take in managing their own lives is ‘speaking the world’, naming their experiences in their own words under conditions where their stories are listened to and respected by others.” Friere & Macedo (in Labonte, Feather and Hills, 1999, p3).

Community Engagement Tools For individuals &/or groups Many and varied Should be participatory Should be user friendly Should be contextual Should result in meaningful (and measureable) data Should allow for triangulation

Community Engagement Tools Project design : Participatory Rapid Appraisal (PRA) A strength based approach Highlight peoples’ strengths as they perceive them To determine shared objectives To determine understandable, measureable indicators Tools: o Stories o History o Fruitful tree

Community Engagement Tools PRA (Participatory Rapid {rural} Appraisal) _appraisal issues/empowerment-and-land- rights/participatory-learning-and-action

Community Engagement Tools Project implementation and monitoring A shared process beginning with an understanding of the intended change process A baseline measurement of indicators Agreed activities Periodic measurement of indicators Comparison with baseline Discussion of the change (+/-, or not) and response to this change - Monitoring

Community Engagement Tools Project implementation and monitoring Monitoring begins with PRA and the baseline – the situation Activities are responses to the initial monitoring Subsequent monitoring informs the ongoing project Understanding of the shared monitoring process by ALL helps to ensure the changes anticipated by the project, are realised Understanding, participation and ownership is empowering, ensures rights are respected and enhances sustainability

Community Engagement Tools Tools: o Ten Seed Technique o Pocket Chart Ten Seed Technique (TST) Jayakaran, Ravi, Dr. (2002) World Vision China.

Community Engagement Tools Objective(s)IndicatorsBaselinePeriodic monitoring √×√×√×

Community Engagement Tools Project evaluation A shared assessment of what change has occurred and the impact it has had Involving ALL in the planning of the evaluation in empowering, ensures rights are respected and increases participation Evaluation is a natural progression from the shared, participatory monitoring process Tools: o Appreciative Inquiry (AI) informed discussion groups o Ten Seed Technique & Pocket chart

Community Engagement Tools Appreciative Inquiry (AI) informed focus groups ry Cooperrider, D.L. & Srivastra, S. X. (1987) Appreciative inquiry in organisational life, I Passmore, W.A. & Woodman, R.W. (eda.), Research in in organisational change and development (Vol. 1), Jai Press, Greenwich CT.

Thanks! Dr John DonnellyDr Alana Hulme Chambers donnelly consultants community development – from design to evaluation