Agent Training Livestock Judging

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Swine Notes.
Advertisements

Selection and Judging of Beef
National FFA Convention Livestock Coaches Clinic Swine Segment Tammy Miller Joliet Junior College October 25, 2012.
It’s All Bull Seminars UW Extension Livestock Focus Team March 23 rd, Elk Mound March 25 th, Almond March 26 th, Platteville.
Selection For Carcass Marbling and Muscling-- Benefits and Pitfalls Jim Gosey University of Nebraska.
Professor N. Nelson Blue Mtn. Agriculture College.
Utilizing Performance Data for Livestock Selection Developed by: Celina Johnson University of Florida.
Seminar July 2012 – Waldo Pigs
Mongastric Production Swine Section Breeding and Selection of Swine.
Expected Progeny Differences Cattle Selection Using Genetic Data Nick Nelson Blue Mountain Community College.
Placings By Traits Muscle: Finish: Capacity: Structure: Balance: Official Placing: Cuts:
Colorado Agriscience Curriculum
BEEF GENETICS NEXT What color are Shorthorns? n A. White n B. Red n C. Roan n D. All the above A B C D NEXT.
Grass-finished Genetics Dan Glenn Deep Grass Graziers.
Mini Test! When: Wednesday 4/8/15
Cow-Calf Operations Makenna Ramos April 10, 2012 Animal Science.
EPD 101 PredictingProfit… Red Angus – EPD 101. EPD 101 Members (Seedstock producers) succeed through enabling the success (profit) of their commercial.
Producers breed for improved genetics Produce all breeding stock (Bulls and Heifers) Raise purebred or registered cattle Pay close attention to EPD’s.
Genetics in the Animal Industry A.Describe the role and importance of genetics in the animal industry B.Recognize & describe the interrelationship between.
From Conception to Carcass 2006 National Angus Conference Mike Kasten.
KIPP BROWN Extension Livestock Coordinator Department of Animal and Dairy Science Mississippi State University.
Beef Evaluation and Pricing continued. Estimating Yield Grade Visually evaluate animal for differences in fat and muscle Shape.
A Bigger Piece of the Pie: Creating Market Share for SimGenetic Cattle Ben Williamson Penn State University September 14, 2015.
Jared E. Decker 1.
Straightbreeding – A simple way to reduce your bottomline D. A. Daley California State University, Chico NCBCEC Brown Bagger Session October 17, 2012.
Using EPDs in Selection Stolen and edited by: Brandon Freel and Daniel Powell Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
Expected Progeny Differences Cattle Selection Using Genetic Data Nick Nelson Blue Mountain Community College.
Livestock Evaluation. I. Bovine A. Breeding Heifers 1. Structural Correctness a. Most important factor b. Skeletal factors c. Watch the stride of the.
WHAT ARE EPD’S?. What is an EPD? E-xpected P-rogeny D-ifference A measure of the degree of difference between the progeny of the bull and the progeny.
The Brown Bagger Beef Cattle Adaptability Current Tools of Assessment John L. Evans Oklahoma State University 1.
Brown Bagger – Beef Cattle Genetics: Fine Tuning Selection Decisions 1 How do I decide what traits are important ? Selection Indices Dorian Garrick Department.
Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education “Economic value of genomic information: Sire and commercial heifer selection" Van Eenennaam 10/19/2011.
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
Evaluating Longevity: 10 Years of Using Stayability EPD Larry Keenan Research & Special Projects Coordinator, RAAA.
Introduction to Pork Production. Definitions Female after giving birth: Sow Young female: Gilt Having piglets: Farrowing Male: Boar Castrated Male: Barrow.
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Understanding Cattle Data Professor N. Nelson Blue Mountain Agriculture College.
NBCEC Brown Bagger: Economic Selection Index Wade Shafer American Simmental Association.
EPD’s: What They Are and How to Use Them. Introduction EPDs = Expected Progeny Differences Progeny = Offspring, usually the offspring of the sire Differences.
Selecting Herd Bull Beef Production Game. What is the job of our bull? Produce sperm Pass on quality genetics of rate of gain, muscling, structure Physically.
Livestock Judging.
MANAGEMENT OF BULLS FOR REPRODUCTIVE AND ECONOMIC SUCCESS Cliff Lamb Beef Specialist University of Florida.
Sally L. Northcutt American Angus Association Selection Tools Beef Improvement Federation April 20, 2006.
Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal 1. 2 Expected Progeny Differences Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal Unit 7 – Lesson 7.2 Predicting.
Using EPDs in Selection Edited by: Jessica Hawley & Brandon Freel Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION Chapters:  29 - Swine Breeds and Breeding  30 - Swine Feeding and Management Spencer Agricultural Education Curriculum 2012.
 Genes- located on chromosomes, control characteristics that are inherited from parents.  Allele- an alternative form of a gene (one member.
Crossbreeding in Beef Cattle Susan Keene A portion of these slides work of: Matthew I. Miller Extension Agent Animal Science This presentation is from.
Evaluation & Use of Expected Progeny Differences in Beef Cattle Dr. Fred Rayfield Livestock Specialist Georgia Agricultural Education To accompany lesson.
Who am I? Grew up on a hog and grain farm in northeast Missouri. All grandparents and great grand parents were farmers, so it’s in my DNA. Love farming.
Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.
Sustainable Agriculture
Beef Cattle Production
Better Oral Reasons Getting Started.
Selection and Judging of Beef Cattle
Evaluation & Use of Expected Progeny Differences in Beef Cattle
Using EPDs in Selection
Quiz for Beef Cattle EPDs.ppt
From Conception to Carcass
Keith Vander Velde UW Extension
Update on Multi-Breed Genetic Evaluation
WHAT ARE EPD’s?.
Pedigrees.
Better Oral Reasons Getting Started.
American Simmental Association’s Economic Selection Indexes
Using EPDs in Selection
CGs to EPDs 2006 BIF Symposium Sponsored by Ultrasound Guidelines Council Dr. Lisa A. Kriese-Anderson Auburn University.
Definition of EBVs of Economically Relevant Traits in Sheep Production
Expected Progeny Differences
Expected Progeny Difference EPD
Presentation transcript:

Agent Training Livestock Judging Dr. Tim Page LSU AgCenter

Livestock Judging Training Resources Judging101.com ($45/year, great DVD, videos, slides) Animalscience101.com (excellent judging videos, slides) Ars.sdstate.edu/LivestockJudgingManual.pdf (Free judging manual) Msucares.com/pubs./publications/p2289.htm (Free judging manual) www.cevmultimedia.com (excellent videos and slides)

To talk about anything?

Parts of a Pig Pig Parts

Parts of a lamb Lamb parts

See any differences ?

Keep it simple Don’t overload young people just getting their feet wet You may be better off with 4-6 kids that don’t know anything about judging All team members must judge the same They must all critique animals the same If each one does their own ‘thing’, the team concept is shot Remember, this is a team made up of individuals

Performance Data EPD’s – Expected Progeny Difference – the expected difference compared to the average of the breed Pigs – NB, NBA, NW, LEA, BF, TRF, D250, MLI, SPI, TSI Cattle – BW, WW, YW, REA, IMF, BF, $Beef

Performance Data NB – Number born, NBA – Number born alive, NW – Number weaned, WW – weaning weight at 21 days, LEA – Loin eye area, BF – backfat, TRF – tenth rib fat, D250 – the number of days for that pig to reach 250 lb, MLI – Maternal Line Index, SPI – Sow Productivity Index, TSI – Terminal Sire Index BW – Birth weight, WW – Weaning weight, YW – Yearling weight, REA – Rib eye are, BF – Backfat, $Beef – Profitability Index

Performance Data Scenario – This class of Angus heifers will be used in a purebred Angus seedstock operation in South Louisiana. This producer derives the majority of his income through an annual production sale where heifers and bulls are sold to fellow producers and as well to youth for 4-H and FFA projects. EPD – Which is better? BW 1.2 or 3.5, WW 35 or 24, IMF 1.5 or .75

Performance Data – Class 1 Angus Heifers ID BW WW YW REA IMF BF $Beef _______________________________________________ 3.6 42 71 .65 1.1 .12 46.40 1.2 42 70 .70 1.3 .08 45.90 .45 29 58 .25 .15 .24 41.23 2.9 38 63 .45 .32 .18 42.50 ________________________________________________ These Angus heifers will be bred to Lim-Flex bulls to produce replacement heifers for sale to other producers as well as retain top 15%.

Data Alone Numbers 2 & 3 are my top pair Numbers 1 & 4 are my bottom pair Use data when giving oral reasons Oral Reasons – Are they an ancient form of punishment? Do we use them to torture 4-H and FFA members? Well, not really, but maybe sometimes Oral Reasons – tell the official what you saw Canned reasons XXXXX Memorize XXX

Oral Reasons Appropriate attire (team colors, neat, no hats or caps, no tennis shoes) Must have the ability to look someone in the eye and deliver oral reasons, do not try to intimidate by being too loud Pick out certain differences and mention them so the officials know you really saw the class Examples: The #2 red hog, or the #4 belted hog, blue rump hog, blaze face heifer, etc. Oral reasons improve public speaking skills, better thinker, increase confidence