Collaborative peer review of teaching (CPRT) Faculty of Business and Law8/25/20141 8/POL371/website/Course%20Website_files/image003.jpg.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Monday, January 13, Instructor Development Unit 1 Instructional Responsibilities Ed Humphrey.
Advertisements

Monday, January 13, Instructor Development Strand 7 / Lesson 8.
Monday, January 13, Instructor Development Unit 1 Instructional Responsibilities Ed Humphrey.
Monday, January 13, Instructor Development Lesson 9.
5 th International Teachers Conference Singapore October 2009 Teaching Science and Languages English as a Second Language.
Dr. Peter OReilly Chairperson- ISM Services Group /23/20141 NAPM-AZ Presentation- March 2009.
The Missing Link: adding scholarship to university preparation courses Olwyn Alexander and Sue Argent.
IEEE Symposium on Pre- University Teacher Training Teacher In-Service Program (TISP) Tampa, 2012 Teacher In Service Program in Uruguay Summary of Workshops.
Florida Association of Accounting Educators Orlando, FL
1 The Promotion and Tenure Process Managing the Academic Career for Faculty Women at Undergraduate Computer Science and Engineering Institutions CRA-W.
Supporting Team-Based Learning Dr. Kathryn R. Ross, Indiana University Kokomo Team-Based Learning Conference 2007, Vancouver, Canada Copyright 2007 Kathryn.
1 DPAS II Process and Procedures for Teachers Developed by: Delaware Department of Education.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
Training for Teachers and Specialists
Joint Information Systems Committee 01/04/2014 | slide 1 (E-)Assessment Guide Consultation Ros Smith, Consultant Joint Information Systems CommitteeSupporting.
Digital Preservation Tools for Repository Managers A practical course in five parts Concluding the course Module 5 University of Northampton, 30 March.
Learning Support Services MetaLib at Bradford Polly Dawes and Martin Wilkinson University of Bradford.
Boston University CEIT and IS&T Student-Centered Learning: Relinquishing Control Domenic Screnci, IS&T Janelle Heineke, CEIT and SMG.
WHAT IS “THE RIGHT STUFF?”
A Teachable Moment: Getting Students to Provide Responsible Feedback Brenda M. Coppard, PhD, OTR/L, FAOTA Creighton University.
Expanding the Reach of Bioinformatics Training Jennifer McDowall, Ph.D. Senior Scientist.
Sustainability2.0: the Deakin experience Sue Owen, Deakin University Library Reality 2.0 Reality 2.0 ALIA – SLA Seminar Series for Information Professionals.
TaskStream Tools of Engagement for Higher Education 6/5/20141Technology Day 2008.
How to thrive at UST: What Faculty Development offers Ann Johnson and Nancy Hartung August 2013.
Submission Writing Master Class Gerard Byrne B Comm FCPA FAIM Townsville, 17 April 2010 Thursday, June 12,
Student Focus Groups UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF PHARMACY 1 Formative Evaluation Using Student Focus Groups Heidi M. Anderson, Ph.D. University of.
HEAD TEACHER PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE PROGRAM PROFESSIONALCONVERSATION “seeking new potentials and possibilities”
THE BHOPAL DISASTER ‘CASE’ HEA Workshop on interdisciplinary CBL 12 April 2013.
8/25/ Seneca Goals For Today  What College is all about  What Seneca has to offer -Program areas -disability, transitional, financial aid, and.
Using Technology to Improve Teaching and Learning Beth Cavallari Acting Associate Director Beth Cavallari Acting Associate Director.
Embedding Information Literacy into the curriculum Presentation for the CSU Tertiary Teaching Colloquium, Bathurst, June 2008.
Office of the DVC (S&E) Students as Change Agents Dr Cassandra Saunders Student Evaluation, Review and Reporting Unit (SERRU) Students Matter Forum 2013.
Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework
Leadership for Administration And Support 1. /Institute Directors Update /Update on the Business Strategy and Services Directorate.
Maree GosperNo 1 22 August 2007 Learning and Teaching in the Information Age Learning with Technologies Dr Maree Gosper CPD/IHERD.
Bronwyn Kosman, Office of the DVC (Provost) No 1 TEACHING MATTERS DEVELOPING INDICATORS OF TEACHING QUALITY Researching (e)Learning and Teaching Presentation.
NETWORK SOURCES for ART TEACHERS. Art Education 2.0 Using Technology in Art Classrooms Art Education.
Teaching and Learning at Deakin University Professor Colin Mason Director, Institute of Teaching and Learning pp John Rosenberg DVCA.
SEPTEMBER 12 TH & 13 TH 2012 PRINCIPALS – LEADERS IN ACTION.
Gayle morris & terry timberlake.  Introduction  The FaST model – POTENT ‘peer observation of teaching: engaging new teachers’  Conceptual framework.
Dr Susanne Owen Principal Officer & Leader, Innovative Learning Environment project DECD Innovation, Presentation to Australian Schools Transformation.
Assuring quality at La Trobe AUQA – WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR YOU?
CO-TEACHING/INCLUSION BEST PRACTICES. Current Knowledge level of Co-Teaching/Modified Inclusion 1. Whose students are they? 2. Who gives the grade? 3.
No Marking Required. Discharges and Environmental Monitoring 2012 Jim Desmond Environmental Monitoring & Assessments Manager WCSSG Environmental Health.
Q 3.5 What methodology will you use to develop your team members? Q 3.6 Outline the proposed project activities to achieve your project aims using.
Facilitating Scholarship of Teaching Through Electronic Course Portfolios Bridgett Piernik-Yoder, PhD, OTR University of Texas Health Science Center at.
PG Cert HE Post Graduate Certificate in Higher Education Teaching
Second year students use of CLaSS Dr Avril Buchanan Centre for Learning and Study Support De Montfort University.
Dale Vidmar Information Literacy and Instruction Librarian Southern Oregon University Library
2015 Program Session Three 1. itali.uq.edu.au Before SemesterDuring Semester Session One What are the expectations for tutor professionalism.
Northampton – Development Opportunities a framework for enabling positive change.
On the Same Page What does good planning look like?
December 16 th, 2014 Webinar outline Eloise Tan and Terry Maguire, National Forum Preview the findings and proposals from the upcoming report, “Mapping.
Basic Skills and Career and Technical Education Lin Marelick & Valerie Carrigan August 11 & 13, 2008 BSI August Institute.
Developmentally Appropriate Practices (DAP)
Being a teacher educator Observing teaching. Aims To examine and develop observation feedback practices.
Google Sites Extending the Walls of Your Classroom.
When I Grow up, I want to be a Werewolf!. “Burnout” Term developed by Herbert Freudenberger. Maslach defines burnout as exhaustion, cynicism, and inefficacy.
PG Cert HE Post Graduate Certificate in Higher Education Teaching.
Designing an authentic blend: Development of a real-life learning environment for higher education Tara Smith & Jenni Parker.
Implementing Formative Assessment Online Professional Development What Principals Need to know.
YEAR 1 INDUCTION Day One Workshop Pennsbury School District.
Blackboard Training. Aim To equip teachers with the skills to use Blackboard to enhance student learning.
Applying for an OLT Citation 2016 INSTITUTE FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING INSTITUTE FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING October 2015 DR ALISON KUIPER, SENIOR LECTURER.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
Learning to Flip the Classroom Using a MOOC Learning Community
The TEAP Portfolio Award and the EAP Teacher Competencies
Peer Consultation Program
Can I Get A Little Help Here?
Being a teacher educator
Presentation transcript:

Collaborative peer review of teaching (CPRT) Faculty of Business and Law8/25/ /POL371/website/Course%20Website_files/image003.jpg

Session overview Welcome Peer review – why do we need it? What is peer review? The Faculty’s CPRT program What is good teaching? Feedback – how to give and receive it Forming review teams Faculty of Business and Law 8/25/20142

Peer review – why do we need it? Developments in peer review in Australian higher education Purposes served by peer review processes Approaches to peer review Faculty of Business and Law8/25/20143 We must do something alien to academic culture: we must talk to each other about our inner lives - risky stuff in a profession that fears the personal and seeks safety in the technical, the distant, the abstract.(Parker J. Palmer) Source: Palmer, P.J The Courage to Teach Jossey-Bass Inc, San Francisco, p. 12.

What is peer review? Approaches to peer review Peer observation versus peer review Teaching practices that can be reviewed ◦ Lectures ◦ Tutorials ◦ DSO sites ◦ Assessment practices ◦ Other? Faculty of Business and Law8/25/20144

Faculty’s CPRT program: Aims ◦ Quality to teaching and learning ◦ Collaboration and discussion ◦ Dissemination of good practice ◦ Self-reflection and scholarship ◦ Recognition of effective practices Faculty of Business and Law8/25/20145

Faculty’s CPRT program: Approach ◦ Developmental ◦ Accessible ◦ Supportive ◦ Confidential ◦ Flexible ◦ Reflective ◦ Sustainable Faculty of Business and Law8/25/20146

Faculty’s CPRT program: Flexible models Person A Person B Person C Person A Person B 3-person or 2-person model peer or ‘expert’ reviewer within or across discipline Faculty of Business and Law8/25/20147

Faculty’s CPRT program: The review cycle: ◦ Introductory session – today ◦ Pre-observation/review session ◦ Observation or review ◦ Post-meeting ◦ Reflection ◦ Group feedback and evaluation – 30 October 8/25/2014Faculty of Business and Law8

What isn’t good teaching? Faculty of Business and Law8/25/20149

……good teaching is peer review of teaching needs a focus on learning which occurs as a result of teaching Teachers open the door. You enter by yourself. Chinese Proverb Source: accessed 23 February 2009http:// Teachers open the door. You enter by yourself. Chinese Proverb Source: accessed 23 February 2009http://

Judging “good” teaching You be the judge! //cooldinners.com/images/qalogo.gif

..or Have you reached a verdict?

…. or 8/25/2014Faculty of Business and Law13 student focused student diversity active and challenging learning up to date knowledge assessment and feedback used strategically reflects on teaching and the scholarship of teaching and learning. review09.pdf HANDBOOK

What’s next? Decide what you would like reviewed. Decide which method of review you prefer. If appropriate - form a review team Discuss within your team ‘what’ each members wants reviewed. Set dates and times for reviews. Other issues? Faculty of Business and Law8/25/201414