Colorado School for the Deaf and the Blind November 13, 2013

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Early Intervention Outcomes Project Allison Sedey, Ph. D. University of Colorado, Boulder Kathryn Kreimeyer, Ph. D. University of Arizona, Tucson Arlene.
Advertisements

Simplifying Reporting of Communication Development Outcomes for Infants and Toddlers with Hearing Loss Karen Anderson, PhD Florida EHDI Audiology Consultant.
Parent Perspectives on EHDI and Communication Choices Katherine Baldwin 2nd Annual National EHDI Conference February 26, 2003.
Western States Early Intervention Outcomes Project Kathryn Kreimeyer, Ph. D. Shirin Antia, Ph. D. Tucson, Arizona Arlene Stredler Brown, CCC-SLP, CED Allison.
ESI-P Early Screening Inventory-Preschool
Delaware Building BLOCKS EARLY CHILDHOOD MONITORING – INSTRUCTION – ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM FOR YOUNG CHILDREN Delaware Special Education Meeting September.
The BRIGANCE® Screens-II
Scoring Terminology Used in Assessment in Special Education
EARLY START Federal and State Requirements. What Is Early Start Frequently asked Questions Frequently asked Questions Which children are served? What.
Developmental Profile 3
VB-MAPP Verbal Behavior Milestones Assessment and Placement Program
Strategies for Supporting Young Children
Judith J. Carta, Ph.D. Juniper Gardens Children’s Project University of Kansas with help from Elaine Carlson, WESTAT.
Title One Program Evaluation Report to the CCSD Board of Education June 17, 2013 Bill Poock, Title One Coordinator Leslie Titler, Title One Teacher.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center 1 Understanding the Three Child Outcomes.
Alternate ACCESS for ELLs: An English Proficiency Test for Students with Significant Disabilities Understanding the Parent/Guardian Report.
Acknowledgments This study was funded in part by a grant from the National Institutes of Health-Institute on Deafness and other Communicative Disorders.
Autism Presented By Salahuddin BLC-Barisal. What is Autism Autism is long life developmental disorder. Autism is complex neurobiological disorder. Autism.
Language Special form of communication in which we learn complex rules to manipulate symbols that can be used to generate an endless number of meaningful.
CSD 5400 REHABILITATION PROCEDURES FOR THE HARD OF HEARING Language and Speech of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Characteristics and Concerns Language Acquisition.
1 The Maryland Early Childhood Accountability System Program Effectiveness Based on Results for Children Maryland State Department of Education Division.
Presenter : LEELA AGNES Co presenter : Prof. Dr. Thiruvalluvar : Prof.Dr. Prabakar Immanual.
Assessment for ASD Programming November 2012IDEA Partnership1.
ACCOUNTING FOR PROGRESS…… ONE CHILD AT A TIME
Assessment of Mental Retardation & Giftedness: Two End of the Normal Curve Lecture 12/1/04.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Georgia State University Series
Speech and Language Development
Colorado School for the Deaf and the Blind November 20, 2013
Our textbook defines Section 504 as:  As a person with a disability as anyone who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or.
Coaching Caregivers to Implement Joint Attention Interventions in the Natural Environment Heather Brownfield Kent State University Early Childhood Special.
Delaware Birth to Three Early Intervention System Evaluation: Child Outcomes July 15, 2004 Conference Call Series: Measuring Child Outcomes “Examples of.
Aligning Child Outcome Measurement to Early Learning Standards NECTAC Outcomes Meeting Monday, August 27, 2007.
All Aboard! Child Outcomes Measurement Across Early Childhood Systems Dawn McGrath ICAN/ISTAR Director Ann Ruhmkorff Indiana GSEG Project Coordinator.
English-Language Development Domain California Preschool Learning Foundations Volume 1 Published by the California Department of Education (2008) English-Language.
Components of Language Review DES 320. Components of Language  Form  Content  Use  Comprehension and Production  Auditory-Oral System  Visual-Graphic.
A NEW SYSTEM OF SUPPORT FOR INFANTS AND TODDLERS WITH DISABILITIES Recent Changes in the Provision of Early Intervention for Infants and Toddlers with.
Early Intervention Mock Evaluation. The following is a mock evaluation of a 15 month year old boy. The boy in this evaluation will be named “Tom” and.
WHERE ARE THEY NOW: Children who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing Identified by Newborn Hearing Screening in Hawai`i 2005 Early Hearing Detection and Intervention.
Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Supporting Individual Children Supporting Students with.
Determining educational success Ralph Leverett and Kris Wolfe an expansion of the S.I.F.T.E.R.
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1  Two Major Types  Language disorders include formulating and comprehending spoken messages. ▪ Categories:
Special Education 547 Unit Five Special Topics Kevin Anderson Minnesota State University Moorhead 2006.
 Services and Support to young children with special needs  creating partnerships  Family  School  Community.
Legal Aspects of Special Education Eligibility and Placement IEP and 504.
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
Assessing Learners with Special Needs: An Applied Approach, 6e © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5: Introduction to Norm- Referenced.
Language Disorders of Young Children
Functional Listening Evaluations:
Parent Guide to Using Lexile Scores Provided on the Georgia Milestones Individual Score Reports Using the Lexile Score to support the growth of your child’s.
The NC Infant Toddler Program: Together We Grow Policy information taken N.C. Infant-Toddler Program Manual.
Cognitive Evaluations. Factors Important in Assessments 1. Developmental History 2. Cultural Uniqueness 3. Impact of Disability.
Significant Developmental Delay Annual State Superintendent’s Conference on Special Education and Pupil Services October 20-21, 2015.
Assessments for Children Birth to 3: Part 1 Minnesota Child Development Inventory Colorado School for the Deaf and the Blind November 6, 2013.
Test of Early Reading Ability-3 (TERA-3) By: Jenna Ferrara.
1 The Development of a Compliant and Instructionally-Relevant Individualized Education Plan Solitia Wilson ADMS 625 Summer 2014.
Introduction to the Pennsylvania Kindergarten Entry Inventory.
E-LAP TRAINING. Who Can Administer? The Manual does not give guidelines as to who can and can’t administer the E-LAP.
The Normal Distribution and Norm-Referenced Testing Norm-referenced tests compare students with their age or grade peers. Scores on these tests are compared.
Reinforcement Look at matched picture after sound ends & it moves 10 trials (5 of each pairing) 2 or 4 blocks (2 pairs of words, 2 pairs of swoops) Participants.
And Referral for Special Education Evaluations By Special Ed Speech Therapy Staff.
Services for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder – Minnesota’s New Benefit Age and Disabilities Odyssey Conference June 17, 2013.
Chapter 8 Children with Communication, Language, and Speech Disorders © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Focus Questions What is assessment?
Introducing preLAS 2000 Gina Davis Assessment Consultant preLAS.
Language Outcomes, Growth, and Predictors of Success: A Multi-State (NECAP) Perspective WREIC June 16, 2017.
Reporting Assessment Information (Assessment Report/ITP)
Assessment of Communication
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
Chris Russell Sam Morgan Hunter College SPED 746
Presentation transcript:

Colorado School for the Deaf and the Blind November 13, 2013 Assessments for Children Birth to 3: Part 2 MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory: Words and Gestures Colorado School for the Deaf and the Blind November 13, 2013

Presenter Allison Sedey, Ph.D., CCC-SLP, CCC-A University of Colorado-Boulder Colorado School for the Deaf and the Blind Allison.Sedey@colorado.edu

Today’s Topics Description of assessment Instructions for administration Opportunity for families with children who are d/hoh to participate in NECAP Interpretation and use of results

Age level 8 to 18 months Older children with language delay Girls with < 70 words in productive vocabulary Boys with < 50 words in productive vocabulary

Areas assessed Comprehension of phrases Vocabulary comprehension Expressive vocabulary (396 words) Communicative gestures Symbolic gestures/pretend play

Published version Available from Brookes Publishing Co. Available in English or Spanish Separate norms for each language

Adapted version for d/hoh Adapted at the University of Colorado- Boulder “Sign” column added Can count words spoken, signed, and produced in both speech and sign Available in English or Spanish

Instructions to Parents Can rely only on instructions on form Can provide supplemental instructions Verbally In writing

Discussing Inconsistencies Opportunity to learn something you may have been unaware of Opportunity to improve parents’ observational skills of child’s language “I see you marked that Anna says ‘now’. Can you give me an example of a situation when she said/signed that word?”

Scoring If child’s CA is within age range of the test (8 to 18 months) Obtain percentile scores If child’s CA is >18 months Obtain age scores Look for your child’s raw score on the 50th %ile line See age associated with that score

NECAP National Early Childhood Assessment Project Assisting interested states in administering two developmental assessments Minnesota Child Development Inventory MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory

NECAP National Early Childhood Assessment Project For children who are deaf or hard of hearing Assessments scored by CU-Boulder Report of child’s results sent to interventionist and/or family Annual accountability report sent to participating state/agency

NECAP Allison.Sedey@colorado.edu **State- or agency-level administrators interested in participating in NECAP can contact: Allison.Sedey@colorado.edu

Interpreting Results Compare subscale scores Typically developing children show approximately equivalent scores across all sections

Interpreting Results Comprehension vs. production If delays exist in both, more significant problem than if only production delays

Interpreting Results Gestures vs. linguistic items Gestures often indication of more general cognitive ability Cognitive red flag if gesture scores are substantially below CA Cognition should predict linguistic ability Language red flag if gesture scores significantly exceed linguistic scores

Interpreting “often”, “sometimes”, “not yet” items Using the tables in the manual Compare child’s status with percentage of age-mates who received an “often” or “sometimes” response

Using Results to Guide Intervention Evaluate communication approach being used (# of words signed vs. spoken) Provide parent education significance of vocabulary development for future academic success Importance of having more than labels

Using Results to Guide Intervention Obtain ratio of nouns to “other” words Should be between .3 and .6 That is, for every 10 nouns a child produces, he/she typically produces between 3 and 6 other types of words Deaf/hoh children are often “noun heavy” Focus on vocabulary in semantic categories where child’s scores are low

Using Results to Guide Intervention To see which words are typically known at each age level go to: www.sci.sdsu.edu/cdi/lexical_e.htm Lists the percentage of children comprehending or producing each individual word at each age Can search database by age level, semantic category, specific words, or word frequency