Opening Statement Maglica v. Maglica Representing Plaintiff.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A GIA is a contract between a surety company and a contractor (or subcontractor)/principal. A GIA is a standard, typical document in the construction.
Advertisements

Maglica v. Maglica What is Mrs. Maglicas fair share?
Civil & criminal law Civil Law.
Let’s Study Legal English Together!. Modal verbs in Legal English Shall and May.
Superior Court of Orange County, California Attorney for the Plaintiff.
Chapter 17 Contracts — Breach of Contract and Remedies.
Enforcing Forum Selection Provisions Legal Considerations Brian S. Inamine, Esq. LeClairRyan - Los Angeles Office.
Legal Responsibilities for Board Members of Nonprofit Organizations Or…all you need to know to stay out of trouble. Presented: July 2007 Prepared by: Elsbeth.
16.1 Civil Cases.
Chapter 18 Torts.
Chapter 16 Lesson 1 Civil and Criminal Law.
The Married Persons Equality Act 1 of 1996
The Sanctity of Marriage
© 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Limited Liability Companies and Limited Liability Partnerships.
CHAPTER 6 “It Was Love, So Strong and So Real”
Guided notes provided Chapter 16 Sections 1 & 2.  Courtrooms job is to provide a place for the plaintiff and defendant to resolve their differences.
What is the purpose of marriage? ● Do we still need to have marriage in our society? ● Benefits? ● Drawbacks? ● Who regulates marriages? ● State government.
A Godly Family In An Ungodly World How Long The Marriage Should Last "Until Death Do You Part" Is Still God's Plan.
Christian views on Divorce LO: To consider Christian attitudes to divorce and explain why there are different attitudes. 15 August 2015.
SMALL CLAIMS COURT. Small Claims Court  Sometimes referred to as “the people’s court”  Informal and inexpensive way for settling disputes  Claims of.
Slides developed by Les Wiletzky Wiletzky and Associates Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Slides to Accompany.
Operating Corporations (and Other Business Entities) OBE–118, Fall 2004 Professor McKinsey Whether you are an owner, a manager or a third party, the ways.
Christianity Family Relationships. Contents Family Life Marriage Breakdown of Marriage Divorce Remarriage Annulment.
CHOOSING THE RIGHT FORM OF OWNERSHIP ENT 12. WHAT ARE THE CHOICES? A new venture can be established as:  a sole proprietorship  a partnership  or a.
© 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 53: Family Law Chapter 53: Family Law Business Law Legal, E-Commerce,
Opening Statement Maglica v Maglica, 1993 Judge Polis, Orange Co., CA.
Copyright Guy Harley Revision. Copyright Guy Harley Types of Remedy  Termination  Rescission  Recovery of Contract Price  Damages 
Copyright © 2004 by Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Slides to Accompany BUSINESS LAW E-Commerce and Digital Law International Law and Ethics.
COPYRIGHT © 2010 South-Western/Cengage Learning..
Healthy Relationships. Characteristics of Healthy Relationships: Healthy Unhealthy.
Opening Statement Opening Statement Maglica v. Maglica Orange County Court, Judge Robert Pullis 1994 Breach of Contract.
Accident Records and Documents  What are examples of records you may need to keep as part of the accident investigation process?  Injured employee 
Jonathan Wilkey Gwyn James Solicitors Legal Workshop Issues in Equity Release.
Chapter 14. Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.  Entrepreneur: A person who forms and operates a new business either.
Business Organizations. Types of Business Organization  Sole Proprietorship - an individual carrying on business alone  Partnership - two or more people.
Maglica v. Maglica Case for the Plaintiff Opening Statement.
Chapter 16.1 Civil Cases. Types of Civil Lawsuits In civil cases the plaintiff – the party bringing the lawsuit – claims to have suffered a loss and usually.
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice-Hall 1 FAMILY LAW © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice-Hall CHAPTER 53.
P A R T P A R T Partnerships 9 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Business Law, 13/e © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Introduction to Forms.
Maglica v. Maglica Case# Judge Robert J. Polis Superior Court of Orange County Attorney for Plaintiff – Claire Maglica.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE 1998.
Maglica v. Maglica Plaintiff’s Case
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Civil Cases. Civil Lawsuits Why do some people file civil suits? – Plaintiff claims to have suffered a loss or injury to themselves and usually seeks.
Marriage and Interdependent Adult Relationships in Canada Mel Lambert.
Business Law and the Regulation of Business Chapter 32: Operation of General Partnerships By Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts.
Family Law What is Marriage?.
© 2007 Sidley Austin LLP, Los Angeles, CA All rights reserved. What is a Civil Case?
Chapter 34 Small Business, Entrepreneurship, and General Partnerships.
Opening Statement Maglica v. Maglica State of California Superior Court January 1992 Representing Plaintiff- Claire Maglica.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. ISHMAEL v. MILLINGTON 241 Cal.App.2d 520, 50 Cal.Rptr.592 (1966) Case Brief.
Business Ownership Structures
Maglica v. Maglica Orange County Courthouse 1993.
OPENING STATEMENT Claire Maglica v. Anthony Maglica Superior Court of Orange County, CA June 1993.
Divorce in Christianity. Unfortunately, life isn’t perfect and things don’t always work out the way we had planned. It is very common for people who were.
Marriage, Divorce, and Remarriage Matthew 19:3-12.
TORTS: A CIVIL WRONG Chapter 18. TORTS: A CIVIL WRONG Under criminal law, wrongs committed are called crimes. Under civil law, wrongs committed are called.
Christian marriage ceremonies What is a Christian wedding like?
Opening Statement Maglica v. Maglica Superior Court of Orange County California 1994 Counsel for the Defendant.
Common Law Marriage & Financial Responsibilities
Agency Law Objective 3.02 Understand agency law.
ESSENTIAL QUESTION Why does conflict develop?
Civics & Economics – Goals 5 & 6 Civil Cases
A Dispute Between Individuals
What Small and Emerging Contractors Need to Know Understanding General Agreements of Indemnity © Copyright 2017 NASBP.
CHAPTER 9 THE CORPORATE ORGANIZATION © 2013 Delmar Cengage Learning.
Differences and similarities
Presentation transcript:

Opening Statement Maglica v. Maglica Representing Plaintiff

Reason for Lawsuit Claire reasonably believed they were married and is owed half of the company’s assets in the divorce. Claire was reasonably expressed to be in a legal oral contract that was broken. Claire was also lead to believe that she owned half or in part of Mag Instrument.

Undisputed Facts of the Case Anthony Maglica, a Croatian immigrant, founded his own machine shop business, Mag Instrument, in He was divorced in 1971 and kept the business. In the same year he met Claire Halasz, an interior designer. They got along very well and lived together, holding themselves out as man and wife—hence Claire changing her name to Maglica. The business was incorporated in 1974 and all shares went into Anthony’s name. Anthony was president and Claire was executive vice president, and they were paid equal salaries after the incorporation. Mag Instrument is now worth hundreds of million dollars.

Undisputed Facts Con’t In 1992 Claire discovered that Anthony was trying to transfer stock to his children but not to her, and the couple split. Claire is suing Anthony for, among other things, breach of contract, breach of partnership agreement, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty and quantum meruit.

Claire Maglica’s Testimony Plaintiff

Claire was promised that the two would share everything in life, good times and the bad, and the liabilities and benefits. She also believes this was a relationship that was built on promises and commitments that were never fulfilled. Claire said she was lead to believe the document she signed in 1977 was a document that would make their marriage official and not a separation of property agreement. Claire always wanted a marriage and Anthony did not. The two shared one office and ran the company as one unit. Claire took care of all the paperwork., managing the business side, payroll, cleaned the bathroom, swept the shop. In the 23 years the two were a couple Claire never worried about losing the business because she was lead to believe that she would be taken care of and the business was part hers. Claire filed suit in 1992 because it was when she found out that Mr. Maglica was giving his children part in the stock with out talking to her first. This is when Mr. Maglica proceeded to tell Claire that she had no decisions in the company’s assets.

Other Evidence for the Plaintiff Celebrated 5/14/1971 as their anniversary date Vows were said in front of witnesses but not in a legal capacity. She believed she signed a marriage document and therefore changes her last name to reflect so. The Separation of Properties agreement had Claire’s name mispelled. Claire also states that it was not her handwriting on the fraudulent receipts.

Anthony Maglica’s Testimony Defendant

Mr. Maglica claims that no such agreement was ever made. Mr. Maglica did agree that Claire was a asset to the company and she did a very good job. He trusted her to take care of thing in his absence. A earlier video revealed that Mr. Maglica only had Claire in the executive position because she was his girlfriend. He never analogizes Claire as his wife. Says he owes obligation to Claire because he cares for her and want to take care of her. Reimbursement bills were changed so Claire could get more money back back from the company.

Conclusion Claire is entitled to part of the profits from the company because she was lead to believe for 23 years she had a stake in the company’s interest. Based on the previously stated Claire is filing the lawsuit for the following reasons: ◦Breach of Contract ◦Breach of Partnership ◦Fraud ◦Breach of Fiduciary Duty ◦Quantum Meruit