Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Basics of Logical Argument Two Kinds of Argument The Deductive argument: true premises guarantee a true conclusion. e.g. All men are mortal. Socrates.
Advertisements

KEY TERMS Argument: A conclusion together with the premises that support it. Premise: A reason offered as support for another claim. Conclusion: A claim.
A Note on Straight-Thinking A supplementary note for the 2nd Annual JTS/CGST Public Ethics Lecture March 5, 2002(b), adj. 2009:03:05 G.E.M. of TKI.
Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning
Deduction and Induction Elementary deduction, my dear Watson…
Arguments, validity, soundness, persuasiveness
{ Introduction to Logic The two types of logos. Induction  Definition: compiling of evidence/reasons/ examples that support an argument  Example: “Wow!
Today’s Outline Hume’s Problem of Induction Two Kinds of Skepticism
Welcome to Dave Penner’s Presentation on Inductive Reasoning!
Deductive Reasoning. Deductive reasoning is the process of reasoning logically from given statements to a conclusion.
Logic and Reasoning Panther Prep North Central High School.
Deductive Versus Inductive Appeals to Reason Ms. O’ Shea Riverside High School English IV.
Logos Formal Logic.
2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning Objectives: 1.To recognize deductive reasoning and use it to arrive at a true conclusion.
 Monty Python – Argument Clinic video  Monty Python Monty Python.
An Introduction to Logic And Fallacious Reasoning
DEDUCTIVE Vs INDUCTIVE
Deduction CIS308 Dr Harry Erwin. Syllogism A syllogism consists of three parts: the major premise, the minor premise, and the conclusion. In Aristotle,
III. Some Basic Concepts of Logic Clarity  Definition -- lexical and stipulative -- ostensive -- definition by examples -- definition by a synonym --
1 Arguments in Philosophy Introduction to Philosophy.
Melissa Seeborg. Reasoning is the process of drawing inferences or conclusions from established knowledge Reasoning uses the audience’s existing knowledge.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning A Framework for Audience Analysis.
How to Argue Successfully Deductive and Inductive Reasoning.
Basic Argumentation.
Inductive Reasoning, Deductive Reasoning, and False Premise.
You will be working with your elbow partner…decide right now who will be Partner A and who will be Partner B.
Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning. Objectives Use a Venn diagram to determine the validity of an argument. Complete a pattern with the most likely possible.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
ARGUMENTS: Deduction and Induction
Persuasion Deductive reasoning works from the more general to the more specific. Sometimes this is informally called a "top-down" approach. Inductive reasoning.
Reasoning!? What’s that???  Reasoning is the act of drawing a conclusion.  You use premises to help you draw a conclusion. Some conclusions are more.
INDUCTION. GENUS: General principle DIFFERENTIA: which states that events in nature are REGULAR, not RANDOM ANALYTIC DEF’N // The past, while not a carbon.
Why did the young man name his puppies Biology, Chemistry and Physics?
MA 110: Finite Math Lecture 1/14/2009 Section 1.1 Homework: 5, 9-15, (56 BP)
Argument Strategies. Aristotle’s 4 main arguments 1. argue about what is possible or impossible 1. If people continue to eat foods with chemicals, it.
9/20/12 BR- Who are the 3 Argument Brothers (from yesterday) Today: How to Argue (Part 1) MIKVA!!
Reason “Crime is common, logic is rare” - Sherlock Holmes.
Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning. Deductive Reasoning Starts with a general rule (a premise) which we know to be true. Then, from that rule, we make.
Reasoning and Critical Thinking Validity and Soundness 1.
10/20/09 BR- Who are the three “brothers” of Argument? Today: Constructing A Logical Argument – Deductive and Inductive Reasoning -Hand in “facts” -MIKVA.
Logic A: Capital punishment is immoral. B: No it isn’t! A: Yes it is! B: Well, what do you know about it? A: I know more about it then you do! B: Oh yeah?
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
The Problem of Induction. Aristotle’s Inductions Aristotle’s structure of knowledge consisted of explanations such as: Aristotle’s structure of knowledge.
An Introduction to Logic And Fallacious Reasoning
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning. F.O.A. (Bellwork) Mr. Ezzell is a man. Men like to watch football. Therefore, …. You fill in the blank. Mrs. Ezzell.
10/21/09 BR- Identify the (1)premises and the (2)conclusion in the following deductive argument. Is it valid or invalid? All fish need gills to breath.
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
BBI 3420 Critical Reading and Thinking Critical Reading Strategies: Identifying Arguments.
Reasoning To understand and analyse how basic philosophical arguments work. Understand basic philosophical terms. Use the terms to identify key features.
Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning
Deductive vs. Inductive Arguments
09/17/07 BR- What is “logic?” What does it mean to make a logical argument? Today: Logic and How to Argue (Part 1)
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
 Induction is the process of drawing a general conclusion from incomplete evidence.  You consider evidence you have seen or heard to draw a conclusion.
What is an argument? An argument is, to quote the Monty Python sketch, "a connected series of statements to establish a definite proposition." Huh? Three.
Section 3.6 Reasoning and Patterns. Deductive Reasoning Deductive reasoning starts with a general rule, which we know to be true. Then from that rule,
Do Now  With your table partner, briefly tell each other about the last argument you had. (keep it school appropriate)
Use of Reason and Logic RATIONALISM.  A Rationalist approach to knowledge is based on the belief that we can ascertain truth by thinking and reflection.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
Day 5 N.O.MA.
Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning
Basic Logic Definitions
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Critical Thinking Lecture 2 Arguments
Logical Fallacies.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
Presentation transcript:

Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning

Deductive Reasoning Starts with a general rule (a premise) which we know to be true. Then, from that rule, we make a true conclusion about something specific.

Deductive Reasoning The process of reasoning from known facts to conclusions. When you reason deductively, you can say “therefore” with certainty. If your facts were firm to begin with, then your conclusions will also be firm.

Deductive Reasoning

Deductive Reasoning From vague To specific

A deductive argument is one in which it is impossible for the premises to be true but the conclusion false. It is supposed to be a definitive proof of the truth of the claim (conclusion). Premise  All men are mortal. Premise  Socrates was a man. Conclusion  Socrates was mortal. If the premises are true (and they are), then it simply isn't possible for the conclusion to be false. If you have a deductive argument and you accept the truth of the premises, then you must also accept the truth of the conclusion.

A deductive argument True Premise Conclusion

Deductive Reasoning Example: Smith owns only blue pants and brown pants. Smith is wearing a pair of pants today. So, Smith is wearing either blue or brown pants today.

Inductive Reasoning The process of going from observations to conclusions. This type of conclusion is sometimes called an inference.

Inductive Reasoning Observing that something is true many times, then concluding that it will be true in all instances Using the data to make a prediction

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive Reasoning From specific To vague

An inductive argument is one in which the premises are supposed to support the conclusion. If the premises are true, it is unlikely that the conclusion is false. The conclusion probably follows from the premises. Premise  Socrates was Greek. Premise  Most Greeks eat fish. Conclusion  Socrates ate fish. Even if both premises are true, it is still possible for the conclusion to be false (maybe Socrates was allergic to fish). Words which tend to mark an argument as inductive include probably, likely, possibly and reasonably.

A inductive argument True Premise True Premise True Probably Conclusion

Inductive Reasoning Example: January has been cold here in Siberia. Today is January 14, so it is going to be another cold day in Siberia.

Which conclusion below shows evidence of deductive reasoning? One time an employee used store computers to download a harmful virus, so employee computer use is a security threat. Many customers complained about employees using computers rather than working, so computer misuse was harming the company’s sales. An employee on a break distracted other employees by using a computer in a public area for private business, so that employee was given a warning. Several employees left customer sales information visible on computer screens, so those employees were instructed to always close windows with personal information.

The word wall is Inductive The windows are Deductive Let’s Practice – The word wall is Inductive The windows are Deductive

#1 Conclusion: This wire will conduct electricity. Premise: Everything made of copper conducts electricity. Premise: This wire is made of copper. Conclusion: This wire will conduct electricity.

Premise: Socrates was Greek. #2 Premise: Socrates was Greek. Premise: Most Greeks eat fish. Conclusion: Socrates probably ate fish.

#3 The local branch of Wachovia Bank was robbed yesterday. Jenny needed money to pay off her gambling debts. She just bought a gun two days ago, and I saw her hanging around the local Wachovia Bank yesterday morning. Today the bookie’s goons stopped looking for Jenny. So Jenny robbed Wachovia Bank yesterday.

#4 Premise: All turtles have shells. Premise: The animal I have captured is a turtle. Conclusion: I conclude that the animal in my bag has a shell.

#5 Sherlock Holmes and Watson were on a camping trip. They had gone to bed and were lying there looking up at the sky. Holmes said, “Watson, look up. What do you see?” “I see thousand of stars.” “And what does that mean to you?” “I guess it means we will have another nice day tomorrow. What does it mean to you, Holmes?” “To me, it means someone has stolen our tent.”

#6 Conclusion: Tonya has bought the set of golf clubs for Jack. Premise: Tonya is seen walking from her car to her home with a set of golf clubs. Premise: Tonya’s husband Jeff loves golf and tomorrow is his birthday. Conclusion: Tonya has bought the set of golf clubs for Jack.