M & E for K to 12 BEP in Schools

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Program Evaluation in Gifted Education Rebecca Mann EDPS 540.
Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.
Analyzing Student Work
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
Low-Cost Private Schools Knowledge Framework Research methodology template.
PM&E Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation Prepared by BMCalub.
Learning and Teaching Using ICT Conferences Summer 2004.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Renewed Outcomes-based Curriculum 6-9. Purpose for Renewal Teacher feedback –Provide concise & coherent curriculum –Time allocations have not changed.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Empowering Staff Through Institute Planning (ESTIP) Executive Workshop Institute Name: XXXXXX Presenter: XXXXXX Date: XXXXXX.
Essential Elements in Implementing and Monitoring Quality RtI Procedures Rose Dymacek & Edward Daly Nebraska Department of Education University of Nebraska-
Dr. Pratibha Gupta Associate professor Deptt. of Community Medicine ELMC & H, Lucknow.
Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Learning Outcomes Are formulated by the academic staff, preferably involving student representatives in the.
What should be the basis of
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Interactive Science Notebooks: Putting the Next Generation Practices into Action
Identity & Purpose Desired State Vision 2012 Target Achievements Projection into the external environment Key Successful factors / Value Drivers / Internal.
Chapter 3 Needs Assessment
Using Data to Improve Adult Ed Programs Administrators’ Workshop.
Dr. G. Johnson, Program Evaluation and the Logic Model Research Methods for Public Administrators Dr. Gail Johnson.
OSSE School Improvement Data Workshop Workshop #4 June 30, 2015 Office of the State Superintendent of Education.
ISTEP: Technology Field Research in Developing Communities Instructor: M. Bernardine Dias CAs: Sarah Belousov and Ermine Teves Spring 2009.
Instructional System Design
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
School’s Cool in Kindergarten for the Kindergarten Teacher School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Academic Intervention Services: Deepening the Conversation District 75 NYCDOE.
Results-Based Management
Hertfordshire in Action Working in Partnership to secure effective Transition and Progression.
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
Connecting the Dots PLC AfL DI Higher Order Thinking TLCP Multi- Literacies Arts Technology Inquiry BIP SEF SIP.
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
What is a Business Analyst? A Business Analyst is someone who works as a liaison among stakeholders in order to elicit, analyze, communicate and validate.
University of Palestine Dept. of Urban Planning Introduction to Planning ( EAGD 3304 ) M.A. Architect: Tayseer Mushtaha
Monitoring & Evaluation: The concepts and meaning Day 9 Session 1.
University of Palestine Dept. of Urban Planning Introduction to Planning ( EAGD 3304 ) M.A. Architect: Tayseer Mushtaha Mob.:
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Integrated Risk Management Charles Yoe, PhD Institute for Water Resources 2009.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Middle Leadership Programme Day 1: The Effective Middle Leader.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Monitoring and Evaluation
Tier III Implementation. Define the Problem  In general - Identify initial concern General description of problem Prioritize and select target behavior.
INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 1 Click to edit Master title style 1 Evaluation and Review of Experience from UNEP Projects.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 24, 2009.
SENJIT Code of Practice update and SEND Support Plans.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
© Crown copyright 2008 Subject Leaders’ Development Meeting Spring 2009.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
Intervention and Support Inclusion Questions. Early and Strategic  How does the school provide purposeful early intervention and support to lift the.
Assessment Small Learning Communities. The goal of all Small Learning Communities is to improve teaching, learning, and student outcomes A rigorous, coherent.
Action Research Purpose and Benefits Technology as a Learning Tool to Improve Student Achievement.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
Initial Project Aims To increase the capacity of primary schools in partnership with parents to implement a sustainable health and sexuality education.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.
Tier III Preparing for First Meeting. Making the Decision  When making the decision to move to Tier III, all those involve with the implementation of.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Learning Resource Plan Adjustment Coordinating Principal-LILA
Presentation transcript:

M & E for K to 12 BEP in Schools

Objectives: enhance KSAs on Monitoring and Evaluation adapt appropriate M & E tool for K to 12 in school level At the end of the session, the participants will be able to: enhance KSAs on Monitoring and Evaluation adapt appropriate M & E tool for K to 12 in school level At the end of the session, the participants will be able to: enhance KSAs on Monitoring and Evaluation adapt appropriate M & E tool for K to 12 in school level At the end of the session, the participants will be able to: enhance KSAs on Monitoring and Evaluation adapt appropriate M & E tool for K to 12 in school level Objectives: At the end of the session, the participants should be able to: enhance KSAs on Monitoring and Evaluation adapt appropriate monitoring tools for K to 12 at the school level

Group Activity Write your personal experience about Monitoring and Evaluation. Differentiate Monitoring from Evaluation Present your output in three (3) minutes

Factors/areas monitored and evaluated Thinking Aloud! Factors/areas monitored and evaluated (what?) Reasons (why?) Methods used (how?)

It also takes monitoring and evaluation to go together…

What is Monitoring? Although the term “monitoring and evaluation” tends to get run together as if it is only one thing, monitoring and evaluation are, in fact, two distinct sets of organizational activities, related but not identical.

What is Monitoring? Monitoring the systematic collection and analysis of information as a project progresses. It is aimed at improving the efficiency and effectiveness of a project or organization. It is based on targets set and activities planned during the planning phases of work.

What is Monitoring? Monitoring It helps to keep the work on track, and can let management know when things are going wrong. If done properly, it is an invaluable tool for good management, and it provides a useful base for evaluation. It enables you to determine whether the resources you have available are sufficient and are being well used, whether the capacity you have is sufficient and appropriate, and whether you are doing what you planned to do

M&E is more than an activity, more than collecting data, and more than reporting. It is purposive, deliberate, and systematically undertaken.

What is Monitoring? Monitoring involves: Setting up systems to collect information relating to these indicators; Collecting and recording the information; Analyzing the information; Using the information to inform day-to-day management.

Monitoring is an internal function in any project or organization

What is Evaluation? Evaluation involves: Looking at what the project or organization intended to achieve – what difference did it want to make? What impact did it want to make? Assessing its progress towards what it wanted to achieve, its impact targets. Looking at the strategy of the project or organization. Did it have a strategy? Was it effective in following its strategy? Did the strategy work? If not, why not?

What is Evaluation? Evaluation involves: Looking at how it worked. Was there an efficient use of resources? What were the opportunity costs of the way it chose to work? How sustainable is the way in which the project or organization works? What are the implications for the various stakeholders in the way the organization works.

Efficiency Effectiveness Impact Indicators of M & E Efficiency Effectiveness Impact

Efficiency Indicators of M&E tells you that the input into the work is appropriate in terms of the output. This could be input in terms of money, time, staff, equipment and so on.

Effectiveness Indicator of M&E is a measure of the extent to which a development program or project achieves the specific objectives it set. If, for example, we set out to improve the qualifications of all the high school teachers in a particular area, did we succeed?

Impact Indicator of M&E tells you whether or not what you did made a difference to the problem situation you were trying to address.

Impact Indicators of Monitoring Was your strategy useful? Before deciding to get bigger, or to replicate the project elsewhere, you need to be sure that what you are doing makes sense in terms of the impact you want to achieve.

Continuous Improvement Areas of M & E Planning Decision-making Continuous Improvement

Areas of M & E Planning The Plan provides the scope of monitoring and evaluation. The Plan defines the areas to be monitored and evaluated

Areas of M & E Plan provides the: destination (outcomes) directions (strategies) and means (resources) to get to the destination.

The Plan should be: Areas of M & E Accurate Correct Clearly written (targets and indicators)

Decision-making Areas of M & E the process of identifying and selecting alternatives, directions, and/or solutions

Continuous Improvement Areas of M & E Continuous Improvement a management process where delivery processes are constantly evaluated and improved in the light of efficiency, effectiveness and flexibility

Continuous Improvement Areas of M & E Continuous Improvement M&E is undertaken not just for troubleshooting or making corrections. It is an important element for improving practices in order to increase the likelihood of achieving the desired outcomes. Monitoring and evaluation are means to support the continuous learning processes of an organization.

Four interrelated processes of M & E Planning Monitoring Adjustments Evaluation

M&E Frame Elements M&E Frame Elements 1. M&E Reasons & Interests Objectives Questions Information Requirements / Scope 3. Monitoring Processes & Strategies Monitoring Standards Monitoring Processes & workflow Monitoring Tools. 2. M&E Strategies Methods of Information Analysis Methods of Data Capture/Collection Information Source

Measure of Performance Types of M & E Types of M & E Description Measure of Performance Timing Progress M&E Assessment of an ongoing implementation. The objective is to steer implementation as efficiently as possible based on the approved plan. Efficiency Physical Accomplishment (Actual versus Plan) During Implementation

Measure of Performance Types of M & E Types of M & E Description Measure of Performance Timing Initial Gains Evaluation Keeps track of the changes or improvement in the behavior, performance and practices of the target group/s. Initial Gains Improvement in the performance of target group/s Middle of the Implementation and before the termination of the current plan

Measure of Performance Types of M & E Types of M & E Description Measure of Performance Timing Results or Outcome M&E Measures the realization of Outcome level objectives; Determines the effectiveness of the implementation Effectiveness – achievement of benefits immediately after the end of implementation

Measure of Performance Types of M & E Types of M & E Description Measure of Performance Timing Impact Evaluation Measures the contribution of the interventions to a higher level objective Impact – achievement of long term objectives Post Implementation (not immediate)

Misconceptions M&E is about submitting reports. Report preparation and submission is just one of the many functions in M&E. It includes the process of gathering data and information, analyzing them, writing and presenting these in a format that will facilitate decision making. These reports will be the basis for future actions and future designs of programs and projects.

Misconceptions M&E is about field visits and data gathering. The M&E System is often equated to filling up forms, tables, and matrices. The more important activity of validating the data and information is often neglected. The practice of filling up forms, tables, and matrices lead to erroneous data and information. M&E is about field visits and data gathering.

School M&E System This is a M&E system for the schools, designed to meet the information needs and decision making requirements of the school heads, teachers and school's nonteaching staff.

School M&E System The School M&E System empowers the school managers and teachers to make intelligent decisions based on data and information it gathers about its own performance and progress. It is a system designed to minimize the school's dependence from externally generated report about school performance which often arrives late and in a form not useful to the school's decision making requirements.

School M&E System The School M&E System tracks the following: the quality of learners participation which includes attendance, classroom participation, academic performance the quality of the learning environment which includes school facilities, textbooks and materials

School M&E System The School M&E System tracks the following: the quality of the teaching and learning process the participation of the school stakeholders like the parents, communities, local government units the capability of the school administrators on school based management, and the efficiency of the school to deliver school programs and projects outlined in the SIP

M&E of K to 12 in Schools Goals and Objectives: DepEd Memorandum No. 196, s. 2012 Goals and Objectives: identify strengths and weaknesses of the K t0 12 teacher training, curriculum and support instructional packages determine teachers’ extent of participation in performing their roles as implementers of K to 12 curriculum

Key Information Needed: On Curricular and Scope Curricular coverage Sequencing of competencies Clustering of competencies within and across learning areas Appropriateness of content and performance standards

Key Information Needed: B. On Instructional Delivery Availability of provided LMs and TGs Provision of holistic, integrative and interactive learning Use of additional time for tool subjects (ICL) and special instructional programs/interventions

Monitoring instruments: Key Informants: Monitoring instruments: Teacher Pupils/students Principal Parents Classroom Observation Interview FGD

M & E Tool Form 1: Enclosure No. 3 to Deped Memorandum No. 196, s. 2012 Form 3: Enclosure No. 3 to Deped Memorandum No. 196, s. 2012

Activity Each group will receive an M & E results on K to 12 for Grades 1 and 7. Based on the findings, what are your specific plan of action? Present your output in 5 minutes using the template provided.

Findings/Issues & Concerns Plan of Action Findings/Issues & Concerns M&E Strategies Next steps