Introduction to Research Ethics Graduate School Students Dave Carpenter University Research Ethics Adviser 5 th February 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kirsty McCormack.
Advertisements

GF8 – Vilnius, June 2007 Hugh Whittall Director Nuffield Council on Bioethics Establishing and supporting research ethics infrastructure and networking.
Dr Birgit Whitman, Research Governance Manager Ethical policies.
The Research Ethics Process RPT Conference 28 th April 2006.
Research Passport Application Process
The HPSS Research Ethics Service Northern Ireland Dr Siobhan McGrath Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland Mar2007.
Research Policy & Management RACD INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH GOVERNANCE.
Good Clinical Practice in Research Clinical Trial Regulations
The School Research Ethics Committee Welsh School of Architecture.
Ethics – where to start! October 2013 Lois Neal FMS Research & Innovation Office.
Research involving adults lacking the capacity to consent Legal, ethical and practical issues Dr Mikey Dunn Senior Research Associate in Health and Social.
Navigating the PhD – The Research Degrees Office.
Ethics Relating to Children in Research in FP7
The Care Act & Adult Safeguarding – Implications for Age UK & Partners Richard Powley Head of Safeguarding Age UK.
An Introduction to the Ethics Review Procedure Lindsay Unwin: Research & Innovation Services, UREC Secretary.
Introducing Research Ethics & the UREC Professor Chris Newman, UREC Chair.
RESEARCH ASSISTANT TRAINING PROGRAM ORGANIZED BY DRMC,
New Trials If you are seeking a collaboration with the UCL CCTU we require you to apply: At least 3 months before the application deadline By using the.
1 Confidentiality and data use in the NHS in Scotland Rod Muir, ISD.
The Staff Code of Conduct ACS Roundtable Forum Presented by Elle Ackland Friday 17 August 2012.
Ethics Approval for Projects based overseas George Ellison (Director) Research & Graduate School
Ethical Approval – where to start! October 2014 – February 2015 Lois Neal FMS Research & Innovation Office.
Michael Clark PhD.  Both involve answering specific questions which relate to the quality of care.  They can both be carried out either prospectively.
Understanding Major & Annual Review September 2014 Donna Crighton, Cheryl Strong & Nikki Sowerby Research Section, QMD, Academic Registry.
Research Governance in Practice
Human Research and Ethics Dr Michèle de Courcy Chair, Faculty of Education HEAG University of Melbourne.
Responsible Sponsorship A case study Dr Birgit Whitman, Head of Research Governance.
Research Ethics-Integrity-Governance. University Initiative:The Catalyst? ‘02 Good Research Practice Standards & Procedure to Investigate Potential Research.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting November 9, 2004 Research Use of Stored Data and Tissues.
FOUNDATIONS OF NURSING RESEARCH Sixth Edition CHAPTER Copyright ©2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Nursing Research,
The Research Project: ethical approval process
Ethics in research involving human subjects
Good Clinical Practice GCP
Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.
Applying to a Research Ethics Committee
Human Research Ethics and Obtaining Ethics Approval
Retha Britz Copyright 2013 All rights reserved for this presentation 1 Establishment and functioning of a REC Retha Britz.
Ethics and Regulatory Approvals Alison Robertson CMDHB Research Officer.
Introducing Research Ethics: Policy and Procedure
Research Ethics PPAL February, 2012.
We have reviewed this material in accordance with U.S. Copyright Law and have tried to maximize your ability to use, share, and adapt it. The citation.
The work of the Research Ethics Committee Dr Carol Chu.
Negotiating access, ethics and the problems of ‘inside’ research.
Introducing the University Research Ethics Committee.
“What’s Ethics Got To Do With It” Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Gary Kent Head Governance Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
The Global Health Network Marijke Geldenhuys 19 September 2014 Adhering to the GCP Principles.. what does that even mean?
Cardiff and Vale UHB Bwrdd lechyd Prifysgol Caerdydd a’r Fro NHS R&D Overview How to avoid the common pitfalls? Thomas Fairman Research Liaison Manager.
Professor David Stanley Northumbria University.  “Human participants or subjects are defined as including living human beings, human beings who have.
R&D – a perspective Dr Nana Theodorou Research Coordinator Sheffield Clinical Research Office.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
Research Governance Overview
University of Sheffield UNIVERSITY RESEARCH ETHICS COMMITTEE.
Presentation 1: Developing information for participants in your research – getting started This presentation contains some exercises to help you get started.
Case Studies: Puzzles in Human Research Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst, Program for Research Integrity Development and Education.
Research Ethics PPAL February, 2011 Part 2.
Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.
Human Subjects Protection Program Office of Research Compliance Navigating through the current HSPP and IRB Presented by: Danielle Griffin, M.S. Research.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Understanding the Mental Capacity Act David Neal Head of Policy, NRES.
8 th November 2007 Research: ethics and research governance Rossana Dowsett Research and Regional Development Division [Pre Award Support] University of.
Introduction to Research Governance, Ethics and Integrity Mrs April Lockyer Senior Research Policy Officer (Governance and Integrity)
Quality Metrics of Performance of Research Ethics Committees Cristina E. Torres, PhD FERCAP Coordinator.
GCP (GOOD CLINICAL PRACTISE)
REGULATORY PROBLEMS IN CARING OUT PRE- AND POST- AUTHORISATION CLINICAL TRIALS Dr Penka Decheva GCP Inspector, BDA.
Good Clinical Practice
And don’t forget… ethics and R&D
Research Integrity & RMIT
Design workshop Introduction: why? Notification intended research
Ethics and governance in drugs research
Ray French Research Governance Manager, ACCORD.
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Research Ethics Graduate School Students Dave Carpenter University Research Ethics Adviser 5 th February 2014

Research Ethics – A basic introduction and a few warnings!

A few key points You should not attempt to recruit any participants before the ethical review Ethical review should not be sought until the research design has been completed and a protocol produced (advice can be sought at any time) Guidance on the ethical design and conduct of the research should be provided by your supervisor There is no rule which states that the ethical review must take place before your major review Use available guidance and templates

Policy: UoP and National UoP: Ethics Policy UoP: Procedure for the Investigation of Allegations of Misconduct in Research 25,en.pdf RCUK: Terms and conditions of research Council fEC grants ebruary2013.pdf RCUK: Policy and Guidelines on Governance of Good Research Conduct UUK: The Concordat to Support Research Integrity df UKRIO: Code of Practice

Registry UPR 8 dffiletodownload,142242,en.pdf UPR 16 dffiletodownload,142256,en.pdf PgRS Handbook

Do I really need to get an ethical review? Human Subjects: Research not involving human subjects is not normally ethically reviewed unless it is particularly sensitive. Involvement of human subjects is not always easy to define. Grey areas include: –Archival research –Web-based research – acquiring data from public web-based forums is increasingly popular Possible impact on the integrity of the environment Possible impact on cultural heritage

National Policy and Law NHS Human tissue Ionising radiation Prisoners Mentally incapacitated adults Clinical trials of medicinal products Medical devices

Faculty/ DeptChairEC BusinessLisa JackPBS EC Creative and Cultural Industries Wendy PowellCCI EC HumanitiesJane WinstoneHUMS EC (ICJS Departmental EC) Science Chris Markham SCIENCE FACULTY EC Departmental ECs: SHSSW PSYCHOLOGY SPORTS SCIENCE BIOMED. SCIENCE TechnologyJohn WilliamsTECH REC Central ServicesUsually HUMS NHS ResearchNRES Social Care ResearchSCREC Which ethics committee?

What does an EC look for? Scientific design and conduct of the study Recruitment of research participants Care and protection of research participants Protection of research participants’ confidentiality Informed consent process

Why should I get my research ethically reviewed?

Care and protection of research subjects Reputation of the University Your own safety Funding Publication Policy Law

Unethical research Inadequate review of the literature Poor design Underpowered Likely outcomes not commensurate with burdens ?? Limited or no social value Role conflict

When should I seek ethical review?

There is no need for PhD students to seek ethical review until their research plans are clear – this might well be some time after major review. The position regarding ethical review is monitored via the annual report (UPR 8). It is perfectly acceptable to record that ethical review will be sought later, or in some cases, not at all – the research might not involve human subjects. Please note the reminder – the final thesis will not be accepted unless (where necessary) ethical review has been undertaken and a favourable opinion provided. The final declaration with regard to ethical review is given in UPR 16 – it includes a direct link to the United Kingdom Research Integrity Office Code of Practice and the UKRIO checklist. The checklist is a useful tool for ethically monitoring research from conception to completion.UPR 8UPR 16Code of Practicechecklist