Non-local exciton- polariton spin switches Laboratoire Kastler Brossel, Paris (experimental part) : C. Adrados R. Hivet J. Lefrère A.Amo E. Giacobino and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

Agenda Semiconductor materials and their properties PN-junction diodes
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
There is a pattern for factoring trinomials of this form, when c
Kapitel 21 Astronomie Autor: Bennett et al. Galaxienentwicklung Kapitel 21 Galaxienentwicklung © Pearson Studium 2010 Folie: 1.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix 01.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
Chapter 1 Image Slides Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
FOM-Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM T E CT E C T E CT E C Carbon Chemical Erosion Yield Experiments in Pilot-PSI Jeroen.
Today • Diffraction from periodic transparencies: gratings
MIT 2.71/2.710 Optics 10/25/04 wk8-a-1 The spatial frequency domain.
Today’s summary • A new look at propagation and phase delays
Summary of Convergence Tests for Series and Solved Problems
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Addition Facts
Stefan Hild for the GEO600 team October 2007 LSC-Virgo meeting Hannover Homodyne readout of an interferometer with Signal Recycling.
11 Contribution of Two-Photon Exchange with Excitation to ep Scattering Revisited Shin Nan Yang National Taiwan University Contribution of Two-Photon Exchange.
1 T. Kataoka, S. E. Day, D. R. Selviah, A. Fernández Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering University College London, U.K. Polarization-Insensitive.
ZMQS ZMQS
Speaker: Tzung Da Jiang Adviser : Dr. Ja-Hon Lin
Femtosecond lasers István Robel
Lecture 23: Polarization
Chiu Choi, Ph.D., P.E. Technical Consultant OIML workshop on the metrology of vehicle speed measurement devices NIST Headquarters, Gaithersburg, MD July.
ABC Technology Project
Plane wave reflection and transmission
Microwave Engineering
Nanophotonics Class 2 Surface plasmon polaritons.
Atmospheric waves from the point of view of a modeler Alexander Medvedev.
Chapter 9. PN-junction diodes: Applications
ULTRAFAST CONTROL OF POLARITON STIMULATED SCATTERING IN SEMICONDUCTOR MICROCAVITIES Cornelius Grossmann1 G. Christmann, C. Coulson and J.J. Baumberg Nanophotonics.
from Coupled Quantum Modes Tim Liew & Vincenzo Savona
PROBING THE BOGOLIUBOV EXCITATION SPECTRUM OF A POLARITON SUPERFLUID BY HETERODYNE FOUR-WAVE-MIXING SPECTROSCOPY Verena Kohnle, Yoan Leger, Maxime Richard,
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Polariton-polariton interaction constants M. Vladimirova S. Cronenberger D. Scalbert A. Miard, A. Lemaître J. Bloch A. V. Kavokin K. V. Kavokin G. Malpuech.
Current POLARITON LIGHT EMITTING DEVICES: RELAXATION DYNAMICS Simos Tsintzos Dept of Materials Sci. & Tech Microelectronics Group University of Crete /
POLARITON CONDENSATION IN TRAP MICROCAVITIES: AN ANALYTICAL APPROACH C. Trallero-Giner, A. V. Kavokin and T. C. H. Liew Havana University and CINVESTAV-DF.
Strong coupling between Tamm Plasmon and QW exciton
Spatial coherence and vortices of polariton condensates
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
1 LOA-ENSTA. 2 3 For PW class laser, a contrast better than is required I ASE has to be < W/cm² The ASE intensity is enough to generate.
Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP.
Waller Creek Intake CFD Modeling and Simulation
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Subtraction: Adding UP
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Week 1.
Fisica Generale - Alan Giambattista, Betty McCarty Richardson Copyright © 2008 – The McGraw-Hill Companies s.r.l. 1 Chapter 23: Reflection and Refraction.
Lecture 4. High-gain FELs X-Ray Free Electron Lasers Igor Zagorodnov Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron TU Darmstadt, Fachbereich May 2014.
Group Meeting Presented by Wyman 10/14/2006
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
A SMALL TRUTH TO MAKE LIFE 100%
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
How Cells Obtain Energy from Food
Overview of ERL R&D Towards Coherent X-ray Source, March 6, 2012 CLASSE Cornell University CHESS & ERL 1 Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based ScienceS.
Theory of Intersubband Antipolaritons Mauro F
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology Physics Department and Solid State Institute Eilon Poem, Stanislav Khatsevich, Yael Benny, Illia Marderfeld and.
Photo-induced ferromagnetism in bulk-Cd 0.95 Mn 0.05 Te via exciton Y. Hashimoto, H. Mino, T. Yamamuro, D. Kanbara, A T. Matsusue, B S. Takeyama Graduate.
Itoh Lab. M1 Masataka YASUDA
Polarization of exciton polariton condensates in lateral traps C. Trallero-Giner, A. V. Kavokin and T. C. H. Liew Havana University and CINVESTAV-DF University.
Alberto Amo, C. Adrados, J. Lefrère, E. Giacobino, A. Bramati
Hybrid states of Tamm plasmons and exciton-polaritons M Kaliteevski, S Brand, R A Abram, I Iorsh, A V Kavokin, T C H Liew and I A Shelykh.
Presentation transcript:

Non-local exciton- polariton spin switches Laboratoire Kastler Brossel, Paris (experimental part) : C. Adrados R. Hivet J. Lefrère A.Amo E. Giacobino and A. Bramati University of Southampton : A.V. Kavokin (theoretical part) EPFL, Lausanne : T.C.H. Liew ( theoretical part ) R. Houdré (fabrication of the sample) PLMCN 10, Cuernavaca, Mexique, avril 2010

Outline I – Spin switch at k≠ 0 1)All optical and non local switch 2)Spin selective switch II – Spin switch at k = 0 with bistability

Semiconductor Microcavities in strong coupling regime : POLARITONS, mixture of excitons and photons. Excitons : High non-linearities at low thresholds due to the Coulomb interaction Photons : Propagate fast (~ 1% speed of light) Short lifetime (a few ps) All optical control : … power of the incident beam : density of polaritons … transverse direction of the incident beam : polaritons velocity … polarization of the incident beam : polaritons spin state + reduced size of the system : integrability Why the use of SC microcavities for all-optical spin switches ? High repetition rate Exciton switch with electrical control : G. Grosso et al. Nature Photonics 3, 577–580 (2009)

Non linear transmission (theory) : k p (μm -1 ) A A off All-optical switch Excitation power P 1 < P threshold Power dependence of the pump P threshold

B k p (μm -1 ) B on Renormalization of the dispersion curve Power dependence of the pump All-optical switch Excitation power P 2 > P threshold Non linear transmission (theory) : P threshold Polariton switch configuration : the amount of power P 2 -P 1 necessary to switch is added thanks to a small probe.

Cw pump (red) : big spot 60 μm (diameter) Cw probe (blue) : small spot 6 μm (diameter) Experimental set up (d) X Y Near field CCD  k kzkz k║k║ Microcavity sample Pump + probe superposed, with same k with incident in plane angle = 3.8° blue detuned by 0.16 meV from the LPB Laser wavelength = nm, blue detuned by 0.16 meV from the LPB

Sub threshold cw pump laser, large Very localized cw probe laser renormalization Pump + probe : switch (renormalization) of the whole pump spot, induced by the probe. Pump (σ+) Probe (σ+)Pump+Probe Detection σ+ 20 µm Non local switch Polariton flow Transmitted power : 9 mW Transmitted power : 54 mW Transmitted power : 3 mW A off B on A off B on Polariton density of the σ+pump vs excitation power

PROBE x Energy PUMP E LPB E Laser A B t=0t=60 ps Blueshift propagation Non local switch Non-local action : The small probe switches on the pump polaritons of the arrival probe area. v polariton = hk // /m polariton = 0.94 μm/ps : propagation all over the pump beam. Model : x Polaritons Energy

Propagation : we move the area of incidence of the probe, same k // for pump and probe, from left to right. Non local switch Polariton flow (pump and probe)

Non local switch Polariton flow (pump and probe) Propagation : we move the area of incidence of the probe, same k // for pump and probe, from left to right.

Non local switch Polariton flow (pump and probe) Propagation : we move the area of incidence of the probe, same k // for pump and probe, from left to right.

Non local switch Polariton flow (pump and probe) Propagation : we move the area of incidence of the probe, same k // for pump and probe, from left to right.

Non local switch Polariton flow (pump and probe) Propagation : we move the area of incidence of the probe, same k // for pump and probe, from left to right.

Non local switch Polariton flow (pump and probe) Propagation : we move the area of incidence of the probe, same k // for pump and probe, from left to right.

Non local switch Polariton flow (pump and probe) Propagation : we move the area of incidence of the probe, same k // for pump and probe, from left to right.

Non local switch Polariton flow (pump and probe) Propagation : we move the area of incidence of the probe, same k // for pump and probe, from left to right.

Non local switch Polariton flow (pump and probe) Propagation : we move the area of incidence of the probe, same k // for pump and probe, from left to right.

Non local switch Polariton flow (pump and probe) Propagation : we move the area of incidence of the probe, same k // for pump and probe, from left to right.

Non local switch Polariton flow (pump and probe) Propagation : we move the area of incidence of the probe, same k // for pump and probe, from left to right.

Non local switch Polariton flow (pump and probe) Propagation : we move the area of incidence of the probe, same k // for pump and probe, from left to right.

Non local switch Polariton flow (pump and probe) Propagation : we move the area of incidence of the probe, same k // for pump and probe, from left to right.

Non local switch Polariton flow (pump and probe) Propagation : we move the area of incidence of the probe, same k // for pump and probe, from left to right.

Non local switch Polariton flow (pump and probe) Propagation : we move the area of incidence of the probe, same k // for pump and probe, from left to right.

Non local switch Polariton flow (pump and probe) Propagation : we move the area of incidence of the probe, same k // for pump and probe, from left to right.

Non local switch Polariton flow (pump and probe) Propagation : we move the area of incidence of the probe, same k // for pump and probe, from left to right.

Exciton-Polariton Spin Exciton with Sz=+1 : made by a +3/2 hole and a -1/2 electron. Exciton with Sz=-1 : made by a -3/2 hole and a +1/2 electron. Exciton with Sz = ±2 (hole +3/2 and electron +1/2 or hole -3/2 and electron +1/2) don’t couple with light. In first approximation, the dominant interaction betwwen 2 excitons is the EXCHANGE INTERACTION (exchange of holes and electrons). When dressed with light (Sz=±1) it results that : Ref : P.Renucci et al, PRB 72, (2005); C.Ciuti et al, PRB 58 p (1998); M.Wouters, PRB 76, (2007); M.Vladimirova et al, PRB 79, (2009); M.Combescot, PRB 74, (2006). for Interaction constant between polaritons with parallel spins g↑↑ Interaction constant between polaritons with antiparallel spins g↑↓ |g↑↑| >> |g↑↓|

Exciton-Polariton Spin Strong EXCHANGE INTERACTION (exchange of holes and electrons) between 2 excitons (Sz=±1) dressed with light Ref : P.Renucci et al, PRB 72, (2005); C.Ciuti et al, PRB 58 p (1998); M.Wouters, PRB 76, (2007); M.Vladimirova et al, PRB 79, (2009); M.Combescot, PRB 74, (2006). |g↑↑| >> |g↑↓| With Interaction constant between polaritons with parallel spins g↑↑ Interaction constant between polaritons with antiparallel spins g↑↓

25 μm pump σ + (no probe)probe σ + (no pump) pump σ + + probe σ + pump σ + + probe σ - FLOW 1 0 EXPERIMENT pump σ + + probe σ + pump σ + + probe σ - THEORY 1 0 A B on off Spin selectivity Pump σ+ Polariton density of the σ+pump vs excitation power >> Solution of the Gross-Pitaevskii equation

Pump σ+ Only on the pump (zone without probe) Ellipticity of the probe σ+σ+ σ-σ- σ+σ+ Pump σ+ and probe σ+ * Gain x6 * Propagation and spin dependence Spin selectivity pump σ + + probe σ + pump σ + + probe σ Threshold in the ellipticity of the probe : minimum amount of σ + required to switch on the σ + pump.

Polarization control A B on off >> Linearly polarized pump Spin dependent interaction Final polarization: that of the probe σ+σ+

Polarization control Linearly polarized pump Spin dependent interaction Final polarization: that of the probe A B on off pump TE + probe σ + 25 μm FLOW pump TE + probe σ + det σ++σ -σ++σ EXPERIMENT THEORY σ+σ+ >>

Polarization control Linearly polarized pump Spin dependent interaction Final polarization: that of the probe A B on off >> σ -σ -

Polarization control Linearly polarized pump Spin dependent interaction Final polarization: that of the probe A B on off 25 μm FLOW det σ++σ -σ++σ EXPERIMENT THEORY σ -σ - pump TE + probe σ - >>

Pump TE (linear) Polarization control Detected Ellipticity

● Interaction between parallel spins >> interaction between opposed spins Pump purely circular + probe : EXCLUSIVE SWITCH Pump linearly polarized + probe : polarization CONTROL ● Non local action ● Low threshold : strong non-linearities and 5 ps polariton lifetime we need low energy densities to induce the switch : 1-2 fJ/μm 2, 2 orders of magnitude less than the state-of-the-art all optical spin switch. ● High potential repetition rate (for a 60 μm spot and a 3.8° incident angle) : about 10 GHz CONCLUSION spin switch at k≠0 Amo et al., Nature Photonics (DOI : /NPHOTON )

Bistability at k // = 0 At normal incidence, we can observe a hysteresis cycle (ref : A.Baas, PRB 70, (R), 2004)

+ Switch off the probe COPOLARIZED probe pump pump + probe : ON Pump only : ON Spin switch at k // = 0 with bistability

● Exclusive switch : when the pump and the probe are crosspolarized, no switch. ● Propagation mecanism : diffusion of the polaritons (probe and pump) thanks to their Δk (around k=0). To check in real time. Spin switch at k // = 0 with bistability

Constructive interferences Destructive interferences Excitation power ● How to switch off the pump thanks to the probe only ? By dephasing the probe with respect to the pump. Probe and Pump must have the SAME SIZE. Spin switch at k // = 0 with bistability Pump OFF state Pump + probe : ON Pump only : ON state Switch off the probe Add a probe (same size as pump) in phase with pump Pump + probe out of phase Ref : I.A.Shelykh et al, PRL 100, (2008)

● How to switch off the pump thanks to the probe only ? by dephasing the probe with respect to the pump and making destructive interferences. For that we need a pump and a probe with THE SAME SIZE. Spin switch at k // = 0 with bistability Pump σ + + probe σ + : pump has been switched on by the probe. Probe has been dephased : extinction of the pump Pump σ + only : the pump stays in the ON state (hysteresis).

CONCLUSION spin switch at k=0 ● We have one bit : we can go from 1 state to the other by tuning an external probe (perturbation), and the bit keeps the memory of the perturbation. ● Also here, we have a high speed of switch : when pump and probe with the same size, it is given by the polariton lifetime (ps range), repetition rate of about 1 THz. ● Very low thresholds (strong non-linearities thanks to the excitonic part of the polaritons)

Spin bistability (k=0) : spin rings Power dependence for an elliptical excitation (mainly spin up) Signature of the interaction between spin up and spin down Ref Yvan, Gippius

ρ c =-1 : σ - ρ c =+1 : σ + Spin rings (still k=0) Colors : degree of circular polarization ρ c Real space (x,y) Ref Yvan, Gippius

ρ c =-1 : σ - ρ c =+1 : σ + Spin rings (still k=0) Colors : degree of circular polarization ρ c Real space (x,y) Ref Yvan, Gippius

ρ c =-1 : σ - ρ c =+1 : σ + Spin rings (still k=0) SPIN RING : both spin up and spin down are renormalized at the center of the GAUSSIAN spot (ρ c ≈0). Colors : degree of circular polarization ρ c Real space (x,y) Ref Yvan, Gippius

ρ c =-1 : σ - ρ c =+1 : σ + Spin rings (still k=0) Colors : degree of circular polarization ρ c Real space (x,y) Ref Yvan, Gippius

ρ c =-1 : σ - ρ c =+1 : σ + Spin rings (still k=0) Colors : degree of circular polarization ρ c Real space (x,y) Ref Yvan, Gippius

Polarization control A B on off 1 0 pump TE + probe σ + pump TE + probe σ - 25 μm FLOW EXPERIMENT pump TE + probe σ + pump TE + probe σ - THEORY 1 0 det σ++σ -σ++σ - Amo et al., Nature Photonics (DOI : /NPHOTON ) >> Linearly polarized pump Spin dependent interaction Final polarization: that of the probe

Conclusion spin rings at k=0 measure (sign and value) of the ratio g parall /g oppos in our conditions (normal incidence, slightly negative cavity-exciton detuning and laser detuned from LPB by meV) ● At normal incidence, the interaction between antiparallel spins is not negligible. ● Spin rings predicted by … Identical to the simulations. Enable the vizualisation of the gaussian beam. Interest… Ref Yvan, Gippius

Transmission versus excitation for different laser – LPB detunings (with E laser always larger than E LPB ) : hysteresis cycles with increasing sizes and increasing thresholds with the detuning.

Pump = 165 mW ; Probe = 11 mW Detection σ+ PUMP σ+ PROBE σ+ Pump (σ+) Probe (σ+)Pump+Probe Detection σ- Pump (σ+) Probe (σ+)Pump+Probe 20 µm reel PumpP ProbeP detM.txt reel PumpP ProbeP detP.txt reel PumpP detM.txt reel PumpP detP.txt reel ProbeP detM.txt reel ProbeP detP.txt Spin conditions

Detection σ+ PUMP σ+ PROBE σ- Pump (σ+)Probe (σ-)Pump+Probe Detection σ- Pump (σ+)Probe (σ-)Pump+Probe 20 µm reel PumpP detM.txt reel PumpP detP.txt reel PumpP ProbeM detM.txt reel PumpP ProbeM detP.txt reel ProbeM detM.txt reel ProbeM detP.txt Pump = 165 mW ; Probe = 11 mW Spin conditions

PUMP σ- PROBE σ+ Detection σ+ Pump (σ-)Probe (σ+) Pump+Probe Detection σ- Pump (σ-)Probe (σ+) Pump+Probe 20 µm reel PumpM ProbeP detM.txt reel PumpM ProbeP detP.txt reel PumpM detM.txt reel PumpM detP.txt reel ProbeP detM.txt reel ProbeP detP.txt Pump = 165 mW ; Probe = 11 mW Spin conditions

Detection σ+ PUMP σ- PROBE σ- Pump (σ-) Probe (σ-)Pump+Probe Detection σ- Pump (σ-) Probe (σ-)Pump+Probe 20 µm reel PumpM detM.txt reel PumpM detP.txt reel ProbeM detM.txt reel ProbeM detP.txt reel PumpM ProbeM detM.txt reel PumpM ProbeM detP.txt Pump = 165 mW ; Probe = 11 mW Spin conditions

Pump (Linear V)Probe (V)Pump+Probe Pump (Linear V)Probe (V)Pump+Probe Pump = 153 mW; Probe = 24 mW Detection H PUMP LINEAR V PROBE V Detection V 20 µm R PumpV ProbeV detV.txt R PumpV ProbeV detH.txt R ProbeV detV.txt R ProbeV detH.txt R PumpV detV.txt R PumpV detH.txt The absolute z-scale in slides 7-8 is kept the same

Pump (Linear V)Probe (H)Pump+Probe Pump (Linear V)Probe (H)Pump+Probe Pump = 153 mW; Probe = 24 mW The absolute z-scale in slides 2 thru 6 is kept the same Detection H PUMP LINEAR V PROBE H Detection V 20 µm R PumpV detV.txt R PumpV detH.txt R PumpV ProbeH detV.txt R PumpV ProbeH detH.txt R ProbeH detV.txt R ProbeH detH.txt

σ- polarization of detection Pump = 140 mW; Probe = 60 mW PUMP LINEAR V Polarization characterization of the pump 30 µm σ+V H absolute z-scale is the same as in the previous slides

Spin dependence : does not work with cross-polarized pump and probe, and with a vertically polarized pump, the polarization of the probe determines the final polarization of the transmitted beam. summary