Developing coherence in assessment. Relationship to the new C- QEM report* Coherence in the course and assessment *Course quality enhancement and monitoring.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improving student learning by changing assessment across entire programmes Graham Gibbs.
Advertisements

Chapter 5 Transfer of Training
NCATS REDESIGN METHODOLOGY A Menu of Redesign Options Six Models for Course Redesign Five Principles of Successful Course Redesign Four Models for Assessing.
Assessment. Assessment What is it ? Why assess and for whom? How should we assess? When should we.
1 Assessing and Giving Feedback. 2 Learning Outcomes By the end of the session, participants should be able to: Identify the purposes and use of different.
Self-directed Learners Dr Sara Preston.
Self-directed Learners Mary Pryor Academic Learning & Study Unit (ALSU)
Assessment: Aligning Assessment to Learning Outcomes by Dr Charles Juwah Department for the Enhancement of Learning, Teaching and Assessment RGU: DELTA.
Experience of using formative assessment and students perception of formative assessment Paul Ong Greg Benfield Margaret Price.
The Course experience questionnaire (P. Ramsden) Designed as a performance indicator 24 statements relating to 5 aspects 1 overall satisfaction statement.
Raising Achievement. 2 Aims To explore approaches and materials to support the planning of learning. To consider strategies for preparing learners for.
Making Feedback a positive learning experience Joint Academy/NUS Special Interest Group Professor Brenda Smith Senior Associate
Contextualising the learning process in Sports and Materials Science C.L Davis, M. Jenkins and E. Wilcock School of Engineering University of Birmingham.
Feedback sessions - Helping first year students get the most out of assessment and feedback Sue R Whittle & Linda B Bonnett Faculty of Biological Sciences.
Key Issues in Assessment and Feedback: The only feedback I received was two ticks and a question mark! University of Surrey Faculty of Arts and Human Sciences.
A Strategy to Enhance Assessment and Feedback Sheila Oliver Director of Assessment School of Dentistry.
Prof Peter Hartley From: 1 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported LicenseCreative.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan Evaluation February 16, 2005.
Course Review on Assessment Professor Brenda Smith.
Session 2: Introduction to the Quality Criteria. Session Overview Your facilitator, ___________________. [Add details of facilitators background, including.
Culminating Academic Review Adams State College Department of Teacher education graduate programs.
GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,
© The Treasury 1 Better Business Cases “Investing for change” Overview.
Campanula Consulting Developing policy, principles and practice in primary school science assessment Professor Derek Bell Teacher Assessment in Primary.
Principles of Assessment and Feedback for Learning Ulster Principles of Assessment and Feedback for Learning School Board Briefing [School/Dept name] [Facilitator.
How creating a course on the e-lastic platform 1.
1 Begin the Transformation: Mapping the Course DOWNLOAD ME!
Stages of assessment Initial assessment Diagnostic assessment (for SfL courses) Formative assessment Summative assessment.
Building your portfolio
© Dr I M Bradley CG109 - Individual Project (Undergraduate) Overview Briefing.
Curriculum Design for Assuring Learning in Business Education
Summative assessment and the pre- sessional EAP Conference : Assessment in EAP – what’s the score?, University of St. Andrews, 28 February, 2015 Workshop.
Elizabeth Deane WIL symposium July One definition: The broad skills that a University expects that graduates will have acquired and be able to demonstrate.
David McClean The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen Project as Journey: Student as Orienteer The Role of Feedback in Learning HEA Enhancement Academy.
Exploring teaching and learning in first year architecture; bridging the gaps. Introduction to Architectural Design I Architecture BA (Hons) 1 st Year.
Culminating Academic Review Adams State College Department of Teacher education graduate programs.
Core principles of effective assessment. Three interrelated objectives for quality in student assessment in higher education 1. Assessment that guides.
Empowering Staff Through Institute Planning (ESTIP) Executive Workshop Institute Name: XXXXXX Presenter: XXXXXX Date: XXXXXX.
Tutorials via Social Networking. Samer El-Daher, Lucie Pollard School of Science.
Teacher Performance Assessment (TPA). PlanningInstruction (Engaging students & supporting learning) AssessmentReflection Academic language Student Voice.
LECTURER OF THE 2010 FIRST-YEAR STUDENT: How can the lecturer help? February 2010.
Online Teaching Workflow Not Work Slow Teaching strategies, helpful tips & best practices for teaching online.
External Examiners’ Briefing Day Assessment Policy Tuesday 6 th January 2015.
Assessment Neil Currant, Head of Academic Development, University of Bedfordshire.
Working with course teams to change assessment and student learning: the TESTA approach to change Graham Gibbs.
Planning and Delivery of HND Programmes Janet Strain.
Certificate IV in Project Management Course Structure Course Number Qualification Code BSB41507.
Preparing students as effective assessors Enabling learning beyond graduation David Nicol Professor of Higher Education Centre for Academic Practice and.
EdTPA Teacher Performance Assessment. Planning Task Selecting lesson objectives Planning 3-5 days of instruction (lessons, assessments, materials) Alignment.
The Transition Experience Bill Daughton EMSE Department.
Human Resources Brookes Assessment Compact Dr Chris Rust, Head, Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development Deputy Director, ASKe.
FYITS – Students Mktg Briefing Nov 2010 BSc (Hons) Engineering Management Nature of Course The course seeks to equip students with management knowledge.
Assessment Design. Four Professional Learning Modules 1.Unpacking the AC achievement standards 2.Validity and reliability of assessments 3. Confirming.
Blueprint for GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS. The Minister’s reform agenda is based on the following belief: “All students are entitled to an excellent education.
Alessio Peluso 1 Critical evaluation of the module ‘Introduction to Engineering Thermo Fluid Dynamics’ First Steps in Learning and Teaching in Higher Education.
The York Pedagogy: What, how and why John Robinson, 20 November 2015.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Making Assessment Feedback Manageable Professor Carol Evans
Creating Assessments that Engage Students & Staff Professor Jon Green.
Pedagogical aspects in assuring quality in virtual education environments University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Assessment and Feedback – Module 1
UQ Course Site Design Guidelines
UQ Course Site Design Guidelines
Assessment in Higher Education
Assessment in Higher Education
Dissertation / Research project
UQ Course Site Design Guidelines
UQ Course Site Design Guidelines
Presentation transcript:

Developing coherence in assessment

Relationship to the new C- QEM report* Coherence in the course and assessment *Course quality enhancement and monitoring report

Link to video on you tube

How do we take a course level view of assessment?

Assessment Patterns that Fail Too much summative assessment Trivial assignments make low intellectual standards Feedback that does not feed forward Too much variety in forms of assessment Over-reliance on documentation to clarify goals and standards Source: TESTA (

Adopting a coherent approach how?

A coherent approach 1.Take an outcomes based approach to assessment and consider course level outcomes to use to map knowledge, skills and attributes across the course. 2.Schedule assessments at a Course Level.

A coherent approach 3.Dealing with the assessment diversity – ‘routes’ through the course. 4.Increasing the use and effectiveness of feedback. 5. Consider integrated assignments

1. Consider course level outcomes

The student journey

Language and discourse The student journey To Graduate professional From student Skills Capabilities Knowledge

2. Schedule Assessments Consider the student experience at a course level Conduct an audit of the number of summative, formative and the variety of assessments. Avoid bunching Look at the balance and workload at a course level

3. Creating “routes” through Too much variety in forms of assessment causes: –Confusion about demands –Lack of progression in standard over time –Feedback not feeding forward –The whole being less than the sum of the part. Make the link between similar assessments within and across semesters and years Feedforward assessments 13

For feedback to be effective, students need to read it, understand it and use it to improve what they do next 4. Increasing the use and effectiveness of feedback

Active engagement with feedback Explicit Criteria Completion and submission of work Students Active engagement with criteria Engaging students at each stage of the assessment process Students need Motive, Opportunity and Means with feedback

Getting the balance right... Quick and dirty Detailed and lengthy Detailed comments individual summative Brief succinct comments Generic /group Formative feedback

Feed forward Assessments Improves the balance between assessment for and assessment of learning Convert feedback into feed-forward – feedback from one task feeds another. Strategies: Link between assessments greater use of formative feedback rather than summative Active use of feedback (123 guides)

Making feedback work (ideas from ASKe )

5. Consider Integrated assessment

Example of a six week integrated activity led -learning activity Level 1 activity: 6 activities and associated resources formed the first 6 week experience for Mechanical and Automotive Engineering students Example of activity of week 1 project to design and build a lightweight cart and bridge to transport a 2 kg mass. 20

21

22

Key features of the activity and assessment: 23 New task every Monday Students timetabled for 18 hours of core task (30 hours including other activities) Lead academic gives key note lectures and leads assessment Supporting facilitator provides supervision and support Students work in small groups of 2 or 3 Students keep individual logbook Assessment by poster presentation / brief report / video Assessment, feedback and result all in final Friday session

Skills and attributes developed 24 Wilson-Medhurst, S. and Green, P. (2012) Researching the effectiveness of Activity Led learning as a pedagogy for engagement with professional development in engineering. Case study. Available [online]:

Module 1: Ecommerce Phase test to test core knowledge Module 2: Business Methods & Decision- making Phase test to test core knowledge Module 3: Supply Chain Phase test to test core knowledge Integrative assessment Project on the car Industry: Individual written project + group video Integrated assessment in a Business Course at Coventry

Criteria for assessment patterns that work... Enough student effort distributed reasonably evenly across all important topics The effort they put in at a high intellectual Students clear and about ‘goals and standards’ and orient their effort appropriately Feedback is effective: students read it, understand it and use it to improve what they do next. Progression over time so that students become more sophisticated in the way that they tackle similar tasks Source: