Academic Registry Assessment Regulations for Northumbria Awards (ARNA) Enid Ashdown, Quality Frameworks Manager Liz Morrow, Quality Review Manager.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Academic Services Division. Progression and Award Regulations for Taught Courses Registry Academic Services Division Chris Bexton, PG Registry Manager.
Advertisements

Dissertation guidelines for: BA/BSc Geography and Environment BSc Environmental Management & BSc Environmental Science
For Year 2 Students 2012/13. Jim OHare ACA Principal Teaching Fellow and Examinations Officer
Regulation and Credit Framework for the Conferment of Awards Quality and Standards Office.
Award Boards. Student-facing as distinct from module- facing Field Boards Degree class calculated on the basis of an aggregate mean score Level 1 does.
External Examiners’ Workshop The University’s examination and assessment regulations Hilary Gilbert Registry
UG ARTS Vicki Phillips April Session Outline What is End of Session? Assessment Periods What is an ART? UG ARTs (when to apply, what each ART does,
End of Session for Undergraduate Students 2011/12 Katie Hoare and Vicki Phillips May 2011.
Changes to Classification Conventions and Procedures Office for Quality Assurance and Validation.
Operation of Central Progression and Award Boards Laurence Fuller Head of Student Records and Examinations Planning and Academic Administration.
Operation of Subject Examination Boards Sarah Lane Senior School Manager, School of Law.
Academic Registry New Examiners’ Forum 24 January 2011.
GT ARTS April Session Outline What is End of Session? Assessment Periods What is an ART? GT ARTs (when to apply, what each ART does, BIRMS auto-calculation)
The University’s examination and assessment regulations Hilary Gilbert Academic Standards and Partnership
Extenuating Circumstances Briefing for Chairs of Extenuating Circumstances Groups and Professional Support Staff.
CONTINUING STUDENTS: PROGRESSION AND AWARD
Friday, April 17, 20151MA Academic Practice Assessment Regulations 2011 / 2012 Peggy Cooke Head of Academic Standards and Quality Enhancement.
© University of South Wales Regulations Briefings Overview of University of Wales, Newport regulations – still in place for ex-Newport students completing.
External Examiner Workshop. The Assessment Process Colin Davis Academic Registry 20 November 2013.
Academic Affairs Presentation Examination Liaison Officers 16 February 2015 Catherine McCorry / Angela Douglas Academic Affairs.
Operation of Central Progression and Award Boards Laurence Fuller Head of Student Records and Examinations Planning and Academic Administration.
Key points of Reference and Assessment Regulations External Examiner Induction.
Board of Examiners and Examination Committee Training Quality Assurance Services
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY BOARD OF EXAMINERS: STAFF DEVELOPMENT SESSIONS Faculty / Quality Assurance Services.
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY Board of Examiners and Examination Committee Training Quality Assurance Services.
1 External Examiner Induction Beatrice Ollerenshaw Karen Hadley Jessica Greenlees.
Programme Leader’s event The framework and progression.
The University’s examination and assessment regulations Hilary Gilbert Academic Standards and Partnership
The University’s examination and assessment regulations Hilary Gilbert Academic Standards and Partnership
External Examiners Induction
University of Brighton Regulations workshop for partner colleges Tanya Izzard, Partnership Manager
© University of South Wales University of South Wales ‘Regulations for Taught Courses’ Hayley Burns Head of Quality Unit.
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY BOARD OF EXAMINERS: STAFF DEVELOPMENT SESSIONS FOR ACADEMIC STAFF Quality Assurance Services.
Summary of the Undergraduate and Postgraduate Standard Assessment Regulations Academic Year 2012/13.
Academic Regulations for Taught Programmes 2014/15 Stewart Smith-Langridge Annette Cooke Governance Services 5 November
Institutional Overview of Quality Frameworks, Quality Assurance and Enhancement Dr Anne Craven, Head of Quality and Academic Partnerships 25/04/2014.
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY BOARD OF EXAMINERS: STAFF DEVELOPMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF Quality Assurance Services.
Changes to the Standard Assessment Regulations for 2013/14 August 2013.
Academic Registry External Examining at Northumbria Alan J Gregg Academic Development Officer Quality & Student Learning Academic Registry.
Summary of Standard Assessment Regulations Academic Year 2013/14.
External Examiner Induction Academic Regulations for Taught Programmes 2015/16 Annette Cooke/Alison Jones Quality and Enhancement Office 4 November 2015.
International Partnerships Conference 21 November 2013 CREATE THE DIFFERENCE1 Dr Noel Morrison Academic Registrar and Director of the Student Experience.
External Examiners’ Seminar 2011/12 Academic Regulations Lynn Jones Regulations, Assessment and Awards Manager Academic Registry.
Undergraduate Examination Board Briefing Prof Chris LANGLEY Chair – RSC Dominic STONE Secretary – RSC 25 th April 2016 Slide 1.
External Examiner Workshop. The Assessment Process Michael Wing Academic Registry June 14, 2016.
BOARDS OF EXAMINERS’ REVIEW Prof Chris LANGLEY Chair – RSC Dominic STONE Secretary – RSC 16 th November 2015 Slide 1.
Guidance for Module / Exam Boards 2015/16 session David Ealey Head of Registry Services.
External Examiners’ Workshop The University’s key examination and assessment regulations Mr Paul Cecil Quality and Standards Manager (Academic Standards.
Forum for New External Examiners. Enid Ashdown, Principal Administrator, Academic Quality Alan Gregg, Academic Coordinator, Academic Quality Vashti Hutton,
Academic Registry External Examining at Northumbria Ann Macfadyen and Alan Gregg Academic Development Officers Quality & Student Learning Academic Registry.
Prof Richard Barnes Student Director
Northumbria University 2016/17 How your bachelors degree is classified
ACADEMIC REGULATIONS INCLUDING UPDATES
External Examiner Workshop Subject / School Boards
Postgraduate Examination Board Briefing
Academic Regulations Dr Sandra Mienczakowski Head of Academic Processes Student Services - Development.
MMU Regulations.
The New Academic Framework and progression
OBU Regulations.
External Examiners Induction
Taught Award Regulations
Marks/Exams Information – All Years
Academic Regulations Dr Sandra Mienczakowski Head of Academic Processes Student Services - Development.
External Examining at Northumbria
External examining at Solent university
External Examiners Induction Academic Regulations
How will my Degree be Classified
External Examiners Induction Academic Regulations
How will my Degree be Classified?
Presentation transcript:

Academic Registry Assessment Regulations for Northumbria Awards (ARNA) Enid Ashdown, Quality Frameworks Manager Liz Morrow, Quality Review Manager

Academic Registry ARNA Introduced in September 2002 Reviewed annually and re-issued each academic year incorporating –any changes to regulations approved by Academic Board (on recommendation of SLE and its Regulations & Frameworks Sub-committee) –minor editorial corrections/clarifications Fundamental review in 2011/12 and 2012/13 with significant changes introduced in 2013/14

Academic Registry ARNA includes…. Progression and Award regulations: –FT programmes (section 3) –PT programmes (section 4) Awards and their classification: –FT programmes (section 9) –PT programmes (section 10) Flow diagrams illustrating the application of the regulations to different types of award (section 11)

Academic Registry Appendix I Academic Misconduct – regulations and procedures Appendix II Regulations governing examinations Regulations governing alteration to assessment arrangements for disabled students in unforeseen medical circumstances Appendix III Glossary of terms ARNA also includes…

Academic Registry ARNA Applies to all NU programmes delivered in UK or overseas (including franchise) – any variations must be approved by SLE’s RFSC (formerly by ULT) and complements Modular Framework for Northumbria Awards (MFNA)

Academic Registry Credit requirements for NU awards specified in ARNA sections 9 and 10 eg –undergraduate honours degrees normally comprise 360 credits at levels 4, 5 and 6 (120 credits at each level) –masters degrees normally comprise 180 credits at level 7 Minimum 60 credits of current learning required for an NU award MFNA (5.2) permits some flexibility eg –up to 30 level 3 credits permitted in level 4 UG programmes –up to 30 level 6 credits in masters degrees Some principles 1

Academic Registry At award stage: classification cannot be improved by compensation or successful referral where requirements for named award met, cannot re-register to improve classification but, from 2013/14: FT and PT programmes no longer governed by the same regulations for progression, compensation and referral Some principles 2

Academic Registry Part-time programme A programme with fewer than 120 credits in an academic or calendar year. Progression Formal progress through an academic programme, meeting key academic requirements…... Glossary of terms (Appendix III)

Academic Registry Compensation Provision for the allowance of module failure on the basis of overall performance to enable a student to progress to the next level or complete the award. Referral/resit A further attempt, following initial failure, at a module assessment…… Glossary of terms (Appendix III)

Academic Registry Current learning Learning undertaken by a student towards a Northumbria award excluding any credit attained elsewhere which has been recognised as contributing to the overall credit requirements for the award. Glossary of terms (Appendix III)

Academic Registry Modules 1 see ARNA section 2 modules have specified level and credit value have one or more components of assessment overall module mark rounded to nearest percentage

Academic Registry Modules 2 module pass mark - UG (level 6 & below) 40%; PG (level 7) 50% module failed if any assessment component not completed ie where student –fails to attend exam or to submit work –submits work late without approval where clearly specified, component pass can be required module/component can be pass/fail

Academic Registry Modules 3 Module credit awarded by: exemption/APL etc (ie through admissions process) passing module –40% UG pass mark; 50% PG pass mark; passing P/F module –all assessment components must be completed NB late unauthorised submission regarded as non-completion compensation of module failure at first sit or referral passing re-assessment ie referral or deferral PAB decision to module pass PEC affected modu le

Academic Registry Progression on FT programmes Progression on FT programmes is to next level or from PG taught modules to master’s dissertation Two requirements for progression: level average requirement –at level 3/4, 1 st sit level average of 30% required –at level 5/6, 1 st sit level average of 40% required –at level 7, 1 st sit level average of 45% required credit requirement –120 credits normally required to progress either initially (at first sit) or following referral

Academic Registry Progression on FT programmes At end of each level, level average calculated and decisions made regarding any failed modules –is compensation possible? –is student eligible for referral?

Academic Registry Compensation on FT programmes 1 At end of level or at PG progression point, compensation of module failure automatic if: failed credits ≤ compensatable credits current learning > 60 credits (ie not for 60 credit awards) maximum 20 credits per 120 credit level (see for full table) required level average met ie –level 3/4 30% –level 5/6 40% –level 7 (IM) 50%IM Integrated Masters –level 7 (other PG) 45% module mark ≥ 30%

Academic Registry Compensation on FT programmes 2 Compensation not applied to module if : –PEC claim approved –all assessment components not completed –substantiated academic misconduct –designated non-compensatable (NC) Module pass mark and credit awarded when module failure compensated but must not improve award classification

Academic Registry Referral on FT programmes 1 No limit to number of referrals of taught modules if required level average met –level 3/4 30% –level 5/6 40% –level 7 (IM) 50% –level 7 (other PG) 45% No level average requirement for referral of master’s project/dissertation Module pass mark and credit awarded for successful referral (but, at award stage must not improve award classification)

Academic Registry Failure on FT programmes At intermediate stage/s: student may apply to repeat the level (if current level is not a repeat level) if referral attempt failed, progression can be suspended to retake failed module/s as if for the first time mark then gained counts in full (with possibility of a further referral) At award stage: student has failed but may be eligible for lower level award (pass degree from UG hons degree) if current learning permits

Academic Registry Progression on PT programmes at end of stage Stage normally at end of academic or calendar year but before programme anniversary Number of credits in stage depends on programme structure Progression requires all modules in stage to have been passed initially or on referral Referral of failed module automatic ie no level average requirement Progression on PT programmes

Academic Registry At award stage only except: –where student exits with lower level award –where all PG taught modules completed at intermediate stage ie award stage comprises project/dissertation only Module pass mark and credit awarded but cannot improve award classification Compensation on PT programmes

Academic Registry Compensation of module failure automatic if: failed credits ≤ compensatable credits current learning > 60 credits (ie not for 60 credit awards) maximum 20 credits per 120 credit level (see for full table) module mark ≥ 30% No compensation if: –PEC claim approved –all assessment components not completed –substantiated academic misconduct –module designated non-compensatable (NC) Compensation on PT programmes

Academic Registry At intermediate stages, referral of failed module is automatic At award stage, referral is automatic if all failed modules cannot be compensated Module pass mark and credit awarded for successful referral but, at award stage, must not improve award classification Referral on PT programmes

Academic Registry If referral attempt failed, at intermediate stage/s: progression can be suspended to retake failed module/s as if for the first time mark then gained counts in full (with possibility of a further referral) If referral attempt failed, at award stage: student has failed but may be eligible for lower level award (pass degree from UG hons degree) if current learning permits Failure on PT programmes

Academic Registry FT programmesPT programmes At end of levelAt end of stage Level average requirementNo level average requirement Credit requirements must be met initially or after referral or compensation Credit requirements must be met initially or after referral (no compensation) Progression FT and PT key differences

Academic Registry FT programmesPT programmes Possible at intermediate and award stages Normally at award stage only Applied at end of levelApplied at award stage or, for PG masters, on completion of taught modules Level average requirementNo level average requirement Compensation FT and PT key differences

Academic Registry FT programmesPT programmes Level average requirementNo level average requirement – automatic at intermediate stage unless intermediate stage represents a progression point to the master’s project/dissertation or student is exiting with lower level award Referral FT and PT key differences

Academic Registry Honours classification 1 1 st sit level average requirement –40% FT UG hons programmes –50% FT IM programmes –not applicable for PT programmes (but average determines award classification) classification based on highest from: –level 5/6 average (level 6/7 IM) weighted 40:60 or –level 6 (level 7 IM) average then: First - average of 70% or above Upper second - at least 60% but less than 70% Lower second - at least 50% but less than 60% Third - less than 50% (minimum 40% FT students only) NB No 3 rd class honours on IM programmes

Academic Registry Honours classification 2 borderline rules apply –3% at 2.1/First boundary (ie where classification average is 67-69%) –2% at other boundaries (ie at 58-59% for 2.2/2.1; % for 3/2.2 (UG hons only) –no borderline at 38-39% (48-49% IM)

Academic Registry Honours classification 3 at classification borderline, higher classification awarded where: –best average ends in 9 (ie 69, 59,49) and at least half of credits at award stage are at higher classification eg where classification average is 59 at least 60/120 credits must be at 60 or above for award of 2.1 –otherwise (ie 68/67/58/48), majority of credits at award stage must be at higher classification eg where classification average is 67, at least 70 level 6 credits must be at 70 or above for award of 1 st borderline rules applied before particular referral and compensation applied ie classification determined at 1 st sit

Academic Registry Classification of other awards see section 5 Distinction requires 1 st sit level average of 70% or more (borderline 67%) Commendation requires 1 st sit level average of % (borderline 58% (UG) 59% (PG)) Borderline regulations as for honours degrees –1st sit level average 69/59% - higher classification awarded if half credits at award level are at higher classification –1 st sit level average of 68/67/58 – higher classification awarded if majority of credits at award level are at higher classification

Academic Registry 30% minimum module mark requirement for compensation removal of ‘option to retrieve’ regulations at award stage of honours degrees ‘module disregard’ at award stage of honours degrees and on PG programmes replaced by compensation with pass mark now reported on SMRF/transcript/HEAR 60 credit lower level awards (eg PgCert) should only be classified where they comprise a sub-set of prescribed modules defined in programme specification removal of ‘right to repeat’ regulations at intermediate stages of honours degrees and PAB discretion to allow repeat opportunity Key changes in ARNA 2013/14

Academic Registry FT programmes 40% level 6 average requirement for compensation and referral at award stage of UG honours degrees (50% level 7 average IM) 45% level 7 average for referral and compensation on PG programmes Student who has failed intermediate stage may apply to repeat level Key changes in ARNA 2013/14

Academic Registry PT programmes Progression at end of stage (formerly level) Referral of failed module/s automatic at intermediate stage Compensation at award stage only (NB possible at intermediate stage of Masters programme if all taught modules have been completed) Possibility of award through credit accumulation eg 3 rd class honours with 1 st sit level average < 40% Key changes to ARNA 2013/14

Academic Registry RFSC (November 2013) agreed that students must not be disadvantaged by changes introduced in 2013/14 System generated recommendations will reflect 2013/14 regulations but, for PABs relating to 2013/14 (including Resit and Autumn PG PABs), where module/s failed, 2012/13 regulations applied if in student’s interest eg: –at Honours award stage, compensation applied for module mark <30% –‘option to retrieve’ regulations may be applied –compensation at PT intermediate stage where this is also end of level and module compensatable under 2012/13 regulations Transitional arrangements, 2013/14

Academic Registry References ARNA Guide to the Examination Board Process 2013/14 Modular Framework (MFNA) work/