Stefan Hild, M.Mantovani, A.Perreca and A. Freise Advanced Virgo meeting, August 2008 Automated simulations: choosing modulation frequencies à la Advanced.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
Advertisements

© 2008 Pearson Addison Wesley. All rights reserved Chapter Seven Costs.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Stefan Hild, Andreas Freise University of Birmingham Roland Schilling, Jerome Degallaix AEI Hannover January 2008, Virgo week, Pisa Advanced Virgo: Wedges.
LSC-Virgo meeting Amsterdam, September 2008 On Aspects of the Advanced Virgo Arm Cavity Design Stefan Hild and Andreas Freise University of Birmingham.
Stefan Hild for the GEO600 team October 2007 LSC-Virgo meeting Hannover Homodyne readout of an interferometer with Signal Recycling.
Beyond The Standard Quantum Limit B. W. Barr Institute for Gravitational Research University of Glasgow.
Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut) HOMODYNE AND HETERODYNE READOUT OF A SIGNAL- RECYCLED GRAVITATIONAL WAVE DETECTOR.
Stefan Hild ASR Group meting, November 2008 Squeezing the best astrophysics out of Advanced Virgo Squeezing the best astrophysics out of Advanced Virgo.
Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
ABC Technology Project
19. October 2004 A. Freise Automatic Alignment using the Anderson Technique A. Freise European Gravitational Observatory Roma
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Dual Recycling for GEO 600 Andreas Freise, Hartmut Grote Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik Universität Hannover Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik.
25 seconds left…...
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
PSSA Preparation.
Stefan Hild and A.Freise Advanced Virgo meeting, December 2008 Preliminary Thoughts on the optimal Arm Cavity Finesse of Advanced Virgo.
Stefan Hild and Andreas Freise Advanced Virgo meeting, August 2008 Advanced Virgo beam size: Asymmetric ROCs and Coating Thermal Noise.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v1.
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities University of Florida 10/05/2005 Volker Quetschke, Guido Mueller.
Optical Configuration Advanced Virgo Review Andreas Freise for the OSD subsystem.
Degeneracy for power-recycling and signal recycling cavities in Advanced Virgo.
Stefan Hild October 2007 LSC-Virgo meeting Hannover Interferometers with detuned arm cavaties.
1 1.ISC scope and activities 2.Initial Virgo status 3.Design requirements 4.Reference solution and design status 5.Plans toward completion 6.Technical.
Stefan Hild (University of Birmingham) + A.Freise, M.Mantovani, A.Perreca Advanced Virgo telecon, June 2008 Why use FinesseTools for Advanced Virgo simulations,
GEO‘s experience with Signal Recycling Harald Lück Perugia,
Amaldi conference, June Lock acquisition scheme for the Advanced LIGO optical configuration Amaldi conference June24, 2005 O. Miyakawa, Caltech.
G Z AJW for Marcus Benna, Cambridge Wavefront Sensing for Advanced LIGO Model of wavefront sensing in a dual- recycled interferometer Consequences.
Advanced Virgo Optical Configuration ILIAS-GW, Tübingen Andreas Freise - Conceptual Design -
LSC-VIRGO joint meeting - Pisa1 Input mirrors thermal lensing effect Frequency modulation PRCL length in Virgo Some results from a Finesse simulation.
1 1.Status a.Design requirements: almost complete. b.Preliminary design: on-going 2.WBS a.Tasks and subtasks b.Manpower, responsibility issues 3.Interfaces.
1 1.Definition 2.Deliverables 3.Status of preliminary design 4.Risks 5.Tasks to be done 6.Decisions to be taken 7.Required simulations 8.Planning ISC workshop:
AIGO 2K Australia - Italy Workshop th October th October 2005 Pablo Barriga for AIGO group.
Nov 3, 2008 Detection System for AdV 1/8 Detection (DET) Subsystem for AdV  Main tasks and requirements for the subsystem  DC readout  Design for: the.
S. ChelkowskiSlide 1LSC Meeting, Amsterdam 09/2008.
M. Mantovani, ILIAS Meeting 7 April 2005 Hannover Linear Alignment System for the VIRGO Interferometer M. Mantovani, A. Freise, J. Marque, G. Vajente.
Dual Recycling in GEO 600 H. Grote, A. Freise, M. Malec for the GEO600 team Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik University of Hannover Max-Planck-Institut.
First DR FFT Results on Advanced LIGO Using Perfect and Imperfect Optics By Ken Ganezer, George Jennings, and Sam Wiley CSUDH LIGO-G Z by Ken.
Stefan Hild 111th WG1 meeting, Hannover, January 2007 DC-Readout for GEO Stefan Hild for the GEO-team.
Aligning Advanced Detectors L. Barsotti, M. Evans, P. Fritschel LIGO/MIT Understanding Detector Performance and Ground-Based Detector Designs LIGO-G
1 Locking in Virgo Matteo Barsuglia ILIAS, Cascina, July 7 th 2004.
CITF A. Allocca, M. Mantovani. Outline CITF schematic Resonance conditions Effect of the misalignment on the error signals Comparison with Virgo+ Effect.
Advanced Virgo: Optical Simulation and Design Advanced Virgo review Andreas Freise for the OSD Subsystem.
1 DC readout for Virgo+? E. Tournefier WG1 meeting, Hannover January 23 rd,2007 DC vs AC readout: technical noises Output mode cleaner for DC readout.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
ILIAS - Geneve1 Input mirrors thermal lensing effect in Virgo J. Marque.
LIGO-G Z 3) Current Status & Plan for Japan RSE -- Stabilization and Installation of PRC & Detuning -- LSC Livingston 2002 Kentaro Somiya.
Stefan Hild 1GWADW, Elba, May 2006 Experience with Signal- Recycling in GEO 600 Stefan Hild, AEI Hannover for the GEO-team.
ET-ILIAS_GWA joint meeting, Nov Henning Rehbein Detuned signal-recycling interferometer unstableresonance worsesensitivity enhancedsensitivity.
Current Status of Main Interferometer Design Yoichi Aso 2011/2/4, LCGT f2f Meeting.
Interferometer configurations for Gravitational Wave Detectors
Advanced Virgo: Optical Simulation and Design
Main Interferometer Meeting
GEO600 Control aspects where do the error signal come from?
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities
Homodyne readout of an interferometer with Signal Recycling
Heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO
Homodyne or heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO?
Heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO
Advanced Virgo Finesse Input File
Effect of sideband of sideband on 40m and Advanced LIGO
Advanced LIGO optical configuration investigated in 40meter prototype
Alignment Investigations towards Advanced Virgo
The ET sensitivity curve with ‘conventional‘ techniques
Advanced Virgo ISC subsystem
Homodyne detection: understanding the laser noise amplitude transfer function Jérôme Degallaix Ilias meeting – June 2007.
Automatic Alignment Control scheme for Advanced Virgo
Presentation transcript:

Stefan Hild, M.Mantovani, A.Perreca and A. Freise Advanced Virgo meeting, August 2008 Automated simulations: choosing modulation frequencies à la Advanced LIGO

S. HildAdvanced Virgo, 15th of August 2008 Slide 2 Outline  Context and Motivation for automated detector design.  A preliminary length sensing and control scheme for Advanced Virgo a la Advanced Ligo  OSD-Tool functions: an easy way to get an optimized detector configuration.  Optimizing the mirror ROCs  Choosing the optimal modulation frequencies  Finding the optimal length of the Power Recycling cavity  Choosing the Schnupp length  Finding the optimal length of the Signal Recycling cavity

S. HildAdvanced Virgo, 15th of August 2008 Slide 3 The context of this work  THE FACT: One deliverable of my postdoc position is a preliminary length sensing and control scheme.  THE HISTORY: When my project was granted and started … there were no subsystems and no Advanced Virgo ISC group.  THE STATUS: The work I show here should NOT be seen as competition to ISC, but rather as potential supplement.

S. HildAdvanced Virgo, 15th of August 2008 Slide 4 Introduction: Why to do automated design of the Ad-Virgo configuration  We need to do plenty of simulations for Advanced Virgo  Many of these simulation task are fairly big constructs (for instance producing control matrix)  Many parameters are not fixed and might change several times within the next year or so  For instance: mod frequencies, beam size,...  Many design options are available which might completely change everything  For instance degenerate recycling cavities  We will have to do the simulations many times, with several parameter set, several optimization criteria …

S. HildAdvanced Virgo, 15th of August 2008 Slide 5 OSD-Tools  OSD-tools are a collection of Matlab functions and scripts:  Providing the possibility of an automated parameter optimization of an Advanced Virgo detector configuration.  OSD-Tools work together with Finesse  Reading in parameters from Finesse input files.  Running Finesse simulations within Matlab  Writing the optimised parameters back to Finesse input Files.  Please note: Finesse is just one tool. We can also use analytical calculations or other simulation software such as Optickle or GWINC with the OSD_tools. (We choose Finesse for convenience).

S. HildAdvanced Virgo, 15th of August 2008 Slide 6 Definition of lengths  Lengths are macroscopic distances (with a maximal accuracy of millimeter).  Length of PR cavity:  Length of SR cavity:  Schnupp length:

S. HildAdvanced Virgo, 15th of August 2008 Slide 7 Definition of the interferometer degrees of freedom  Degrees of freedom correspond to microscopic mirror positions, i.e. their tunings.  For DC-readout we need a dark fringe offset => transmit TEM 00 carrier to output port.

S. HildAdvanced Virgo, 15th of August 2008 Slide 8 Our preliminary length sensing scheme: Copying the ALIGO approach  The LSC spend years of R&D (simulations, table top experiments, 40m prototype) to develop the ALIGO ISC.  For simplicity we copied their approach for our preliminary length sensing and control scheme.  Some aspects of higher order modes are included.  We do not take lock acquisition into account. (We start from a locked system)

S. HildAdvanced Virgo, 15th of August 2008 Slide 9 What order do use for parameter optimization ??  There is natural order in which the optimization has to be carried out !! Fine tuning Primary optimisation Full control matrix (5xN- matrix) Calculate Figure of merit: Controlability of the system Quadratic control matrix (5x5)

S. HildAdvanced Virgo, 15th of August 2008 Slide 10 Optimising the mirror ROCs  The actual beam size at the mirrors is determined by the radii of curvature (ROC) of the mirrors.  For a given beam size we calculate the required mirror ROCs.  Input: Beam size  Output: new ROCs of IMX, EMX, IMY, EMY, PRM and SRM.  Function: OSD_ROC.m

S. HildAdvanced Virgo, 15th of August 2008 Slide 11 Choosing optimal modulation frequencies (I)  Requirement 1: Modulations should not be resonant inside the arm cavities.  Requirement 2: Higher order optical modes of the modulation sidebands should also not be resonant inside the arm cavities. (For our analysis we consider all orders up to 6)  Requirement 3: We want 2 modulation frequencies. One to readout the PRC, one two read out the SR cavity.  Both frequencies have to be resonant in the PRC.  If we choose f1 to be at the 1st FSR of the PRC, then f2 has to be a harmonic of f1:

S. HildAdvanced Virgo, 15th of August 2008 Slide 12 Choosing optimal modulation frequencies (II)  Requirement 4: The modulations sidebands should not be exactly anti-resonant inside the arm cavities.  For modulation indicies of 0.2 to 0.3 about 10% of the modulation appears in the first harmonic (2f)  If f is chosen to be exactly anti- resonant, then 2f will be exactly resonant inside the arm cavities !!  Requirement 5: Also all optical higher order modes should not be anti resonant inside the arm cavities.

S. HildAdvanced Virgo, 15th of August 2008 Slide 13 Choosing optimal modulation frequencies (III)  For each potential set of f1 and f2 we calculate the distance of +f1, -f1, +f2 and -f2 to resonance and anti- resoance inside the arm cavity (8 values)  We do the same for all higher order optimal modes up to 6th order ((1+6)x8 = 56 values)

S. HildAdvanced Virgo, 15th of August 2008 Slide 14 Choosing optimal modulation frequencies (III) Modulation sideband of optical higher order mode (l+m) has the frequency: With transversal mode spacing given by (Note: TMS changes with the mirror ROCs) 28 distances to resonance: 28 distances to anti-resonance: Take the minimum distance out of this 56 values as figure of merit.

S. HildAdvanced Virgo, 15th of August 2008 Slide 15 Choosing optimal modulation frequencies (V) 1.Find minimum distance for each modulation frequency. 2.Scan over a certain range of frequencies. 3.Choose the one with the largest minimal distance Minimum distance  Input: Freq range, M (f2 = M x f1)  Output: f1, f2.  Function: OSD_modfreq.m

S. HildAdvanced Virgo, 15th of August 2008 Slide 16 Choosing the length of PRC  The length of PRC is chosen to make both modulation sidebands resonant inside the PRC:  Input: N, f1, rough length of PRC.  Output: L_prc, readjusted ROC of PRM  Function: OSD_PRC_length.m

S. HildAdvanced Virgo, 15th of August 2008 Slide 17 Choosing Schnupp length and SRC length  Requirement: f2 resonant inside SRC, while f1 not resonant in SRC (maximum decoupling).  We find f2 resonant for two different Schnupp lengths (short and long option). Need to decide for one option.  Finally we choose the SRC length to make f2 resonant inside the SRC. Optical power inside the SRC Short long Schnupp length

S. HildAdvanced Virgo, 15th of August 2008 Slide 18 Choosing Schnupp length and SRC length Optical power inside the SRC Short long Schnupp length  Input: Schnupp option (short or long), rough length of SRC.  Output: L_Schnupp, length of SRC, readjusted ROC of SRM  Function: OSD_SR_Schnupp.m

S. HildAdvanced Virgo, 15th of August 2008 Slide 19 Building a chain of OSD-tool functions  The first OSD-function (OSD_ROC) reads in a full Advanced Virgo parameter set from a FINESSE input file.  The optimized parameters are written back to a new Finesse file, which is then read in by the next function. And so on and so on…  The last function finally writes the fully optimised parameter set.

S. HildAdvanced Virgo, 15th of August 2008 Slide 20 Primary Optimisation Primary optimisation  Using the OSD-tool function we can perform the full primary optimization with a Matlab script of 4 Lines.  Example 1: In case we decide to change the beam size … you only have to change one number in the script and run it again.  Example 2: In case we change the thickness of the BS … you only change it in the Finesse input file and rerun the script

S. HildAdvanced Virgo, 15th of August 2008 Slide 21 Primary Optimisation Primary optimisation  Using the OSD-tool function we can perform the full primary optimization with a Matlab script of 4 Lines.  Example 1: In case we decide to change the beam size … you only have to change one number in the script and run it again.  Example 2: In case we change the thickness of the BS … you only change it in the Finesse input file and rerun the script OSD-tools provide an easy and automated way to calculate an optimized Advanced Virgo detector configuration.

S. HildAdvanced Virgo, 15th of August 2008 Slide 22 Availability and Documentation  All OSD-tool functions and input files are stored in a subversion repository including backup and version control.  This svn is accessible to everyone:  Server: svn://lnx0.sr.bham.ac.uk  Repository: adv-osd  If there is interest we can build OSD-tools for working with Optickle or other simulation software of interest.  For more detailed information please have a look at: S.Hild et al “Advanced Virgo design: The Advanced LIGO approach for choosing modulation frequencies”, Virgo note, VIR-066A-08. VIR-066A-08

S. HildAdvanced Virgo, 15th of August 2008 Slide 23 … Nearly the E N D…

S. HildAdvanced Virgo, 15th of August 2008 Slide 24 Final remarks Fine tuning Primary optimisation Full control matrix (5xN- matrix) Calculate Figure of merit: Controlability of the system Quadratic control matrix (5x5)

S. HildAdvanced Virgo, 15th of August 2008 Slide 25 Producing the control matrix Full control matrix (5xN- matrix) Calculate Figure of merit: Controlability of the system Quadratic control matrix (5x5) OSD_fullcontrolmatrix.m OSD_submatrix.m 5 x 35 matrix

S. HildAdvanced Virgo, 15th of August 2008 Slide 26 Final remarks Fine tuning Primary optimisation Full control matrix (5xN- matrix) Calculate Figure of merit: Controlability of the system Quadratic control matrix (5x5)

S. HildAdvanced Virgo, 15th of August 2008 Slide 27 Fine tuning Trade-off between noise couplings (increase with dfo) and higher order mode content at output port (need to make dfo large enough to dominate the output port). Need to provide sufficient Signal to shot noise ratio at all detection ports. Might need to increase modulation index and/or reflectivity of pick-off AR coatings Need to optimize demodulation phases. Especially with detuned SR one cannot expect to have maximum signal for demodulation phase equal 0 or 90 deg. Function available: OSD_optimization.m OSD_submatrix.m

S. HildAdvanced Virgo, 15th of August 2008 Slide 28 E N D…