Some (more) Nuclear Structure

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MP-41 Teil 2: Physik exotischer Kerne
Advertisements

MP-41 Teil 2: Physik exotischer Kerne, SS-2012 MP-41 Teil 2: Physik exotischer Kerne 13.4.Einführung, Beschleuniger 20.4.Schwerionenreaktionen, Synthese.
3224 Nuclear and Particle Physics Ruben Saakyan UCL
Some Aspects of Nuclear Structure Paddy Regan Department of Physics University of Surrey Guildford, UK IASEN School 1 Dec 2013 iThemba.
Picosecond Lifetime Measurements in ‘Vibrational’ Cadmium and Palladium Isotopes Paddy Regan Department of Physics, University of Surrey Guildford, GU2.
Collective properties of even- even nuclei Vibrators and rotors With three Appendices.
Isomer Spectroscopy in Near-Spherical Nuclei Lecture at the ‘School cum Workshop on Yrast and Near-Yrast Spectroscopy’ IIT Roorkee, October 2009 Paddy.
Electromagnetic Properties of
The Collective Model Aard Keimpema.
Projected-shell-model study for the structure of transfermium nuclei Yang Sun Shanghai Jiao Tong University Beijing, June 9, 2009.
Nuclear models. Models we will consider… Independent particle shell model Look at data that motivates the model Construct a model Make and test predictions.
W. Udo Schröder, 2005 Rotational Spectroscopy 1. W. Udo Schröder, 2005 Rotational Spectroscopy 2 Rigid-Body Rotations Axially symmetric nucleus 
The Long and the Short of it: Measuring picosecond half-lives… Paddy Regan Dept. of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK
Doctoral Defense of Barak Hadina 18 th January 2008 In-Beam Study of Extremely Neutron Deficient Nuclei Using the Recoil Decay Tagging Technique Opponent:
NUCLEAR STRUCTURE PHENOMENOLOGICAL MODELS
Isomer Spectroscopy in Near-Spherical Nuclei Lecture at the ‘School cum Workshop on Yrast and Near-Yrast Spectroscopy’ IIT Roorkee, October 2009 Paddy.
IBA Lecture part 2. Most general IBA Hamiltonian in terms with up to four boson operators (given N) IBA Hamiltonian Mixes d and s components of the wave.
The Shell Model of the Nucleus 5. Nuclear moments
Nuclei with more than one valence nucleon Multi-particle systems.
NSDD Workshop, Trieste, February 2006 Nuclear Structure (II) Collective models P. Van Isacker, GANIL, France.
5. Exotic modes of nuclear rotation Tilted Axis Cranking -TAC.
Lecture 20: More on the deuteron 18/11/ Analysis so far: (N.B., see Krane, Chapter 4) Quantum numbers: (J , T) = (1 +, 0) favor a 3 S 1 configuration.
Symmetries in Nuclei, Tokyo, 2008 Symmetries in Nuclei Symmetry and its mathematical description The role of symmetry in physics Symmetries of the nuclear.
Collective Model. Nuclei Z N Character j Q obs. Q sp. Qobs/Qsp 17 O 8 9 doubly magic+1n 5/ K doubly magic -1p 3/
1 In-Beam Observables Rauno Julin Department of Physics University of Jyväskylä JYFL Finland.
Shape phase transition in neutron-rich even-even light nuclei with Z=20-28 H.B.Bai X.W.Li H.F.Dong W.C.Cao Department of Physics, Chifeng University, Chifeng.
Experimental evidence for closed nuclear shells Neutron Proton Deviations from Bethe-Weizsäcker mass formula: mass number A B/A (MeV per nucleon)
The Algebraic Approach 1.Introduction 2.The building blocks 3.Dynamical symmetries 4.Single nucleon description 5.Critical point symmetries 6.Symmetry.
1 New symmetries of rotating nuclei S. Frauendorf Department of Physics University of Notre Dame.
Nuclear Models Nuclear force is not yet fully understood.
The Highs and Lows of the A~100 Region Paddy Regan Dept. of Physics, University of Surrey, UK and WNSL, Yale University, New Haven, CT
Spontaneous symmetry breaking and rotational bands S. Frauendorf Department of Physics University of Notre Dame.
Surrey Mini-School Lecture 2 R. F. Casten. Outline Introduction, survey of data – what nuclei do Independent particle model and residual interactions.
Lecture 12: The neutron 14/10/ Particle Data Group entry: slightly heavier than the proton by 1.29 MeV (otherwise very similar) electrically.
10-1 Fission General Overview of Fission The Probability of Fission §The Liquid Drop Model §Shell Corrections §Spontaneous Fission §Spontaneously Fissioning.
Shell Model with residual interactions – mostly 2-particle systems Start with 2-particle system, that is a nucleus „doubly magic + 2“ Consider two identical.
ShuangQuan Zhang School of Physics, Peking University Static chirality and chiral vibration of atomic nucleus in particle rotor model.
Lecture 23: Applications of the Shell Model 27/11/ Generic pattern of single particle states solved in a Woods-Saxon (rounded square well)
Shell Model with residual interactions – mostly 2-particle systems Simple forces, simple physical interpretation Lecture 2.
Quantum Phase Transitions (QPT) in Finite Nuclei R. F. Casten June 21, 2010, CERN/ISOLDE.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, 1 st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Shell model Notes: 1. The shell model is most useful when applied to closed-shell.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Extreme independent particle model!!! Does the core really remain inert?
July 29-30, 2010, Dresden 1 Forbidden Beta Transitions in Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay Kazuo Muto Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Some (more) High(ish)-Spin Nuclear Structure Paddy Regan Department of Physics Univesity of Surrey Guildford, UK Lecture 2 Low-energy.
Angular Momentum of Spherical Fission Fragments F. Gönnenwein University of Tübingen In collaboration with V. Rubchenya and I.Tsekhanovich Saclay May 12,2006.
Shape evolution of highly deformed 75 Kr and projected shell model description Yang Yingchun Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai, August 24, 2009.
Quantum phase transitions and structural evolution in nuclei.
Quantum Phase Transitions in Nuclei
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, 1 st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Electromagnetic moments Electromagnetic interaction  information about.
Some (more) High(ish)-Spin Nuclear Structure Paddy Regan Department of Physics Univesity of Surrey Guildford, UK Lecture 3 Deformed.
Monday, Oct. 2, 2006PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #8 Monday, Oct. 2, 2006 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Nuclear Models Shell Model Collective Model.
Nordita Workshop on chiral bands /04/2015 Multiple chiral bands associated with the same strongly asymmetric many- particle nucleon configuration.
Lecture 4 1.The role of orientation angles of the colliding nuclei relative to the beam energy in fusion-fission and quasifission reactions. 2.The effect.
Pairing Evidence for pairing, what is pairing, why pairing exists, consequences of pairing – pairing gap, quasi-particles, etc. For now, until we see what.
Rotational energy term in the empirical formula for the yrast energies in even-even nuclei Eunja Ha and S. W. Hong Department of Physics, Sungkyunkwan.
超重原子核的结构 孙 扬 上海交通大学 合作者:清华大学 龙桂鲁, F. Al-Khudair 中国原子能研究院 陈永寿,高早春 济南,山东大学, 2008 年 9 月 20 日.
Determining Reduced Transition Probabilities for 152 ≤ A ≤ 248 Nuclei using Interacting Boson Approximation (IBA-1) Model By Dr. Sardool Singh Ghumman.
The role of isospin symmetry in medium-mass N ~ Z nuclei
Evolution of octupole collectivity in 221Th
Surrey Mini-School Lecture 2 R. F. Casten
CHEM 312 Lecture 8: Nuclear Force, Structure and Models
PHL424: Nuclear surface vibration
Nuclear Chemistry CHEM 396 Chapter 4, Part B Dr. Ahmad Hamaed
Lecture 5-6 xxxxxxx.
PHL424: Shell model with residual interaction
Nuclear Physics, JU, Second Semester,
a non-adiabatic microscopic description
PHL424: Nuclear surface vibration
High spin physics- achievements and perspectives
Nuclei at the Extremes of Spin: The Superdeformed Bands in 131,132Ce
Presentation transcript:

Some (more) Nuclear Structure Lecture 2 Low-energy Collective Modes and Electromagnetic Decays in Nuclei Paddy Regan Department of Physics Univesity of Surrey Guildford, UK p.regan@surrey.ac.uk

Outline of Lectures 1& 2 1) Overview of nuclear structure ‘limits’ Some experimental observables, evidence for shell structure Independent particle (shell) model Single particle excitations and 2 particle interactions. 2) Low Energy Collective Modes and EM Decays in Nuclei. Low-energy quadrupole vibrations in nuclei Rotations in even-even nuclei Vibrator-rotor transitions, E-GOS curves

What about 2 nucleons outside a closed shell ?

Residual Interactions? We need to include any addition changes to the energy which arise from the interactions between valence nucleons. This is in addition the mean-field (average) potential which the valence proton/neutron feels. Hamiltonian now becomes H = H0 + Hresidual 2-nucleon system can be thought of as an inert, doubly magic core plus 2 interacting nucleons. Residual interactions between these two ‘valence’ nucleons will determine the energy sequence of the allowed spins / parities.

What spins can you make? If two particles are in identical orbits (j2), then what spins are allowed? Two possible cases: Same particle, e.g., 2 protons or 2 neutrons = even-even nuclei like 42Ca, 2 neutrons in f7/2 = (nf7/2)2 We can couple the two neutrons to make states with spin/parity Jp=0+, 2+, 4+ and 6+ These all have T=1 in isospin formalism, intrinsic spins are anti-aligned with respect to each other. Proton-neutron configurations (odd-odd) e.g., 42Sc, 1 proton and 1 neutron in f7/2 We can couple these two make states with spin / parity 0+, 1+, 2+, 3+, 4+, 5+, 6+ and 7+. Even spins have T=1 (S=0, intrinsic spins anti-aligned); Odd spins have T=0 (S=1, intrinsic spins aligned)

m – scheme showing which Jtot values are allowed for (f7/2)2 coupling of two identical particles (2 protons or 2 neutrons). Note, that only even spin states are allowed.

Schematic for (f7/2)2 configuration. 4 degenerate states if there are no residual interactions. Residual interactions between two valence nucleons give additional binding, lowering the (mass) energy of the state.

Geometric Interpretation of the d Residual Interaction for a j2 Configuration Coupled to Spin J Use the cosine rule and recall that the magnitude of the spin vector of spin j = [ j (j+1) ]-1/2 q

e.g. Jp = (h9/2)2 coupled to 0+, 2+, 4+, 6+ and 8+. q q d-interaction gives nice simple geometric rationale for Seniority Isomers from DE ~ -VoFr tan (q/2) for T=1, even J 8 6 4 DE(j2J) 2 e.g. Jp = (h9/2)2 coupled to 0+, 2+, 4+, 6+ and 8+. 180 90 q 2 4 6 8 q

d - interaction gives nice simple geometric rationale for Seniority Isomers from DE ~ -VoFr tan (q/2) for T=1, even J 2 4 6 8 See e.g., Nuclear structure from a simple perspective, R.F. Casten Chap 4.)

Note, 2 neutron or 2 proton holes in doubly magic nuclei show spectra like 2 proton or neutron particles. A. Jungclaus et al.,

Basic EM Selection Rules?

The EM transition rate depends on Eg2l+1,, the highest energy transitions for the lowest l are (generally) favoured. This results in the preferential population of yrast and near-yrast states.

The EM transition rate depends on Eg2l+1,, the highest energy transitions for the lowest l are (generally) favoured. This results in the preferential population of yrast and near-yrast states.

The EM transition rate depends on Eg2l+1,, the highest energy transitions for the lowest l are (generally) favoured. This results in the preferential population of yrast and near-yrast states.

The EM transition rate depends on Eg2l+1,, the highest energy transitions for the lowest l are (generally) favoured. This results in the preferential population of yrast and near-yrast states.

The EM transition rate depends on Eg2l+1,, the highest energy transitions for the lowest l are (generally) favoured. This results in the preferential population of yrast and near-yrast states. = gamma-ray between yrast states

The EM transition rate depends on Eg2l+1, (for E2 decays Eg5) Thus, the highest energy transitions for the lowest l are usually favoured. Non-yrast states decay to yrast ones (unless very different f , K-isomers) = g ray between yrast states = g ray from non-yrast state.

The EM transition rate depends on Eg2l+1, (for E2 decays Eg5) Thus, the highest energy transitions for the lowest l are usually favoured. Non-yrast states decay to yrast ones (unless very different f , K-isomers) = g ray between yrast states = g ray from non-yrast state.

The EM transition rate depends on Eg2l+1, (for E2 decays Eg5) Thus, the highest energy transitions for the lowest l are usually favoured. Non-yrast states decay to yrast ones (unless very different f , K-isomers) = g ray between yrast states = g ray from non-yrast state.

Schematic for (f7/2)2 configuration. 4 degenerate states if there are no residual interactions. Residual interactions between two valence nucleons give additional binding, lowering the (mass) energy of the state.

2+ 0+ Excitation energy (keV) Ground state Configuration. Spin/parity Ip=0+ ; Ex = 0 keV

4+/2+ energy ratio: mirrors 2+ systematics. Excitation energy (keV) 4+ 2+ 0+ Ground state Configuration. Spin/parity Ip=0+ ; Ex = 0 keV

B(E2; 2+  0+ )

What about both valence neutrons and protons? In cases of a few valence nucleons there is a lowering of energies, development of multiplets. R4/2  ~2-2.4 35

Quadrupole Vibrations in Nuclei ? Low-energy quadrupole vibrations in nuclei ? Evidence? Signatures? Coupling schemes ?

b2 En n=0 n=1 n=2 n=3 http://npl.kyy.nitech.ac.jp/~arita/vib b2 V

We can use the m-scheme to see what states we can make when we couple together 2 quadrupole phonon excitations of order J=2ħ . (Note phonons are bosons, so we can couple identical ‘particles’ together).

From, Nuclear Structure From a Simple Perspective, by R.F. Casten, Oxford University Press.

For an idealised quantum quadrupole vibrator, the (quadrupole) phonon (=‘d-boson’) selection rule is Dn=1 , where n=phonon number.

4+ →2+ E2 from n=3 →n=1 is ‘forbidden’ in an idealised quadrupole vibrator by phonon selection rule. For an idealised quantum quadrupole vibrator, the phonon (=‘d-boson’) selection rule is Dn=1

‘forbidden’ in an idealised quadrupole vibrator by 4+ →2+ E2 from n=3 →n=1 is ‘forbidden’ in an idealised quadrupole vibrator by phonon selection rule. Similarly, E2 from 2+→0+ from n=3 →n=0 not allowed. For an idealised quantum quadrupole vibrator, the phonon (=‘d-boson’) selection rule is Dnp=1

Collective (Quadrupole) Nuclear Rotations and Vibrations What are the (idealised) excitation energy signatures for quadrupole collective motion (in even-even nuclei) ? (extreme) theoretical limits Perfect, quadrupole (ellipsoidal), axially symmetric quantum rotor with a constant moment of inertia (I) has rotational energies given by (from Eclass(rotor) = L2/2I) Perfect, quadrupole vibrator has energies given by the solution to the harmonic oscilator potential (Eclassical=1/2kx2 + p2/2m ).

Collective (Quadrupole) Nuclear Rotations and Vibrations What are the (idealised) excitation energy signatures for quadrupole collective motion (in even-even nuclei) ? (extreme) theoretical limits Perfect, quadrupole (ellipsoidal), axially symmetric quantum rotor with a constant moment of inertia (I) has rotational energies given by (from Eclass(rotor) = ½ L2/2I) Perfect, quadrupole vibrator has energies given by the solution to the harmonic oscilator potential (Eclassical=1/2kDx2 + p2/2m ).

Other Signatures of (perfect) vibrators and rotors Decay lifetimes give B(E2) values. Also selection rules important (eg. Dn=1). Eg=ħw ; DEg (J→J-2)=0 Ex=(ħ2/2I)J(J+1) , i.e., Eg (J→J-2)= (ħ2/2I)[J(J+1) – (J-2)(J-3)] = (ħ2/2I)(6J-6); DEg=(ħ2/2I)*12=const. For (‘real’) examples, see J. Kern et al., Nucl. Phys. A593 (1995) 21

Other Signatures of (perfect) vibrators and rotors Decay lifetimes give B(E2) values. Also selection rules important (eg. Dn=1). Ex=(ħ2/2I)J(J+1) + + + + Ex=(ħ2/2I)J(J+1) , i.e., Eg (J→J-2)= (ħ2/2I)[J(J+1) – (J-2)(J-3)] = (ħ2/2I)(6J-6); DEg=(ħ2/2I)*12=const.

Other Signatures of (perfect) vibrators and rotors Decay lifetimes give B(E2) values. Also selection rules important (eg. Dn=1). Eg=ħw ; DEg (J→J-2)=0 Ex=(ħ2/2I)J(J+1) , i.e., Eg (J→J-2)= (ħ2/2I)[J(J+1) – (J-2)(J-3)] = (ħ2/2I)(6J-6); DEg=(ħ2/2I)*12=const. For (‘real’) examples, see J. Kern et al., Nucl. Phys. A593 (1995) 21

So, what about ‘real’ nuclei ?

Many nuclei with R(4/2)~2.0 also show Ip=4+,2+,0+ triplet states at ~2E(2+).

Note on ‘near-yrast feeding’ for vibrational states in nuclei. If ‘vibrational’ states are populated in very high-spin reactions (such as heavy ion induced fusion evaporation reactions), only the decays between the (near)-YRAST states are likely to be observed. The effect is to (only?) see the ‘stretched’ E2 cascade from Jmax →Jmax-2 for each phonon multiplet. = the ‘yrast’ stretched E2 cascade.

Note on ‘near-yrast feeding’ for vibrational states in nuclei. If ‘vibrational’ states are populated in very high-spin reactions (such as heavy ion induced fusion evaporation reactions), only the decays between the (near)-YRAST states are likely to be observed. The effect is to (only?) see the ‘stretched’ E2 cascade from Jmax →Jmax-2 for each phonon multiplet. = the ‘yrast’ stretched E2 cascade.

Nuclear Rotations and Static Quadrupole Deformation

T (E2) = transition probability = 1/t (secs); Eg = transition energy in MeV 2+ 0+ B(E2: 0+1  2+1)   2+1 E20+12 60

T (E2) = transition probability = 1/t (secs); Eg = transition energy in MeV 2+ 0+ Qo = INTRINSIC (TRANSITION) ELECTRIC QUADRUPOLE MOMENT. This is intimately linked to the electrical charge (i.e. proton) distribution within the nucleus. Non-zero Qo means some deviation from spherical symmetry and thus some quadrupole ‘deformation’. B(E2: 0+1  2+1)   2+1 E20+12 Rotational model, B(E2: I→I-2) gives: 61

This depends on nuclear deformation and I~ kMR2 Thus, I ~ kA5/3 Bohr and Mottelson, Phys. Rev. 90, 717 (1953) Isomer spin in 180Hf, Ip>11 shown later to be Ip=Kp=8- by Korner et al. Phys. Rev. Letts. 27, 1593 (1971)). K-value very important in understanding isomers. Ex = (ħ2/2I)*J(J+1) I = moment of inertia. This depends on nuclear deformation and I~ kMR2 Thus, I ~ kA5/3 (since rnuc=1.2A1/3fm )

Therefore, plotting the moment of inertia, divided by A5/3 should give a comparison of nuclear deformations across chains of nuclei and mass regions….

Nuclear static moment of inertia for E(2+) states divided by A5/3 trivial mass dependence. Should show regions of quadrupole deformation.

Lots of valence nucleons of both types: emergence of deformation and therefore rotation

Perfect rotor limit R(4/2) = 3.33 = 4(4+1) / 2(2+1)

Best nuclear ‘rotors’ have largest values of Np.Nn This is the product of the number of ‘valence’ protons, Np X the number of valence neutrons Nn

Alignments and rotational motion in ‘vibrational’ 106Cd (Z=48, N=58), PHR et al. Nucl. Phys. A586 (1995) p351

Some useful nuclear rotational, ‘pseudo-observables’…

Some useful nuclear rotational, ‘pseudo-observables’… Rotational ‘frequency’, w given by,

8qp states, Ex~8D 6qp states, Ex~6D 4qp states, Ex~4D C.S.Purry et al., Nucl. Phys. A632 (1998) p229

Transitions from Vibrator to Rotor?

PHR, Beausang, Zamfir, Casten, Zhang et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett

PHR, Beausang, Zamfir, Casten, Zhang et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett

PHR, Beausang, Zamfir, Casten, Zhang et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett

Vibrator-Rotator phase change is a feature of near stable (green) A~100. ‘Rotational alignment’ can be a crossing between quasi-vibrational GSB & deformed rotational sequence. (stiffening of potential by population of high-j, equatorial (h11/2) orbitals). PHR, Beausang, Zamfir, Casten, Zhang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 152502