Chapter 10 Are there Rival Causes?.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LOGIC AND CRITICAL THINKING
Advertisements

Argumentation.
Experimental and Quasiexperimental Designs Chapter 10 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Canada, a division of Reed Elsevier Canada, Ltd.
Chapter 7 Hypothesis Testing
Why We Do Research Chapter 1. Ordinary Versus Systematic Biased Question: A question that leads to a specific response or excludes a certain group Nonscientific.
The results of repeated observations and/or experiments concerning a naturally occurring event (phenomenon) are reasonably the same when performed and.
Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research
Critical/“Critiquing” Thinking Objective & Subjective Claims Fact & Opinion Issue & Argument Cogency Reasoning Premise & Conclusion Cognitive Biases Belief.
Logical Fallacies.
A thinking map We have looked at a large number of pieces of reasoning types, and now we need a thinking map of how to best analyse, understand, and evaluate.
Logical Fallacies AKA “How NOT to Win an Argument”
4 Thinking Critically. 2 2 Learning Outcomes The student will learn techniques for: Interpreting written texts. Participating in class discussions about.
©2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Thinking and Speaking Critically.
Correlation AND EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
The Elements of Persuasion “... Verbal communication that attempts to bring about a voluntary change in judgment so that readers or listeners will accept.
Formal fallacies and fallacies of language
Social biases - 1 Forer effect (aka Barnum Effect) - the tendency for people to give high accuracy ratings to descriptions of their personality, that supposedly.
Basic punctuation Logical Fallacies. Basic Punctuation See handout.
Building Logical Arguments. Critical Thinking Skills Understand and use principles of scientific investigation Apply rules of formal and informal logic.
Critical Thinking Lecture 12 Causal Arguments
Research Methods in Crime and Justice Chapter 5 Causality.
Chapter 5 Research Methods in the Study of Abnormal Behavior Ch 5.
Causality, Reasoning in Research, and Why Science is Hard
Foundations Of Individual Behavior Chapter 2. Aim of this chapter To explain the relationship between ability and job performance Contrast three components.
Clinical causality assessment I. Ralph Edwards R.H.B Meyboom.
Point of View and Perspective Understanding the Characters in a Story.
Chapter 31: Fallacies of Weak Induction. Appeal to Authority (pp ) The fallacy of appeal to authority occurs when someone is taken to be an authority.
Copyright © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
How to avoid errors in logic
Logical Fallacies. What is a Fallacy? Fallacy (n.) a mistaken belief, especially one based on an unsound argument a failure in reasoning that makes an.
Elements of Persuasion Ethos –An appeal to a person’s sense of ethics or morals focuses on credibility and good character. Ethos –An appeal to a person’s.
Credibility and Reasoning. Describing Credibility Credibility is the audience’s attitude toward or perception of the speaker. Components of Credibility.
INFORMAL FALLACIES. FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE Errors resulting from attempts to appeal to things that are not relevant, i.e., not really connected to or.
McGraw-Hill©Stephen E. Lucas 2001 All rights reserved. CHAPTER SIXTEEN Methods of Persuasion.
Maniac Magee Literary Elements.
Scientific Method. My 4 out of 5 Rule If you make an observation.
BUS 290: Critical Thinking for Managers
Chapter 4 Research Design. Chapter Outline Three Purposes of Research The Logic of Nomothetic Explanation Necessary and Sufficient Causes Units of Analysis.
© 2005 Pearson Education Inc. Publishing as Longman Chapter 12: Reading Arguments Active Reading Skills, 1/e Kathleen McWhorter PowerPoints by Gretchen.
Chapter 12 Informal Fallacies II: Assumptions and Induction Invitation to Critical Thinking First Canadian Edition Joel.
Logical Fallacies Guided Notes
Chapter 10 Lecture Notes Causal Inductive Arguments.
Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 12 Lecture Notes Chapter 12.
Argumentation.
CHAPTER 13: CAUSAL ARGUMENTS ENG 101: Writing I from Practical Argument.
ASSIGNMENTS Draft 2 due by 5 p.m. today Study logical fallacies for Jeopardy on Wednesday. Pick out your 3-4 member team Keep working on your paper Exam.
1.  What inferential statistics does best is allow decisions to be made about populations based on the information about samples.  One of the most useful.
Fallacy An error of reasoning based on faulty use of evidence or incorrect interpretation of facts.
© 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Chapter 11 Testing for Differences Differences betweens groups or categories of the independent.
Chapter 13: Causal Arguments ENG 113: Composition I.
AP Textbook Notes.
ENG101 Exam 2 Study Guide Exam date: Thursday,
1 Chapter 1 Section 1 Notes NatureOfScience. 2 What is Science?  A way or process used to investigate what is happening around you.  Not New  Early.
Argumentation.
Chapter 9 Warranted Inferences. Chapter 9 Warranted Inferences.
Chapter 10 notes Logic and Reasoning.
Writing Cause and Effect Essays
Predicting Presidential Elections
Argumentative Writing
Chapter 12 Causal Arguments
Lesson #3 Objective(s): Identify the key features of scientific skepticism. Identify and explain the text’s six principles of scientific thinking. Agenda:
The Nature of Science How can you differentiate between science and non-science using the scientific method?
SPEECH110 C.ShoreFall 2015 East San Gabriel Valley, ROP
Ch 3: Social Beliefs & Judgments
Chapter 3 The Idea Of Causation on Social Research
Concise Guide to Critical Thinking
Chapter 13: Causal Arguments
Logical Fallacies.
1 Chapter 8: Introduction to Hypothesis Testing. 2 Hypothesis Testing The general goal of a hypothesis test is to rule out chance (sampling error) as.
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 10 Are there Rival Causes?

1. A plausible alternative explanation that can explain why a certain outcome occurred is an excuse a filibuster a rival cause 13

2. The following key words indicate causal thinking, except increases the likelihood in contrast contributes to deters 10

3. Whose responsibility is it to generate rival causes? non-profit organizations the author or speaker the government the critical reader or listener 10

4. Causal oversimplification ignores contributory causes “a cause, not the cause” critical thinking all of the above 10

5. If a study is carried out using proper scientific research you don’t have to consider rival causes. True False 10

6. Failing to recognize that two events may be influencing each other is a reasoning fallacy called Neglect of a Common Cause that you should look out for called Confusion of Cause and Effect both b and c 10

7. “Neglect of a ______ Cause” is a fallacy that doesn’t recognize that ______ events may be related because of the effects of a ______ factor. contributory, some, outside common, two, third primary, associated, correlating 10

8. Which is not an example of Post hoc Fallacy in reasoning? Never walk under ladders. My dating life increased after my cosmetic surgery. More people lost their jobs right after Obama was elected. 10

9. Which is not an example of the fundamental attribution error? “Of course she can, she’s Hispanic.” “That’s just the way he is.” “The devil made me do it!” “Boys will be boys” 20

10. In evaluating rival causes, you should look at their emotional soundness their consistency with other knowledge that you have their future success in explaining or predicting events 10