2 Oct 2003 UCL 2nd Year Talk 1 Crosstalk Removal to Improve Muon dE/dX Measurements Leo Jenner, UCL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update on Data / MC Comparisons for Low Hadronic Energy CC-like Events Reminder of problem Fiducial studies with more MC statistics Effect of offset in.
Advertisements

Data/Monte Carlo disagreement for Rustem’s Signal Fluctuation variable in the Far Detector (Working Title) Philip Rodrigues Oxford MINOS Group Meeting.
FD Crosstalk or A disappointing lack of pretty colours Philip Rodrigues Oxford MINOS Meeting 20 May 2008.
Jan Cambridge Collaboration Meeting1 Pi/Mu Separation and Muon dE/dX Leo Jenner, UCL.
11 Mar 2004Nemo Collaboration Meeting1 Preliminary Study of 214 Bi Background in Mo foils Preliminary Study of 214 Bi Background in Mo foils Leo Jenner,
Crosstalk Removal to Improve dE/dX measurements Leo Jenner, UCL.
Data/Monte Carlo disagreement for Rustem’s Signal Fluctuation variable in the Far Detector (Working Title) Part 2 Philip Rodrigues Oxford MINOS Group Meeting.
May 11 th, 2007 LNF Scient. Comm M.Spinetti 1 OPERA/CNGS1 O scillation P roject with E mulsion-t R acking A pparatus 1. Electronic detectors status of.
Electromagnetic shower in the AHCAL selection criteria data / MonteCarlo comparison of: handling linearity shower shapes CALICE collaboration meeting may.
INTRODUCTION TO e/ ɣ IN ATLAS In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to identify.
Reconstruction Issues in Cosmic Ray Muons Maury Goodman/Gavril Giurgiu & Jurgen Reichenbacher.
1 Study of the Tail Catcher Muon Tracker (TCMT) Scintillator Strips and Leakage with Simulated Coil Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE.
Status of the MICE SciFi Simulation Edward McKigney Imperial College London.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
1Calice-UK Cambridge 9/9/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. Work in progress – no definitive conclusions.
Atmospheric Neutrino Event Reconstruction Andy Blake Cambridge University June 2004.
1 Andrea Bangert, ATLAS SCT Meeting, Monte Carlo Studies Of Top Quark Pair Production Andrea Bangert, Max Planck Institute of Physics, CSC T6.
1 G4MICE Analysis of KEK Test Beam Aron Fish Malcolm Ellis CM15 10th June 2006.
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
Tracking Photon Conversions. Existing Track Seeding From pixels –Widely used, but not useful here From stereo silicon layers –Uses layers 5 and 8 (barrel),
GLAST LAT Project Test Beam Meeting, June 6, 2006 S. Funk 1/6 PS Positron Simulations Stefan Funk June 6, 2006.
Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, 2002 Summary of Core “Performance Review” for TkrRecon How do we know the Tracking is working?
Tests with JT0623 & JT0947 at Indiana University Nagoya PMT database test results for JT0623 at 3220V: This tube has somewhat higher than usual gain. 5×10.
Muon alignment with Cosmics: Real and Monte Carlo data S.Vecchi, S.Pozzi INFN Ferrara 37th Software Week CERN June 2009.
Preliminary comparison of ATLAS Combined test-beam data with G4: pions in calorimetric system Andrea Dotti, Per Johansson Physics Validation of LHC Simulation.
HCAL1 Status 2003 Oleg Gavrishchuk, JINR, Dubna 1. HCAL1 performance 2003 General design High Voltage system LED monitoring 2. Tests in muon halo beam.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
Monte Carlo Comparison of RPCs and Liquid Scintillator R. Ray 5/14/04  RPCs with 1-dimensional readout (generated by RR) and liquid scintillator with.
Surrounding the tracker, the calorimetry system measures with high accuracy the energy of electrons and photons as well as individual hadrons with 7500.
Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinZEUS Monday Meeting, Apr. 18th Preliminary Request: Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS.
Muon Identification in the MINOS Calibration Detector Anna Holin 05 December 2005 University College London.
1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.
Commissioning and Performance of the CMS High Level Trigger Leonard Apanasevich University of Illinois at Chicago for the CMS collaboration.
The ATLAS detector. High energy particle physics Typical detector layout Tracking chamber ElectroMagnetic calorimeter Hadronic calorimeter Muon chamber.
1 Endcap C SCT Efficiency Calculation Update Nicholas Austin University of Liverpool Operations Meeting June 2007.
First Look at Data and MC Comparisons for Cedar and Birch ● Comparisons of physics quantities for CC events with permutations of Cedar, Birch, Data and.
1ECFA/Vienna 16/11/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare these test beam data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. CALICE has tested an (incomplete) prototype.
Cedar and pre-Daikon Validation ● CC PID parameter based CC sample selections with Birch, Cedar, Carrot and pre-Daikon. ● Cedar validation for use with.
Diffractive W/Z Bosons Andrew Brandt UTA Run I Diffractive W/Z Boson Production Recap Run II Preliminary Search for Diffractive Z Bosons (Courtesy of Tamsin.
D. Jason Koskinen FNAL Collaboration mtg. 10/ Near Detector Efficiency.
Calibration of the MINOS Detectors Using Stopping Muons Jeff Hartnell University of Oxford & Rutherford Appleton Laboratory IoP Particle Physics 2004 Tuesday.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
D. Jason Koskinen UCL 1 st year presentation 6/2005 Temp Work and other MINOS projects.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting U.C. Irvine Monday 21 st August 2006 M. Ellis & A. Bross.
DN/d  and dN/dp T analysis status Gabor Veres for the working group QCD meeting, Jan 12, 2010.
Muons at CalDet Introduction Track Finder Package ADC Corrections Drift Points Path Length Attenuation Strip-to-Strip Calibration Scintillator Response.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
H Y P A T I A HYbrid Pupil’s Analysis Tool for Interactions in Atlas
Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
Tau31 Tracking Efficiency at BaBar Ian Nugent UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA Sept 2005 Outline Introduction  Decays Efficiency Charge Asymmetry Pt Dependence.
MICE Tracker Software A. Dobbs CM32 9 th Feb 2012.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
FinCMS Dec 19, 2008 V.Karimäki, Sensor shapes 1 1 Tracker calibration for curved sensors (brief overview) V. Karimäki FinnCMS meeting Helsinki
Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
A PID based approach for antineutrino selection
Muon stopping target optimization
Preliminary Study of 214Bi Background in 100Mo foils
HARPO Analysis.
Higgs → t+t- in Vector Boson Fusion
Chris Smith California Institute of Technology EPS Conference 2003
Individual Particle Reconstruction
2000 Diffuse Analysis Jessica Hodges, Gary Hill, Jodi Cooley
Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE Collaboration
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
BesMUC Reconstruction Algorithm
Recent Results on TRT Alignment
Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE Collaboration
Presentation transcript:

2 Oct 2003 UCL 2nd Year Talk 1 Crosstalk Removal to Improve Muon dE/dX Measurements Leo Jenner, UCL

2 Oct 2003 UCL 2nd Year Talk 2 In brief Crosstalk removal algorithm Comparison of Tracking + Crosstalking to MC truth Some hitches… Preliminary comparison of MC to data

2 Oct 2003 UCL 2nd Year Talk 3 A Cosmic Ray Muon Crosstalk removal helps with Tracking and is also important for correcting muon dE/dX for relative calibration of the MINOS detectors.

2 Oct 2003 UCL 2nd Year Talk 4 CrossTalk Algorithm Work through all the hits in a given pair of planes and look at the 8 pixel window around each ‘test’ hit Sum the charge and identify the largest hit in the window The test hit is flagged as crosstalk if its charge is less than the sum of the pixels around it, multiplied by a user definable factor. This is usually set to 1 for beam/cosmic muons since low energy deposition combined with photon statistics can lead to crosstalk with very comparable energy to real hits The Crosstalker currently runs as a module before the CalDet muon tracking code Testing is taking place on Crosstalking Monte Carlo

2 Oct 2003 UCL 2nd Year Talk 5 Number of Crosstalk hits: Truth vs Tracked The crosstalker finds about 82% of the crosstalk hits as I’ve opted for a high purity (>90%)

2 Oct 2003 UCL 2nd Year Talk 6 dE/dX from Monte Carlo (Truth and Tracked)

2 Oct 2003 UCL 2nd Year Talk 7 Comparison of MC truth to MC+Tracking For the most part there is good agreement…

2 Oct 2003 UCL 2nd Year Talk 8 Number of Hits: Tracked/Truth A close up of the last few planes shows the discrepancy increasing But only 0.32% of events go to plane 54 or more…

2 Oct 2003 UCL 2nd Year Talk 9 Last Plane Hit Some of the hits at the end of the track seem to go missing after tracking…

2 Oct 2003 UCL 2nd Year Talk 10 Very curvy muons In the third plot along the two blue hits at the end of the track are genuine track hits Maybe the muon curves sharply to the left and travels in the air gap between planes The tracker doesn’t nominally find the last hit because it falls outside of the search window Noise also creates spurious hits at the end of the track

2 Oct 2003 UCL 2nd Year Talk 11 Preliminary comparison to data Quite low statistics but it still looks a bit odd

2 Oct 2003 UCL 2nd Year Talk 12 Data - Last Plane Hit Even with cut: 10<first strip hit <13 ‘PS’ Muons, Other off momentum muons coming down the beampipe

2 Oct 2003 UCL 2nd Year Talk 13 Conclusion More work to do to optimise Tracking and Crosstalk removal using Monte Carlo Fold crosstalk back into real hits to further improve MC dE/dX Apply crosstalk removal to data

2 Oct 2003 UCL 2nd Year Talk 14

2 Oct 2003 UCL 2nd Year Talk 15 Anomalies Entry: Record: 3107 End: A Plane: 48 Strip: 8 HitBit: PE: TrackEnd: B Plane: 48 Strip: 8 HitBit: PE: Entry: Record: 3107 eventnum: 3107 Entry: Record: 3107 eventnum: 3107 : End: B Plane: 54 Strip: 10 HitBit: 0 PE: Entry: Record: 3107 eventnum: 3107 There is an unphysical hit of nearly 1pe… it’s ignored by the truth (see above) but the tracker finds it

2 Oct 2003 UCL 2nd Year Talk 16 Number of Hits Truth vs Tracked