Helical Collaboration I.R. Bailey, P. Cooke, J.B. Dainton, K. Hock,L.J. Jenner, L.I. Malysheva, L. Zang (University of Liverpool / Cockcroft Institute)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
I.R. Bailey, J.B. Dainton, L.J. Jenner, L.I. Malysheva (University of Liverpool / Cockcroft Institute)
Advertisements

Photon Collimation For The ILC Positron Target Lei Zang The University of Liverpool Cockcroft Institute 24 th March 2007.
A Study of Mechanical and Magnetic Issues for a Prototype Positron Source Target The positron source for the International Linear Collider (ILC) comprises.
Liverpool Accelerator Physics Group International Linear Collider (ILC) R&D The Cockcroft Institute The University of Liverpool is the lead organisation.
I.R. Bailey, J.B. Dainton, L.J. Jenner, L.I. Malysheva (University of Liverpool / Cockcroft Institute)
DEELS workshop, ESRF, 12.– 13. May 2014 Friederike Ewald Difficulties to measure the absolute electron beam energy using spin depolarisation at the ESRF.
Mike Jenkins and Ian Bailey. Positron Requirements of a New Collider CLIC SLCILC LHeC 6.0x10 12 e + /s 3.9x10 14 e + /s 4.0x10 16 e + /s 1.1x10 14 e +
Ian Bailey University of Liverpool / Cockcroft Institute Target Design and Photon Collimator Overview EUROTeV: WP4 (polarised positron source) PTCD task.
Accelerator Science and Technology
Using Realistic Photon Spectra Mike Jenkins Lancaster University and The Cockcroft Institute.
GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006.
ILC prototype undulator project ILC positron source meeting 31 st Jan – 2 rd feb Beijing James Rochford For the HeLiCal Collaboration.
31st May 2007LCWS1 Robust Spin Polarisation Status Helical Collaboration I.R. Bailey, P. Cooke, J.B. Dainton, L.J. Jenner, L.I. Malysheva (University of.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project  IR background issues and plans for Snowmass Jeff Gronberg/LLNL Linear Collider Workshop October 25, 2000.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Abstract The baseline design of the positron source for the International Linear Collider (ILC)
Liverpool Accelerator Physics Group International Linear Collider (ILC) R&D The Cockcroft Institute The University of Liverpool is the lead organisation.
The Siberian Snake Kai Hock Liverpool Group Meeting, 12 August 2008.
Software Tools The heLiCal collaboration J.A. Clarke +, N.A. Collomb, O.B. Malyshev +, N.C. Ryder, D.J. Scott +, B.J.A. Shepherd + STFC ASTeC Daresbury.
Status of the HELICAL contribution to the polarised positron source for the International Linear Collider The positron source for the International Linear.
Overview of ILC Plans D.Rubin April 17, D. Rubin2 ILC R&D Activities and Plans 1.Positron Source 2.Damping Ring 3.Low Emittance Transport - damping.
Software Tools The heLiCal collaboration A. Birch +, J.A. Clarke +, O.B. Malyshev +, D.J. Scott +, B.J.A. Shepherd + STFC ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory, Daresbury,
20 March 2005Ken Moffeit LCWS1 Highlights from the MDI workshop Spin Rotation System for 2 IR’s Downstream polarimetry Ken Moffeit.
2 February 2005Ken Moffeit Spin Rotation scheme for two IRs Ken Moffeit SLAC.
Electron and Ion Spin Dynamics in eRHIC V. Ptitsyn Workshop on Polarized Sources, Targets and Polarimetry Charlottesville, VA, 2013.
Software Tools Beam-Beam TESLA damping ring As part of a study to choose the optimum damping ring configuration for the ILC, the depolarisation effects.
Incoherent pair background processes with full polarizations at the ILC Anthony Hartin JAI, Oxford University Physics, Denys Wilkinson Building, Keble.
Simulation of Positron Production and Capturing. W. Gai, W. Liu, H. Wang and K. Kim Working with SLAC & DESY.
Ian Bailey University of Liverpool / Cockcroft Institute Depolarization Effects and Other Aspects.
Polarimetry at the LC Source Which type of polarimetry, at which energies for LC ? Sabine Riemann (DESY), LEPOL Group International Workshop on Linear.
Helical Undulator Based Positron Source for LC Wanming Liu 05/29/2013.
12th April 2007Cockcroft Institute1 WP2.3 - Robust Spin Polarisation Status Helical Collaboration I.R. Bailey, P. Cooke, J.B. Dainton, L.J. Jenner, L.I.
Summary of WG1 K. Kubo, D. Schulte, P. Tenenbaum.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
3-4 March 2009Advanced QED Methods for Future Accelerators Introduction and Scope I. Bailey Cockcroft Institute / Lancaster University.
1 Options for low energy spin manipulation Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October 2009 K. Moffeit, D.
EUROTeV WP4 Report Polarised Positron Source Jim Clarke, on behalf of the WP4 team DESY Zeuthen STFC (Daresbury and RAL) University of Durham University.
Development of a Positron Production Target for the ILC Positron Source Capture Optics Positron beam pipe/ NC rf cavity Target wheel Vacuum feedthrough.
Ian Bailey University of Liverpool / Cockcroft Institute UK Target Update EUROTeV: WP4 (polarised positron source) PTCD task I. Bailey, J. Dainton, L.
1 Overview of Polarimetry Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Ken Moffeit,
Oct. 6, Summary of the Polarisation Session J. Clarke, G. Moortgat-Pick, S. Riemann 10 November 2006, ECFA Workshop, Valencia.
Spin Control and Transportation O. Adeyemi*, M. Beckmann**, V. Kovalenko*, L. Malysheva*, G. Moortgat-Pick*, S. Riemann**, A. Schälicke**, A. Ushakov**
Implementation and study of depolarizing effects in GUINEA-PIG++ beam-beam interaction simulation Advanced QED Methods for Future Accelerators 3 rd -4.
ILC/CLIC e + generation working group Jim Clarke, STFC Daresbury Laboratory and Louis Rinolfi, CERN.
Beam Dynamics WG K. Kubo, N. Solyak, D. Schulte. Presentations –N. Solyak Coupler kick simulations update –N. Solyak CLIC BPM –A. Latina: Update on the.
22 th October 2010 IWLC Sources working group J. Clarke, T. Omori, L. Rinolfi, A. Variola Summary of Sources working group WG1 with contributions from.
Beam-Beam interaction SIMulation: GUINEA-PIG C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay CARE 05, Geneva, November 2005.
For Layout of ILC , revised K.Kubo Based on following choices. Positron source: Prepare both conventional and undulator based. Place the.
WG3a Sources Update Jim Clarke on behalf of WG3a GDE Meeting, Frascati, December 2005.
IWLC10, 18 th -22 nd October10, CERN/CICG 1 Global Design Effort Updates to ILC RDR Beam Delivery System Deepa Angal-Kalinin & James Jones ASTeC, STFC.
1 Positron Source AD & I Report Jim Clarke ASTeC & Cockcroft Institute Daresbury Laboratory.
LC-ABD WP2.3 (robust spin polarisation) and WP5.1 (helical undulator) form the heLiCal collaboration. Ian Bailey on behalf of the Helical Collaboration.
LC-ABD: WP2.3 (robust spin polarisation) and WP5.1 (helical undulator). Helical Collaboration I.R. Bailey, P. Cooke, J.B. Dainton, L.J. Jenner, L.I. Malysheva.
Dollan, Laihem, Lohse, Schälicke, Stahl 1 Monte Carlo based studies of polarized positrons source for the International Linear Collider (ILC)
Positron Source for Linear Collider Wanming Liu 04/11/2013.
Photon Collimator and Conversion Target Status I. Bailey University of Liverpool / Cockcroft Institiute Cockcroft Institiute.
Beam-Beam interaction SIMulation: GUINEA-PIG
Helical Undulator Programme J Rochford T Bradshaw On behalf of the HeLiCal collaboration.
Depolarisation Effects at the ILC Damping Ring
P. Chevtsov for the ELIC Design Team
Progress with Spin Tracking in GEANT4
AD & I : BDS Lattice Design Changes
CLIC Undulator Option for Polarised Positrons
GUINEA-PIG++ Workshop on Spin Simulation Tools, 9-11 Nov 2010, DESY
Electron Polarization In MEIC
Helical Undulator Insertion Device The heLiCal collaboration
Preliminary results on depolarization due to beam-beam interaction at SuperB Cecile Rimbault LAL - Orsay.
ILC Baseline Design: Physics with Polarized Positrons
Update on MEIC Ion Polarization Work
Progress Update on the Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
Summary and Plan for Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
Presentation transcript:

Helical Collaboration I.R. Bailey, P. Cooke, J.B. Dainton, K. Hock,L.J. Jenner, L.I. Malysheva, L. Zang (University of Liverpool / Cockcroft Institute) D.P. Barber (DESY / Cockcroft Institute) A. Hartin (Oxford University / JAI) G.A. Moortgat-Pick (IPPP, University of Durham / Cockcroft Institute) J.A. Clarke, O.B. Malyshev, N. Ryder, D.J. Scott (CCLRC ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory / Cockcroft Institute) E. Baynham, T. Bradshaw, A. Brummit, S. Carr, Y. Ivanyushenkov, A. Lintern, J. Rochford (CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory) Robust Spin Transport LC-ABD2 WP1.2 Previously LC-ABD1 WP2.3

Both stochastic spin diffusion through photon emission and classical spin precession in inhomogeneous magnetic fields can lead to depolarisation. 1 mrad orbital deflection  30° spin precession at 250GeV. Largest depolarisation effects are expected at the Interaction Points. Motivation Photon emission Spin precession Our motivation is to ensure optimum use is made of polarised beams at the ILC which give increased effective luminosity, access to precision physics and new physics. We are developing the theory and software tools needed to fully understand the ILC spin dynamics.

UndulatorCollimator / TargetCapture Optics Physics Process ElectrodynamicsStandard ModelT-BMT (spin spread) Packages SPECTRA, URGENT GEANT4, FLUKAASTRA Damping ringMain Linac / BDS Interaction Region Physics Process T-BMT (spin diffusion) T-BMTBunch-Bunch Packages SLICKTRACK, (Merlin) SLICKTRACK (Merlin) CAIN2.35 (Guinea-Pig) Packages in parentheses will be evaluated at a later date. e + source Software Tools

Review of LC-ABD1  Updated SLICKTRACK software package to include full non-commuting spin rotations Simulated spin dynamics in ILC damping rings Simulated spin dynamics in ILC beam delivery system Simulated spin dynamics through main linac Evaluated theoretical uncertainties in beam-beam interactions at the ILC Introduced fully-polarised pair- production cross-sections into CAIN (A. Hartin) Goal 1 - Develop SLICKTRACK for ILC spin dynamics simulations. Remaining Milestones for LCABD1 Goal 2 - Develop beam-beam simulation. Goal 3 - Investigate robustness of ILC polarisation. Goal 4 - Benchmark simulations. Simulation of consecutive ILC regions in progress. Completion due Oct 07. All milestones complete. Journal paper in progress. Completion due Nov 07. Benchmarking of simulations using analytical calculations and alternative tools in progress. Completion due Nov 07. Major Milestones Completed Cockcroft /EUROTeV

LC-ABD1 Highlights(1) Spin Transport Simulations The mean square angle of tilt away from vertical in units of square miliradians as a function of the number of turns around a damping ring. The OCS6 damping ring at 5.0 GeV (expected operating energy) with +/- 25 MeV injected energy spread as expected for the ILC positron source. Developed Monte Carlo spin dynamics simulation with full non-commuting spin rotations. Simulated spin precession and depolarisation effects in the ILC damping rings (DR), main linac and BDS. Contributed to ILC DR lattice design study. Variance of transverse spin component distribution in electron damping ring < 0.1mrad 2 Variance of transverse spin component distriution in positron damping ring < 20mrad 2 Demonstrated that longitudinal components of spin vectors may not fully decohere in the ILC damping rings. Impact on ILC design. 2 spin rotators needed per DR even for baseline positron source Example of SLICKTRACK output showing depolarisation in ILC damping rings will be negligible.

LC-ABD1 Highlights (2) Beam-Beam Simulations Applied CAIN beam-beam simulation to the ILC interaction point for a range of possible beam parameters. Depolarisation dominated by spin precession (see table on right). Derived strong-field approximation of the anomalous magnetic moment and validated form used by CAIN in T-BMT equation. Investigated validity of equivalent photon approximation used in pair- production processes in CAIN and showed approximation is NOT valid in all cases. Included fully polarised cross-sections for incoherent pair-production processes into CAIN. A 10% reduction in the number of pairs produced at low energy is predicted. Classical spin precession in inhomogeneous external fields: T-BMT equation. Stochastic spin diffusion from photon emission: Sokolov- Ternov effect, etc. Depolarisation at the IP

LC-ABD1 Highlights (3) Incoherent pair-production dominates at ILC energies Polarised cross-sections for incoherent Breit-Wheeler pair production added to CAIN: Equivalent Photon Approximation requires proper treatment of initial and final state polarisation. Not valid in all cases. Tony Hartin Beamstrahlung photons have little circular polarisation  final state e + /e - are largely unpolarised. A. Hartin - EUROTeV

Status by ILC Region  Electron Source  Not aware of any spin transport simulations.  Positron Source  Partial simulations exist (e.g. DESY, ANL) but not yet complete.  Currently deveoping realistic simulation of photon beam polarization.  Need to track electrons through undulator (all analytical calculations show the depolarization to be negligible).  Damping Rings  Depolarization (e - ) ~5×10 -5 %  Depolarization (e + ) ~1×10 -3 %  Realistic injected bunches needed  Main linac  Spin precession ~26°  Depolarization~5×10 -7 %  BDS  Spin precession ~332°  Depolarization~6×10 -2 %  Currently repeating older 2 mrad study with 14 mrad lattice  IP  Depolarization ~0.1 %

Goals for LC-ABD2  Future work motivated by  Growing HEP community support for polarised beams to offset any reduction in ILC design luminosity  Precision physics requires uncertainty ≤0.1% on luminosity-weighted polarisation. We’ve shown depolarising effects also of order 0.1%.  ILC compatability with upgrade to a 60% polarised positron beam has been identified as a critical R&D topic by the Global R&D board (see April 2007 report)  Spin transport is already incorporated in plans for 2 of the 7 accelerator systems EDR groups, with more anticipated.  Goals  Inclusion of non-linear transport maps in SLICKTRACK  Development of positron source simulation including electron beam jitter, photon collimation effects, etc  Use MAP2 and other computing resources.  Continued theoretical work on beam-beam interactions including second-order coherent pair-production processes, etc.  A continued rolling study of the whole machine to optimise use of polarisation as a tool for the ILC.