Learning Assessment for the 21st Century: Making Course Evaluations More Meaningful and Useful with the FREE Student Assessment of Learning Gains Stephen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Online Course Design Online Course Design EVALUATION AND REVISION
Advertisements

Eli Collins-Brown, Ed.D. Illinois State University July 12, 2006 Aspects of Online Courses That Are More Effective and Successful than Traditional, Face-to-Face.
CBEA CONFERENCE OCTOBER 20, 2010 MRS. DEDERER BUSINESS TEACHER BETHEL HIGH SCHOOL Moodle.
Rich Formative Assessment: Critical Component of Instruction
A Quality Matters “Quickie”
Introduction to Service-Learning for Students
Self-Directed Students & MetaLearning Presented for Lilly TC attendees ~ 2012 Stephen Carroll, PhD Melissa Ganus, EdD, MBA If you have internet, please.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Promoting Student Success Online Tutoring from SMARTHINKING.
Daniel Peck January 28, SLOs versus Course Objectives Student Learning Outcomes for the classroom describe the knowledge, skills, abilities.
Teacher Preparation and Education Reform: A Behavioral Systems Perspective Çhair: Ronnie Detrich, Wing Institute Discussant: Chuck Salzberg, Utah State.
Cambridge International Examinations
Greenville Technical College Assessing and Developing Student Computing Technology Skills September 19, 2012 Dr. Lenna Young, Mark Krawczyk, and Mary Locke.
Student Evaluations. Introduction: Conducted: Qualtrics Survey Fall 2011 o Sample Size: 642 o FT Tenured: 158, FT Untenured: 59 o Adjunct: 190 o Students:
TAB (Teaching for Artistic Behavior) Authentic Creation / Thinking /Assessment.
Introduction to teaching and assessing so students will learn more using learner-centered teaching Phyllis Blumberg Warm-up activity How can instructor’s.
Student (and other) Course Evaluations Response Rates, Relevance and Results Kathleen Norris Plymouth State University, NH.
UMCP Educational Technology Outreach On-line Course Assessment and Evaluation Model 2005 EDUCAUSE Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference Baltimore, Maryland.
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
+ Measuring Teaching Quality in the Online Classroom Ann H. Taylor Director, Dutton e-Education Institute College of Earth and Mineral Sciences.
E-Learning: Education Anytime, Anywhere Randy Rodgers Walden University.
November 9,  Proving that students are learning  Reaction to challenges in public education  Rising potential, stagnant performance  Regional.
Supporting Evaluation Rubrics with Digital Evidence and Artifacts Bill Jensen, Rhonda Laswell, Rose Maudlin & Ramesh Sabetiashraf.
Formative Assessment.
Student Learning targets
Writing at Doane College: a Workshop David Smit Department of English Kansas State University.
How to Administer Constructive and Effective Feedback to Online Students Denielle R. Vazquez, M.S.Ed – 2014 Teaching and Learning.
Enhancing student learning through assessment: a school-wide approach Christine O'Leary, Centre for Promoting Learner Autonomy Sheffield Business School.
Assessing Tomorrow’s Leaders Today in an Integrated Reading and Writing Course NADE 2015 – Greenville, SC Kina Lara and Tina Willhoite San Jacinto College.
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
Klein Independent School District Technology Integration Mentor Program Moving from learning to use technology...to using technology to learn Ann McMullan,
ACTIVE LEARNING: Putting “how people learn” to work Robin Wright
The College of Saint Rose School of Education Department of Literacy and Special Education Teacher Candidate Assessment.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
Assessing General Education Workshop for College of the Redwoods Fred Trapp August 18, 2008.
Information for school leaders and teachers regarding the process of creating Student Learning Targets. Student Learning targets.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
On SLOA (SLO Assessment). (after Munch) Will Lecture die? No…
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Jeff Johnston Assistant Director, Center for Teaching Lecturer, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Vanderbilt University Meeting the learning.
Large-Scale Assessment of Student Learning: Valid, Reliable and Customizable Instruments for Courses, Departments, and Across Programs Stephen Carroll.
Faculty Applications of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Research Kathleen McKinney and Patricia Jarvis with the assistance of Denise Faigao.
Information Literacy: Assessing Your Instruction Texas Library Association District 10 Fall Workshop October 15, 2005 Michelle Millet Information Literacy.
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. Electronic Portfolios for Teachers, Learners, and Reusable.
Flexible Scheduling Mrs. Smith's class leaves Mr. Brown's class enters Improving Student Learning Through Expanded Use of the Library Media Center Library.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.
Using IDEA for Assessment, Program Review, and Accreditation Texas A & M University November 8, 2012 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD.
What does it mean to be a RETA Instructor this project? Consortium for 21 st Century Learning C21CL
Peer Coaching for Effective Professional Learning.
 Teaching: Chapter 14. Assessments provide feedback about students’ learning as it is occurring and evaluates students’ learning after instruction has.
Assessment of Student Academic Achievement. What is Assessment An evaluative process Provides continuous review and oversight of curriculum.
Assessment Instruments and Rubrics Workshop Series Part 1: What is a rubric? What are the required elements? What are VALUE rubrics? February 24, 2016.
Intel ® Teach Program Copyright © 2010 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative and Intel Teach Program.
Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
Instructional Design Groundwork:
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
European Network on teacher Education Policies
EDU 695Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
EDU 695 STUDY Lessons in Excellence-- edu695study.com.
EDU 695 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
EDU 695 STUDY Education for Service-- edu695study.com.
EDU 695 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Ongoing Reporting Guiding Principle 2
Welcome to Your New Position As An Instructor
Revamping the student opinion instrument for faculty
Presentation transcript:

Learning Assessment for the 21st Century: Making Course Evaluations More Meaningful and Useful with the FREE Student Assessment of Learning Gains Stephen Carroll & Melissa Ganus Lilly—Bethesda 2012 Session slides & handouts online at learninghabits.wordpress.com

SALG Student Assessment of their Learning Gains freely available at

The challenges with Standardized Course Evaluations (SCEs) Almost all SCEs using Scantron-based forms have questions primarily focused on teacher behavior and other qualities and/or student satisfaction Neither teacher behavior nor student satisfaction are necessarily related to course goals – they are not a good proxy for actual student learning SCEs rarely provide any information that helps teachers make specific improvements in their teaching or courses

The challenges with Standardized Course Evaluations (SCEs) The experience of filing out most course evaluations offers little to nothing of value to students These kinds of SCE’s punish innovative teaching They also punish those who step outside of traditional gender roles Are SCEs wasting time for both faculty and students?

Why SALG? SALG was designed specifically to avoid these problems SALG was created to provide detailed, meaningful feedback to teachers about the value and efficacy of their teaching and to guide improvements SALG was designed to promote metacognition in students, improving their learning

Why SALG? SALG is a valid, reliable instrument that has been in use and ongoing development since 1997 SALG is used by over 5,000 college and university instructors SALG is FREE! SALG is accepted as evidence of student learning by many accrediting bodies

SALG Basic Principles You measure teaching effectiveness in terms of the specific stated goals of the course Students have something valuable to tell us about what they learned in our class and what helped them learn it (and what didn’t) Students have the opportunity to be metacognitive, reflecting on their learning gains, as they complete a SALG

SALG Scheduling Baseline survey near the beginning of the term assesses students’ current level of achievement in relation to course learning goals SALG survey at the end of the term measures learning gains (improvements relative to course learning goals)

SALG Structure 2 Main parts: - Learning goals (4 question sections) - Pedagogy (6 questions) The first four questions focus on learning goals: Understanding Skills Affective gains Integrations (or Habits) (Mnemonic= USA-1)

SALG Structure The second six questions focus on pedagogy: Course design Class activities Graded assignments Resources Meta-information Support for the individual learner

Validity & Flexibility? The stem questions and the scales they use are fixed to preserve the validity and identity of the SALG (and to make it useful as a research instrument) But since evaluation always has to be in terms of stated goals and those goals are always specific, the SALG was designed to encourage instructors to adapt it specifically to their own courses.

Customizing your SALG

Analytical Capabilities Detailed statistics about student responses N, Mean, Std Dev, Mode, # at Mode, etc. Histograms for each question set Aggregated statistics for multiple instruments Cross-tabs Simple text coding for qualitative analysis Entire analysis can be downloaded into Excel

Department SALG Department admin can make templates with locked questions related to departmental learning goals Faculty using templates cannot modify locked questions, but can control everything else After the survey, department admin gets data for locked questions only; instructors get all data back

Outside of College Classrooms An adaptation of the SALG is the SAIL: Self-Assessment of Increases in Learning Designed for paper-based evaluation of conference sessions, workshops, and shorter format learning experiences Core questions remain: What gains do you feel you made during the session? How well did the components presented contributed help with those gains?

SALG User Community Over 5,000 instructors using the SALG, with many customized instruments publicly viewable and reusable Word-of-mouth helps promote educational innovations Users can use SALG data for SoTL research publications User input needed to help prioritize improvements as we move forward

Thank You! visit to get started and learninghabits.wordpress.com to get these slides and handouts Stephen Carroll Melissa Ganus And, YES!, we’re available to come to your campus!