B&Q – small steps over time – driven by the label. 10% of world’s productive forests FSC’ed - Marks and Spencer - Wyevale Garden Centres WWF Buyers’ Group
One solution inspires others:
“ACCPE Toolbox” Success stories – issue specific, bespoke for product
Different tools over time to drive change Choice editing = no to G’s to C’s
Richmond Parking fees Road tax banding £25 congestion charge Different tools over time Choice editing = no to G’s to C’s
15% - brewing 4% - malting 81% - Manufacture packaging (Distribution?) 0.2% - crop production BUT - Foot-printing is vital to drive the right decisions…
The Stuff Debate If everyone in the world used the same amount of stuff as we do in UK … Finite limits of everything!
FSC was about Finite Limits
FISS – Sustainable Food = balance between:
Does this help…
Business and public policy drives change – not the consumer….
Different labels are different for a reason
Richmond Parking fees Road tax banding £25 congestion charge Different tools over time Choice editing = no to G’s to C’s
Product Roadmaps (clothes, cars, lighting… 10x) DEFRA Leading the way Label Choice editing Standards Product Roadmaps
Food preparation?
Product use…
“ Boil what you need” “Boil what you need…”
“ Boil what you need” “Boil what you need…”
Not just energy related…
What about use? Co2 labelled peat is coming! Carbon to dig and move peat to store – included Carbon from decay of peat – not included Decay = x4 more Co2
Labelling – should not be a distraction for better solutions
And everyone’s going green Nuclear?
Do offsets and labels fit together?
“Law of unintended consequences”