Self and Peer Assessment Institute of Teaching and Learning Seminar Series Jan Fermelis Faculty of Business and Law 14 August 2008 14 August 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. 2 We feel part of a multilingual Europe and we would like to give our contribution: for this reason we decided to apply for the European Language label.
Advertisements

Eli Collins-Brown, Ed.D. Illinois State University July 12, 2006 Aspects of Online Courses That Are More Effective and Successful than Traditional, Face-to-Face.
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Tammy Muhs-University of Central Florida
Cathy Jordan, PhD Associate Professor of Pediatrics Director, Children, Youth and Family Consortium University of Minnesota Member, Community Campus Partnerships.
1 Overview Program Goals Laptops Wireless Networking Desktop Management Support Training Pilot Project Timelines Connecting Classrooms Agenda.
Computer- Assisted Assessment Team of 14 Based on both sites Includes project managers and learning technologists Broad base of expertise and experience.
Refreshing institutional policies around academic integrity: a focus on student training Dr Neil Morris Faculty of Biological Sciences.
1 Designing a training programme Module 6 Sessions 9&10.
The Course experience questionnaire (P. Ramsden) Designed as a performance indicator 24 statements relating to 5 aspects 1 overall satisfaction statement.
Supporting managers: assessment and the learner journey
Aberdeen City Council 2008 IMPROVEMENT CONFERENCE 1st APRIL 2009.
Is improving feedback like herding cats? One School's approaches for enhancing feedback to students Steve Rutherford
Beyond compliance: aligning disability issues with learning, teaching and assessment approaches Part of the HEA disability seminar series Wednesday 1 st.
Technology to support the transition from paper based to electronic modes of feedback and assessment Mark Dransfield, Technology Enhanced Learning Advisor.
PACT Feedback Rubric Pilot Results with UC Davis English Cohort.
QEP BASICS.
Dr. Debbie Ging and Dr. Miriam Judge Dublin City University.
Improving Practitioner Assessment Participation Decisions for English Language Learners with Disabilities Laurene Christensen, Ph.D. Linda Goldstone, M.S.
Kim Atkinson Gail Fluker Leanne Ngo Mary Dracup Trish McCormick December 2009 Introducing a learning repository using a blended professional development.
Bronwyn Kosman, Office of the DVC (Provost) No 1 TEACHING MATTERS DEVELOPING INDICATORS OF TEACHING QUALITY Researching (e)Learning and Teaching Presentation.
Online assessment Mary Rice & Dale Holt Institute of Teaching and Learning - Ph: Ph:
Teaching and Learning at Deakin University Professor Colin Mason Director, Institute of Teaching and Learning pp John Rosenberg DVCA.
Gayle morris & terry timberlake.  Introduction  The FaST model – POTENT ‘peer observation of teaching: engaging new teachers’  Conceptual framework.
How graduate attributes could redefine how we teach and how students learn......(but haven’t) National Learning and Teaching Forum Melbourne, Australia.
Online Rubric Assessment Tool for Marine Engineering Course
Agenda 8.30 – 9.00 QIO Update 9.00 – 9.45 New Standardised Assessments (Linda Hearton GL Assessment) 9.45 – 10.15Assessment and Moderation Group Discussion/
Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
Designing an education for life after university: Why is it so difficult? CHEC, South Africa March 2011 A/PROF SIMON BARRIE, THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY.
LITERACY PROFESSIONAL LEARNING RESOURCE Primary Schools Program Session 6: Planning for School Implementation.
Study Skills Support: Where are we now? What should we aim for? Margaret March The University Library Karen Burton Study Support Service Student Services.
OECD/INFE High-level Principles for the evaluation of financial education programmes Adele Atkinson, PhD OECD With the support of the Russian/World Bank/OECD.
5th International CDIO Conference Singapore, June , The Role of Peers in the Assessment of Students’ CDIO Skills Ivan D’haese Johan D’heer.
Implementation of a Vertical Teaching Model Tom Randell, Steve Glautier, and Doug Bernstein University of Southampton.
Cooperative/Collaborative Learning An Instructional technique in which learning activities are specifically designed for small interactive groups Collaborative.
Dr. Barbara M. Wheeling Associate Professor College of Business Director of Accreditation and Assessment MSUB Coordinator of Institutional Assessment.
Peer assessment of group work using WebPA Neil Gordon Symposium on the Benefits of eLearning Technologies University of Manchester, in conjunction with.
Problem-Based Learning by floating facilitation Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education George Watson Courtesy of Deborah Allen and Hal White.
Designing and Implementing Learning Technology Projects – A Planned Approach Professor Mark Stiles and Dr Jenny Yorke Staffordshire University EFFECTS/ELT.
Peer-to-Peer Development with Media-Rich Faculty Case Studies Gail Matthews-DeNatale, Ph.D. Associate Director, Academic Technology Elizabeth Santiago,
Partnership between the NYCI, the Health Service Executive and the Department of Children and Youth Affairs National Youth Health Programme Kevin O’ Hagan.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Jigsaw Learning - Using innovative teaching techniques to promote group learning, cooperation, listening engagement and empathy. Daryl May Senior Lecturer.
Developing a programme of information literacy. Strategy Will you work at an institutional level? Will you work at a course level? Will you work at a.
Developing a Strategy for Technology Enhanced Learning at UEL.
Patricia Campbell and Jonathan Sly
Managerial Role – Setting the Stage Lesson 6 Jeneen T. Chapman John Madden Facilitators.
Evidence based research in education Cathy Gunn University of Auckland.
Development and Implementation of Teaching Aids to enhance the Understanding of Control Systems Dr Mahmoud Abdulwahed Prof Zoltan K Nagy and Dr Adam R.
Tertiary Education Management Conference 2006 Integration For a New Generation – Technological solutions for linking core functions of teaching and learning.
Learners’ Attitudes and Perceptions of Online Instruction Presented by: Dr. Karen S. Ivers Dr. JoAnn Carter-Wells Dr. Joyce Lee California State University.
OECD/INFE Tools for evaluating financial education programmes Adele Atkinson, PhD Policy Analyst OECD With the support of the Russian/World Bank/OECD Trust.
On-Line Discussion Forums: New Platforms to supplement Professional Development at Walter Sisulu University BY Z.G.Baleni RPL Manager 10/16/20151.
MENTORING BEGINNING TEACHERS TO PROMOTE HIGHER STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT AND RETENTION RATES.
Resource Sharing Begins at Home Opportunities for Library Partnerships on a University Campus Robert A. Seal Dean of University Libraries Loyola University.
Role modelling Intending Trainers’ Course Reference BMJ. 2008; 336:
CPD Scheme Development
1 Welcome to the Team : Tutor and Demonstrator Development Program Faculties of Science.
WELCOME TO BUS 302 The Gateway Experience For more information visit:
Moodle Wiki Trial Design for Online Learning SEM
Chantira Chiaranai, RN, PhD Institute of Nursing Suranaree University of Technology Electronic Learning Portfolio: An Innovation Emphasizing Self-directed.
1 The Development of Web-based Resources to Support Students Undertaking Problem-based Learning Carolyn Gibbon Project Manager University of Central Lancashire.
Improving Instruction for Students with Severe Disabilities William Sharpton Richard Hall University of New Orleans.
Team Building Project Design and Development Storyboard 1.
EDU 675 Complete Class ASH Check this A+ tutorial guideline at EDU 675 Week 1 Assignment.
Using mixed methods to develop and evaluate public health education interventions Presented by: Louise C. Palmer
Collaborative Learning
Case study of a novel assessment using a group wiki space.
Teaching and Learning with Technology
Integrated Delivery Model
Presentation transcript:

Self and Peer Assessment Institute of Teaching and Learning Seminar Series Jan Fermelis Faculty of Business and Law 14 August August 2008

Seminar Outline 1. Team assignment challenges and strategies 2. Online SAPA demonstration 3. Discussion ITL Seminar 14 Aug 2

Team Formation Unit realities Unit realities Size/nature of student cohort Size/nature of student cohort Number of campuses/instructors Number of campuses/instructors Teaching/learning aims Teaching/learning aims Self-selected Self-selected Reduced likelihood of team wars or divorces Reduced likelihood of team wars or divorces Instructor-selected Instructor-selected Improved opportunities for intercultural and teamwork skills Improved opportunities for intercultural and teamwork skills ITL Seminar 14 Aug 3

Teaching/Learning Strategies Integration of teaching/learning/assessment experiences Integration of teaching/learning/assessment experiences Lecture and reading materials Lecture and reading materials Team dynamics Team dynamics Interpersonal communication skills and strategies Interpersonal communication skills and strategies Tutorial activities: Tutorial activities: Discussion of team member attributes and role expectations Discussion of team member attributes and role expectations Speed Meeting exercise Speed Meeting exercise Tutorial time for team meetings Tutorial time for team meetings Student opportunities to reflect and to trial strategies Student opportunities to reflect and to trial strategies Instructor availability to mentor teams Instructor availability to mentor teams ITL Seminar 14 Aug 4

Assessing Team Assignments Shared score for all team members Shared score for all team members Instructor workload Instructor workload Student perceptions of fairness Student perceptions of fairness Individualised scores Individualised scores Paper systems Paper systems Online systems Online systems ITL Seminar 14 Aug 5

Online Self and Peer Assessment Pioneered by Richard Tucker, Architecture & Building Pioneered by Richard Tucker, Architecture & Building Improved quality of work Improved quality of work Student preference for individualised assessment Student preference for individualised assessment STALGS grant for cross-disciplinary pilot within Business Communication and Architecture/Design STALGS grant for cross-disciplinary pilot within Business Communication and Architecture/Design Testing in a more complex educational context Testing in a more complex educational context Ongoing development and refinement Ongoing development and refinement ITL Seminar 14 Aug 6

Research Program Phase 1 Implementation (arch and bus comm) Implementation (arch and bus comm) Compulsory use Compulsory use Penalty for missed entries (arch) Penalty for missed entries (arch) Reward for entries made (bus comm) Reward for entries made (bus comm) Individualisation of assessment Individualisation of assessment Voluntary entry and exit questionnaires Voluntary entry and exit questionnaires Ongoing development and refinement of the software Ongoing development and refinement of the software ITL Seminar 14 Aug 7

Research Program Phase 2 Compulsory implementation (arch) Compulsory implementation (arch) Reward for entries made Reward for entries made Optional implementation (bus comm) Optional implementation (bus comm) Neither rewards nor penalties Neither rewards nor penalties Voluntary entry and exit questionnaires Voluntary entry and exit questionnaires Ongoing development and refinement of the software Ongoing development and refinement of the software ITL Seminar 14 Aug 8

Research Program Phase 3 No implementation of SAPA No implementation of SAPA No individualisation of assessment No individualisation of assessment Voluntary, online questionnaires Voluntary, online questionnaires ITL Seminar 14 Aug 9

Software Enhancements 1 Three types of assessment per SAPA entry Three types of assessment per SAPA entry Relative contribution ( ) Relative contribution ( ) Individual performance (1-5) Individual performance (1-5) Comments Comments Visual attractiveness of SAPA website Visual attractiveness of SAPA website Password protection for students Password protection for students Refinement of Multiplicative Scaling Factor Refinement of Multiplicative Scaling Factor ITL Seminar 14 Aug 10

Software Enhancements 2 Process for keying in team and member details Process for keying in team and member details Username check Username check Add/change team members Add/change team members Password reset Password reset Unit co-ordinator capacity to edit settings Unit co-ordinator capacity to edit settings Easy unit co-ordinator access to results: Easy unit co-ordinator access to results: Students not in groups Students not in groups Number of student entry submissions Number of student entry submissions Student ratings and comments Student ratings and comments ITL Seminar 14 Aug 11

SAPA Procedural Enhancements Motivation and training of staff Motivation and training of staff Motivation and training of students Motivation and training of students User friendliness of entry process User friendliness of entry process Clarity of SAPA instructions Clarity of SAPA instructions Hotlinked reminders Hotlinked reminders ITL Seminar 14 Aug 12

Some Initial Results Positive student attitude to individualisation Positive student attitude to individualisation Almost no complaints about lowered marks Almost no complaints about lowered marks Varying levels of student compliance Varying levels of student compliance Large, complex vs small, single teacher cohort Large, complex vs small, single teacher cohort On-campus vs. off-campus teams On-campus vs. off-campus teams Compulsory vs optional Compulsory vs optional Penalty vs reward Penalty vs reward Staff encouragement vs discouragement Staff encouragement vs discouragement ITL Seminar 14 Aug 13

For Further Research Student self-censorship Student self-censorship Visibility of MSF ratings and comments Visibility of MSF ratings and comments Continuous vs overall SAPA Continuous vs overall SAPA Potential for student collusion Potential for student collusion Inclusion vs. exclusion of SELF assessment Inclusion vs. exclusion of SELF assessment Impact of cross-cultural factors on extreme responses Impact of cross-cultural factors on extreme responses ITL Seminar 14 Aug 14