© 2007 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, on behalf of the WIDA Consortium www.wida.us Lynore Carnuccio, WIDA Consultant Mariana Castro,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
Advertisements

Understanding the ACCESS for ELLs®
© 2011 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, on behalf of the WIDA Consortium Introduction to the WIDA Consortium Jesse Markow.
0 - 0.
ALGEBRAIC EXPRESSIONS
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
Trends in Number of High School Graduates: National
Past Tense Probe. Past Tense Probe Past Tense Probe – Practice 1.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Week 1.
CHAPTER 11 FILINGS IN MAINE CALENDAR YEARS CALENDAR YEAR CHAPTER 11 FILINGS This chart shows chapter 11 case filings in Maine for calendar.
The West` Washington Idaho 1 Montana Oregon California 3 4 Nevada Utah
Exhibit 1. Premiums and Premium Increases, Single Coverage, by Metal Tier and State, 2014–2015 Premium increases, 2014– premiums for 40-year-old.
TOTAL CASES FILED IN MAINE PER 1,000 POPULATION CALENDAR YEARS FILINGS PER 1,000 POPULATION This chart shows bankruptcy filings relative to.
© 2010 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, on behalf of the WIDA Consortium Project and Consortium Management: Lessons.
MAINE NEW HAMPSHIRE VERMONT MASSACHUSETTS CONNECTICUT RHODE ISLAND Maine: Augusta New Hampshire: Concord Vermont: Montpelier Massachusetts: Boston Connecticut:
Iredell Statesville Schools English as a Second Language Department Fall 2010 WIDA Standards.
BINARY CODING. Alabama Arizona California Connecticut Florida Hawaii Illinois Iowa Kentucky Maine Massachusetts Minnesota Missouri 0 Nebraska New Hampshire.
© 2007 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, on behalf of the WIDA Consortium Lynore Carnuccio, WIDA Consultant Mariana Castro,
U.S. Civil War Map On a current map of the U.S. identify and label the Union States, the Confederate States, and U.S. territories. Create a map key and.
This chart compares the percentage of cases filed in Maine under chapter 13 with the national average between 1999 and As a percent of total filings,
Map Review. California Kentucky Alabama.
Judicial Circuits. If You Live In This State This Is Your Judicial Circuit Alabama11th Circuit Alaska 9th Circuit Arkansas 8th Circuit Arizona 9th Circuit.
1. AFL-CIO What percentage of the funds received by Alabama K-12 public schools in school year was provided by the state of Alabama? a)44% b)53%
WIDA ELP Standards Providing Educational Equity to ELLs through Language Development.
Directions: Label Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia--- then color.
1 The Literate High School Student: The Common Core State Standards for ELA and Literacy Theresa Craig, Susan Wheltle, and Paul Zinni CONNECT Conference.
 As a group, we thought it be interesting to see how many of our peers drop out of school.  Since in the United States education is so important, we.
Some FIRST QUESTIONS Who are the ELLs I am teaching? What can they do? Will they understand?
Warm Up Complete the Coordinate Practice #10. Content Objective: – Compare the physical and political regions. Language Objectives: – SWBAT define region.
CHAPTER 7 FILINGS IN MAINE CALENDAR YEARS 1999 – 2009 CALENDAR YEAR CHAPTER 7 FILINGS This chart shows total case filings in Maine for calendar years 1999.
© 2007 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, on behalf of the WIDA Consortium Lynore Carnuccio, WIDA Consultant Mariana Castro,
Study Cards The East (12) Study Cards The East (12) New Hampshire New York Massachusetts Delaware Connecticut New Jersey Rhode Island Rhode Island Maryland.
Hawaii Alaska (not to scale) Alaska GeoCurrents Customizable Base Map text.
US MAP TEST Practice
Education Level. STD RATE Teen Pregnancy Rates Pre-teen Pregnancy Rate.
TOTAL CASE FILINGS - MAINE CALENDAR YEARS 1999 – 2009 CALENDAR YEAR Total Filings This chart shows total case filings in Maine for calendar years 1999.
The United States is a system that can be broken into 5 major parts or regions.
Can you locate all 50 states? Grade 4 Mrs. Kuntz.
NEADA Winter Meeting February 28, 2017.
2012 IFTA / IRP MANAGERS’AND LAW ENFORCEMENT WORKSHOP
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
Physicians per 1,000 Persons
USAGE OF THE – GHz BAND IN THE USA
Content Objective: Language Objectives:
1. Connecticut Delaware Georgia Maryland Massachusetts New Hampshire
Name the State Flags Your group are to identify which state the flag belongs to and sign correctly to earn a point.
GLD Org Chart February 2008.
State Adoption of Uniform State Test
The States How many states are in the United States?
State Adoption of NMLS ESB
Supplementary Data Tables, Trends in Overall Health Care Market
Table 2.3: Beds per 1,000 Persons by State, 2013 and 2014
Regions of the United States
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NORTH AND SOUTH
Introduction to the WIDA Consortium
Supplementary Data Tables, Utilization and Volume
Eastern United States Geography Quiz
Slave States, Free States
WASHINGTON MAINE MONTANA VERMONT NORTH DAKOTA MINNESOTA MICHIGAN
States During the Civil War
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
CBD Topical Sales Restrictions by State (as of May 23, 2019)
USAGE OF THE 4.4 – 4.99 GHz BAND IN THE USA
Presentation transcript:

© 2007 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, on behalf of the WIDA Consortium Lynore Carnuccio, WIDA Consultant Mariana Castro, Professional Development Consultant Introduction to the WIDA English Language Proficiency Standards

Introduction to the WIDA ELP Standards 2 WIDA Consortium / CAL / Metritech

Introduction to the WIDA ELP Standards 3 WIDA Consortium / CAL / Metritech Wisconsin (1) Delaware (2) District of Columbia (3) Rhode Island (4) Vermont (5) Maine (6) New Hampshire (7) Illinois (8) Alabama (9) New Jersey (10) Georgia (11) Oklahoma (12) Kentucky (13) North Dakota (14) Pennsylvania (15) Virginia (16) South Dakota (17) North Carolina (18) Mississippi (19) The WIDA Consortium 2008

Introduction to the WIDA ELP Standards 4 WIDA Consortium / CAL / Metritech The Bottom Line In order for students to achieve academically and exhibit that learning on Large Scale, High Stakes assessment, they MUST master Academic Language.

Introduction to the WIDA ELP Standards 5 WIDA Consortium / CAL / Metritech More on language proficiency vs content knowledge How many different ways can you read the following mathematical expression? 3+2= 

Introduction to the WIDA ELP Standards 6 WIDA Consortium / CAL / Metritech Language versus Content Language proficiency involves the language associated with the content areas. Content knowledge reflects the declarative (what) and procedural knowledge (how) associated with the content. WIDA ELP standards focus on academic language; academic content standards focus on academic content.

Introduction to the WIDA ELP Standards 7 WIDA Consortium / CAL / Metritech The Language of Math greater than[>] and less than[<] NOT 6 [>/<] 5

Introduction to the WIDA ELP Standards 8 WIDA Consortium / CAL / Metritech The Language of Science

Introduction to the WIDA ELP Standards 9 WIDA Consortium / CAL / Metritech Why are English language proficiency (ELP) standards necessary? To facilitate ELL students’ English proficiency attainment, access to content knowledge, and ultimately, their academic success To provide a curriculum/assessment resource anchored in academic content standards To establish a common yardstick to define and measure how ELLs acquire language across the domains of listening, speaking, reading, and writing To comply with federal law (No Child Left Behind Act of 2001) requiring ELP standards and ELP standards- based assessments

Introduction to the WIDA ELP Standards 10 WIDA Consortium / CAL / Metritech Overall Organization of Standards Frameworks for Formative & Summative Assessment (2) English Language Proficiency Standards (5) Language Domains (4) Grade Level Clusters (5) Language Proficiency Levels (5) Model PIs are the lowest level of expression of the standards Model Performance Indicators

Introduction to the WIDA ELP Standards 11 WIDA Consortium / CAL / Metritech Summative Is amenable to large- scale testing under standardized conditions Includes visual and graphic supports Contains model performance indicators that are observable and measurable Formative Corresponds to everyday classroom practice Includes visual, graphic, and interactive supports Contains model performance indicators that include strategies, technology, and long-term projects Two Standards Frameworks

Introduction to the WIDA ELP Standards 12 WIDA Consortium / CAL / Metritech The Five WIDA ELP Standards Standard 1: English language learners communicate for SOCIAL AND INSTRUCTIONAL purposes within the school setting (SIL) Standard 2: English language learners communicate information, ideas, and concepts necessary for academic success in the content area of LANGUAGE ARTS (LoLA) Standard 3: English language learners communicate information, ideas, and concepts necessary for academic success in the content area of MATHEMATICS (LoMA) Standard 4: English language learners communicate information, ideas, and concepts necessary for academic success in the content area of SCIENCE (LoS) Standard 5: English language learners communicate information, ideas, and concepts necessary for academic success in the content area of SOCIAL STUDIES (LoSS)

Introduction to the WIDA ELP Standards 13 WIDA Consortium / CAL / Metritech The Four Language Domains Listening Speaking Reading Writing

Introduction to the WIDA ELP Standards 14 WIDA Consortium / CAL / Metritech The Grade-Level Clusters The 2007 WIDA ELP Standards are clustered: PreK−K Grades 1−2 Grades 3−5 Grades 6−8 Grades 9−12

Introduction to the WIDA ELP Standards 15 WIDA Consortium / CAL / Metritech The WIDA ELP Scale 6 ENTERING BEGINNING DEVELOPING EXPANDING BRIDGING REACHINGREACHING

Introduction to the WIDA ELP Standards 16 WIDA Consortium / CAL / Metritech Criteria for Performance Definitions Linguistic Complexity: The amount and quality of speech or writing for a given situation Vocabulary Usage: The specificity of words or phrases for a given context Language Control: The comprehensibility of the communication based on the amount and type of errors ENTERINGBEGINNINGDEVELOPINGEXPANDINGBRIDGING REACHINGREACHING

Introduction to the WIDA ELP Standards 17 WIDA Consortium / CAL / Metritech Performance Definitions

Introduction to the WIDA ELP Standards 18 WIDA Consortium / CAL / Metritech Another Way to Examine Performance by ELP Level

Introduction to the WIDA ELP Standards 19 WIDA Consortium / CAL / Metritech The Elements of the MPI Model performance indicators consist of 3 elements: The Language Function The Content Stem or Sample Topic The Support or Strategy*

Introduction to the WIDA ELP Standards 20 WIDA Consortium / CAL / Metritech A Model Performance Indicator Grade Level Cluster: 1-2 Domain: Speaking English Language Proficiency Standard 4: English language learners communicate information, ideas, and concepts necessary for academic success in the content area of SCIENCE.

Introduction to the WIDA ELP Standards 21 WIDA Consortium / CAL / Metritech Organization of MPIs within Standards

Introduction to the WIDA ELP Standards 22 WIDA Consortium / CAL / Metritech Organization of PI’s within Standards STRAND MPI

© 2007 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, on behalf of the WIDA Consortium Click on English Language Proficiency Scroll down to the bottom of the page Click on Grade level clusters PreK-5Grade level clusters PreK-5 You might want to save this link as a “favorite” website on your internet tool bar.

© 2007 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, on behalf of the WIDA Consortium Please use the Sharpie and the Yellow Flags to mark the following pages in your booklet. RG-10 ELP Standards RG-15 MPI Elements RG-21 Supports RG-23 Graphic Organizers RG-45 Performance Definitions RG-55 Speaking Rubric RG-56 Writing Rubric RG-58 Can Do Descriptors