Use of Trademarks in Domain Names & Domain Name Disputes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SET YOUR SITES ON.AU INFORMATION SEMINAR May 2002 Chris Disspain and Jo Lim.au Domain Administration Ltd (auDA)
Advertisements

1 drt 6455 eCommerce Law lesson 7 – IT and Intellectual Property (part 2) associate professor faculty of law university of montreal university of montreal.
Internationalized Domain Names: Opportunities for the Arab World Baher Esmat ICANN.
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Louis Touton Presentation to the FTAA Joint Public-Private Sector Committee of Experts on the Internet.
More Details on Cyber Piracy Equal Justice Conference, 2007 Hugh Calkins & Gabrielle Hammond.
Legal Aid in the 21 st Century Protecting our clients and their rights online…
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN THE DIGITAL ECONOMY Dr. Kristina Janušauskaitė WIPO TOT Program for SMEs Damascus, Syria January 16-20, 2011.
The use of Trademarks on the Internet: Problems and solutions Trademark owners perspective Marques cyberspace team September 2012.
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION Global Protection and Enforcement of Trademarks.
Chapter 11: Domain Names and Other Trademark Issues on the Internet By: Adrian Lui.
Doing Business in the Information Age John Corker GENL0230.
The Future of.ID domain Budi Rahardjo ID-DOMREG
Tradition innovation Online Branding Kate Legg Solicitor.
CYBERSQUATTING: PREVENTION AND REMEDIATION STRATEGIES NET2002 – Washington, DC April 18, 2002 Scott Bearby NCAA Associate General Counsel Copyright Scott.
Dispute Settlement Services offered by the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center Heike Wollgast, WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center.
Protecting internet domain names, recent cases Nicholas Smith Barrister, Blackstone Chambers, Panellist at WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Dispute Settlement and Effective Enforcement of IP.
™ May 8, 2015 Copyright
Lim Yuk Min Operations Manager, SGNIC Workshop on Member States’ Experience with ccTLDs Geneva, 3 – 4 March 2003 “Singapore Experience”
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School April 11, 2008 Trademark – Domain Names.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School April 9, 2008 Domain Names.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School April 1, 2009 Trademark – Domain Names.
Johannes Christian Wichard Deputy Director WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center WIPO and ccTLDs ccTLD Best Practices: Latest and Future developments Luxembourg,
1 Domain Name Disputes Rami Olwan Bibliotheca Alexandrina IP and the Digital Age Workshop December 2008.
Domain Disputes Overview of UDRP Procedures 6/5/2015.
Dublin, May 2, 2003 Corporate Domain Names Management Dublin, May 2, 2003 Etienne Wéry, Attorney - Brussels and Paris bars Teacher at « Université Paris.
New gTLD Basics. 2  Overview about domain names, gTLD timeline and the New gTLD Program  Why is ICANN doing this; potential impact of this initiative.
«ccTLD.RU: regulation» Pavel Khramtsov Moscow-2008.
WIPO update - Intellectual Property Issues in the Digital Agenda Lucinda Jones World Intellectual Property Organization International Conference on the.
Trade Marks and Domain Names: new developments UNSW: Cyberspace regulation Patrick Gunning 24 May 2001.
Resolving Domain Name Disputes Sean M. Mead Mead, Mead & Clark, P.C. Salem, Indiana.
Chapter 5 E- Commerce and Dispute Resolution. 2 Chapter Objectives 1. Describe how the courts are dealing with jurisdictional issues with respect to cyberspace.
Ioannis Iglezakis Domain Names. The Domain Name System A domain name is an electronic address of a computer connected to the Internet. The actual address.
Domain Names Ferenc Suba LLM, MA Chairman of the Board, CERT-Hungary, Theodore Puskás Foundation Vice-Chair of the Management Board, European Network and.
Implementation Recommendation Team (IRT) Proposal Comments Sue Todd, Director, Product Management Monday 11 May 2009, San Francisco.
Business Law for the Entrepreneur and Manager
HUYI GLOBAL One-stop Brand Management.
The Case Against Cybersquatting A Discussion of Domain Name Trademark Protection By Matt Poole.
MANAGEMENT & LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF eCOMMERCE Trade Marks & Domain Names Chapter 8, Forder & Quirk.
Report of the WIPO Internet Domain Name Process. Genesis USG White Paper, June 5, 1998: –“The U.S. Government will seek international support to call.
Amber Bennett Cybersquatting. Introduction What is cybersquatting? Cyber: Internet Squatting: to live in a building or on land without the owner’s permission.
Real and Virtual Identities Francis Gurry Assistant Director General World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
Trademarks IV Domain Names & Trademarks Class 23 Notes Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2004 Professor Wagner.
1 ICANN’s New gTLD Program: Trademark-related Concerns Arbitration and Mediation Center World Intellectual.
Domain Name Registration Sanjay Gupta August 29, 2008.
CYBERLAW CLASS 14 Regulating Domain Name Disputes – ICANN and the International System Oct. 15, 2002.
New gTLD Basics. 2  Overview about domain names, gTLD timeline and the New gTLD Program  Why is ICANN doing this; potential impact of this initiative.
OECD - HCOPIL - ICC Conference on Building Trust in the Online Environment The Hague, December 11-12, 2000 THE ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION EXPERIENCE OF.
Trademark Cases And now for something confusingly similar
Trademarks IV Domain Names & Trademarks Class Notes: April 9, 2003 Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2003 Professor Wagner.
ccTLD IDN Report ccTLD Meeting, Montreol June 24, 2003 Young-Eum
Implementation of the.eu Top Level Domain Marko Bonač Arnes.
On the Internet, No-one Knows You're a … Cat! Absurdity and the UDRP David HELLAM GA ČR S.
Essentials Of Business Law Chapter 25 Intellectual Property McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
International Intellectual Property Profs. Atik and Manheim Fall, 2006 Cybersquatting [slides by David Steele]
Trademark Law1  Nov. 20, 2006  Week 12 Chapter 11 – Trademarks and the Internet.
International Treaties regarding the Protection of Trademark.
Domains What is a Domain Name ● A domain name ● identification label that defines a realm of: – administrative autonomy, authority,
Use of Trademarks in Domain Names & Domain Name Disputes
“ICT Policy for Civil Society” Curriculum Produced by APC and CTO
Trademark and the Internet
ICANN’s Policy Development Activities
Rights Protection Mechanism Report to the ICANN Governmental Advisory Committee
Web Development & Design
حمایت از علائم تجاری در قانون تجارت الکترونیک ایران
Trademark Law Meets The Internet
موضوعات عالمية جديدة فى مجال الملكية الفكرية
Introduction to the Internet and World Wide Web
Overview & Guideline for Dispute Resolution Mechanism
Presentation transcript:

Use of Trademarks in Domain Names & Domain Name Disputes

What Is a Domain Name? A domain name is the user-friendly form of an Internet Protocol (IP) address that points an Internet user’s computer to the website the user wants to view Each IP address is a string of numbers The domain name is made of characters that are easier to remember Example: inta.org is easier to remember than its corresponding IP address,

Domain Name System (DNS) Basically, DNS is a global addressing system DNS allows users to go to a specific website by entering its corresponding domain name DNS locates and translates domain names into IP addresses

Components of Domain Names Second-level domain Top-level domain

Components of Domain Names: Top-Level Domains Highest level in the DNS hierarchy –Generic Top-Level Domains (gTLDs) Examples:.com,.net,.org Also, gTLDs for business or interest groups (e.g.,.gov for the U.S. government, etc.) NEW gTLDs (e.g.,.brand,.community,.geographical area) –Country-Code Top-Level Domains (ccTLDs) Examples:.au for Australia,.mx for Mexico –Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) Contain local language characters such as accents and may include non-Latin scripts Examples: 香港 (Hong Kong), рф (Russian Federation)

Components of Domain Names: Second-Level Domains Second-level domain names: –Follows “ and precedes the top-level domain name –Chosen by registrant –Must be: (1) unique term not previously used as a second-level domain name, and (2) registered

New gTLD Names Examples of new gTLD names: –by brand (.amazon,.dunlop), music and arts community (.theater,.band), cause (.eco,.charity), geographic/cultural area (.nyc,.irish), etc. Companies and organizations will be able to create and operate a registry business for the new gTLD The use of non-Latin characters (such as Cyrillic, Arabic, Chinese, etc.) will also be allowed in gTLDs The initial application process closed on May 30, 2012 The time period for a second round of applications has not yet been established, but it will likely be at least a couple of years after the close of the initial round of applications

New gTLD Names: Trademark Owners’ Remedies The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) is the exclusive provider of dispute resolution services for trademark-based “Legal Rights Objections” for the new gTLDs (More info:

Timeline for New gTLDs For the most up-to-date information, see: aspxhttp:// aspx

How Are Domain Names Registered? Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) manages domain name system (More info: ICANN-Accredited Registrars handle the actual registration of gTLDs National Registry or Local Registrars handle the actual registration of ccTLDs

Domain Name Disputes Cybersquatting refers to when a party registers, without permission, a domain name that is confusingly similar to a third-party trademark with the intention of seeking to reap some type of commercial or financial benefit, often in an effort to block the trademark owner from using the domain until the owner agrees to pay an exaggerated sum for the domain.

Domain Name Disputes Typosquatting Domain Name Testing

Reactions to Cybersquatting Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP): Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act 1999 (ACPA):

Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP) International arbitration process for resolution of domain name disputes adopted by ICANN Incorporated into domain name registration agreements of accredited registrars –Also, registrants make certain representations regarding their domain names (e.g., domain name registration will not infringe third-party rights, etc.) Only administrative alternative to going to courts

UDRP Service Providers World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) National Arbitration Forum (NAF) Asian Domain Name Dispute Resolution Centre The Czech Arbitration Court Arbitration Center for Internet Disputes (More info:

UDRP: Applicable to the Following All ICANN-Accredited Registrars for gTLDs:.aero,.asia,.biz,.cat,.com,.coop,.info,.jobs,.mobi,.museum,.name,.net,.org,.pro,.tel,.travel and.xxx Some ccTLDs, such as.au (Australia)

UDRP Rules Proceedings are governed by: The Uniform Domain-Name Dispute- Resolution Policy (UDRP), AND Supplemental rules issued by the dispute resolution service provider

UDRP Procedure: WIPO Example Complaint filed Formal commencement Response due (within 20 days) 1 or 3 panelist(s) appointed Decision due to WIPO (within 14 days) WIPO forwards decision to parties, ICANN and registrar (within 3 days) Decision implemented by registrar (More info:

UDRP Policy Complaint requirements: (a) Same or confusingly similar trademarks (b) No legitimate interest in the domain name (c) Bad faith registration and use of the domain name

UDRP: Same or Confusingly Similar Trademarks Domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which the complainant has rights Different panelists may have different views with regard to trademark + terms (sucks, love, my, hate, …) (e.g., xyzsucks.com) (the content will generally determine the relevance of the term) Different panelists may also have different views with regard to “generic” trademarks (the content and respondent’s rights will likely determine the outcome) (More Info:

UDRP: No Legitimate Interests Registrant/respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the domain name at issue Complainant must establish prima facie case that respondent lacks rights (More Info:

UDRP: Demonstrating Rights & Legitimate Interests Use of (or demonstrable preparations to use) the domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods/services Commonly known by the domain name (even if no trademark rights) Legitimate noncommercial or fair use (e.g., in some cases, criticism and fan sites) (More info:

UDRP: Bad Faith Registrant registered and is using the domain name in bad faith Bad faith is determined at the time of registration (not renewal) Offers to sell a domain name (even during settlement discussions) can show bad faith (More Info:

UDRP: Evidence of Registration and Use in Bad Faith Registration of the domain name to: –Sell, rent or transfer the domain name for valuable consideration in excess of the out-of- pocket costs directly related to the domain name –To prevent the owner of the trademark from obtaining the domain name, or a pattern of such conduct –Disrupt business of a competitor –Attract users to a website for commercial gain by creating confusion with trademark owner’s mark

UDRP Remedies Cancellation of the domain name Transfer of the domain name to the trademark owner

Other Jurisdictions Many countries have their own policies and procedures Examples: Mexico —Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy for.mx (LDRP): Israel—Procedures for Alternative Dispute Resolution under the.il ccTLD by Dispute Resolution Panels (IL-DRP): (More Info: WIPO Arbitration & Mediation Center ccTLD Database:

Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) United States law that provides trademark owners with a civil remedy against cybersquatting Cybersquatting is defined as “registering, trafficking in, or using a domain name with bad faith intent to profit from the goodwill of a trademark belonging to someone else” One portion of ACPA relates to famous individuals

ACPA Requirements The mark is valid The owner registered the domain name in bad faith in order to profit from the mark The mark was distinctive when the domain name was registered The domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the mark

ACPA Remedies A court order requiring that the domain name be transferred to the mark owner Monetary damages

Summary—UDRP vs. ACPA ACPAUDRP ExpensiveInexpensive Lengthy proceedingsQuick proceedings UncertainMajority of decisions in favor of complainant Limited to the United StatesIncorporated globally for certain domains (e.g.,.com) DamagesDamages are not available

Recommendations to Trademark Owners Use watch services Proactively register a few basic variations of your company name or brand name for defensive purposes (also known as defensive registrations)

INTA Resources Internet Topic Portal Domain Names Fact SheetDomain Names Differences Between Trademarks and Domain Names Fact SheetDifferences Between Trademarks and Domain Names The UDRP: Alternative Dispute Resolution For Domain Name Disputes Fact SheetThe UDRP: Alternative Dispute Resolution For Domain Name Disputes